- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Other Sellers on Amazon
$17.95
+ Free Shipping
+ Free Shipping
Sold by:
Caladonian Rose Books
$19.46
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
tabletopart
$20.05
+ $3.98 shipping
+ $3.98 shipping
Sold by:
Griffin Books CT
Have one to sell?
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Authors
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe Paperback – December 10, 2003
by
Peter D. Ward
(Author),
Donald Brownlee
(Author)
Peter D. Ward
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Donald Brownlee
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
-
Print length372 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherCopernicus
-
Publication dateDecember 10, 2003
-
Dimensions6.1 x 0.83 x 9.25 inches
-
ISBN-100387952896
-
ISBN-13978-0387952895
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- The View from the Center of the Universe: Discovering Our Extraordinary Place in the CosmosJoel R. PrimackHardcover
- Conceptual Integrated Science (2nd Edition)Paperback
- A New History of Life: The Radical New Discoveries about the Origins and Evolution of Life on EarthPeter WardHardcover
- The Life and Death of Planet Earth: How the New Science of Astrobiology Charts the Ultimate Fate of Our WorldPeter D. WardHardcover
- If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life (Science and Fiction)Paperback
- The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for DiscoveryPaperback
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- The View From the Center of the Universe: Discovering Our Extraordinary Place in the CosmosJoel R. PrimackPaperback
- Conceptual Integrated Science (2nd Edition)Paperback
- If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life (Science and Fiction)Paperback
- A New History of Life: The Radical New Discoveries about the Origins and Evolution of Life on EarthPeter WardPaperback
- The Life and Death of Planet Earth: How the New Science of Astrobiology Charts the Ultimate Fate of Our WorldPeter WardPaperback
- Astrobiology: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)David C. CatlingPaperback
Special offers and product promotions
Editorial Reviews
Review
"...likely to cause a revolution in thinking..."
The New York Times
"...[the book] has hit the world of astrobiologists like a killer asteroid..."
Newsday (New York)
"...a sobering and valuable perspective..."
Science
"...a startling new hypothesis..."
Library Journal
"...Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee offer a powerful argument..."
The Economist
"...provocative, significant, and sweeping..."
Northwest Science & Technology
"...a stellar example of clear writing..."
American Scientist
About the Author
Peter D. Ward is Professor of Geological Sciences and Curator of Paleontology at the University of Washington in Seattle.
Product details
- Publisher : Copernicus; 12/17/03 edition (December 10, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 372 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0387952896
- ISBN-13 : 978-0387952895
- Item Weight : 2.51 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.1 x 0.83 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#108,539 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #233 in Astronomy (Books)
- #254 in Astrophysics & Space Science (Books)
- #697 in Evolution (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Fearless and inspiring
Discover Black voices on Audible. Learn more
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
285 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on December 8, 2015
Verified Purchase
I learned about this book watching the History Channel’s multi-part documentary about the creation of the Earth and the amazing journey it has been on ever since. The book covers the same story but in greater detail, with particular emphasis on the origin of life and the equally amazing journey it has been on, from basic microbial life to complex animal life to highly intelligent life capable of conscious thought—to homo sapiens, us. Are we really the stuff of stars, as Carl Sagan said? How do the most elementary particles—forged in the Big Bang—evolve over time to produce brain cells capable of rational thought, indeed, able to reflect on the creation of the universe? This question goes unaddressed in “Rare Earth” and is the 600-pound gorilla in the room. I don’t blame the authors. It’s a question with vast implications and well beyond the book's scope. Still, I couldn’t help thinking about it.
The premise of “Rare Earth” is that microbial life is common throughout the universe while animal life is rare. How can this be? Because microbial life—life in its most basic form—is extremely hardy. It can withstand extreme temperatures (from below freezing to above the boiling point of water) incredibly high pressure, does not require oxygen, and in some cases does not require sunlight. The authors believe that microbial life may not have originated on earth, but been transferred here by comets or possibly by asteroids that originated on a neighboring planet, probably Mars. Animal life, on the other hand, is extremely fragile. It can only survive in an atmosphere of plentiful oxygen, lots of water, minimal planet disruptions, and Goldilocks’ temperatures—neither too hot nor too cold. Microbial life arrived not long after earth’s formation and early on survived countless planet disruptions that would have destroyed all forms of animal life.
During the 600 million years it took to develop animal life, earth enjoyed a charmed existence. It was neither too close nor too far from a large stable sun, had a circular rather than elliptical orbit, was protected from astroids and comets by outer gas giants (notably Jupiter), and likewise protected from ultra-violate rays by a strong magnetic field, thanks to Earth’s largely iron core. During this time the oceans and the atmosphere were transformed by the introduction of oxygen. At the same time continents formed made of durable and relatively lightweight granite, which more or less floated on heavier molten rock. The floating continents, coupled with a few active volcanoes, helped regulate Earth’s temperatures and insured that the planet surface was continually being recycled. Add a generously large moon to regulate the tides, with the earth tilted on its axis just so to create seasons and further regulate temperatures, and the earth became a veritable garden of eden.
Still, all was not perfect. Over time, there were a few well-placed catastrophic events that destroyed all but the smallest and most adaptable forms of life. The most recent was a large asteroid or comet that struck earth 65 million years ago that put an end to the age of dinosaurs. A good thing, too, because with dinosaurs around mammals didn’t stand a chance of evolving into larger creatures, such as goats, pigs, oxen, horses, elephants, monkeys and apes and, as late as 50 thousand years ago, homo sapiens. These catastrophic events, while rare, served as a reset button—an occasional re-shuffling of the order of life on earth—without which the appearance of thinking homo sapiens would not have been possible. There are many more dimensions to earth’s charmed existence, including its location on the outer edge of the Milky Way galaxy, far from gamma ray explosions, with but a few non-threatening stars in the immediate galactic neighborhood, the presence of the right amount of carbon (neither too much nor too little), an iron rich planet composition, neither too much nor too little water, and eons of relatively uninterrupted time for life to emerge from the primordial ooze, develop into animal life and, with a few hiccups, produce life capable of rational thought.
All of these things must happen in order for a planet to produce complex life—an amazing string of events threatened at every turn, yet somehow defying the odds to not merely survive but thrive. Indeed, what are the odds? Thirty years ago, Carl Sagan said there were as many as a million planets in our galaxy capable of producing life. We have learned a great deal since then, including our first observations of distant solar system and planets, none of which act much like our own. The authors conclude it's probable that microbial life is common throughout the universe while a stable and long-lasting environment necessary for the evolution of animal life may not be—hence the rarified and charmed existence of earth. Are we alone? While the odds have been significantly reduced since Sagan made his prediction, the jury is still out.
About the book: it’s well organized, well-written and not at all hard to understand, if you don’t rush. To get the most out if it, careful reading is recommended. I spent about two hours a day for a week or so reading the book, learned a great deal, and enjoyed the experience. Five stars.
The premise of “Rare Earth” is that microbial life is common throughout the universe while animal life is rare. How can this be? Because microbial life—life in its most basic form—is extremely hardy. It can withstand extreme temperatures (from below freezing to above the boiling point of water) incredibly high pressure, does not require oxygen, and in some cases does not require sunlight. The authors believe that microbial life may not have originated on earth, but been transferred here by comets or possibly by asteroids that originated on a neighboring planet, probably Mars. Animal life, on the other hand, is extremely fragile. It can only survive in an atmosphere of plentiful oxygen, lots of water, minimal planet disruptions, and Goldilocks’ temperatures—neither too hot nor too cold. Microbial life arrived not long after earth’s formation and early on survived countless planet disruptions that would have destroyed all forms of animal life.
During the 600 million years it took to develop animal life, earth enjoyed a charmed existence. It was neither too close nor too far from a large stable sun, had a circular rather than elliptical orbit, was protected from astroids and comets by outer gas giants (notably Jupiter), and likewise protected from ultra-violate rays by a strong magnetic field, thanks to Earth’s largely iron core. During this time the oceans and the atmosphere were transformed by the introduction of oxygen. At the same time continents formed made of durable and relatively lightweight granite, which more or less floated on heavier molten rock. The floating continents, coupled with a few active volcanoes, helped regulate Earth’s temperatures and insured that the planet surface was continually being recycled. Add a generously large moon to regulate the tides, with the earth tilted on its axis just so to create seasons and further regulate temperatures, and the earth became a veritable garden of eden.
Still, all was not perfect. Over time, there were a few well-placed catastrophic events that destroyed all but the smallest and most adaptable forms of life. The most recent was a large asteroid or comet that struck earth 65 million years ago that put an end to the age of dinosaurs. A good thing, too, because with dinosaurs around mammals didn’t stand a chance of evolving into larger creatures, such as goats, pigs, oxen, horses, elephants, monkeys and apes and, as late as 50 thousand years ago, homo sapiens. These catastrophic events, while rare, served as a reset button—an occasional re-shuffling of the order of life on earth—without which the appearance of thinking homo sapiens would not have been possible. There are many more dimensions to earth’s charmed existence, including its location on the outer edge of the Milky Way galaxy, far from gamma ray explosions, with but a few non-threatening stars in the immediate galactic neighborhood, the presence of the right amount of carbon (neither too much nor too little), an iron rich planet composition, neither too much nor too little water, and eons of relatively uninterrupted time for life to emerge from the primordial ooze, develop into animal life and, with a few hiccups, produce life capable of rational thought.
All of these things must happen in order for a planet to produce complex life—an amazing string of events threatened at every turn, yet somehow defying the odds to not merely survive but thrive. Indeed, what are the odds? Thirty years ago, Carl Sagan said there were as many as a million planets in our galaxy capable of producing life. We have learned a great deal since then, including our first observations of distant solar system and planets, none of which act much like our own. The authors conclude it's probable that microbial life is common throughout the universe while a stable and long-lasting environment necessary for the evolution of animal life may not be—hence the rarified and charmed existence of earth. Are we alone? While the odds have been significantly reduced since Sagan made his prediction, the jury is still out.
About the book: it’s well organized, well-written and not at all hard to understand, if you don’t rush. To get the most out if it, careful reading is recommended. I spent about two hours a day for a week or so reading the book, learned a great deal, and enjoyed the experience. Five stars.
33 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2020
Verified Purchase
During the middle-ages, under the Ptolemaic system, it was widely believed that the stars and planets revolved around our flat-earth and we humans were the crowning glory of creation. That notion began to unravel when in 1514 Nicolaus Copernicus proposed the heliocentric model in which the planets move around the sun in perfect circle, later revised by Johannes Kepler who showed that the planets’ orbits trace out ellipses around the sun. These revelations were just the beginning of the Copernican Principle of mediocrity that has flourished ever since, portending that we live on an average planet, rotating around an average star, in an average galaxy, one among billions of such galaxies in the vast universe. But are these assumptions true? Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee weave a convincing argument that this is not the case.
Ward and Brownlee maintain that our good fortune of being on this particular rare planet, in a location in the habitable zone of our solar system often referred to at the Goldie Locks Zone where temperatures are not too hot and not too cold, as well as our favorable position in our galaxy, provide the unique and necessary condition to evolve complex life.
They believe that microbial life could be ubiquitous throughout the universe because simple organisms can exist in very harsh environments; however, the evolution of larger, more fragile, complex life requires very special conditions that persist for billions of years. These special conditions do not seem to be common in other parts of the universe.
We often hear that we are an average planet orbiting an average star, but this is not factual. Approximately 95% of all stars are less massive than our sun, and their habitable zones are closer to their stars, which is not at all favorable for life, because as planets get closer to their suns, the gravitation tidal effects induce synchronous rotation in which one side of the planet always faces the star it orbits. Planets that are tidally locked to their stars create a situation where the dark side of the planet gets so cold that it freezes the atmosphere, while the side facing its star gets extremely hot, making these planets uninhabitable for complex life.
Stars that are more massive than our sun have a more distant habitable zone than we see in our solar system, but it is doubtful that planets in such a zone could support complex life because stars that are 50% more massive than our sun enter the red-giant stage, increasing their brightness a thousand-fold after only 2 billion years. Additionally, massive stars are hotter and radiate substantially more ultraviolet light. Ultraviolet light is very detrimental to biological molecules and can strip away an earth-like atmosphere.
Only 6% of all galaxies in the universe are spiral galaxies like ours, so we are once again very fortunate because other galaxies are unlikely to have solar systems that could support life.
Elliptical galaxies are regions with little dust and exhibit little new star formation. They are nearly as old as the universe itself and have a low abundance of heavy elements because all of the elements required for life such as carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, sodium, iron, and copper are created in stars. These elements were not created in the Big Bang and were not in abundance for at least 2 billion years after the birth of the universe.
Other regions of the universe with a high volume of stars, such as open star clusters and globular star clusters, are also unlikely to harbor planets with life, according to the authors. Open clusters are too young and have not yet produced heavy elements. Globular clusters are too dense with stars in a given amount of space, have too much radiation and gravitational disturbance to form a stable solar system, are low in heavier elements required for life, and have a high probability of a neighboring star going supernova sterilizing any planet within one light year and making conditions for life untenable in stars within 30 light years.
Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee, make a good case for the rarity of complex life in the universe, and in the process have narrowed the scope of the search for planets that have some probability of harboring complex life.
We should first look for spiral galaxies similar to our Milky Way Galaxy belonging to a very small class of about six galaxies out of every hundred in the universe. As we saw, other types of galaxies are probably not conducive to life. Next, we should search the band of stars in a region about 15,000 to 30,000 light years from the galaxy’s center, the habitable zone of the galaxy, and then find stars in that band that are similar to our sun. Out of every one hundred candidates, we should find about five. From those stars we should try to find planets in the habitable zone of each of those stars. Since the star’s mass will be similar to our sun, the habitable zone should be about the same distance from the star as our planet is from the sun. Next, we should do a spectral analysis of the planet’s atmosphere. We would not be able to look directly for Nitrogen and Oxygen because they do not produce detectable absorption bands, but the detection of ozone, which has a strong detectable wavelength absorption band, would indicate the presence of oxygen.
This book was sobering for those of us who believe that we are, or have been visited by extraterrestrials. The information contained within does not rule out the possibility that intelligent life exists in other regions of the universe; it only restricts the places where it could exist; that is, if it is even possible to predict such a thing. Physicist Paul Davies once said that at some point in the future we might have enough knowledge of the universe to predict fairly accurately the number of habitable planets in the universe, but until we know what life is, we can make no predictions as to how many planets are actually inhabited. We still don’t know how life arose on this planet.
In addition, though most of the authors assumptions might be considered to be irrefutable, some of their assumptions have recently been challenged by other researchers. Still, they have made a good case for the rarity of complex life in the universe. But rare does not mean nonexistent. Even if we limit our search for stars in the habitable zone of our own galaxy between 15,000 and 35,000 light years from its center, and in that region, limit our search to the 5% of stars that are similar to our sun, in a galaxy 200,000 light years in diameter, made up of 200 billion stars and at least as many planets, roughly estimated, that still leaves us with 1.5 billion stars and about an equal number of planets that could support complex life in our galaxy alone.
Ward and Brownlee maintain that our good fortune of being on this particular rare planet, in a location in the habitable zone of our solar system often referred to at the Goldie Locks Zone where temperatures are not too hot and not too cold, as well as our favorable position in our galaxy, provide the unique and necessary condition to evolve complex life.
They believe that microbial life could be ubiquitous throughout the universe because simple organisms can exist in very harsh environments; however, the evolution of larger, more fragile, complex life requires very special conditions that persist for billions of years. These special conditions do not seem to be common in other parts of the universe.
We often hear that we are an average planet orbiting an average star, but this is not factual. Approximately 95% of all stars are less massive than our sun, and their habitable zones are closer to their stars, which is not at all favorable for life, because as planets get closer to their suns, the gravitation tidal effects induce synchronous rotation in which one side of the planet always faces the star it orbits. Planets that are tidally locked to their stars create a situation where the dark side of the planet gets so cold that it freezes the atmosphere, while the side facing its star gets extremely hot, making these planets uninhabitable for complex life.
Stars that are more massive than our sun have a more distant habitable zone than we see in our solar system, but it is doubtful that planets in such a zone could support complex life because stars that are 50% more massive than our sun enter the red-giant stage, increasing their brightness a thousand-fold after only 2 billion years. Additionally, massive stars are hotter and radiate substantially more ultraviolet light. Ultraviolet light is very detrimental to biological molecules and can strip away an earth-like atmosphere.
Only 6% of all galaxies in the universe are spiral galaxies like ours, so we are once again very fortunate because other galaxies are unlikely to have solar systems that could support life.
Elliptical galaxies are regions with little dust and exhibit little new star formation. They are nearly as old as the universe itself and have a low abundance of heavy elements because all of the elements required for life such as carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, sodium, iron, and copper are created in stars. These elements were not created in the Big Bang and were not in abundance for at least 2 billion years after the birth of the universe.
Other regions of the universe with a high volume of stars, such as open star clusters and globular star clusters, are also unlikely to harbor planets with life, according to the authors. Open clusters are too young and have not yet produced heavy elements. Globular clusters are too dense with stars in a given amount of space, have too much radiation and gravitational disturbance to form a stable solar system, are low in heavier elements required for life, and have a high probability of a neighboring star going supernova sterilizing any planet within one light year and making conditions for life untenable in stars within 30 light years.
Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee, make a good case for the rarity of complex life in the universe, and in the process have narrowed the scope of the search for planets that have some probability of harboring complex life.
We should first look for spiral galaxies similar to our Milky Way Galaxy belonging to a very small class of about six galaxies out of every hundred in the universe. As we saw, other types of galaxies are probably not conducive to life. Next, we should search the band of stars in a region about 15,000 to 30,000 light years from the galaxy’s center, the habitable zone of the galaxy, and then find stars in that band that are similar to our sun. Out of every one hundred candidates, we should find about five. From those stars we should try to find planets in the habitable zone of each of those stars. Since the star’s mass will be similar to our sun, the habitable zone should be about the same distance from the star as our planet is from the sun. Next, we should do a spectral analysis of the planet’s atmosphere. We would not be able to look directly for Nitrogen and Oxygen because they do not produce detectable absorption bands, but the detection of ozone, which has a strong detectable wavelength absorption band, would indicate the presence of oxygen.
This book was sobering for those of us who believe that we are, or have been visited by extraterrestrials. The information contained within does not rule out the possibility that intelligent life exists in other regions of the universe; it only restricts the places where it could exist; that is, if it is even possible to predict such a thing. Physicist Paul Davies once said that at some point in the future we might have enough knowledge of the universe to predict fairly accurately the number of habitable planets in the universe, but until we know what life is, we can make no predictions as to how many planets are actually inhabited. We still don’t know how life arose on this planet.
In addition, though most of the authors assumptions might be considered to be irrefutable, some of their assumptions have recently been challenged by other researchers. Still, they have made a good case for the rarity of complex life in the universe. But rare does not mean nonexistent. Even if we limit our search for stars in the habitable zone of our own galaxy between 15,000 and 35,000 light years from its center, and in that region, limit our search to the 5% of stars that are similar to our sun, in a galaxy 200,000 light years in diameter, made up of 200 billion stars and at least as many planets, roughly estimated, that still leaves us with 1.5 billion stars and about an equal number of planets that could support complex life in our galaxy alone.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 22, 2020
Verified Purchase
I had no idea so many conditions were necessary for the emergence of multicellular life on Earth, such as a large moon to stabilize seasonal variations, a large Jupiter to deflect cometary bombardments, a magnetic field to prevent the solar wind from stripping off the atmosphere, an ocean not too deep or too shallow, and tectonic plate action to regulate global temperature over billions of years. Many other factors are also explained, such as having the right kind of a large stable sun in the right neighborhood of the galaxy, not too central (lethal radiation inside) or too peripheral (metal poor outside). It seems incredible that we are here today in this blink of geologic time. Maybe we are dreaming.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
david h kinnon
4.0 out of 5 stars
Rare Earth, rare science
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 14, 2018Verified Purchase
Understanding our universe, our galaxy and our planet from the standpoint of the natural philosopher illustrated from maths, physics, biology and cosmology is my current fascination. This book illustrates how the "fine-tuning" of conditions necessary for the universe to have existed and in turn for life to be sustainable on earth against all mathematical odds if random, and in line with "intelligent design" more accurately now known as "intelligent causation" plays the critical role in life existing at any level, far less in the complicated animal forms of which humankind is part.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Mr C.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Classic
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 18, 2019Verified Purchase
It's a bit dated now but it's still a classic. A truly mind boggling tour of all the main factors that enabled complex life to evolve on Earth, and therefore why it will be rare in the Universe.
T N.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Well worth buying to put in your library.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 2, 2016Verified Purchase
I wont re state much of what has already been said here. To read and enjoy this book you should not need to be a qualified scientist as indeed I am not but you will need a healthy appreciation of matters scientific, this book will certainly stimulate thought. It is important to note that the authors do not categorically argue that no advanced life might exist elsewhere just that the odds are stacked against this. Sadly I have come to the view that they are very probably correct in this hypothesis. I have deducted a point; somewhat unfairly, just because the book was written fifteen years ago and recent planetary discoveries which reinforce their position are not debated. I will spend the following months looking for just such analysis using this document as a template, such is the thought provoking value in this book.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
J Wheeler
4.0 out of 5 stars
A real good read
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 3, 2006Verified Purchase
Ward & Brownlee set out very clearly their hypothesis that complex life is unlikely to be common in the universe. One of the beauties of the book is that it deals with the latest ideas in astrobiology. Using these ideas it sets out the thesis that for simple life to arise in the universe may not be rare, since it took a mere 600 million years for "simple life" to arise after the formation of the earth. However since it then took "complex (animal) life" a further 3 400 million years to evolve it would seem far less likely to occur. Using the earth as their only possible example, the factors needed for complex life to arise - & to be maintained - are explored at length. They conclude that "With the best intentions, but limited by natural laws & materials it is unlikely that Earth could ever truly be replicated. Too many processes in its formation involved sheer luck".
The exploration of these processes in some detail I found both fascinating & easy to read. They ranged from galaxies, the formation of the earth, extremophiles, snowball earth, plate tectonics to the roles of the moon & Jupiter. On another level it provided a fresh way of approaching the evolution of complex life on earth. I became so interested & absorbed in this new material that I read the book for a second time this time making notes for my own use. It has also provided me with jumping off points to find out more on the various topics from the internet.
All in all a real good read. I only withhold one star because I hope, when they produce the next edition, the dog's breakfast that is Fig 9.1 is drastically revised.
The exploration of these processes in some detail I found both fascinating & easy to read. They ranged from galaxies, the formation of the earth, extremophiles, snowball earth, plate tectonics to the roles of the moon & Jupiter. On another level it provided a fresh way of approaching the evolution of complex life on earth. I became so interested & absorbed in this new material that I read the book for a second time this time making notes for my own use. It has also provided me with jumping off points to find out more on the various topics from the internet.
All in all a real good read. I only withhold one star because I hope, when they produce the next edition, the dog's breakfast that is Fig 9.1 is drastically revised.
23 people found this helpful
Report abuse
E. L. Wisty
5.0 out of 5 stars
Convincing
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 9, 2008Verified Purchase
I don't think I can really add much to the excellent review given here by Stephen A. Haines. Despite the attacks on this book (see for example
Life Everywhere: The Maverick Science of Astrobiology
, written as a direct response), Ward and Brownlee's argument remains convincing.
When you've finished, follow on with the same authors' The Life and Death of Planet Earth: How the New Science of Astrobiology Charts the Ultimate Fate of Our World .
When you've finished, follow on with the same authors' The Life and Death of Planet Earth: How the New Science of Astrobiology Charts the Ultimate Fate of Our World .
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
More items to explore
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent DesignPaperback
- The First Three Minutes: A Modern View Of The Origin Of The UniverseSteven WeinbergPaperback
- The Origin of Species: 150th Anniversary EditionMass Market Paperback
- The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of EvolutionPaperback
- Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical MinimumPaperback
- Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to EvolutionPaperback
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: earth science textbook, rare books, astronomy guide, the universe of physics books
There's a problem loading this menu right now.
Get free delivery with Amazon Prime
Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books.