Abstract
Gauging a specific difference of lepton numbers such as L
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in dijet events using 37 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 052004 [arXiv:1703.09127] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter mediators and other new particles, JHEP 08 (2018) 130 [arXiv:1806.00843] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 68 [arXiv:1903.06248] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 07 (2021) 208 [arXiv:2103.02708] [INSPIRE].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP Electroweak collaborations, Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions at W-Boson-Pair Energies at LEP, Phys. Rept. 532 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1302.3415] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel, Hunting All the Hidden Photons, JHEP 07 (2018) 094 [arXiv:1803.05466] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Complete Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111808 [arXiv:1205.5370] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Atoms 7 (2019) 28 [INSPIRE].
A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano and A. Vainshtein, Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073006 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 119901] [hep-ph/0212229] [INSPIRE].
C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g − 2)
μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and \( \alpha \left({m}_Z^2\right) \) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [arXiv:1706.09436] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and \( \alpha \left({M}_Z^2\right) \): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.00007] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 08 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1907.01556] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to \( \alpha \left({m}_Z^2\right) \), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, \( \alpha \left({M}_Z^2\right) \), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].
A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 144 [arXiv:1403.6400] [INSPIRE].
K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113006 [hep-ph/0312226] [INSPIRE].
P. Masjuan and P. Sanchez-Puertas, Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the (g
μ − 2): a rational approach, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054026 [arXiv:1701.05829] [INSPIRE].G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions, JHEP 04 (2017) 161 [arXiv:1702.07347] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold and S. P. Schneider, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole, JHEP 10 (2018) 141 [arXiv:1808.04823] [INSPIRE].
A. Gérardin, H. B. Meyer and A. Nyffeler, Lattice calculation of the pion transition form factor with Nf = 2 + 1 Wilson quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 034520 [arXiv:1903.09471] [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134994 [arXiv:1908.03331] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub and P. Stoffer, Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)
μ with large-Nc Regge models, JHEP 03 (2020) 101 [arXiv:1910.13432] [INSPIRE].T. Blum et al., Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 132002 [arXiv:1911.08123] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, A. Nyffeler, M. Passera and P. Stoffer, Remarks on higher-order hadronic corrections to the muon g − 2, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 90 [arXiv:1403.7512] [INSPIRE].
Muon g − 2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
Muon g − 2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, X. G. He, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, Model for a light Z′ boson, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4571 [hep-ph/9401250] [INSPIRE].
S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, The Muon anomalous magnetic moment and a new light gauge boson, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 119 [hep-ph/0102222] [INSPIRE].
S. Baek, N. G. Deshpande, X. G. He and P. Ko, Muon anomalous g − 2 and gauged L
μ – Lτ models, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 055006 [hep-ph/0104141] [INSPIRE].B. Murakami, The Impact of lepton flavor violating Z-prime bosons on muon g-2 and other muon observables, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 055003 [hep-ph/0110095] [INSPIRE].
P. Fayet, U-boson production in e+ e− annihilations, psi and Upsilon decays, and Light Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 115017 [hep-ph/0702176] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095002 [arXiv:0811.1030] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, D. P. Roy and S. Roy, Gauged L
μ − Lτ with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 525 (2002) 101 [hep-ph/0110146] [INSPIRE].J. Heeck and W. Rodejohann, Gauged L
μ − Lτ Symmetry at the Electroweak Scale, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 075007 [arXiv:1107.5238] [INSPIRE].C. D. Carone, Flavor-Nonuniversal Dark Gauge Bosons and the Muon g-2, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1301.2027] [INSPIRE].
K. Harigaya, T. Igari, M. M. Nojiri, M. Takeuchi and K. Tobe, Muon g − 2 and LHC phenomenology in the L
μ − Lτ gauge symmetric model, JHEP 03 (2014) 105 [arXiv:1311.0870] [INSPIRE].H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee and W. J. Marciano, Muon g − 2, rare kaon decays, and parity violation from dark bosons, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095006 [arXiv:1402.3620] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in L
μ – Lτ models, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095033 [arXiv:1403.1269] [INSPIRE].G. Tomar and S. Mohanty, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and positron excess at AMS-02 in a gauged horizontal symmetric model, JHEP 11 (2014) 133 [arXiv:1403.6301] [INSPIRE].
H.-S. Lee, Muon g − 2 anomaly and dark leptonic gauge boson, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 091702 [arXiv:1408.4256] [INSPIRE].
B. Allanach, F. S. Queiroz, A. Strumia and S. Sun, Z′ models for the LHCb and g − 2 muon anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 055045 [Erratum ibid. 95 (2017) 119902] [arXiv:1511.07447] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck, Lepton flavor violation with light vector bosons, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 101 [arXiv:1602.03810] [INSPIRE].
S. Patra, S. Rao, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu, Gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model in light of muon g − 2 anomaly, neutrino mass and dark matter phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 917 (2017) 317 [arXiv:1607.04046] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, C.-Y. Chen, P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Soni, Lepton flavor violating Z’ explanation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 389 [arXiv:1607.06832] [INSPIRE].
S. Iguro, Y. Omura and M. Takeuchi, Probing
μ τ flavor-violating solutions for the muon g − 2 anomaly at Belle II, JHEP 09 (2020) 144 [arXiv:2002.12728] [INSPIRE].I. Holst, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, The Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g – 2 and Thermal Dark Matter, arXiv:2107.09067 [INSPIRE].
T. Hapitas, D. Tuckler and Y. Zhang, General kinetic mixing in gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model for muon g − 2 and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 016014 [arXiv:2108.12440] [INSPIRE].
HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and
τ -lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 226 [arXiv:1909.12524] [INSPIRE].B. Belfatto, R. Beradze and Z. Berezhiani, The CKM unitarity problem: A trace of new physics at the TeV scale?, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1906.02714] [INSPIRE].
Y. Grossman, E. Passemar and S. Schacht, On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, JHEP 07 (2020) 068 [arXiv:1911.07821] [INSPIRE].
K. Shiells, P. G. Blunden and W. Melnitchouk, Electroweak axial structure functions and improved extraction of the Vud CKM matrix element, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 033003 [arXiv:2012.01580] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Seng, X. Feng, M. Gorchtein and L.-C. Jin, Joint lattice QCD-dispersion theory analysis confirms the quark-mixing top-row unitarity deficit, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 111301 [arXiv:2003.11264] [INSPIRE].
L.-S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jäger, S.-Y. Li, J. Martin Camalich and R.-X. Shi, Implications of new evidence for lepton-universality violation in b → sℓ + ℓ-decays, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035029 [arXiv:2103.12738] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and J. Heeck, Explaining h →
μ ±τ ∓, B → K∗μ +μ − and B → Kμ +μ −/B → Ke+ e− in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged Lμ − Lτ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 151801 [arXiv:1501.00993] [INSPIRE].A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and J. Heeck, Addressing the LHC flavor anomalies with horizontal gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 075006 [arXiv:1503.03477] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, M. Carena and A. Crivellin, L
μ − Lτ theory of Higgs flavor violation and (g − 2)μ , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 095026 [arXiv:1604.08221] [INSPIRE].A. J. Buras, A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari and M. Montull, Global analysis of leptophilic Z’ bosons, JHEP 06 (2021) 068 [arXiv:2104.07680] [INSPIRE].
X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, New Z′ phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22 [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 527 [INSPIRE].
X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z′ model, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118 [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2007.14792] [INSPIRE].
Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870 [INSPIRE].
B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53 (1967) 1717 [INSPIRE].
N. F. Bell and R. R. Volkas, Bottom up model for maximal
ν μ −ν τ mixing, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 013006 [hep-ph/0008177] [INSPIRE].S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, A Flavor symmetry for quasi-degenerate neutrinos: L
μ − Lτ , Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005) 259 [hep-ph/0411190] [INSPIRE].P. Binetruy, S. Lavignac, S. T. Petcov and P. Ramond, Quasidegenerate neutrinos from an Abelian family symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 496 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9610481] [INSPIRE].
K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi and N. Nagata, Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 763 [arXiv:1705.00419] [INSPIRE].
T. Araki, K. Asai, J. Sato and T. Shimomura, Low scale seesaw models for low scale \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095012 [arXiv:1909.08827] [INSPIRE].
Z. G. Berezhiani, The Weak Mixing Angles in Gauge Models with Horizontal Symmetry: A New Approach to Quark and Lepton Masses, Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 99 [INSPIRE].
S. F. King and G. G. Ross, Fermion masses and mixing angles from SU(3) family symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 520 (2001) 243 [hep-ph/0108112] [INSPIRE].
S. F. King and G. G. Ross, Fermion masses and mixing angles from SU(3) family symmetry and unification, Phys. Lett. B 574 (2003) 239 [hep-ph/0307190] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, P. Cox, C. Han and T. T. Yanagida, Anomaly-free local horizontal symmetry and anomaly-full rare B-decays, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 071701 [arXiv:1704.08158] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E. Fernandez Martinez, M. B. Gavela, B. Grinstein, L. Merlo and P. Quilez, Gauged Lepton Flavour, JHEP 12 (2016) 119 [arXiv:1609.05902] [INSPIRE].
C.-W. Chiang and K. Tsumura, Model with a gauged lepton flavor SU(2) symmetry, JHEP 05 (2018) 069 [arXiv:1712.00574] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski,
μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
S. L. Glashow, The Future of Elementary Particle Physics, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61 (1980) 687 [INSPIRE].
R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Neutrino Masses in the Minimal O(10) Theory, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 81 [INSPIRE].
F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Effects of new leptons in Electroweak Precision Data, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013010 [arXiv:0803.4008] [INSPIRE].
N. Kumar and S. P. Martin, Vectorlike Leptons at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 115018 [arXiv:1510.03456] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy lepton resonances decaying to a Z boson and a lepton in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 09 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1506.01291] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052003 [arXiv:1905.10853] [INSPIRE].
N. F. Bell, M. J. Dolan, L. S. Friedrich, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and R. R. Volkas, Electroweak Baryogenesis with Vector-like Leptons and Scalar Singlets, JHEP 09 (2019) 012 [arXiv:1903.11255] [INSPIRE].
P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel, Purely flavor-changing Z′ bosons and where they might hide, JHEP 05 (2017) 010 [arXiv:1612.07789] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsányi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, C. A. Manzari and M. Montull, Hadronic Vacuum Polarization: (g − 2)
μ versus Global Electroweak Fits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 091801 [arXiv:2003.04886] [INSPIRE].A. Keshavarzi, W. J. Marciano, M. Passera and A. Sirlin, Muon g − 2 and ∆
α connection, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 033002 [arXiv:2006.12666] [INSPIRE].G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Constraints on the two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136073 [arXiv:2010.07943] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 011102 [arXiv:1606.03501] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091801 [arXiv:1406.2332] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and M. Pierre, Cosmology with A Very Light L
μ – Lτ Gauge Boson, JHEP 03 (2019) 071 [arXiv:1901.02010] [INSPIRE].A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter,
β Decays as Sensitive Probes of Lepton Flavor Universality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 111801 [arXiv:2002.07184] [INSPIRE].A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and C. A. Manzari, Fermi Constant from Muon Decay Versus Electroweak Fits and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 071801 [arXiv:2102.02825] [INSPIRE].
A. M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin and C. A. Manzari, Global Fit to Modified Neutrino Couplings and the Cabibbo-Angle Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 071802 [arXiv:1912.08823] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari and M. Montull, Global Electroweak Fit and Vector-Like Leptons in Light of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, JHEP 12 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2008.01113] [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM II collaboration, A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 337 [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays
τ ± → e±γ andτ ± →μ ±γ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802 [arXiv:0908.2381] [INSPIRE].MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay
μ + → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Neutrino oscillation constraints on U(1)′ models: from non-standard interactions to long-range forces, JHEP 01 (2021) 114 [arXiv:2009.14220] [INSPIRE].
A. Greljo, Y. Soreq, P. Stangl, A. E. Thomsen and J. Zupan, Muonic Force Behind Flavor Anomalies, arXiv:2107.07518 [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 124201 [arXiv:1504.04855] [INSPIRE].
A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy and V. Syvolap, Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023517 [arXiv:2008.00749] [INSPIRE].
K. Bondarenko et al., An allowed window for heavy neutral leptons below the kaon mass, JHEP 07 (2021) 193 [arXiv:2101.09255] [INSPIRE].
E. Di Valentino, S. Gariazzo and O. Mena, Most constraining cosmological neutrino mass bounds, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083504 [arXiv:2106.15267] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, G. Raffelt and D. V. Semikoz, Cosmological and astrophysical bounds on a heavy sterile neutrino and the KARMEN anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 331 [hep-ph/0002223] [INSPIRE].
A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, G. Raffelt and D. V. Semikoz, Heavy sterile neutrinos: Bounds from big bang nucleosynthesis and SN1987A, Nucl. Phys. B 590 (2000) 562 [hep-ph/0008138] [INSPIRE].
K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, D. Gorbunov and O. Ruchayskiy, Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy Neutral Leptons, JHEP 11 (2018) 032 [arXiv:1805.08567] [INSPIRE].
KATRIN collaboration, Direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-electronvolt sensitivity, Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 160 [arXiv:2105.08533] [INSPIRE].
P. Foldenauer, Light dark matter in a gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035007 [arXiv:1808.03647] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2111.04744
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Alonso-Álvarez, G., Cline, J.M. Gauging lepton flavor SU(3) for the muon g − 2. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 42 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)042
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)042