These are the safest (and most dangerous) countries in the world

Earlier this year, the Institute for Economics and Peace released its GPI – Global Peace Index. Tiny spoiler alert: the United States ranked 94th.

Image via IEP.

The GPI measures the relative position of nations’ and regions’ peacefulness, taking into consideration statistical factors such as murder rates and military expenditure, but also including nuclear and heavy weapon capability and the level of perceived criminality. In total, there are 22 indicators, which you can see here. The Index has received endorsements as a political project from a number of major international figures and is generally regarded as acceptably accurate, for a topic that is bound to create polarizing opinions. The criticism that can be brought to it is that is doesn’t really take into consideration violence against women and children, but it’s pretty much the best thing you can use to gauge a country’s relative peacefulness.

The most peaceful countries

Perhaps not surprisingly, many of the most peaceful countries are from Northern Europe:

  • Iceland
  • Denmark
  • Austria
  • New Zealand
  • Finland
  • Switzerland
  • Canada
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • Czech Republic

The Czech Republic is perhaps the only surprising one on the list, with countries like New Zealand, Denmark, Switzerland and Finland commonly found on the “best of” lists of countries. Taking Iceland for example, they have almost no military spending, just 0.13% of their GDP, compared to UK (2.49%) or the US (4.35%). They also have extremely low levels of crime, and even political disagreements tend to be very peaceful. Fellow northern Europeans Sweden and Norway trailed a bit behind despite their perceived neutrality, mostly due to their higher crime levels and weapon export.

The least peaceful countries

At the other end of the spectrum, there are also few surprises (surprises are more in the middle of the pack, but more on that later). Here are the bottom 10:

  • Syria
  • Iraq
  • Afghanistan
  • South Sudan
  • Central African Republic
  • Somalia
  • Sudan
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Pakistan
  • North Korea

The unstable situation in the Middle East (read: War Zone) has obviously made a massive difference. In 2008, Syria ranked 88th out of a total of 162 countries, so about in the middle of things, but due to the civil war and the rise of ISIS, Syria is quite possibly the most dangerous country to be in at the moment. Iraq and Afghanistan have a lot in common with Syria, and the continuous Civil War going on in Sudan, despite not making news that often, is also devastating. The fact that nine countries are considered worse than North Korea is quite telling. The War on Terror is taking a massive toll. Ukraine was considered the 13th most dangerous country on Earth, ironically less dangerous than Russia (11th), the country that forced them into war.

peace2

The GPI also tries to quantify the effects that violence has:

“The economic impact of violence on the global economy was US$14.3 trillion in 2014, which represents 13.4 per cent of world GDP. This is equivalent to the combined economies of Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom.”

They report that the effects of worldwide violence and conflict have risen since 2008, which reflects a deterioration in global peace.

“Since 2008, the total economic impact of violence has increased by 15.3 per cent, from US$12.4 trillion to US$14.3 trillion PPP. Large increases in costs have occurred due to deaths from internal conflict, IDPs and refugee support, UN peacekeeping and GDP losses from conflict. This reflects the deterioration in global peace.”

The big guns

So, we know the most peaceful and least peaceful countries, but where are the big countries? Where’s the US and UK, where’s China? Well, the US ranks in at 94/162 – worse than Syria was 7 years ago. They rank just below Armenia, Guyana and Kazakhstan, and just above countries like Saudi Arabia, Haiti and Papua New Guinea. The United States is by far the biggest contributor to military expenditure, accounting for over US$1.3 trillion alone, while China is the second largest contributor with US$370 billion. Overall, China comes in at 124, and the UK at 39.

The conclusions are difficult to draw, but there are some worrying trends. It’s almost natural for some areas to be more violent than others, but things can chance extremely quickly. Syria went from being a moderately peaceful country to being the least peaceful on the planet in just a few years, and the overall trends are not encouraging.

 

 

Andrei’s background is in geophysics, and he published his first scientific paper when he was still an undergrad; now, his main focus is on how geology and geophysics can be applied to understand and protect the environment. Feeling that there is a gap between scientists and the general audience, he started ZME Science – and the results are what you see today.

Every day we learn something new about the Universe. Wanna join?

  • Progressive Republican

    It would be interesting to know how much of the economic damage is a direct result of U.S. foreign policy.

  • Alex Hradek

    Rubbish. 1. There is no reason why military spending should have a detrimental effect on an arbitrary “peace index” rating. 2. Paris, France. Yeah, somebody is dead wrong.