Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period.
We're officially getting to the point where it's harder to find a computer manufacturer that doesn't sell a consumer oriented Linux PC than to find one that does.
The HP dx2250 has a base price of $AU600, which is about $490 US dollars. The systems come with OpenOffice, Firefox, and Evolution preinstalled, which is pretty much all you need to make a Linux desktop useful for most computer users.
Now if we could just get HP to offer the system in the US. Sure, you could go ahead and install Red Hat, Ubuntu, or your Linux distribution of choice on almost any HP computer you might pick up. But it's nice to buy a system that you know has been tested for driver compatibility first.
Red Hat released Fedora 7 today, a new version of their Linux operating system developed in partnership with the open source community and Red Hat engineers. This is Fedora's first release to merge the Fedora Core and Fedora Extras package repositories under one set of packaging policies. Another first for Fedora 7 is all the software used is released under a free license, and all decision-making is made in public.
The big innovations touted for this release are:
Revisor tool - a graphical appliation built on top of Fedora's other build tools that gives flexibility to build an ISO, a live CD, etc. Mike Spevack, Fedora's project leader, feels this is Fedora's crown jewel. Customized versions of Fedora are now possible to an extent that was not available previously.
Live CD - first time for Fedora, (however not an industry shake-up here).
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) technology has been integrated with the Fedora graphical virtualization manager tool. KVM provides a full virtualization solution, and users have a choice between KVM and Xen, along with Qemu, in this release.
You can pick up a copy of this new version at the Fedora Project. Thanks FF!
Symantec, usually no fan of Microsoft, recently released their 11th Internet Security Threat Report, in which they found, "Windows had the fewest number of patches and the shortest average patch development time of the five operating systems it monitored in the last six months of 2006."
It took Microsoft an average of 21 days to roll out a patches for 39 security holes in Windows (a more than 100% increase in vulnerabilities over the same period in 2006), beating #2 ranked Red Hat Linux which required an average of 58 days to fix 208 security issues. Of course, of those 208 holes in Red Hat, only 2 were high-severity and 76 were considered low-risk.
Apple, for it's part, needed an average of 66 days to fix 43 vulnerabilities. (I guess the Cupertino kids were busy working on that iPhone hotness).
As announced on Friday by David Eisenstein, the Fedora Legacy project is shutting down. As of his announcement (or maybe even earlier) Fedora Core 4 and earlier distributions are no longer being maintained or supported. He said that their current model of maintaining older distributions of Fedora Core are being examined, but right now everything is on (seemingly indefinite) hold. Jesse Keating later followed up and put it on record that the lack of contributors, and zero response to their call for help with the project, lead to the demise. I can't imagine anyone who would be absolutely dependent on Fedora Core 4, except maybe for older servers. If you're a dedicated Desktop Linux user, you're likely running Fedora Core 6, or another distribution like Ubuntu or SuSE.
The real question this leaves in my mind (an no doubtedly others) - is this just another case, in what has seemed like a recurring theme, of a concerted group of people being unable to provide support for Linux over the long term? Will Ubuntu LTS succeed where Fedora Legacy could not? With the rapid pace of Linux development, is long term support just a pipe dream, or a realistic goal?
Reader Sergio wrote in to tell us that, hot on the heels of last just in time for this week's Ubuntu Edgy release, the final release of Fedora Core 6 is now available. There's lots of new stuff in the latest release of the Red Hat-sponsored, community-driven Linux distribution including an improved installation system, support for Intel-based Macs, improved Xen virtualization support and a new GUI virtualization manager, the Yum update system in place of Up2date, and major performance improvements. As always, the best way to get your hands on Fedora Core is via BitTorrent.
The Linux Standards Base (LSB) has just launched their attempt at building an MSDN type developer site for Linux and open-source developers. The site is starting out with a bunch of content from O'Reilly and Pearson Technology Group to get started, but hopes developers will swoop in and take over in the forums and adding new content to the site. Several major companies on the Linux front lines have joined up including IBM, Intel, Red Hat, Novell, just to name a few. The site is produced and directed by The Free Standards Group (FSG) and is now in beta. Any Linux developers out there ever wish you had a version of the MSDN motherlode of programming knowledge (except for Linux and free) to help you out? This may be your ticket.
The answer is on Debian. The OS isn't happy with Mozilla's recent hardened stance on their trademark, and doesn't even want to use the Mozilla logos in their distributions. Debian plans to change the name of Firefox in their distros and think it will only take a week to complete. Mozilla doesn't want Firefox to be marketed inside Debian without the logo. It seems that the Debian folks don't like the idea of patches and updates going through Mozilla first. Red Hat and Novell are already doing it. So if you Linux buddies told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it? Well, Debian wouldn't, or so it looks right now. I'm taking bets on names, how about Fiber-fox, or Firbuntu? No? Fine, I give up. Any other clever names for what to actually call Firefox in its altered form from brilliant minds out there?
Wow, I am pretty blown away. Almost unanimously everyone said that Ubuntu is the best Linux distro for almost everything you would want to do. I am already a Ubuntu fan, and I thought there would be a huge list of distros because there are so many out there. Ubuntu is the distro I used at work to recover old PC data, and fix PCs when even windows was trashed. It is definitely a killer build and deserves all the recognition it gets. If anyone out there is wondering which Linux distro is good for your uses, this should be proof enough. Other distros that made the list, but were all soundly spanked by Ubuntu are:
Thanks to everyone for your comments and thoughts on your favorite Linux flavor. I will be awarding stars as soon as I can, but I believe that feature is down at the moment.
Social networking isn't exactly a sector I'd have expected Linux developer Red Hat to jump into (insert joke about geeks socializing here), but that's what they've done with Mugshot. Mugshot's stated purpose is "to create a live social experience around entertainment," and perhaps what's most notable about Mugshot is that it's open source, i.e. if you want you can download the source code to the Mugshot server and set up your own social networking site, and you can contribute code to the project as well. That's something you'll probably never see News Corp., Six Apart, or even AOL allow. Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow praises a demo of Mugshot he saw at the Red Hat Summit this week, saying, "it was pretty hot; they nicked the best stuff out of all the social networking sites and put them together in an open codebase."
Correction: Six Apart VP Anil Dash wrote in to remind us that LiveJournal, owned by Six Apart and one of the first social networking apps, is totally open source and has spawned many clones with millions of users, and that many of the web's most popular sites rely on its components (in particular memcached). Thanks, Anil!
This would appear to
be a match made in heaven. Red
Hat has announced it is buying JBoss. So what? Well considering JBoss is chock full of middleware apps in the open
source universe, and Red Hat makes server and desktop Linux flavors for businesses and homes, this would appear to
complete a circuit of sorts. In fact, Red Hat makes great pains in their press release to note how this will signal a
shift towards more "service-oriented architectures (SOA), by enabling the next generation of web-enabled
applications running on a low-cost, open source platform." Wait, what technology company in their right ming would
want to promote web services? Oh yeah, all of them. In fact, this is a terrific boon for Red Hat. And how much
is this costing them? Again, from the press release: "$350 million in initial consideration, plus approximately
$70 million subject to the achievement of certain future performance metrics." It'll be interesting to see what
develops out of this, because I can see a whole range of services provided by Red Hat as a result...
The
latest edition of Red Hat's community-supported Linux distribution is now available for download. If you're a Linux geek,
it doesn't get much better than this. Slashdot is linking to a video describing the improvements over Fedora
Core 4. What's one to do with Fedora Core Linux, you ask? Well, why not build a bicycle-powered telephone system? Or do
some wicked pagination? Or, perhaps coolest of all, build your own Tivo-killer!
BusinessWeek is running an article called A Watershed for Open Source,
which identifies 2005 as a big year—perhaps the biggest yet—for open source. The article says that 87% of
businesses are using now using open source software in some capacity, though for having polled "a dozen experts,
investors, early adopters, and entrepreneurs," their round-up of the biggest open source headlines of '05 is
surprisingly short. On the list? Red Hat's profits, Sun's open source moves, Motorola and mobile Linux, VCs banking on
open source, and, of course, Firefox.
Want Linux on that Dell, dude? Maybe you can get it, maybe you can't. In answering a question about whether the company would ship computers with Linux pre-installed, Dell CEO Chairman Michael Dell cited the fact that there are too many distros to choose from,and suggested that customers seeking Linux pick up one of the company's n-series boxes — which include FreeDOS and no other software — instead. However, Dell does ship some n-series computers with Linux, including the Precision series of workstations (pictured), which come with Red Hat Enterprise Linux pre-installed. In fairness to Dell (the man, not the company), he was probably referring to consumer PCs, and not workstations or servers, since his comments were made at an event to mark the launch of the company's latest high-end consumer boxes. And in that respect, he's right. You can't get a consumer-class Dell with Linux pre-installed — unless you want to move to France, where the company offers a laptop with Mandrivia Linux pre-installed. No problem picking a distro there, monsieur Mike.
As the annual LinuxWorld conference begins, The Wall Street Journal has a warning for open source developers: pay attention to the needs of corporate customers. According to the Journal article, some corporate customers, including Tommy Hilfiger, have switched to Windows from Linux and other open source tools, because of reliability concerns. The paper also reports that both Red Hat and Novell - which specialize in selling Linux installations and service plans to corporate customers - have experienced slower sales recently. Can Linux prove the sceptics wrong? The open-source model "is maturing and
it's working," David Patrick, a vice president at Novell, told the Journal .
"Enterprise customers are participating. People are really feeling very
comfortable with that as a model."