(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Pre-screening: TSA expands pre-check programme | The Economist
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20120222042516/http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2012/02/pre-screening
Gulliver

Business travel

Pre-screening

TSA expands pre-check programme

Feb 20th 2012, 17:35 by N.B. | WASHINGTON, D.C.

AMERICA'S Transportation Security Administration is expanding its programme to pre-screen certain passengers and speed them through airport security a bit faster. The TSA has been working to make airports easier for certain pre-screened passengers for years now. But this latest expansion suggests that the programme could finally attain real scale and have an impact on the lives and commutes of a significant number of business travellers.

Over the course of 2012, the agency plans to extend its "Pre-Check" programme to 28 of America's busiest airports, including all three of Washington, DC's major airports, Dulles, BWI, and Reagan; New York City's LaGuardia and JFK airports; Philadelphia, San Francisco, and even Chicago's giant O'Hare.

Previously, the pre-check programme—which allows passengers to keep their shoes, belts and sweaters on and their bag of liquids and their laptop in their bag—was only available at seven US airports. The TSA says that 336,000 passengers "have already been screened through a TSA Pre✓™ lane," but that's not a particularly large number compared with the millions of passengers most large airports handle in the course of a year.

The airports that will be included by the end of this year handle a huge chunk of US domestic flights. Many more business travellers will have access to the pre-check programme, which can significantly speed up the security process. You do have to be an elite frequent flyer on Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines or US Airways, but I would wager that many American business travellers already are. (You could also be a member of the US government's "trusted traveller" programme, which has the added is bonus of speeding up border crossings.)

After Pre✓ (a trial for any typist) expands to Washington's airports, I will sign up, test it out and report back. In the meantime, FareCompare's Rick Seaney has a pretty positive review

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

alexsw1

Pre✓ is the way forward. I've used it twice now and it's like a little bit of civilisation has returned to air travel.

rostbeef

Dear US,
Easiest way for you to live without fear of terrorism?

STOP behaving in ways that make (so many of) the world's people hate you!

santanna

This is a “blame the victim” racket designed to extort more money from the traveling people into an Orwellian bureaucracy. If Al-Qaeda were still a threat, they would attack a TSA line: easy, cheap, severely disruptive and with no viable countermeasures.

Fortunately Al-Qaeda is no more, but the security apparatus must pretend it still exists so as to keep being paid to harass the public.

Fisher1949

For the past year TSA has insisted that everyone must be subjected to the same security procedures, whether a child, elderly grandmother or US Senator.

Now they are letting the privileged buy their way out of the program. TSA is saying that wealthy people are "more equal" than the rest of us. This smacks of racism and government extortion.

If you are “invited” you must pay a fee and give them your financial information even though TSA has lost the personal information of their employees and accidentally published their secret procedures. For this you MIGHT get expedited screening but could be selected for further screening anyway. What a bargain.

If someone can buy their way out of screening then this is all security theater that is gratuitously harassing passengers. Congress must demand that TSA adopt sensible and respectful procedures for everyone, not just the privileged.

Connect The Dots

Since 9/11 there is major trend in terror: Jihad.

The US State Department lists 120 groups as Terror sponsors, including antique non active groups like the IRA, Ulster Defense Group, Red Brigade, 17Nov, and the ANC. Most of these have been inactive for over a decade. However all the active and newest groups are militant Islam-- over 95%.

Scotland Yard divides Terror Organizations into Domestic and International. The International Groups number 45. All but three are Islamist.

The IRA renounced violence in the aftermath of 9/11. Basque separatist have severely curtailed their operations, occasionally setting off a firecracker in a parked car at an airport garage. They warn authorities since they don't want anyone hurt.

2% of the world population is schizophrenic. Only a small minority have a violent streak, but they do things like assassinations and shooting sprees that are NOT terror, much like the Belgian Algerian Drug dealer gunman, Nordine Amrani, who went on a rampage with grenades and shooting in Liege.

Famous schizoprhenic gunman include Mark Chapman( John Lennon), John Hinkley(President Reagan), and Tucson gunman Jared Lee Loughner( Rep. Gabriele Giffords) and Anders Behring Breivik(Norway rampage). These men are documented schizophrenics and are in custody in a mental asylum. You can visit them and play paddy-cake if you please--but they are CERTIFIABLY INSANE.

The mentally ill will always be with us. And are always statistical threats to themselves or others...but it is very low.

The difference between mentally ill killing sprees and Terrorism is the difference between a random murder and mafia killings.

Terror is using violence for political coercion. Trying to win converts. Overthrow a government. Establish a theocracy.

Terrorist perpetrators are no more 'mad' than the typical mafia conspirator. And they have an aim of Jihad to set the world on fire. Watch Ossama bin Ladin's video speeches.

The first rule of survival, is to realize an existential threat when you see it, whether you are a Muslim or not. No one wants to die a violent death and become pulverized into cat food chunks.

Ironically over 90% of Terror victims are Muslims. And Muslim Sectarian genocide in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Libya are ramping up Muslim deaths.

Not all Muslims are Terrorists.
But today, all Terrorists are Muslim.

The TSA automatically categorizes travelers as high risk needing additional screening from North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, Afghanistan, Algeria, Lebanon, Libya, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen.

Cuba and North Korea are included in the list but in reality are not risks since they do not allow their citizens to travel because of their risk of fleeing, not terrorism. Otherwise all these nations are Muslim or Arab or both.

Therefore simple common sense screening is racial profiling and targeting Muslims. It is the unsaid TSA Security policy endorsed by the Obama Administration. And in the absence of any hijacking or terror deaths since 9/11, it is remarkably effective.

If you were in charge of boarding 500 passengers with 1500 pieces of luggage in 45 minutes for an international flight and had only 10 agents, then you cannot inspect every cell phone or toothpaste tube. And you know there is a high probability of at least one bomber targeting this flight: You must to be selective and pragmatic. And realistic and effective. It is life and death.

But also the plane MUST leave on time. Passengers have to make connections. Equipment must get moving. Take off slots are small. But we cannot spend a year boarding a single flight.

Yes, we can ignore more than 95% of travelers and still be safe! Reality is what it is. Racial profiling for Risk Works. Everyone wants to fly safely and arrive intact. Even Muslims know this and they also do not want to become part of a victim list.

If your existential survival is on the line, demand effective and smart screening versus a 'fair and equal' search that preserves citizen rights. The first human right is that of not being killed violently.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/us/04webtsa.html?pagewanted=all

flymulla in reply to Connect The Dots

truce
1. A suspension of hostilities by mutual agreement; armistice; cease-fire.
2. A temporary respite from something unpleasant.
Respelling of trewes, plural of Middle English trewe (agreement, pledge), from Old English treow (belief, trust). Ultimately from the Indo-European root deru-/dreu- (to be firm), which is also the source of truth, trust, betroth, tree, endure, and druid. Earliest documented use: around 1330.USAGE: "The government has instigated a policy of peace talks and truces, although a number of rebel groups remain in conflict." Hundreds of India Separatists Lay Down Arms; BBC News (London, UK); Jan 24, 2012.A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. -John F. Kennedy, 35th US president (1917-1963)

T-Cat in reply to Connect The Dots

"Not all Muslims are Terrorists.
But today, all Terrorists are Muslim."

This is the most dangerous piece of propaganda I have ever seen. I work in risk assessment - for TERRORISM claims.

95% of the world's active terrorists ARE NOT MUSLIM.

Yes, thats right, I just said 95% OF THE WORLDS ACTIVE TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIM. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!!!!

About Gulliver

In this blog, our correspondents inform and entertain business travellers with news, views and reviews that help them make the most of life on the road. Sign up for our weekly "Gulliver's best" newsletter to have the blog's highlights delivered to your inbox »

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
An accelerating universe
From Babbage - February 21st, 23:36
Sharing the spoils
From Democracy in America - February 21st, 21:59
Bigger beast, thicker chains
From Free exchange - February 21st, 21:18
Touchy typing
From Babbage - February 21st, 19:51
Borrowing in Asia
From Graphic detail - February 21st, 19:32
An inspiring relationship
From Prospero - February 21st, 18:31
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.