(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
The euro crisis: Solving the Greek puzzle | The Economist
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20120223042654/http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2012/02/euro-crisis
Charlemagne's notebook

European politics

The euro crisis

Solving the Greek puzzle

Feb 20th 2012, 17:20 by The Economist | Brussels

(Updates at end of this post)

AFTER weeks of angry words, tear gas and smoke, there is an air of agreement over the salvage of Greece. European finance ministers gathered in Brussels tonight sounding hopeful that an accord over a second Greek bail-out, worth €130 billion ($170 billion), was at hand.

“Today we have all the elements we need to reach a deal. It's like a puzzle. All the pieces are on the table; what's needed now is to put them together,” said François Baroin, the French finance minister. Even Germany’s Herr Nein, Wolfgang Schäuble, said he was confident of a deal, saying ministers were “aiming to finalise the decision on a new rescue package for Greece”.

Another symbolic bit of good news came from the European Central Bank (ECB), which announced today that it had made not made any purchases last week under its bond-buying programme. This is the first time the ECB has not resorted to this emergency measure since August, when it acted to stop Italy and Spain from being sucked down the drain.

So is the debt crisis finally on its way to resolution? Not so fast. The Dutch finance minister, Jan Kees de Jager, poured so much cold water on his colleagues' optimistic comments that the euro dropped immediately. On his way into the meeting, he said:

Greece wants the money and so far we haven’t given them anything. We have said no over the past weeks. We can afford to say to no until Greece has met all the demands. It’s up to Greece and the troika to say whether this has been done and for us it is a no until Greece has done so.

Tough talk. But it is hard to imagine the Dutch wrecking a deal on their own if the Germans have decided to grant the second bail-out. Does the Netherlands really want to provoke another round of the crisis now that its economy is in recession? Indeed, Dutch sources whisper that the minister's words have been overplayed.  More likely, Mr de Jager is living up to his reputation as the hard man of the Eurogroup, whose job is to stiffen Germany’s resolve.

The real issue for the finance ministers is to try to fit the ever-deteriorating Greek numbers within two self-imposed conditions. One is that the restructuring of Greece’s debt should reduce its burden down to “about 120% of GDP” by 2020. The other is that that the contribution of governments to the second package should be €130 billion (including some funds left over from the first €110 billion bail-out) after the "voluntary" losses being negotiated with Greece's private creditors*. Both are somewhat artificial figures. The debt ratio of 120% was chosen because it is the level of Italy's debt; the contribution of €130 billion was decided in October, so cannot be changed for fear of giving the impression that Greece is a "bottomless pit".

But as matters stand at the start of the meeting, the package would leave Greece with a debt burden of 129% of GDP – too high for many of the creditors. Tonight's homework for the ministers will be to fill the remaining fiscal hole: by convincing the ECB to forego profits on the bonds it bought at a discount (it has more or less agreed to do so) and perhaps by reducing the interest rate that Greece is charged by its creditors.

For lovers of numbers, the details of the options are reported in some detail in the FT (here), the Wall Street Journal (here) and Reuters (here).

But even if a deal is agreed tonight, big questions remain. How long will it be before Greece must come back for still more money? And if it must be kept permanently under threat of default, what is the chance of restoring the confidence needed to help Greece recover? For now, the ministers seem ready to play for time, in the hope that Italy and Spain can be stabilised. They will no doubt express confidence that the Greek problem has been settled once and for all. But sooner or later, they will be back for more crisis talks.

* insert

Update 22:00 - The word is that it's going to be a long night. The finance ministers are busy with another round of negotiations with Greece's private creditors to squeeze a bigger "voluntary" contribution, beyond the 70% loss negotiated so far.

Update 22:20 - The scale of uncertainty about the prospects for Greece are highlighted in the IMF's debt sustainability assessment, which concludes that, if Greece does not carry out structural reforms, its debt ratio could reach 160% of GDP in 2020. From Reuters:

... a scenario of particular concern involves internal devaluation through deeper recession (due to continued delays with structural reforms and with fiscal policy and privatisation implementation). This would result in a much higher debt trajectory, leaving debt as high as 160 percent of GDP in 2020. Given the risks, the Greek program may thus remain accident-prone, with questions about sustainability hanging over it

Update 02:30 - A more detailed account of the IMF's debt sustainability report is here, from the FT's Peter Spiegel. Diplomats claim the leak is having little impact on the negotiations. But it will have a big impact on the journalists' interpretation of the deal of the credibility off the deal - if and when it is reached.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

Gamotoxrima

And you keep talking about money and solutions. Gentlemen, I wonder when many of you will wake up from your dream, so full of charts and graphs and percentages, that all point has been lost for the sake of calculation and speculation about the (financial) future. Because when it comes to the actual future, well, it seems that thinking about it is now frowned upon by joyless technocrats and bankers. Although this is hardly surprising in the case of bankers et al. the saddest part is that this trend has influenced people who have nothing to gain. Since when all of you started caring about the bankers' pockets more than about your fellow citizens, or countrymen or anyone else? How have you been convinced to do that?

flymulla in reply to Gamotoxrima

What is all this hype about, “If you stop or increase the price of oil we, cut you off from trade” The U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Wednesday it had failed to secure an agreement with Iran during two days of talks over disputed atomic activities and that the Islamic Republic had rejected a request to visit a key military site. We have been noticing this for a long time. Iran has no nukes, proved several; times but we as human must see the moon and start the month like Muslims do. Iraq had none. WMD were never there however we need to show our power as we have been to the moon we are still are able to let you live our way. Barack Obama will address the annual convention of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on March 4, a day before he and visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold talks expected to focus on Iran, the White House announced Tuesday. Do you know how you borrow pay the interest keep on paying and the bank says, but that was interest the capital sum is compounding and is due in next 5 years and if you fail by that time, we take your houses, cars, wives(Muslims only) cats, basins where you shine your teeth and the lot . We will give these to the auctioneers. I thank you Firozali A. Mulla DBA

edwardong

The cumulative cost, as reported on Bloomberg, currently stands at EUR386bn. Greece has a population of 11.3m, so that's EUR34,159 per person. If each EU citizen looked at it this way and started to ask for a EUR34,159 handout from their government...

boontee

Greek puzzle!
Where will the $173 billion come from? To be printed?
How would debt-ridden Eurozone fork out this huge sum of money?
Using a new debt to cover up a deteriorating old debt is like using salt to cover up a worsening wound. Ludicrous! (vzc1943, btt1943)

publius50

Yes, when will Europe be able to convince people to buy an asset they can't hedge against with a CDS, while effectively putting them into a junior tranche behind the ECB and IMF. Europe to markets: "Hey, who wants to play a game where the other guy can change the rules anytime he feels like it?!" The ECB has decided not to profit off Greek debt - how nice of them not to demand a profit for their bad investments.

Quick question, if you were a banker and someone came in to your office, asked for a loan to pay off his bookie, and then proceeded to spit in your face and burn you in effigy after informing that no, he had no intention of showing up at work as he was on strike, what interest rate would you charge him?

hellokeith

Has anyone done in-depth research on the CDS piece of this puzzle? As private insurance contracts, they are not readily visible, but surely the quarterly financials of the big firms could yield some idea.
Of course, the creditors with both loans to Greece and CDS contracts as a hedge must predict the more profitable outcome. If they take voluntary cuts, then they are also essentially writing off the money spent on the CDS, unless the CDS contracts are for multiple years. 70% loan reduction + CDS write-off sounds like a very costly proposition, might be better to refuse and get the CDS payout. There is no guarantee that down the road Greece will not haircut the loans further.

chernyshevsky in reply to hellokeith

Credit default swaps have expiration dates. It's not really an asset in on itself. But obviously, if you have a CDS and you're confidence about the counterparty's ability to honor it, you're not going to accept the voluntary deal. The amount of outstanding CDS on Greek bonds is said to be quite small, around €3 billion. More of them will expire after March, if the bail-out proceed as planned.

Connect The Dots

Hold off on the Champagne.

This problem was nominally solved every other week for the last 6 months. It is not solved today.

It is a can kicked down the road.

After a rocket launch, it is a tin can circling the globe more than Sputnik.

mashed potatoes

"Does the Netherlands really want to provoke another round of the crisis now that its economy is in recession?"

That is the wrong question. The correct question is if the Netherlands believe that this bail-out is a good investment. An increasing amount of "experts" claims that it would be better for Europe and particularly Greece to return to the Drachma and to use the 130 bn to support Greece during the transition phase. It could be a win-win for every country.

publius50 in reply to chernyshevsky

It is a "loan". They aren't going to get it back either way.
If Europe was to loan money to Greece following an exit I had assumed that official creditors would issue it loans denominated in drachmas, I thought that was the whole point. If not, that would be, as you point out, a very very bad idea.

There's something absurd about the whole affair. The debate over how much Greece should cut / how much creditors will lose is pointless. They will all lose everything. After you scrapped every anti-competitive Greek regulation, after you cut the Greek state down to a minimum, and after the creditors, official and private, took a complete loss, Greece might just be in a position to recover / finance a loan for the recovery period. These fights are over assets that do not exist.

Of course it's a loan. Unfortunatelly, you will see that it turns out to be a gift very soon when Greece defaults in a few months. It would have been better to let Greece default now, to prepare all the logistics properly and to support Greece with a loan denominated in drachmas. But our politicians don't have the guts, they are intimidated by all the armageddon scenarios which the financial industry spreads in the media since they don't want to loose more.

chernyshevsky in reply to publius50

Why would a loan be denominated in a currency other than the one that the borrower received the money in? After exiting what Greece needs are euro. Without access to hard currency it can't import essential goods: oil, electricity, medical supply, food, etc. Heck, it probably won't even be able to print drachmas because the paper is made in Germany.

The notion that Greece's debt is unpayable is at best an exaggeration. Imagine the EU is willing to loan it money at 4%, a reasonable rate for both sides. Now 165% x 4% = 6.6%. That's about 17% of revenue. The country spends about 24% of revenue on personnel. If it reduces this to the level, say, Poland at 12%, then it's 2/3 of the way there. Greece is asked not to become Singapore, but to go from super corrupt and inefficient to somewhat corrupt and inefficient. But it isn't willing.

pinotpomeroy

For all the efforts of the troika and the Greek government, the real test will be whether the Greek people actualy change their way of operating. Doubtful.

rewt66 in reply to pinotpomeroy

If the Greeks don't change their way of operating, eventually the rest of Europe will change theirs (and stop subsidizing Greece). At that point, Greeks will have to change their way of operating, very abruptly and painfully.

About Charlemagne's notebook

In this blog, our Charlemagne columnist considers the ideas and events that shape Europe, while dealing with the quirks of life in the Euro-bubble. An archive of print columns can be found here. Follow Charlemagne on Twitter »

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
So long, for now
From Schumpeter - February 22nd, 22:55
Link exchange
From Free exchange - February 22nd, 21:48
Which Latin lessons?
From Free exchange - February 22nd, 21:00
The weekly papers
From Free exchange - February 22nd, 20:30
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.