A method of estimating the Moho density contrast with a tentative application of EGM08 and CRUST2. 0 LE Sjöberg, M Bagherbandi Acta Geophysica 59, 502-525, 2011 | 118 | 2011 |
Analysis of the refined CRUST1. 0 crustal model and its gravity field R Tenzer, W Chen, D Tsoulis, M Bagherbandi, LE Sjöberg, P Novák, S Jin Surveys in geophysics 36, 139-165, 2015 | 105 | 2015 |
Gravity inversion and integration LE Sjöberg, M Bagherbandi Springer International Publishing AG, 2017 | 78 | 2017 |
Non-isostatic effects on crustal thickness: a study using CRUST2. 0 in Fennoscandia M Bagherbandi, LE Sjöberg Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 200, 37-44, 2012 | 62 | 2012 |
Improved global crustal thickness modeling based on the VMM isostatic model and non-isostatic gravity correction M Bagherbandi, R Tenzer, LE Sjöberg, P Novák Journal of Geodynamics 66, 25-37, 2013 | 51 | 2013 |
Combined gravimetric–seismic crustal model for Antarctica A Baranov, R Tenzer, M Bagherbandi Surveys in Geophysics 39, 23-56, 2018 | 48 | 2018 |
Signature of the upper mantle density structure in the refined gravity data R Tenzer, M Bagherbandi, V Gladkikh Computational Geosciences 16, 975-986, 2012 | 40 | 2012 |
A comparison of three gravity inversion methods for crustal thickness modelling in Tibet plateau M Bagherbandi Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 43 (1), 89-97, 2012 | 38 | 2012 |
An isostatic earth crustal model: And its applications M Bagherbandi KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011 | 34 | 2011 |
Reformulation of the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy for isostatic gravity disturbances R Tenzer, M Bagherbandi International Journal of Geosciences 3 (5A), 918-929, 2012 | 32 | 2012 |
A combined global Moho model based on seismic and gravimetric data M Eshagh, M Bagherbandi, L Sjöberg Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 46 (1), 25-38, 2011 | 30 | 2011 |
Quasigeoid-to-geoid determination by EGM08 LE Sjöberg, M Bagherbandi Earth science informatics 5, 87-91, 2012 | 27 | 2012 |
Comparison of crustal thickness from two gravimetric-isostatic models and CRUST2. 0 M Bagherbandi, LE Sjöberg Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 55, 641-666, 2011 | 26 | 2011 |
Multi-objective versus single-objective models in geodetic network optimization M Bagherbandi, M Eshagh, LE Sjöberg Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 6 (1), 2009 | 23 | 2009 |
Localized subsidence zones in Gävle City detected by sentinel-1 PSI and leveling data NAA Gido, M Bagherbandi, F Nilfouroushan Remote Sensing 12 (16), 2629, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
Combined gravimetric-seismic Moho model of Tibet A Baranov, M Bagherbandi, R Tenzer Geosciences 8 (12), 461, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
Global model of the upper mantle lateral density structure based on combining seismic and isostatic models R Tenzer, M Bagherbandi, P Vajda Geosciences Journal 17, 65-73, 2013 | 20 | 2013 |
Improving gravimetric–isostatic models of crustal depth by correcting for non-isostatic effects and using CRUST2. 0 M Bagherbandi, LE Sjöberg Earth-Science Reviews 117, 29-39, 2013 | 20 | 2013 |
Crustal thickness recovery using an isostatic model and GOCE data M Bagherbandi, M Eshagh Earth, planets and space 64, 1053-1057, 2012 | 19 | 2012 |
On gravity inversion by no-topography and rigorous isostatic gravity anomalies LE Sjöberg, M Bagherbandi, R Tenzer Pure and Applied Geophysics 172, 2669-2680, 2015 | 18 | 2015 |