Debian Bug report logs - #703902
add new option to run adequate after a package is installed

Display info messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 557048-done@bugs.debian.org, submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: add new option to run adequate after a package is installed

Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:54:41 +0100

package: piuparts
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Hi,

this (#557048) functionally was implemented in adequate 0.2 and the idea to 
run adequate from within piuparts has been floating around already, now 
turning this into a proper bug report so we don't forget to implement it.


cheers,
	Holger

Message #10 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 00:58:08 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 703902 + pending
thanks

Hi,

please comment on branch feature/adequate which adds support for running 
adequate after running piuparts.

What I dislike is the use of "adequate --all" instead of "adequate 
$package(s)_name" but right now i couldn't grok my head around 
restore_selections() in piuparts.py anymore...

(And this is rather needed as it adds way too much to the runtime.)

Help welcome, the rest is rather straightforward :)


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 01:16:28 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

to illustrate:

On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> What I dislike is the use of "adequate --all" instead of "adequate
> $package(s)_name" but right now i couldn't grok my head around
> restore_selections() in piuparts.py anymore...
> 
> (And this is rather needed as it adds way too much to the runtime.)

root@piu-slave-bm-a:/# time adequate --all   
debconf: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/debconf.py
debconf: pyshared-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/pyshared/debconf.py
iputils-ping: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /bin/ping6 => 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/nfnl_osf => 
/usr/lib/libnfnetlink.so.0
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_pdwrite
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_pglobal_lookup
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_lsetregs
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_getpid
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_lgetfpregs
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_lsetfpregs
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_lgetregs
libc6:amd64: undefined-symbol /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db-1.0.so => 
ps_pdread

real    0m12.894s
user    0m0.848s
sys     0m0.876s
root@piu-slave-bm-a:/# time adequate debconf
debconf: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/debconf.py
debconf: pyshared-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/pyshared/debconf.py

real    0m0.392s
user    0m0.060s
sys     0m0.008s


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org, adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:31:07 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> please comment on branch feature/adequate which adds support for running
> adequate after running piuparts.

this is still true - and the branch has been updated.

I'm also now considering to always run adequate if it's installed, and as such 
turn the --adequate switch into an --no-adequate switch. What do you think? 
(And defaulting to only warn on adequate failures, which can be changed with 
--fail-if-inadequate.)


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #25 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:26:10 +0200

* Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-16, 16:31:
>>please comment on branch feature/adequate which adds support for 
>>running adequate after running piuparts.
>
>this is still true - and the branch has been updated.

It would be good to print a warning if adequate exits with non-zero exit 
code. As as said on IRC, this would normally indicate a bug in adequate 
itself, but let's not sweep such bugs under the carpet. :) </wishlist>

Typo: installatiom -> installation

Other than that, it looks good to me.

>I'm also now considering to always run adequate if it's installed, and 
>as such turn the --adequate switch into an --no-adequate switch. What 
>do you think? (And defaulting to only warn on adequate failures, which 
>can be changed with --fail-if-inadequate.)

No strong opinion about this

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #30 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: Bug#703902: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:16:45 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Jakub,

On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> It would be good to print a warning if adequate exits with non-zero exit
> code. As as said on IRC, this would normally indicate a bug in adequate
> itself, but let's not sweep such bugs under the carpet. :) </wishlist>

right. do you know a way to force adequate like this? Or will I have to link 
it to false to test my code? :)
 
> Typo: installatiom -> installation
> Other than that, it looks good to me.

Thanks for the review!

> >I'm also now considering to always run adequate if it's installed, and
> >as such turn the --adequate switch into an --no-adequate switch. What
> >do you think? (And defaulting to only warn on adequate failures, which
> >can be changed with --fail-if-inadequate.)
> No strong opinion about this

I think I will do it. It's not set in stone anyway, so should complains arise, 
it's trivial to change.


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #33 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: Bug#703902: RFC: feature/adequate

Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:42 +0200

* Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-17, 14:16:
>>It would be good to print a warning if adequate exits with non-zero 
>>exit code. As as said on IRC, this would normally indicate a bug in 
>>adequate itself, but let's not sweep such bugs under the carpet. :) 
>></wishlist>
>right. do you know a way to force adequate like this? Or will I have to 
>link it to false to test my code? :)

Maybe ask it to check a non-existent package:

$ adequate piupartz
dpkg-query: no packages found matching piupartz
dpkg-query -W: failed at /usr/bin/adequate line 174.
$ echo $?
1

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #38 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: adequate@packages.debian.org, 703902@bugs.debian.org

Subject: adequate testing

Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 14:22:53 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Jakub,

did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate results? or 
should we expect a lot of issues when running it against 40k packages?


cheers,
	Holger, just curious! :-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #41 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: adequate testing

Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:33:18 +0200

* Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-18, 14:22:
>did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate results? 
>or should we expect a lot of issues when running it against 40k 
>packages?

I haven't run it archive-wide.

I do however test every release by running --all on my own system. 
Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #46 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org, adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: adequate testing

Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:54:52 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

On Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I haven't run it archive-wide.

ok.
 
> I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
> Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.

3% of 40k means... about 1200 issues to be fixed. whoa. So we'll indeed start 
with warnings only.


cheers,	
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #51 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Dave Steele <dsteele@gmail.com>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 13:13:44 -0400

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
>
>> I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
>> Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.
>
> 3% of 40k means... about 1200 issues to be fixed. whoa. So we'll indeed start
> with warnings only.
>
>

If I understand correctly, #615034/699059 will be elevating 500 of
these. The rest of the tests look like they should pretty clearly be
considered failure conditions early, if not out of the box.

Message #56 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>

To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>, 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:49:20 +0200

On 2013-05-18 15:33, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-18, 14:22:
>> did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate
>> results? or should we expect a lot of issues when running it against

I just started running adequate in my instance, too.
Do you have some examples for inadequate packages that I could retest?


Andreas

Message #61 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org, adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:55:11 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Andreas,

On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I just started running adequate in my instance, too.

\o/ :)

> Do you have some examples for inadequate packages that I could retest?

root@matrix:~# adequate --all
openssh-client: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/apport/package-
hooks/openssh-client.py
asciidoc: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/asciidoc/asciidocapi.py
python-apt-common: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/python-
apt/migrate-0.8.py
iputils-ping: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /bin/ping6 => 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0

btw, I've added known_problems/inadequate_*conf to my branch which I consider 
ready for merging into develop. I'm now waiting for adequate in wheezy 
backports, which then can be installed on piu-slave-bm-a-debian.org.


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #64 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:12:56 +0200

* Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-21, 12:55:
>root@matrix:~# adequate --all
>openssh-client: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/openssh-client.py

FWIW, this is a false-positive: apport never imports these files[0], so 
there's no benefit from byte-compilation. I'll whitelist 
/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/ in the next release.

>python-apt-common: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/python-apt/migrate-0.8.py

This is just a script with .py extension.
Maybe I should whitelist executable .py files in private directories...


[0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/apport.git;a=blob;f=apport/report.py;h=1e9e381400421bf0ce64a56df147e72ab8997fe9;hb=HEAD#l188

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #69 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 18:33:56 +0200

* Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 2013-05-21, 13:18:
>> FWIW, this is a false-positive: apport never imports these files[0], so
>> there's no benefit from byte-compilation. I'll whitelist
>> /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/ in the next release.
>
>good, thanks.

Now tracked as #709187.

>>>python-apt-common: py-file-not-bytecompiled
>>>/usr/share/python-apt/migrate-0.8.py
>>This is just a script with .py extension.
>>Maybe I should whitelist executable .py files in private directories...
>definitly you should. I assume there are many more scripts in eg 
>/usr/share/doc...

Nah, /usr/share/doc/ is already whitelisted. :)
Now tracked as #709192.

And I've just uploaded adequate_0.5.2~bpo70+1 to backports-master.

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #74 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:21:57 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Now tracked as #709187.
> Nah, /usr/share/doc/ is already whitelisted. :)
> Now tracked as #709192.
> And I've just uploaded adequate_0.5.2~bpo70+1 to backports-master.

cool!

:-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #79 received at 703902@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

To: 703902@bugs.debian.org

Cc: adequate@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#703902: adequate testing

Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:56:47 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

adequate is now installed on piu-slave-bm-a.d.o and the patch has been applied 
there too, IOW all new piuparts tests running there will fire up adequate at 
the end \o/

Plus I rescheduled these (known failing) packages in sid + wheezy, so tomorrow 
we shall have some failures found:

openssh-client_* asciidoc_* python-apt-common_* iputils-ping_*


cheers,
	Holger

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #84 received at 703902-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org>

To: 703902-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#703902: fixed in piuparts 0.52

Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:33:21 +0000

Source: piuparts
Source-Version: 0.52

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
piuparts, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 703902@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org> (supplier of updated piuparts package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 18:10:43 +0200
Source: piuparts
Binary: piuparts piuparts-master piuparts-slave piuparts-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.52
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: piuparts developers team <piuparts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Holger Levsen <holger@debian.org>
Description: 
 piuparts   - .deb package installation, upgrading, and removal testing tool
 piuparts-common - common piuparts components
 piuparts-master - piuparts master components
 piuparts-slave - piuparts slave components
Closes: 669966 701618 703058 703902 705975 708241
Changes: 
 piuparts (0.52) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Andreas Beckmann ]
   * piuparts.py:
     - Really disable PDiffs.  (Closes: #708241)
   * piuparts-master.in:
     - Use timeout to prevent master from getting stuck.  (Closes: #701618)
   * piuparts-slave.py:
     - Report upgrade tests involving downgrades as untestable.
     - Always pass --arch <arch> to piuparts.
   * piuparts-analyze.py:
     - Consider archived bugs, too.  (Closes: #669966)
   * piuparts-report.py:
     - Switch from python-rpy to python-rpy2.  (Closes: #705975)
     - rpy2: Use a noninteractive grDevice.
   * Makefile:
     - Switch default target from 'install' to 'build'.
   * scripts-no-usr-share-doc/post_setup_disable_usr_share_doc: New custom
     script to instruct dpkg to skip installing most files in /usr/share/doc.
     This catches maintainer scripts relying on /usr/share/doc content.
   * New bug template: postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.
   * piuparts-master.deb:
     - Switch Depends: python-rpy to Depends: python-rpy2.
 .
   [ Holger Levsen ]
   * piuparts.py:
     - Run adequate (if installed) after installation test. New options
       --no-adequate and --fail-if-inadequate. (Closes: #703902)
     - Workaround #709372 and ignore broken symlinks found by adequate.
     - Do not print a "Guessed: debian" line on every run. It's the default
       anyway. (Closes: #703058)
   * piuparts-report:
     - Add templates for known_problems/inadequate_issue and inadequate_error.
     - Add link to the piuparts source at the top of the navigation menu on the
       left.
     - Add links to Debian QA group and jenkins.debian.net at the bottom of
       that navigation menu.
   * debian/control: Add adequate to piuparts' recommends.
   * piuparts-slave.postrm: Also remove /var/cache/piuparts/tmp on purge.
   * conf/crontab-master: Run generate_daily_report twice a day.
   * piuparts-slave.deb: Add piuparts_slave_run.8 and piuparts_slave_join.8
     manpages.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8668a8d07d783726c901a4f8ddac43d79785cd5a 1829 piuparts_0.52.dsc
 b6e63ec9254635b2e85e4102c8944e9d98b0c774 187822 piuparts_0.52.tar.gz
 7d067b25dd1b4336cd3a47b5e2c1f70a49767034 102080 piuparts_0.52_all.deb
 d9c615be7602625e643c615908dadc768220f31c 102928 piuparts-master_0.52_all.deb
 bbe144cd3789c4a8bf1330496eaf22146c66ba68 45260 piuparts-slave_0.52_all.deb
 faaf89bc185364f7a84dbc769b5d1e9f87c54a1a 43730 piuparts-common_0.52_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 cd8b7e699d1e13e12e949c175f1a27dfcc1b567009c41055cc7fb01910b5fb19 1829 piuparts_0.52.dsc
 65de37709050c62f71a57a70e4943309e3323e14a7438ce5a8ba201ac7a461ae 187822 piuparts_0.52.tar.gz
 831099843d7e24b33e62d06940a2134d41b76c5d5fbc325b3d7e3abf2e21a98f 102080 piuparts_0.52_all.deb
 9f627288a2b2a3a6a73cdb6a665df5d365f2817b556e107fb21c048a908a627c 102928 piuparts-master_0.52_all.deb
 d6518bb2e0edb8df61fb4947dafacbf2bc27cb8fc63d924b6f5e8893d70a4b8b 45260 piuparts-slave_0.52_all.deb
 4487255aa80058314c2c141d229c60fa834cda16cca802752b12545815aa660e 43730 piuparts-common_0.52_all.deb
Files: 
 5b0f6ba9450d81c46be244236f70902d 1829 devel extra piuparts_0.52.dsc
 c1e8efd9b74b123eaa4be712487a8c4f 187822 devel extra piuparts_0.52.tar.gz
 7e75b433baab1ea81ac6b47b51142a4a 102080 devel extra piuparts_0.52_all.deb
 26871e65069829c0497d23da45489dc4 102928 devel extra piuparts-master_0.52_all.deb
 b9e654fe57621e92d439f4565c52adc5 45260 devel extra piuparts-slave_0.52_all.deb
 875b7cf5bb4d752b6ae129ffc0f1d283 43730 devel extra piuparts-common_0.52_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=+m8y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.