Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 11 Sep 2012 (v1), last revised 17 Nov 2015 (this version, v4)]
Title:On the resilience of helical magnetic fields to turbulent diffusion and the astrophysical implications
View PDFAbstract:The extent to which large scale magnetic fields are susceptible to turbulent diffusion is important for interpreting the need for in situ large scale dynamos in astrophysics and for observationally inferring field strengths compared to kinetic energy. By solving coupled equations for magnetic energy and magnetic helicity in a system initiated with isotropic turbulence and an arbitrarily helical large scale field, we quantify the decay rate of the latter for a bounded or periodic system. The energy associated with the non-helical magnetic field rapidly decays by turbulent diffusion, but the decay rate of the helical component depends on whether the ratio of its magnetic energy to the turbulent kinetic energy exceeds a critical value given by M_{1,c} =(k_1/k_2)^2, where k_1 and k_2 are the wave numbers of the large and forcing scales. Turbulently diffusing helical fields to small scales while conserving magnetic helicity requires a rapid increase in total magnetic energy. As such, only when the helical fields are sub-critical can they so diffuse. When super-critical, the large scale helical field decays slowly, at a rate determined by microphysical dissipation even when macroscopic turbulence is present. Amplification of small scale magnetic helicity abates the turbulent diffusion. Two implications are that: (1) Standard arguments supporting the need for in situ large scale dynamos based on the otherwise rapid turbulent diffusion of large scale fields require re-thinking since only the non-helical field is so diffused in a closed system. Boundary terms could however provide potential pathways for rapid change of the large scale helical field. (2) Since M_{1,c} <<1 for k_1 << k_2, the presence of long-lived ordered large scale helical fields, as in extragalactic jets, does not guarantee that the magnetic field dominates the kinetic energy.
Submission history
From: Eric Blackman [view email][v1] Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:01:54 UTC (89 KB)
[v2] Sat, 6 Oct 2012 07:54:55 UTC (153 KB)
[v3] Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:26:14 UTC (136 KB)
[v4] Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:44:26 UTC (136 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.