|
|
Indiantelevision.com's
interview with NGC India managing director (South Asia) Zubin Jehanbux
Gandevia |
|
"The
History Channel has a strategy that even the NGC doesn't have"
|
|
|
Posted
on 20 December 2003 |
|
People
at NGC India, especially managing director for south Asia, Zubin
Jehanbux Gandevia, these days chant the history mantra more than
geography. And, why not? The History Channel has arrived in India
after 70 countries and its distributor, NGC India, wants to drum
up enough noise about the channel as the feeling is that the channel
is right for a
non-addressable environment that prevails in India at the moment.
The
History Channel is being positioned as India's only television channel
purely dedicated to history, bringing the power and passion of the
past to life. According to Gandevia, "It not only satisfies
the ever-growing demand for historical programming, but also stimulates
people’s curiosity to know
more about the world."
The
History Channel is owned by A&E Television Networks, a general
entertainment network reaching over 76 million subscribers. A&E
offers a unique blend of programming, including the highly acclaimed
Biography series, intriguing mysteries, original movie presentations
and engaging documentaries. In the 13 years that the Emmy Award–winning
Biography has been on television, it has profiled more than
700 people, from Sid Caesar to Julius Caesar, Oprah Winfrey to Irving
Berlin. Recent A&E Original Movies have included Jeff Daniels
as General George Washington in The Crossing and Oscar-winner
Timothy Hutton in The Golden Spiders.
With
Star India as the sales partner, The History Channel is looking
at carving a niche for itself, the same way as Discovery and NGC
have done so. The only difference being that it is targeting the
first goal in a shorter period of time compared to other such infotainment
channels.
In
this interview with indiantelevision.com, Gandevia; sitting
in the NGC office in Delhi that has congratulatory messages of all
types ('The world’s best dad’ and 'Congrats for completing
five years' are just a few amongst many); talks about the new channel,
the targets and part of the business
plan. Excerpts:
|
|
Give us an overview of The History Channel.
The History Channel, like any other product of its genre, is unique.
But what is good about it is that it does not just bring alive the
history, it entertains, while educating. It's a place where people
experience history personally and connect their own lives to the
great lives and events of the past. That, I'd say, is the biggest
connect with the viewers, apart from the fact that the channel does
not look at history in the strictly traditional sense.
As
part of an international award-winning network, The History Channel
has exclusive access to a vast library of the world's best historical
and factual programming offering a high standard of quality in both
production value and research - not just from every corner, but
every corner of the world.
The
channel, and its other siblings, is owned by A&E Television
Networks, a joint venture of the Hearst Corporation (37.5 per cent
is held by it; 37.5 per cent by ABC Inc. and 25 per cent by NBC).
The company is an award-winning, international media company offering
consumers a diverse communications environment ranging from television
programming, magazine publishing, Web sites, books and music CDs,
to home videos and support of nationwide educational initiatives.
The
History Channel, launched in 1995 reveals the power and passion
of history as inviting and is the only place "Where the Past
Comes Alive." The History Channel received the prestigious
Governor's Award from the Television Academy of Arts & Sciences
for the network's "Save Our History" campaign dedicated
to historic preservation.
|
|
"Mind
it, The History Channel is not a kiddy channel"
|
 |
|
|
Hype
apart, what do you think is the key to success?
It has a strategy that even the NGC doesn't have. The three
cornerstone for the channel are the product, brand and localisation.
Where
the product is concerned, the underlying theme is that people want
to watch historical events and personalities worldover and not just
from their own country. So, have a product that would have universal
appeal. There are some 2000 hours of programming in the library
and every year 400 to 500 hours of programming is added to it.
Where
the brand is concerned, the philosophy is to create a product with
global appeal that is fit for family viewing so that the elders
would not be embarrassed to watch along with the kids in the family.
But mind it, The History Channel is not a kiddy channel. So the
branding, to put in a nutshell, has to be fascinating, compelling,
premium, informative and entertaining.
Localisation
helps the channel to have a positioning that is custom-made for
every different market so that each country can have prime time
and premium programming during its own prime time, not depending
on the US or other countries' timing. That is why the much-acclaimed
Biography is run every day of the week at 10 pm IST and not
at some unearthly hour just because in some other country it's prime
time there. Localisation also helps in local packaging, using local
people and personalities. Moreover a local feed helps. Not even
the NGC started with a dedicated India feed, but The History Channel
has done so from the first day.
|
|
Can
you give an example of local packaging?
Well, if there is a programme on Arnold Schwarzenegger, then
we can have a famous action hero from Bollywood to host the programming
before the show goes on air. Things like this are being explored
and soon people would see local faces on The History Channel. But
these local faces would be more like guest anchors and presenters.
|
|
Would
we see more programming being sourced out India, then?
Sure. The idea of localisation of The History Channel is to
create more programming out of India not only for the domestic market,
but for the global audiences. That's something that we are looking
at during phase two, probably one year from now.
The
History Channel is committed to presenting a perspective of the
world through the eyes of Indians as the channel is managed and
programmed locally. This is to ensure a fresh and relevant on-air
presentation.
|
|
 |
"By
June 2007, 15 per cent of the global viewing, 10 per cent
of the global revenue & 10 per cent of global programming
should be sourced from India"
|
|
|
Which
area of programming do you think can originate from India?
I guess it would be in the Biography section because
India has some towering personalities who have had influences all
over the world (the only two persons from India who now feature
in the channel's list are Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa).
|
|
Do
you think that the channel would manage to keep away from controversy
in India, considering in India history is a sensitive topic and
everybody and anybody has an opinion?
Agreed that in India most people have
an opinion on almost everything. But then India is not so unique
after all. The trend has been witnessed worldover. However, since
A&E Networks dabbles only in history-related programming, it
has carved an expertise for doing so, managing to steer clear of
controversies wherever the channel is aired. We think, the channel
would keep clear of any controversy in India too.
|
|
What
are the targets that the channel and NGC has set for themselves?
To start off with we'd like to have 25 million viewers in a
year's time. Our target is that by June 2007, 15 per cent of the
global viewing, 10 per cent of the global revenue and 10 per cent
of global programming being sourced from India.
Distribution
may look easy, as we have begun with approximately 15 million homes
(that were getting Adventure One), adding another 10 million homes
means more work and more networking. We would soon be launching
a host of activity for the cable fraternity and we are optimistic
that the existing relationship with cable operators would help The
History Channel.
We
are also slated to spend Rs 250 million on all our business activities
relating to the channel over the next one year.
|
|
Why
phase out Adventure One? Is it a reflection of NGC's failure to
market and distribute it effectively?
We were looking at ways to make the entry of The History Channel
swift and replacing Adventure One with the historical fare seemed
like the best bet.
However,
we also feel that in a non-CAS environment or an environment where
addressability is still in its infancy, The History Channel has
a better prospect. Adventure One airs very niche programming that
would fit when CAS has been implemented or when DTH becomes more
popular. Still, one can watch Adventure One from midnight to 8 am
on the same frequency on which The History Channel is beamed.
|
|
But
DTH is already here. Has NGC decided that it would give its channels
only to the Star-backed DTH platform and not to one backed by Zee?
As a broadcaster, we are open to all options. But considering
the great relationship that we have with Star, we'd be comfortable
with what Star does in this regard.
|
|
|
Click
for archives |
|
|
|
|
|