(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Health campaign may hurt farmers
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20140518190415/http://www.newsinenglish.no/2014/05/02/health-campaign-could-hurt-farmers/

Health campaign may hurt farmers

Bookmark and Share

Philanthropist and doctor Gunhild Stordalen has teamed up with incoming Labour Party (Arbeiderpartiet, Ap) leader Jonas Gahr Støre and Rema 1000 supermarket boss Ole Robert Reitan as part of a global initiative to combat lifestyle diseases and food production that is damaging to the environment. One of Stordalen’s key messages is to eat less meat, a policy that goes against the interests of the farming and meat lobby in Norway that Støre and the Labour Party otherwise claim to support.

From left, leader of the Norwegian Medical Association Hege Gjessing, Eat founder Gunhild Stordalen, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan and incoming Labour Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre, in Geneva last month to discuss the Eat forum. PHOTO: twitter.com/G_stordalen

From left, leader of the Norwegian Medical Association Hege Gjessing, Eat founder Gunhild Stordalen, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan and incoming Labour Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre, in Geneva last month to discuss the Eat forum. PHOTO: twitter.com/G_stordalen

The initiative, known as “Eat,” was set up in collaboration with the Stockholm Resilience Center by the Stordalen Foundation, an organization run by Gunhild and her husband, hotelier and investor Petter Stordalen. Newspaper Dagens Næringsliv (DN) has reported  that Eat aims to unite international political, industrial and academic leaders to discuss ways to create a healthy and sustainable food industry. The organization’s first conference, the Eat Stockholm Food Forum, will be held at the end of the month in Sweden, with former US president and overeater-turned-vegan Bill Clinton as the keynote speaker.

Stordalen said the goal was to create a forum as globally important and influential as the World Economic Forum’s Davos conference, and that the idea had quickly gained traction. “What started as a little two-hour breakfast seminar has become a global initiative in almost a year,” she told DN. “There hasn’t been enough recognition of the relationship between food, health and sustainability. Eat is a triple helix, with food, health and sustainability, including climate challenges.”

“We’re gathering academia, industry and politics in one arena,” she continued. “The business community is extremely important to Eat, because we think that they must go from being a part of the problem to being a very important part of the solution. But in order for industry to get the right growth conditions to manage to come up with new solutions, we need long-sighted framework and the right political regulations. We saw the need to drive the three sectors together.”

WHO connections
Jonas Gahr Støre, who served as longtime foreign minister  and also health minister in the last Labour-led Norwegian government, was instrumental in building Eat’s global profile, providing important connections to the World Health Organization (WHO). In early April he and Stordalen traveled to Geneva to meet with the WHO’s head, Margaret Chan. “This quite special network with Gunhild Stordalen and many others has triggered an initiative that could not have been adopted by a ministry or public institution,” he said.

Støre is a member of Eat’s council, made up of 27 representatives from international university and research groups, the United Nations food program, World Economic Forum and medical journal The Lancet. The leader of the Norwegian Medical Association (Den norske legeforeningen), Hege Gjessing, and the director of the Stockholm Resilience Center, Johan Rockström, are also on board.

The incoming Labour leader said he thought long and hard before joining the Eat initiative. Støre said he was curious about what Stordalen could achieve. “She is a doctor with a PhD, and I know that she is a hard-working person,” he told DN. “Furthermore I saw that the Swedish professor Johan Rockström was on the member council. And when he had joined it, that was yet another reason to listen to what Gunhild had to say.”

Støre said such entrepreneurship was important in the field, because politicians were bound by criteria governing what they could participate in. “But if we think that we can solve these challenges just with political decisions here in Parliament and international gatherings, forget it! It sometimes brings us out on ice which can be thin, but we must try to take the steps. I’m thinking of what I call politics 2.0. You are needed to lift the policy up to a new level which is complicated because there are many actors, but it triggers energy. We don’t have time not to do this.”

Potential conflicts
Støre said he did not see any problems with him being involved in a project significantly financed by the Stordalens, because the budget had been open and transparent. “Where the ice is thin, I believe, is to be watchful over which sponsors the project can take,” he said. “Another thin ice is that Eat is not a decision-making body.” He said that’s why it was necessary to make contact with the WHO.

Støre faces another conflict closer to home. Stordalen told Norwegian Broadcasting (NRK) on Tuesday night that one of the best things consumers can do to help stop climate change is to eat less meat or go vegetarian, because of the meat industry’s significant contribution to carbon emissions. That’s a move that could hurt Norwegian farmers, and by supporting her message, Støre seems to contradict Labour’s work towards agricultural support and protection.

Supermarket contributions
Stordalen would not say how much she and her husband Petter had spent on Eat, or on the forum in Stockholm. Rema 1000 is one of the principal sponsors, but Ole Robert Reitan would not be drawn on how much the chain had contributed. “I don’t remember the total,” he said. “But it wasn’t difficult to join in on this. We fill the refrigerators of every fourth Norwegian, and we feel a clear responsibility to help contribute to healthy food and sustainable food production.”

He said the industrialization of food production over the last century had meant many more Norwegians could eat their fill, but at the same time the relentless pursuit of efficiency, volume growth and production growth had led to a loss of perspective, and created health problems.

“I am an actor who quite surely has been a part of the problem,” said Reitan. “Our ambition is to learn the most possible, therefore we’re on board with Eat and the World Economic Forum. We want to be at the place where skill and experience meet.” He said supermarkets could drive healthy eating by positioning the fruit and vegetable departments where customers first enter, increasing sales, and by cutting out environmentally damaging products like palm oil.

newsinenglish.no/Emily Woodgate

Bookmark and Share
  • frenk

    Nothing here about ‘actual healthy eating’…..with Norwegians mainly eating processed foods full of salt, sugar, preservatives etc?

    • Tom Just Olsen

      We drink half as much of alcohol as you Brits, which must explain why we are more healthy. : )

      • frenk

        Mmmmm….why then is 25% of your population on long term sickness benefits…..and you take more time of work ‘ill’ than anywhere else in the developed world?

      • hydro_2

        Do you have an accurate stat for alcohol consumption in Norway, Tom? I’m guessing most alcohol consumed in Norway is purchased in Sweden? Then there’s duty-free for travellers abroad. And let’s not ignore the lucrative home brew businesses. Norway’s mortality stats these days are no better than any other European country’s. And your understaffed hospitals don’t help matters at all.

        • Tom Just Olsen

          Norwegians ‘get’ alcohol from several sources. Sweden is one that is very easy to ‘count’. Most of the alcohol bought in Sweden is bought at the state run Systembolaget. Besides duty free, in Norway or abroad. Norwegian alcohol consumption even includes estimates of illegal (smuggled, moonshine production) alcohol. Alcohol consumption is something our auhorities like to measure. To defend the high taxation. Our total alcohol consumption includes all….
          What ‘mortality statistics’?
          Understaffed hospitals? Compared to the UK?
          Norway has a physician density of 3,7 per 1000 inhabitants. About the same as Sweden. UK: 2,7/1000. Norway has a child mortality rate of 2,4/1000. UK 4,4/1000…. Particularly the latter confirms that NHS is in deep trouble. What conserns Norwegian health specialists is our high maternal mortality: 7/1000. Far lower than Sweden at 4/1000. Distribution of the population (long distances to the maternity wards/hospitals, might be ‘some’ of the explanation. Then UK should do well with high population density. But not: Mortality deaths in the UK 12/1000… (Source: CIA Factbook).
          We complain a lot about our health care system here in Norway. But most are actually quite satisfied, when it comes to it. A demand which is impossible to meet is to offer the same service to those living in Stokmarknes or Gryllefjord as to those living in Oslo.

  • Abram Tamez

    ‘Healthy
    campaign may hurt farmers’?? Oh, you mean ANIMAL SLAUGHTERERS? Because i
    can only imagine real farmers would only benefit from people eating
    more fruits and vegetables. And if animal slaughterers have to HURT in
    order for the planet, the animals, and the people to survive and thrive,
    then bring on the pain! Raising animals for food is NOT sustainable by any means.

    • inquisitor

      Man is an omnivore and not a vegetarian.
      His very biology and physiology demonstrates this.

      Historically, animal and animal-derived foods have been a part of man’s omnivorous diet since his beginnings long prior to recorded history.
      All that we are now and all we have accomplished could never have taken place without the consumption of animals and animal products as food. The raw material necessary of the development of a large brain and complex nervous system came about from this omnivorous diet.
      I have to laugh with disdain and disgust at people who suggest otherwise.

      Vegetarianism is a derivation of the Hindu caste and religious culture that eventually spread to the west. It is an imposition on humanity to suggest that anyone has to be a vegetarian. It is not natural. It is derived from a religion, just as the whole sustainability movement is also a religion.
      The global warming zealots, who now call it climate change, were caught fudging their numbers and now science indicates warming is cyclic and we are in a down period. A lie.

      If it were not for international shipping, a huge imposition on sustainability, then Norwegian’s locally produced and ideal diet would be mainly animal-based as would any people living in cold climates with long winters. It is only natural that one living closer to the equator could subsist of more of a plant-based diet, and even then a completely vegetarian diet is not the ideal for maximum nutrition particularly for pregnant mothers and the young.
      Rickets would be widespread if Norwegians had to eat vegetarian because not vegetable source can give you what you need to prevent it. The population would begin to have weaker bones and smaller brains with each successive generation. Suggesting those in cold climates with long winters to be vegetarian is suggesting they commit slow suicide.
      The reason why non-lacto-ovo strict vegetarians in India don’t get deficiency disease is because their vegetables and grains are so loaded with insects, larvae and eggs, a concentrated source of nutrients, they get what they need by eating those animals.

      Stop screwing around with real food and ban the garbage the corporations sell in the store in a box.

      • richard albert

        One little quibble. Deficiency diseases are more widespread than is generally realised. Many exhibit themselves as apparently unrelated conditions and mortalities. Also, hours of sunlight per year are critically important. High latitudes are particularly at risk. And yes, processed foods are insidious and corrosive. While a vegetarian diet and good health are not mutually exclusive, such is an onerous and complex path which is certainly not for the unaware. For the US Mayo Clinic’s advice, see http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/vegetarian-diet/art-20046446?pg=2

  • Interrogative

    Rema 1000 promoting healthy eating…. Hilarious.
    They stock the same overpriced processed tosh like every other Norwegian ‘supermarket’. I have no doubt the sheeple of Norway will buy into it though.
    You really can’t make this up :-)

    • inquisitor

      Remove the candy, soda, alcohol, tobacco and pre-packaged refined garbage foods from the stores.
      In fact, save resources and stop the production of all non-nutrient dense foods entirely.

      Meat is food. Leave it alone.