Abadie, Alberto and Guido Imbens. 2002. Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators For Average Treatment Effects. National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Working Paper 283. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/t0283.pdf.
- Bloom, Howard S., Charles Michaelopoulos and Carolyn J. Hill. 2005. “Using Experiments to Assess Nonexperimental Comparison-Groups Methods for Measuring Program Effects,†in Howard S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning More from Social Experiments: Evolving Analytic Approaches, New York: Russell Sage, 173-235.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Corson, Walter S., Paul T. Decker, Philip M. Gleason, and Walter Nicholson. International Trade and Worker Dislocation: Evaluation of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program. Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Labor. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, April 1993.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- D’Amico, Ronald, Kate Dunham, Annelies Goger, Melissa Mack, Rebekah Kebede, Johanna Lacoe, Jeffrey Salzman. 2009. Initial Implementation of the Trade Act of 2002: A Report Prepared as Part of the Evaluation of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dehejia, Rajeev H. and Sadek Wahba. 1999. Causal Effects in Non-Experimental Studies: ReEvaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (December) 1053-1062.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dolfin, Sarah and Jillian Berk. 2010. National Evaluation of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program: Characteristics of Workers Eligible under the 2002 TAA Program and Their Early Program Experiences. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
- Epanechnikov, V. A. 1969. Nonparametric Estimates of a Multivariate Probability Density. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, vol. 14, pp. 153-158.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fraker, Tom and Rebecca Maynard. 1987. “The Adequacy of Comparison Group Designs for Evaluations of Employment-Related Programs.†Journal of Human Resources, vol. 22, no. 2.
Galdo, Jose, Jeffrey Smith, and Dan Black. 2007. Bandwidth Selection and the Estimation of Treatment Effects with Unbalanced Data. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3095, October.
- Gemmill Erin, P. Nemeth, P. Schochet, and J. Berk. 2009. Logos and Dollars: How Procedural and Incentive Payment Changes Can Increase Response Rates. Mathematica Policy Research Working Paper: Princeton, NJ. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Glazerman, Steven, Dan M. Levy and David Myers. 2003. “Nonexperimental versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts,†Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 589 (September), 63-93.
Heckman, James J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, vol. 47(1), pp.153-61.
Heckman, James J. and V. Joseph Hotz. 1989. Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: the Case of Manpower Training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 84(408), pp. 862-74.
Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, and Petra E. Todd. 1997. Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme, Review of Economic Studies 64 (October), 605-654.
Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, and Petra E. Todd. 1998. Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator, Review of Economic Studies 65 (April), 261-294.
Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, Jeffrey A. Smith, and Petra E. Todd. 1998. Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data, Econometrica 66 (September), 1017-1098.
- Heinrich, C., P. Mueser, and K. Troske. 2008. Workforce Investment Act Non-Experimental Net Impact Evaluation. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (December).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Imbens, Guido M. and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. 2008. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program. Evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 14251.
LaLonde, Robert. 1986. “Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data.†American Economic Review, 76.
Mueser, Peter R., Kenneth R Troske, and Alexey Gorislavsky. 2007. “Using State Administrative Data to Measure Program Performance,†Review of Economic and Statistics (vol. 89, no. 4, November), pp. 761-783.
Peikes, Deborah N., Lorenzo Moreno and Sean Michael Orzol. 2008. “Propensity Score Matching: A Note of Caution for Evaluators of Social Programs,†The American Statistician 62 (August), 222231.
- Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin. 1983. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika 70, 41-55.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schochet, Peter Z. 2009. “An Approach for Addressing the Multiple Testing Problem in Social Policy Impact Evaluations†Evaluation Review, vol. 33, no. 6, December.
Schochet, Peter Z., John Burghardt, and Sheena McConnell. 2008. Does Job Corps Work? Impact Findings from the National Job Corps Study. American Economic Review, 98(5): 1864–86.
- Social Policy Research Associates and Mathematica Policy Research. 2004. Evaluation of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program: Design Report. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (August).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- U. S. Government Accountability Office. 2006. Trade Adjustment Assistance: Labor Should Take Action to Ensure Performance Data Are Complete, Accurate, and Accessible (GAO-06-496, April).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Create a citation alert || Missing content? Let us know