Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period.
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20071012085226/http://www.engadget.com:80/2007/10/11/dells-22-inch-sp2208wfp-with-webcam-and-24-incher-out-in-japan/
It's not out in the US yet, but Dell just announced another webcam packing LCD monitor: the SP2208WFP for Japan. This 1,680 x 1,050 resolution 22-incher features a 2 megapixel webcam and microphone integrated flush with the upper bezel, a 2-ms response, 2,000:1 contrast, and the ability to reproduce 92% of the NTSC color gamut. Inputs? Oh hells yes: analog D-Sub 15, DVI-D (with HDCP), 3x HDMI, and 4x USB. Japan-only for the time being for a tax-inclusive price of ¥59,800 or about $510 whenever it pops Stateside. They've also announced a ¥68,800 ($587) 24-inch E248WFP prepped for a Japan release on October 23rd. This 1,920 × 1,200 model increases the color gamut from the 72% found in their current 24-incher to the same 92% found in the new SP2208WFP. Peep the 24-incher after the break.
What's the response time of the 24 incher? That's the key question these days, what with there being no 24 inch monitors with less than 5ms response times.
I think the 2ms response on the latest 24inch Acer must have been a typo or something because the 22 inch version was 5ms and response doesn't get better with screen size.
The reason that the response time on the bigger monitors is because they are mostly either s-pva or mva. This means that the colour representation is true 8 bit per colour representation, which is the only useable monitor in photoediting and film making.
TN panels, like the Acer have a better response time but have terrible viewing angles and even worse colour representation in comparison. Its also worth mentioning that the response time that the Acer 24" monitor states is the grey-to-grey response time, which is vastly less than the Black to White response time, which is what your really should be looking at.
Personally, Ive got the Dell 2407WFP HC (a s-pva panel) and it is a great all round monitor. I watch plenty of films, play lots of games and edit all of my photos. I have never noticed any difference in gaming or watching films (in terms of response time) compared to previous TN panels I've had and the advantages of having incredible viewing angles and decent colour representation greatly outweigh any other possible dissadvantages.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BlissX @ Oct 11th 2007 5:22AM
What we need is Dell to refresh their 30" LCD with more inputs than a single lousy DVI-D input. WTF DELL.
It would be nice if it also adopts the aluminum look of the 27" design.
L.Rawlins @ Oct 11th 2007 6:09AM
The 2407-HC (High Contrast) already puts out 92% of the colour gamut.
http://accessories.euro.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=uk&l;=en&s;=dhs&cs;=ukdhs1&sku;=104716
Does this imply though that an eventual '2408' will finally see HDMI as a standard input over DVI?
E71 @ Oct 11th 2007 7:50AM
What's the response time of the 24 incher?
That's the key question these days, what with there being no 24 inch monitors with less than 5ms response times.
I think the 2ms response on the latest 24inch Acer must have been a typo or something because the 22 inch version was 5ms and response doesn't get better with screen size.
Joe Templeman @ Oct 11th 2007 10:37AM
The reason that the response time on the bigger monitors is because they are mostly either s-pva or mva. This means that the colour representation is true 8 bit per colour representation, which is the only useable monitor in photoediting and film making.
TN panels, like the Acer have a better response time but have terrible viewing angles and even worse colour representation in comparison. Its also worth mentioning that the response time that the Acer 24" monitor states is the grey-to-grey response time, which is vastly less than the Black to White response time, which is what your really should be looking at.
Personally, Ive got the Dell 2407WFP HC (a s-pva panel) and it is a great all round monitor. I watch plenty of films, play lots of games and edit all of my photos. I have never noticed any difference in gaming or watching films (in terms of response time) compared to previous TN panels I've had and the advantages of having incredible viewing angles and decent colour representation greatly outweigh any other possible dissadvantages.
George @ Oct 11th 2007 8:35AM
The old designs were better.
Rex @ Oct 11th 2007 8:53AM
A few weeks ago I bought a Samsung 22", have to see if I can get any money back for it. Any idea when this is expected stateside?
Jonathan Keim @ Oct 11th 2007 9:33AM
Waiting for a 27" update
EL_RIEL @ Oct 11th 2007 12:08PM
mmmhhh im in the market for a wide color gamut 24" LCD.
So this "low end" E series from Dell will make it to the USA?
Current 2407WFP-HC is about 600+ usd..
I guess i will have to wait another month to find out :(
mikey @ Oct 11th 2007 1:48PM
I bought a Dell 2407WFP HC a few months ago and I love it as well. It does great with photos, video ect.
RE @ Oct 11th 2007 5:52PM
I'm tempted to buy that monitor, but I'm wondering if I should wait for an LED backlit variant.
Unregistered @ Oct 11th 2007 10:51PM
I'm really keen on the Samsung 225MW because of its additional TV tuner. I can plug in my PS3 and switch between tv and computer. :)