(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Blogger: The Chuck Cowdery Blog - Post a Comment
1 – 6 of 6
Blogger Unknown said...

I don't know if we count distillery-only bottles as selling what they make, but when I toured them (shortly before Thanksgiving) they did have bottles of their wheated white dog for sale if memory serves. It's surprisingly good; I believe they're actually using the Maker's Mark mashbill. It was a good tour (and the 10-year OBSV-equivalent single barrel I had was shockingly good).

January 13, 2016 at 8:13 PM

Blogger Chuck Cowdery said...

Good to know. While it's not technically 'nothing,' what they're selling at the distillery doesn't change the fact that their success has been as marketers, not distillers.

January 13, 2016 at 9:11 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Potemkin Craft. What a joke

January 13, 2016 at 10:16 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

I'm not sure that's fair. They completely own the fact that they didn't distill the whiskey they sell and they'll even tell you what the mash is (I assume there's an NDA in place since they won't directly acknowledge that it came from Lawrenceburg)

January 14, 2016 at 9:37 AM

Blogger Chuck Cowdery said...

MGP does not require NDAs.

January 14, 2016 at 9:48 AM

Anonymous kallaskander said...

Hi there,

that is interesting.

The drinks giants are eying craft... or what counts as such.

Diageo has two outfits Distill Ventures and Whisky Union.

Bacardi bought into Angel’s Envy and now Constellation follows suit.

What more wil we see?

Diageo "helps" small businesse onder the obligatory option to be able to buy them.

The products that Whisky Union is producing are whisky related... at best but the goal is to innovate and to be creative out from under the behemoth umbrella.

Seems the biggies are outsourcing creativity.

Greetings
kallaskander

January 14, 2016 at 9:56 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot