(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:History of biology: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Talk:History of biology: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
6,536,164 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject template(s). Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep the rating of {{VA}} "FA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove the same ratings as {{WPBS}} and keep only the dissimilar ones from {{WikiProject History of Science}}, {{WikiProject Biology}}, {{WikiProject Palaeontology}}, {{WikiProject Evolutionary biology}}, {{WikiProject History}}, {{WikiProject European history}}.
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=History|class=FA}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
Line 21 ⟶ 20:
|currentstatus=FA
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject History of Science|class=FA|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Biology|class=FA|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Palaeontology|class=FA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Evolutionary biology|class=FA|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject History|class=FA|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject European history|class=FA|importance=high}}
 
}}
{{To do}}
Line 77 ⟶ 75:
 
::Further to the above, I came across problems with one of Jagged 85's sources. (For full details see [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#The Islamic Contribution to Science, Mathematics and Technology: Towards Motivating the Muslim Child]] and the Jagged 85 cleanup project that it links to.) Because of the many problems, including misrepresenting sources, undue weight and so forth, that have been ascribed to him I am reverting some of his changes, represented by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_biology&diff=185441717&oldid=183609032 this] combined diff. I will look at the rest of his edits to this article in due course. All the best, ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>01:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC).</small><br />
 
== Ancient medicine may actually be understated in the article ==
 
I added links to [[Susruta]] and [[Zhang Zhongjing]], who I was disappointed to find missing here. Still, I think the article might provide more detail on the [[Ebers Papyrus]] and other texts demonstrating that ancient surgeons were well aware of the concept of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia with [[opium]], [[deadly nightshade]], [[cannabis]], [[aconite]] and other drugs was a crucial advance which permitted physicians to perform involved surgeries, and therefore gave them both the reason and the opportunity to learn more about human anatomy and physiology. Even the ancient [[Sumeria]]ns grew opium and performed surgeries. The roots of medicine are very deep - there is actually some (debatable) evidence that [[Neanderthal]]s collected medicinal herbs such as [[Achillea]] for the ill. (see {{PMID|1548898}})
:I think the text you added on [[Susruta]] and [[Zhang Zhongjing]] was quite reasonable. However, there is a separate [[history of medicine]] article and I think we want to limit the level of detail that goes into this article on topics covered (or that should be covered) elsewhere. [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 08:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 
:I added a mention of the Ebers papyrus. I agree that one-sentence summaries are best here (partly because these ancient traditions did not create a "science", as the word is understood today, and partly for the reason given by Cashman). Readers who want further knowledge can click on the Wikilinks, which also serve as references. I would have put in links to "main articles", but I don't know how yet. [[User:Eall Ân Ûle|&#39;&#39;&#39; &#39;&#39; Solo Owl &#39;&#39; &#39;&#39;&#39;]] ([[User talk:Eall Ân Ûle|talk]]) 22:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 
== External links modified ==
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_biology"