(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Phys. Rev. B 74, 035114 (2006) - Magnetic spectral response and lattice properties in mixed-valence ${\mathrm{Sm}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Y}}_{x}\mathrm{S}$ solid solutions studied with x-ray diffraction, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, and inelastic neutron scattering

Magnetic spectral response and lattice properties in mixed-valence Sm1xYxS solid solutions studied with x-ray diffraction, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, and inelastic neutron scattering

P. A. Alekseev, J.-M. Mignot, E. V. Nefeodova, K. S. Nemkovski, V. N. Lazukov, N. N. Tiden, A. P. Menushenkov, R. V. Chernikov, K. V. Klementiev, A. Ochiai, A. V. Golubkov, R. I. Bewley, A. V. Rybina, and I. P. Sadikov
Phys. Rev. B 74, 035114 – Published 21 July 2006

Abstract

Mixed-valence phenomena occurring in the “black” (B) and “gold” (G) phases of Sm1xYxS have been studied by x-ray diffraction, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, and inelastic neutron scattering. Lattice-constant and phonon-dispersion results confirm that the valence instability occurs already inside the B phase. On the other hand, pronounced temperature anomalies in the thermal expansion αあるふぁ(T), as well as in the Sm mean-square displacements, denote the onset of the BG transition for the compositions x=0.33 and 0.45. It is argued that these anomalies primarily denote an effect of electron-phonon coupling. The magnetic spectral response, measured on both powder and single crystals, is dominated by the Sm2+ spin-orbit component close to 36meV. A strongly overdamped Sm3+ contribution appears only for x0.33 near room temperature. The quasielastic signal is strongly suppressed below 70K, reflecting the formation of the singlet mixed-valence ground state. Quite remarkably, the signal around 36meV is found, from the single-crystal spectra, to arise from two distinct, dispersive, interacting branches. The lower peak, confirmed to exist from x=0.17 to x=0.33 at least, is tentatively ascribed to an excitation specific to the mixed-valence regime, reminiscent of the “exciton” peak reported previously for SmB6.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 17 March 2006

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035114

©2006 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

P. A. Alekseev1, J.-M. Mignot2, E. V. Nefeodova1, K. S. Nemkovski1, V. N. Lazukov1, N. N. Tiden1, A. P. Menushenkov3, R. V. Chernikov3, K. V. Klementiev4, A. Ochiai5, A. V. Golubkov6, R. I. Bewley7, A. V. Rybina1, and I. P. Sadikov1

  • 1LNSR, ISSSP, Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute,” 123182 Moscow, Russia
  • 2Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-CNRS, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
  • 3Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (State University), Kashirskoe shosse, 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia
  • 4HASYLAB at DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany
  • 5Center for Low Temperature Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980, Japan
  • 6A. F. Ioffe PTI, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
  • 7ISIS, RAL, Didcot, Oxon OX110QX, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 74, Iss. 3 — 15 July 2006

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×