(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Peer Review | Brill

COLLECTED BY

Organization: Archive Team

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.

The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.

This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.

Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.

The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Collection: Archive Team: The PDF Print-Out

A collection of various PDF files gathered from around the world to be captured inside the Wayback machine.

TIMESTAMPS

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20160411164801/http://www.brill.com/resources/authors/publishing-books-brill/peer-review

Peer Review

Download the complete Author Guide

Peer review is usually conducted on a double blind basis, meaning that neither you nor the reviewer know the other’s identity. (It will therefore not be possible to contact the reviewer directly should you have any questions with regard to the review. Please send these questions to Brill, and we will then forward them.) Depending on the book series and the type of manuscript (commissioned or unsolicited), one or two reviews will be required. These reviews may be conducted either by a member of the editorial board of a series or by an external reviewer.

It generally takes 6 to 8 weeks for a review to come in. Once the review is in, it will first be sent to the series editors. Together, the series editors and Brill will decide on the recommendations that they will send to you. This may either result in:

A request for you to revise and resubmit the manuscript for a second reviewed assessment;
A final decision on acceptation or rejection of the manuscript for publication.

The series editors and Brill will decide on the revisions that are needed before the manuscript can go into production. Should you accept these comments and agree to work on revising your manuscript, we can then proceed towards the final version of the manuscript and publication.