(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Left at war in wake of communist raid on Indian village | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20071207163601/http://www.guardian.co.uk:80/india/story/0,,2222693,00.html

Skip to main content

Go to:   
Guardian Unlimited
Search:
Guardian Unlimited Web
Guardian UnlimitedSpecial reports
Home UK Business Audio Guardian Weekly The Wrap News blog Talk Search
The Guardian World America Arts Special reports Podcasts News guide Help Quiz

India


  Search this site


Go to ...
Special report: India

India: archived articles




 In this section
Bar jobs open to Indian women

Left at war in wake of communist raid on Indian village

India's drivers feel the need for speed

India's supreme court throws out ban on female bartenders

Speed limits rise as India falls in love with the car

Leader: In praise of ... Shah Rukh Khan

Obituary: Eddie Askew

Bangladeshi writer goes into hiding

After the cyclone, Bangladesh begins to bury its dead

Hollywood takes action hero Jesus to India

Cyclone cuts trail of destruction through Bangladesh - 1,100 feared dead

Six die in fights with Bengali Communists

Kate Dineen tells Angela Neustatter about her quest for perfect colours

Conservationists hail Hilton drunk elephants appeal

Six killed as farmers and communists clash in West Bengal


Left at war in wake of communist raid on Indian village



ˇ Western authors' letter highlights risks of split
ˇ Signatories ignorant of facts, says historian

Graphic: map of West Bengal


Randeep Ramesh in New Delhi
Thursday December 6, 2007
The Guardian


Attempts by India's communist party to rebrand itself has sparked a war of words between leftwing intellectuals in India and those abroad after a violent attempt by the party to seize paddy fields in West Bengal to be turned over to big business.

When armed communist cadres raided the village of Nandigram last month, killing six people and raping several women, thinkers and writers from across India decried the violence as a "bloody capitulation to globalisation and imperialism". Houses were burnt and thousands fled to refugee camps.



But the party has received support from fellow travellers in the west, notably academic Noam Chomsky, historian Howard Zinn and writer Tariq Ali, who put their names to a letter in the Hindu newspaper highlighting the dangers of splitting the left at a time "when a world power has demolished one state (Iraq) and is now threatening another (Iran)".

This foreign intervention, which was reproduced in the mouthpiece of the Communist party of India (Marxist), has not been welcomed by critics in India.

Indian historians, artists and writers including Arundhati Roy wrote a letter warning that "history has shown us that internal dissent is invariably silenced by dominant forces claiming that a bigger enemy is at the gate. Iraq and Iran are not the only targets of that bigger enemy. The struggle against corporate globalisation is an intrinsic part of the struggle against US imperialism."

Sumit Sarkar, a leftwing historian, said the western authors had an "ignorance of what is happening in India. They have no idea of the on-the-ground facts."

West Bengal is the seat of the world's longest serving democratically elected communist government. But in recent years the CPI(M) has been busy rebranding itself.

It began its Chinese-style reforms five years ago, with the most controversial policy being the establishment of special economic zones that would cut red tape, slash taxes and relax labour laws for foreign companies who wanted to invest. It also snuffed out dissent with a ruthless campaign to silence critics of the new policies.

It had ordered the Nandigram paddy fields to be turned over to a special economic zone for an Indonesian-owned petrochemical complex.

For detractors the communists have begun to betray the very people - the poor - they were supposedly dedicated to helping. Led by Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, a silver-haired playwright with a penchant for Harold Pinter and the novels of Gabriel García Márquez, the communists say their actions were justified.

But Prof Sarkar said that many were now disillusioned with the policies of the government in Bengal.

"When they were first elected in the 1970s there was great enthusiasm for them. We saw land reform and a number of other good policies. But now we see farmland forcibly grabbed for capitalists and multinationals. It is a kind of fetish that Stalin used to have."

Independent observers say that the fight for the soul of the party has left the rest of the country bemused.

"Words like neoliberalism sound like pointless abuse to me," said Ramachandra Guha, a historian and writer. "I am not an economist but many intellectuals do not really understand economics. Yet in India they are happy to argue endlessly over it. The real issue is that the thinking left nurses a deep sense of betrayal over events in Nandigram."




Email
r.ramesh@guardian.co.uk

Archive search
More articles by Randeep Ramesh

Special reports
India
Pakistan
Kashmir

News guide
Indian news sources




Printable version | Send it to a friend | Clip





UP


Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007