Talk:Tata Group
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tata Group article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 360 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
"Mass killings"
You MUST discuss changes here. I have justified every source.
There have been at least 4 IP-address editors or editors with a single edit who try to remove this content. You must discuss it here. DenverCoder9 (talk) 02:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- yeah you should remove the mass killing part as it cannot be justified with just one internet article and if you just want to add that add in controversy part and not in the top of the article Master bolt (talk) 13:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- and the link 17 and 18 both are not working Master bolt (talk) 13:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- and link 12 is page not found ,and 13 does not specify anything related to mass killings Master bolt (talk) 13:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- You are the 5th account without any edit history trying to remove this. I will point out that your account was created today. This is your first edit. Curiously, you seem astonishingly precocious in understanding Wikipedia's policies and talk page discussions. IN encourage you to disclose previous Wikipedia accounts on your talk page.
- As stated by @Swadge2 , the links are accessible via archive.
- If you believe more citations are needed, I suggest looking up Kalinganagar Massacre, Singur Oppression, or many of the other Tata actions conducted via police operation.
- The "mass killings" is part and parcel of a method of operating, well cited throughout the article, that can best be described as "semi-governmental cronyism". It is well cited that Tata enjoys significant latitude to operate outside the law, to the extent of India's "rule of law". It is not WP:OR to state this on a talk page. DenverCoder19 (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- and link 12 is page not found ,and 13 does not specify anything related to mass killings Master bolt (talk) 13:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- and the link 17 and 18 both are not working Master bolt (talk) 13:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Infobox: what should the type field say?
Moved from Talk:Toddy1
Hello, I have recently noticed that you have reverted my edit on Tata Group twice. I would like to elaborate on why I changed it from "Corporate group" to "Private because below the Type, there is the Industry section that perfectly describes it as a "Conglomerate". Since groups can't be owned by any member, it is private. Thank you for understanding.
Other examples of "Private" used to describe groups:
WiinterU (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your logic makes no sense to me.
- Tata Group is a group of 29 publicly listed companies. It therefore fits the definition of a corporate group. Some editors in the past have made a POV push that the family is the real owner of the company and misrepresented what cited sources said to fit their story. Before your talk-page post above, I thought that your edits to the article were another attempt to push that POV. But the message above suggests that you have a different point.
- Perhaps you could provide (on this talk page) some quotations from reliable published sources that explain whatever it is that you are trying to get across. Please may sure that they apply to Tata Group. Maybe then we could evaluate your point (if any).-- Toddy1 (talk) 23:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- First, Corporate group doesn't perfectly describe what the company is. Per a sentence in Corporate Group: "If the corporations are engaged in entirely different businesses, the group is called a conglomerate." Second, under the "Company type" section, Conglomerate is already there. It perfectly describes what the group is better than Corporate group. Also, "Company Type" is meant to describe a company like this with an example company
- {{ubl
- |Private: S.C. Johnson and Son
- |Public: The Walt Disney Company
- |Subsidiary: Waymo
- |Public Subsidiary: T-Mobile US
- |Division: Fox Entertainment
- |Joint venture: Yahoo! Inc.
- }}
- It should not have anything like "Corporate Group" "Incorporated" "Corporation" "Limited Liability Company" "Limited Partnership" "Limited Liability Partnership" "Limited Liability Limited Partnership" (yes, that is a real thing) "Subsidiary of Company" "Division of Company" or "Conglomerate". WiinterU (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- We are talking about a field in Template:Infobox company. The field name is "type". The documentation on that page says:
Type of ownership in the company (not their legal form of incorporation), wiki-linked where appropriate. To list percentages owned of a private company, use the ownership parameter.
Available types:[[Privately held company|Private]]
[[Public company|Public]]
[[Subsidiary]]
[[Division (business)|Division]]
- But it is not really any of those. It is a group of companies.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- We are talking about a field in Template:Infobox company. The field name is "type". The documentation on that page says:
Curry houses?
Someone has entered first line describing Tata as a chain of curry houses which is untrue and is at best tacit racism, not sure what this should have read prior. 217.45.11.12 (talk) 13:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- C-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of High-importance
- C-Class Maharashtra articles
- Top-importance Maharashtra articles
- C-Class Maharashtra articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Maharashtra articles
- C-Class Mumbai articles
- Top-importance Mumbai articles
- C-Class Mumbai articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Mumbai articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English