(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Has Ken Clarke opened the door to 'alternatives' to Trident? – Telegraph Blogs
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20111021191903/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jameskirkup/100035959/has-ken-clarke-opened-the-door-to-alternatives-to-trident/

Friday 21 October 2011 | Blog Feed | All feeds

James Kirkup

James Kirkup is a Political Correspondent for the Daily Telegraph and telegraph.co.uk. Based at Westminster, he has been a lobby journalist since 2001. Before joining the Telegraph he was Political Editor of the Scotsman and covered European politics and economics for Bloomberg.

Has Ken Clarke opened the door to 'alternatives' to Trident?

Is it me, or has Ken Clarke has just come perilously close to breaching Conservative policy on Trident?

In a BBC News Channel interview, Mr Clarke, the shadow business secretary, said the Conservatives would retain the British nuclear deterrent. So far, so uncontroversial.

But he then opened the door to looking at cheaper alternatives to a direct replacement for the Trident system.

He said:

“We can look at alternatives. If we can find a less costly way of delivering it, that’s fine. I’m not convinced there is one.”

For the record, the Conservative manifesto states:

“We support the decision to renew Britain’s submarine-based nuclear deterrent, based on the Trident missile system.”

The Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, have said that they would keep a nuclear weapon, but ruled out a “like-for-like” Trident replacement. Instead, they say, Britain should, er, look at cheaper alternatives… Hmmm.

comments powered by Disqus