High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
[Submitted on 13 Feb 2023 (v1), last revised 18 Apr 2023 (this version, v2)]
Title:Implication of cosmological upper bound on the validity of golden ratio neutrino mixings under radiative corrections
View PDFAbstract:We study the implication of the most recent cosmological upper bound on the sum of three neutrino masses, on the validity of the golden ratio (GR) neutrino mixings defined at high energy seesaw scale, considering the possibility for generating low energy values of neutrino oscillation parameters through radiative corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). The present study is consistent with the most stringent and latest Planck data on cosmological upper bound, $\sum |m_{i}| < 0.12$ eV. For the radiative generation of sin$\theta_{13}$ from an exact form of golden ratio (GR) neutrino mixing matrix defined at high seesaw energy scale, we take opposite CP parity mass eigenvalues ($m_{1},-m_{2},m_{3}$) with a non-zero real value of $m_{3}$, and a larger value of $\tan\beta > 60$ in order to include large effects of radiative corrections in the calculation. The present analysis including the CP violating Dirac phase and SUSY threshold corrections, shows the validity of golden ratio neutrino mixings defined at high seesaw energy scale in the normal hierarchical (NH) model. The numerical analysis with the variations of four parameters viz. $M_{R}$, $m_{s}$, $\tan\beta$ and $\bar{\eta_{b}}$, shows that the best result for the validity is obtained at $M_{R}=10^{15}$ GeV, $m_{s}=1$ TeV, $\tan\beta=68$ and $\bar{\eta_{b}}=0.01$. However, the analysis based on inverted hierarchical (IH) model does not conform with this latest Planck data on cosmological bound but it still conforms with earlier Planck cosmological upper bound $\sum |m_{i}|< 0.23$ eV, thus indicating possible preference of NH over IH models.
Submission history
From: Monitar Yumnam Singh [view email][v1] Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:05:35 UTC (248 KB)
[v2] Tue, 18 Apr 2023 06:33:05 UTC (249 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.