(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Untitled Document
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20130114113456/http://www.cpluhna.nau.edu/Biota/beaver.htm

Search the CP-LUHNA Web pages

Biota of the Colorado Plateau

Biotic Communities

Alpine Tundra
Subalpine Conifer Forest
Quaking Aspen Forest
Mixed Conifer Forest
Ponderosa Pine Forest
Montane Chaparral/Scrub
Pinyon-Juniper Woodland
Mountain Grasslands
Semi-arid Grasslands
Mountain Wetlands
Riparian Areas
Paleocommunities
Elevational Range
Merriam's Life Zones

Changes in the Biota

Endangered Species
California Condor
Endangered Fish
Mammal populations
Megafaunal Extinction
Invasive/Exotic Species
Forest Composition
Species Range Expansion
Species Extirpations
Status and Trends of Plants
Succession
Riparian Degradation
Loss of Beaver
Wildfire History and Ecology
Ponderosa Fire Ecology
Tamarisk Invasion

Agents of Biotic Change

biotaEarly Fur-Trapping and the Fate of the Beaver

Adapted from: McNamee, Gregory. 1994. Gila: The Life and Death of an American River. Orion Books, New York.

At the time of European arrival in North America scientists estimate there may have been up to 400 million beaver living on the continent; by 1850 the number stood at only 9 million. Having eliminated the beaver from Europe by 1600, European explorers found in America a rich resource and within 250 years the pattern of extirpation had nearly been repeated. More than any other economic activity, the fur trade opened the West to American expansion. Trappers led the way for many settlers, and their names, including those of Bill Williams, Antoine Leroux, and Kit Carson, are engraved in the region's history

Beaver

Line drawing courtesy of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

The demise of the beaver brought about a major alteration of the Western landscape. The beaver is an integral part of riparian ecosystems, felling trees to create reservoirs where it builds its underwater lodges, thereby trapping alluvial sediments, providing opportunities for new plant growth, and increasing the diversity of wildlife habitats. Beaver dams help control seasonal flooding, a common occurrence on many Southwestern rivers and streams, thereby preventing erosion and downcutting of riparian channels. The reservoirs formed by dams also provide wetlands for migratory birds. Eventually these dams may be abandoned, and when they slowly break away and the pools dry up, great meadows of tall grass often grow up along the floodplain. These meadows sustain large populations of deer and elk, while the remnants of felled trees provide shelter for nesting birds and smaller animals.

The wholesale destruction of the beaver in the intermountain West disrupted these ecological relationships, and as a result erosion became a serious problem while the loss of habitat led to declining ungulate and bird populations. Removal of beavers or their dams, together with livestock grazing, has contributed to arroyo cutting and gullying of the landscape. As the channel cuts deeper and the gradient increases, the water table is lowered and surface sediments begin to dry out; gradually, the vegetation becomes composed of plants tolerant of drier conditions.


References and Resources:

Chadde, S. W. and Kay, C. E. 1991. Tall willow communities on Yellowstone’s northern range: a test of the "natural regulation" paradigm. Pp. 231-262 In: Keiter, R. B. and Boyce, M. S., editors. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Yale University Press, New Haven.

Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. and Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373-386.

Kay, C. E. 1994. The impact of native ungulates and beaver on riparian communities in the Intermountain West. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 1: 23-44.

Knopf, F. L. and Scott, M. L. 1990. Altered flows and created landscapes in the Platte River headwaters, 1840­1990. Pp. 47-70 In: Sweeney, J. M., editor. Management of dynamic ecosystems. North-central section, The Wildlife Sociey, West Lafayette, Ind.

Martinsen, G. D., Driebe, E. M. and Whitham, T. G. 1998. Indirect interactions mediated by changing plant chemistry: beaver browsing benefits beetles. Ecology 79: 192-200.

Masslich, William J.; Brotherson, Jack D.; Cates, Rex G. 1988. Relationships of aspen (Populus tremuloides) to foraging patterns of beaver (Castor canadensis) in the Strawberry Valley of central Utah. The Great Basin Naturalist. 48(2): 250-262.

McNamee, G. 1994. Gila: The Life and Death of an American River. Orion Books, New York.

Naiman, R. J., Johnson, C. A. and Kelley, J. C. 1988. Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience 38: 753-762.

Naiman, R. J., Pinay, G., Johnston, C. A. and Pastor, J. 1994. Beaver influences on the long-term biogeochemical characteristics of boreal forest drainage networks. Ecology 75: 905-921.

Stock, A. Dean. 1970. Notes on mammals of southwestern Utah. Journal of Mammalogy. 51(2): 429-433.

Stock, J. D. and Schlosser, I. J. 1991. Short-term effects of a catastrophic beaver dam collapse on a stream fish community. Environmental Biology of Fishes 31: 123-129

Zeveloff, Samuel I. 1988. Mammals of the Intermountain West. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press. 365 p.