The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls.
At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer.
View the web archive through the Wayback Machine.
- Top ranked pages (up to a max of 100) from every linked-to domain using the Wide00012 inter-domain navigational link graph
-- a ranking of all URLs that have more than one incoming inter-domain link (rank was determined by number of incoming links using Wide00012 inter domain links)
-- up to a maximum of 100 most highly ranked URLs per domain
The seed list contains a total of 431,055,452 URLs The seed list was further filtered to exclude known porn, and link farm, domains The modified seed list contains a total of 428M URLs
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20160323202325/http://minoan.deaditerranean.com/resources/linear-b-ideograms/sus/
I’ve been doing some data analysis related to the sign groups and adjuncts that most frequently appear in conjunction with SUS on the Knossos tablets. Here’s what most frequently appears in the context of SUS at Knossos (I’ve excluded single instance appearances; and please ignore the case sensitivity, it’s just an issue with my current set of data):
[“OVISf”, 6],
[“OVISm”, 6],
=> 12 instances
[“CAPf”, 6],
[“CAPm”, 5],
=> 11 instances
[“BOSf”, 4],
[“BOSm”, 3],
=> 7 instances
[“A-KO-RA-JA”, 3],
[“TO-SA”, 2],
[“DU-MA”, 2], // appears exclusively in a SUS context at Knossos
to do:
break it down further into SUS, SUSf and SUSm
case insensitivity
run Pylos and compare once PY data entry is complete
de-duplicate entries from single inscriptions with multiple sources
is there a distance analysis that can modify weights based on close to or far from the ideogram a sign group is?
Sow (female pig), SUSf
Boar (male pig), SUSm
Pig, SUS; also /au/ phonetic value when not used as an ideogram
KNOSSOS …
I’ve been doing some data analysis related to the sign groups and adjuncts that most frequently appear in conjunction with SUS on the Knossos tablets. Here’s what most frequently appears in the context of SUS at Knossos (I’ve excluded single instance appearances; and please ignore the case sensitivity, it’s just an issue with my current set of data):
[“OVISf”, 6],
[“OVISm”, 6],
=> 12 instances
[“CAPf”, 6],
[“CAPm”, 5],
=> 11 instances
[“BOSf”, 4],
[“BOSm”, 3],
=> 7 instances
[“A-KO-RA-JA”, 3],
[“TO-SA”, 2],
[“DU-MA”, 2], // appears exclusively in a SUS context at Knossos
to do:
break it down further into SUS, SUSf and SUSm
case insensitivity
run Pylos and compare once PY data entry is complete
de-duplicate entries from single inscriptions with multiple sources
is there a distance analysis that can modify weights based on close to or far from the ideogram a sign group is?