(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
What Does the LA Dodgers Bankruptcy Say About America? | The Nation
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110702172754/http://www.thenation.com:80/blog/161740/what-does-la-dodgers-bankruptcy-say-about-america

What Does the LA Dodgers Bankruptcy Say About America? | The Nation

Blogs > The Notion

The Notion

What Does the LA Dodgers Bankruptcy Say About America?

  • Share
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 0
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A

Much has been written about the Los Angeles Dodgers declaration of bankruptcy. Much has been said about the business practices of Dodgers owner Frank McCourt and his battle against the efforts of Major League Baseball commissioner Bud Selig to forcibly seize the team. But what does an insolvent Dodgers franchise say about the state of America in the 21st century? Maybe it says nothing at all. Maybe it’s as simple as saying that Frank McCourt's greed and incompetence ran a civic institution into the ground. Yes, it’s true that McCourt used the team as a personal ATM to live a lifestyle that would shame Caligula.

About the Author

Dave Zirin
Named one of UTNE Reader’s “50 Visionaries Who Are Changing Our World,” Dave Zirin is the sports...

Also by The Author

Alternately hilarious and moving, here is the memoir for your beach blanket this summer.

Adrian Gonzalez will be at the 2011 All-Star Game in Arizona. That's good news for Major League Baseball and bad news for immigrant rights activists.

But that doesn’t explain the broader economic crisis in the sport. It doesn’t explain why the Texas Rangers in 2010, on the road to the World Series, had to be auctioned off at a bankruptcy sale. It doesn’t explain why the New York Mets, playing in the game’s biggest market, are flat broke after team owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz thought Bernie Madoff would make a fine personal investment banker.  It doesn’t explain why Selig, when he crows about baseball’s rosy financial picture, sounds like he’s living in the last days of disco. But more than anything else, it doesn’t explain how – of all teams – the Los Angeles Dodgers find themselves in this crucible of humiliation. The Dodgers are arguably the most culturally significant franchise in the history of American Sports. It’s the team of Jackie Robinson, Sandy Koufax, Fernando Valenzuela, and Hideo Nomo. That’s more than just a tradition. That’s a Ken Burns epic

From their days in Brooklyn, the Dodgers were the franchise of the immigrants, the strivers, the ones who thought the American Dream was there for those willing to scratch and bleed for it. They were able to maintain this persona even when they broke Brooklyn’s heart and absconded for the Left Coast. There, they entered the hearts and homes of the Chicanos, Dominicans, and Asians that make up Southern California. Going to Chavez Ravine in the 1970s and 1980s was like going to a diverse people’s assembly that would shame the United Nations. They have always been baseball as baseball wants to be known: a melting pot that speaks to our best angels. Unlike the Yankees who simply won with remorseless efficiency, the Dodgers were interested in building a more perfect union.

Precisely because this team has always lived at the heart of the national Zeitgest, their bankruptcy should be seen as a brutal microcosm of the leveraged capital and dashed dreams that define the new century. As Harold Meyerson wrote in the Washington Post, the Dodgers now represent “a particularly vicious form of capitalism that America has come to know too well the past few decades: a new owner takes over a venerable firm and extracts what he can for himself, decimating the company and damaging the community in the process.”  In as public a way as possible, they are now the public symbol of a reality we often turn to sports to escape.

American author Alison Lurie once wrote, “as one went to Europe to see the living past, so one must visit Southern California to observe the future.” That future is now the site of income inequality on par with the Ivory Coast, Jamaica and Malaysia. It’s a place of fake riches and real pain. Official unemployment sits at a doctored twelve percent with youth unemployment at thirty-five percent. All of these numbers should be taken about as seriously as a Goldman Sachs balance sheet.

In such an environment, the team that was always supposed to represent the spirit of immigrant America now has a shrinking, demoralized base of support. Attendance has plummeted. Tailgating is dismal. After a brutal beating in the stadium parking lot on Opening Day, security is now run by the LAPD. They shadow every corner of the landscape, making the Elysian Fields feel like occupied territory. Instead of Dodgers Stadium being the place where you take your kids on your day off, it’s the place you either avoid or hope to find a job.

Perhaps the most emblematic moment of this entire saga has been seeing the name of Vin Scully on the team’s list of creditors.The 83-year-old Scully has been the Dodgers announcer for 62 years. Starting in Brooklyn and making his way with the team across the country, he has brought the exploits of immortals like Roy Campanella, Don Drysdale, Orel Hershiser and now Andre Ethier to life. As Meyerson wrote, “I’ve long believed that kids who grew up listening to Scully got at least a 30-point bump on their verbal SAT.” Now Scully is just another person the Dodgers went to court so they wouldn’t have to pay. Now he’s just another senior citizen wondering how a California dream could become so scarred. What does the Dodgers bankruptcy say about America? Everything.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
  • Share
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 0
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A

If you like this article, consider making a donation.

Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.

Comments

[ Post Your Comment ]
Showing 16 comments of 16
Current Sort: last to first
1. posted by: cka2nd at 07/01/2011 @ 4:28pm

posted by: Michael Green at 06/29/2011 @ 2:39pm

Hey, in a country where some former NFL have become homeless and the former long-time President of NARAL - as she documented in The Nation - has been driven to the brink of poverty by our wonderful health care system, never say never.

2. posted by: cka2nd at 07/01/2011 @ 4:25pm

posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 06/30/2011 @ 1:25pm

Oh, bullshit Darin. As bookfraud noted below, the NFL does quite well financially with a union - not that the greedy owners seem to understand that - while the more "dog eat dog" capitalist MLB is suffering because it doesn't share enough revenue.

3. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 06/30/2011 @ 2:25pm

What Does the LA Dodgers Bankruptcy Say About America?

I'll tell you what it say. It says that every legal entity forced to deal with a unionized workforce is heading inevitably toward financial ruin.

4. posted by: rbourgeau at 06/30/2011 @ 11:39am

what does it say? it says this is what happens when the wealthy are allowed to run their investments with out any rules or regulations.
this is a world wide problem , wall street, banks, creditors, hedgefund managers, are all in control of the gov officals around the world and have removed all regulations and regulators to keep them in check. and, instead of a world wide depression there will be a world wide revolution and it will take place in this country as well.
these abusers must be put out of their misery. regulations must be placed on them. speculators and dirivatives must be removed, and owners of teams should have to place monies in reserve.
the rich have played too long and have created a world wide devistation

5. posted by: pregmatic at 06/29/2011 @ 7:03pm

7. posted by: luckyshow at 06/29/2011 @ 12:06pm Report abusive  |  Ignore This User 

"The team of the Bridegrooms, the Superbas, the Robins, these are all long gone. O'Malley changed all that. Brooklyn has only a minor league team now. Gil Hodges is the name of a bridge. "

Oh my god. Get over it, dude. They have been the Los Angeles Dodgers for longer than they were the Brooklyn Dodgers. Let it go.

6. posted by: pregmatic at 06/29/2011 @ 6:59pm

5. posted by: bookfraud at 06/29/2011 @ 12:28pm Report abusive  |  Ignore This User 

"2HAPPY -- Baseball revenues are largely determined by local television contracts, and thus big-market teams get boucoup bucks and build high-priced teams that actually good every year "

Big market teams like the Cubs and Dodgers, huh?
Good every year, huh? Seems like there is a little bit more than just having a lot of money.

7. posted by: Michael Green at 06/29/2011 @ 3:39pm

Look, Mr. Zirin, I agree with a lot. But you make it sound as though Vin Scully will wind up at a mission for shelter if he doesn't get this check. Let's not overdo it, ok? The Nation serves a great purpose and does some great reporting, but every now and then, even my favorite lefty magazine has the habit of reporting--not just editorializing on--what it WANTS to believe, not what is really happening.

8. posted by: pregmatic at 06/29/2011 @ 2:00pm

The answer to the question posed by Zirin is this:

It says that lawyers and divorces are costly, and the richer you are, the more costly.

9. posted by: dps2116 at 06/29/2011 @ 1:26pm

great piece! it must also be pointed out that the Dodgers in LA have consistently been a contradictory institution due to the theft of land and displacement of the people who lived in Chavez Ravine prior to the stadium. additionally to the notorious policing by the LAPD has been the hiring of the infamous former Boston-NYC-LA police chief Bratton whose pushing of broken windows policing has ravaged every poor and working class community he has targeted.

10. posted by: Beethoven1 at 06/29/2011 @ 1:00pm

And if you're going to insult someone named "Beethoven" by calling him "Wolfie," at least get your composers correct. Unless you think it's Wolfgang van Beethoven or Ludwig Amadeus Mozart.
____________________________________________________________________________________________

Thanks for defending me, but I did used to go by Wolfgang1 after Mozart and then switched to Beethoven. I've always liked both composers. Then again, from what I've seen from Happy's posts, he probably wouldn't know who Beethoven or Mozart was because that type of information won't make any money for him playing the stock market.

But, spot on with hammering the hamster...Happy2. KNow

11. posted by: bookfraud at 06/29/2011 @ 12:28pm

@2HAPPY -- Baseball revenues are largely determined by local television contracts, and thus big-market teams get boucoup bucks and build high-priced teams that actually good every year (see YES network, NESN). There is no salary cap in baseball, just a luxury tax that many owners are more than willing to fork over. Why do the Yankees contend all the time whereas the Pirates stink? The Yankees can afford over-the-hill shortstops $15+ million a year while the Pirates can't afford to pay bupkis.

And as far as the MLBPA is concerned, their great "crime" against capitalism was helping secure free agency for players in the 1970s -- you know, the ability to work where you want for the salary an employer is willing to pay you. I thought THAT was capitalism, not the reserve clause that made players beholden to one employer only.

If you're looking for socialism in sports, take a look at the NFL. They share network TV revenues equally and have a hard salary cap, with limited free agency. So owners are guaranteed a profit and players have limited options.

And if you're going to insult someone named "Beethoven" by calling him "Wolfie," at least get your composers correct. Unless you think it's Wolfgang van Beethoven or Ludwig Amadeus Mozart.

12. posted by: luckyshow at 06/29/2011 @ 12:06pm

I dispute one point here. This silliness about family and continuity, etc. They ripped the team out and moved it 3,000 miles away. The only fans they pleased were Hollywood celebrities and such, who also were ex-Brooklyn patriots. They moved purely for monetary reasons. Perhaps they were that way still with the players. But certainly not to their loyal fan base. Which is the basis for pro sports, I assume,

The team of the Bridegrooms, the Superbas, the Robins, these are all long gone. O'Malley changed all that. Brooklyn has only a minor league team now. Gil Hodges is the name of a bridge. Ebbets Field, unlike Fenway Park, unlike Wrigley Field, is no longer extant, flown from and demolished long ago.

Oh, and no unions were involved when these teams all carpet-bagged away. This has nothing to do with player's unions (the first of which occurred in 1890). Do you work under a reserve clause? And if you can be summarily fired, is that really right? Fair? Instead of always complaining that others have it better and wanting that stopped, perhaps if we all strived to also have such protections....oh forget it. There seems a particularly different strain of non-fan in LA. Even NFL teams have a tough sell there.

13. posted by: 2HAPPY at 06/29/2011 @ 12:03pm

Poor, Angry, Depressed and Unhinged Wolfie: "That is pure capitalism."

Uh, no, it isn't! In "pure capitalism", there would be no players unions, no $$ transfers from big-media-market-teams to small-market-teams, no umbrella TV contracts that give each team the same $$.....

Should "Ignorant" be added to Wolfie's already unwieldy name?

14. posted by: subtext at 06/29/2011 @ 11:52am

Sorry, 2Happy, but you're completely off-base, looking to pin the world's problems on unions, and you don't sound too happy at all.
Player salaries aren't exorbitant due to unions, but due to the greed and grandiosity of billionaire owners.
I'm seeing prices getting ratcheted up - hundreds of dollars for one seat in 'corporate' sections for regular season LA Clippers games for crying out loud.
So corporations are taking deductions for 'entertainment expense', greedy owners are setting the prices now at what corporations will pay, and our tax dollars are paying for the inflation.
This corporate cronyism is much more to blame for our current state than unions.

15. posted by: Beethoven1 at 06/29/2011 @ 11:47am

Article is dead on. Fans have this loyalty to their teams, but the team owners could give a rip less about your loyalty if they can make more money moving the franchise elsewhere. They'll even black mail the city to get the city to pay for a new ball park or stadium with threats to leave if the city doesn't do as they say.
If you think about it, businesses are exactly like a psychopath in that they have no feelings for anyone but their own wants.
Businessmen make callous decisions based strictly on profit margins and of course their own chances of getting that bonus and higher salary.

Then there are owners like this jerk who owns the Dodgers. They think nothing of destroying peoples' lives so that they can live like kings or gods.
That is pure capitalism. Ultimate greed is good to quote Milton Friedman. How folks can claim to be Christians and followers of Friedman at the same time are somewhat at odds. Greed is good? I don't recall Jesus saying that in the bible, but the neocon Jesus said it and the GOP slogan from the time of Reagan and since has been to follow the advice of the anointed Friedman.

16. posted by: 2HAPPY at 06/29/2011 @ 11:18am

What is happening in baseball, and eventually all big pro sports, is due to unions. Players' unions lead to equally bad biz practices from the owners.

It was fascinating to read in yesterday's WSJ that of the top 5 creditors to the Dodgers, 4 are current and ex-players. Doesn't this remind anyone of GM & Chrysler where the union pension funds were the big creditors which then, with Zero's help, simply took over most of the companies and wiped out the bondholders?

I haven't watched pro sports since the Rocket's back-to-back championships and when the Oilers became the Titans. The Astros are for sale......Pro Baseball is dying, deservedly so!

It's funny, at a time when I can actually afford to go to pro games often, I have no interest at all in stuffing the players' pockets!

Showing 16 comments of 16
Current Sort: last to first

Post Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment