Abstract
The detection of the first electromagnetic counterpart to the binary neutron star (BNS) merger remnant GW170817 established the connection between short
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
1. Introduction
The gravitational-wave (GW) event detected on 2017 August 17 by the advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors resulted from the merger of two neutron stars (NSs). The GW signal was followed after ∼2 s by a short, low-luminosity
After ∼160 days, the synchrotron radiation started to plateau and later fade (Figure 1). This is similar to the behavior of a young supernova remnant, and suggests that the ejecta is transitioning from the free expansion to the Sedov–Taylor phase when the ejected mass of the merger remnant equals the swept-up circumstellar material.
Rodrigues et al. (2019) infer a total kinetic energy in the ejecta of 1051 erg, implying a total number of electrons in the remnant of 1055. Accelerated electrons should also scatter off the intense radio and X-ray synchrotron radiation field and produce synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) emission. The expected peak energy of the SSC component depends on the maximum accelerated electron energy as probed by the X-rays. While the radio to X-ray emission probes the product of energy in electrons, ue, and energy in magnetic fields, uB, the SSC component is proportional to . As shown by Takami et al. (2014) and Rodrigues et al. (2019), observations in the
In this work, we present deep H.E.S.S. observations of GW170817/GRB 170817A covering the peak and onset of fading in the X-ray and radio lightcurves from 124 to 272 days after the merger. This measurement is accompanied by an improved analysis of the H.E.S.S. data taken on the early (up to 5 day) kilonova. In the next section we present the H.E.S.S. data set and results, followed by a discussion on the implied magnetic field strength in a non-relativistic kilonova scenario and a relativistic jet scenario. Throughout this work we adopt a distance to the host galaxy NGC 4993 of 41.0 Mpc, corresponding to a redshift of z = 0.009727 (Hjorth et al. 2017).43
2. Data Analysis and Results
The data set was obtained from observations with the H.E.S.S. phase II array, including the upgraded 12 m diameter CT1-4 telescopes (Ashton et al. 2020) and the large 28 m diameter CT5 telescope. The analysis presented by Abdalla et al. (2017) used monoscopic data of the 28 m telescope obtained between 5.3 hr and 5.3 days after the binary neutron star (BNS) merger. Here we extend this analysis to also include data taken with CT1-4. Observations from 2017 December to 2018 May with telescopes pointing 05 offset from GW170817 were conducted allowing for simultaneous estimation of the background level in the signal region as discussed below. The different data sets are summarized in Table 1. A standard data quality selection is applied to the data (Aharonian et al. 2006; H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al. 2017). The events have been selected and their direction and energy reconstructed using a Monte Carlo, template-based, shower model technique (Parsons & Hinton 2014), requiring at least two telescope to see the same
Table 1. Properties of the H.E.S.S. Data Sets on GW170817/GRB 170817A and Analysis Results
Data Set | Configuration | T − T0 | Exposure | Energy Range | F( > Eth) | Zenith Angle | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(days) | (hr) | (TeV) | (erg cm−2 s−1) | (erg cm−2 s−1) | (deg) | |||
I | CT 5 | 0.22–5.23 | 3.2 | 0.27–8.55 | <1.5 × 10−12 | ⋯ | 58 | Abdalla et al. (2017) |
II | CT 1–5 | 0.22–5.23 | 3.2 | 0.56–17.8 | <4.7 × 10−12 | <2.8 × 10−12 | 58 | This work |
III | CT 1–5 | 124–272 | 53.9 | 0.13–23.7 | <1.6 × 10−12 | <3.2 × 10−13 | 24 | This work |
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
Figure 1 depicts the radio and X-ray flux measurements along with the inferred H.E.S.S. energy flux upper limits in the 1–10 TeV energy range for data sets II and III. Figure 2 shows the inferred energy flux upper limits at the 95% C.L. in the VHE
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image3. Discussion
Recent detections of VHE emission from GRBs over minutes (Mirzoyan 2019) and hours (de Naurois 2019) motivate the search for very late time emission from GRB-related events, like the remnant of GW170817. The H.E.S.S. differential upper limits can be translated into an integral energy flux limit, for a given assumption on the spectrum of the radiating particles. In turn, this limit provides a constraint on the magnetic field strength under the assumption of one-zone synchrotron emission with corresponding inverse Compton (IC) emission.
Observational evidence suggests that at early times, the kilonova provides the dominant target radiation field in the remnant (Villar et al. 2017). However, the decay of this component, whose flux falls steeply with t−2.3, results in a late-time dominance of the synchrotron radiation in the source. It is therefore naturally expected that at late times SSC will dominate the remnant's IC emission.
The measured X-ray flux of the source can be used to infer the X-ray luminosity emitted as synchrotron radiation, LX. In order to consistently model the emission from this electron population, a geometry assumption is necessary. We consider two scenarios: one where the remnant expands isotropically and non-relativistically, and the other where a relativistic jet is launched.
In the isotropic scenario, we assume a volume-filled spherical emitter with radius Riso =
In the relativistic scenario, we consider a jet with speed
The maximum energy of the emitted synchrotron radiation is fixed by X-ray observations, EX ≈ 10 keV (Nynka et al. 2018). This is related to the magnetic field strength in the source, B', and the maximum electron energy of the emitting electrons, , through . This means that in the relativistic scenario, for a given value of B', the maximum energy of the emitting electrons scales as . Furthermore, since the jet blob emits isotropically in its own rest frame, the X-ray luminosity, obtained assuming the observed emission is isotropic, deduced from flux measurements relates to the luminosity in the rest frame of the blob through . This luminosity relates to the total number of X-ray-emitting electrons, , as well as and , through , where is the synchrotron cooling timescale. Therefore, in the relativistic jet scenario, for a given value of B' and measured X-ray flux, the number of electrons scales as . This will affect the results of the SSC model, since for higher values of
The
Thus, a slower expansion of the emission region would lead to a more compact source and therefore a stronger constraint on the magnetic field strength (both in the jet-like and isotropic scenarios).
In Figure 2 we show the modeled synchrotron emission spectrum (black curves) and the respective SSC emission for both scenarios introduced above. These spectra were obtained with a numerical radiation model, introduced by Rodrigues et al. (2019). In this model, a population of electrons is considered to fill homogeneously the emission region, and to be continuously accelerated to a power-law spectrum, with a possible cutoff at the highest energies. As can be seen in Figure 2, these characteristics can explain radio (red points) and X-ray observations (blue points and blue shaded region). The parameters of the electron population have then been adjusted, and the magnetic field strength minimized, so that the predicted SSC emission does not exceed any of the 95% C.L. upper limits in the VHE
As a point of comparison with the lower limit obtained through this analysis, the minimum magnetic field expected at late times downstream of the shock is of the order of (Kumar et al. 2012), where BISM is the magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium (ISM). Furthermore, observations of the prompt emission of GRB 080916C by Fermi-LAT and 1 day afterglow emission in X-rays and optical wavelengths have provided evidence of magnetic fields in the shock that are at the level of the compressed surrounding medium (Kumar & Duran 2009), thus suggesting an ISM magnetic field of .
Very-high-energy
The support of the Namibian authorities and of the University of Namibia in facilitating the construction and operation of H.E.S.S. is gratefully acknowledged, as is the support by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), the Max Planck Society, the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Helmholtz Association, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS/IN2P3 and CNRS/INSU), the Commissariat à l'Énergie atomique et aux Énergies alternatives (CEA), the U.K. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the National Science Centre, Poland grant No. 2016/22/M/ST9/00382, the South African Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation, the University of Namibia, the National Commission on Research, Science & Technology of Namibia (NCRST), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), the Australian Research Council (ARC), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by the University of Amsterdam. We appreciate the excellent work of the technical support staff in Berlin, Zeuthen, Heidelberg, Palaiseau, Paris, Saclay, Tübingen, and in Namibia in the construction and operation of the equipment. This work benefited from services provided by the H.E.S.S. Virtual Organization, supported by the national resource providers of the EGI Federation. X.R. was supported by the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association.
Footnotes
- 43
At this distance, very-high-energy (VHE; 100 GeV < E < 100 TeV) photons pair-produce e± in interactions with the extragalactic background light (EBL) on their way from GW170817 to Earth. The VHE flux reduction due to the EBL is energy dependent and varies between 10% and 30% between 1 and 10 TeV, respectively, assuming the Franceschini et al. (2008) EBL model. Note that the model curves have been derived ignoring the EBL correction.
- 44
We base this discussion on the 110 day timescale, for which there are quasi-simultaneous flux measurements in both radio and X-ray bands. As shown in Figure 1, the flux levels at this timescale are comparable throughout the H.E.S.S. observation window.
- 45
Throughout this text, primed quantities denote parameter values in the shock rest frame and unprimed ones in the observer's frame.