[1294b]
[1]
This then is one mode of combining the two. Another
is to take the middle course between the regulations of each: for example,
democracies permit membership of the assembly on no property-qualification at
all or a quite small one, oligarchies on a large property-qualification, but the
combination clearly is to have neither principle, but one which lies in the
middle between either of these two qualifications. In the third place is a
combination of the two systems, taking some features from the oligarchical law
and some from the democratic; I mean, for example, that it is thought to be
democratic for the offices to be assigned by lot, for them to be elected
oligarchic, and democratic for them not to have a property-qualification,
oligarchic to have one; therefore it is aristocratic and constitutional to take
one feature from one form and the other from the other, from oligarchy that
offices are to be elected, and from democracy that this is not to be on a
property-qualification. This then is the mode of the mixture; and the mark of a good mixture of democracy and
oligarchy is when it is possible to speak of the same constitution as a
democracy and as an oligarchy; for manifestly this is so when it is said because
they have been mixed well, and this is the case with the form that lies in the
middle, for each of the two extreme forms can be seen in it. This is the case with the constitution of
Sparta. For many
people
[20]
endeavor to describe it as
being a democracy, because its system has many democratic features, for instance
first of all its regulation for the rearing of boys, since the sons of the rich
are brought up in the same way as those of the poor, and are educated in a
manner in which the sons of the poor also could be educated, and they are also
treated similarly at the next age, and in the same manner when they are grown
up, for there is nothing that distinguishes the rich man from the poor
man—thus the arrangements for food are the same for all at the common
messes, and the rich wear clothes such as even any poor man could procure, and
also because of the two greatest offices the common people elect to one and
share in the other (they elect the Elders and share in the
Ephorate); but others call it an oligarchy, because it has many
oligarchical features, for instance that all the offices are elective and none
appointed by lot and few persons have the power to sentence to death and exile,
and a number of other such matters. But in a well-constructed mixed constitution both of the two factors, and
neither of them,1 should seem to be present, and
it should be kept safe by its own means and not by outside aid, and by its own
means not because those who desire its security are more numerous outside
it2 (for
even a bad constitution might possess this quality), but because no
section of the state whatever would even wish for another
constitution.The proper way therefore to
establish a constitutional government, and similarly also the governments named
aristocracies, has now been stated.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.