-
Compositional modelling of immune response and virus transmission dynamics
Authors:
William Waites,
Matteo Cavaliere,
Vincent Danos,
Ruchira Datta,
Rosalind M. Eggo,
Timothy B. Hallett,
David Manheim,
Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths,
Timothy W. Russell,
Veronika I. Zarnitsyna
Abstract:
Transmission models for infectious diseases are typically formulated in terms of dynamics between individuals or groups with processes such as disease progression or recovery for each individual captured phenomenologically, without reference to underlying biological processes. Furthermore, the construction of these models is often monolithic: they don't allow one to readily modify the processes in…
▽ More
Transmission models for infectious diseases are typically formulated in terms of dynamics between individuals or groups with processes such as disease progression or recovery for each individual captured phenomenologically, without reference to underlying biological processes. Furthermore, the construction of these models is often monolithic: they don't allow one to readily modify the processes involved or include the new ones, or to combine models at different scales. We show how to construct a simple model of immune response to a respiratory virus and a model of transmission using an easily modifiable set of rules allowing further refining and merging the two models together. The immune response model reproduces the expected response curve of PCR testing for COVID-19 and implies a long-tailed distribution of infectiousness reflective of individual heterogeneity. This immune response model, when combined with a transmission model, reproduces the previously reported shift in the population distribution of viral loads along an epidemic trajectory.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Inferring Risks of Coronavirus Transmission from Community Household Data
Authors:
Thomas House,
Heather Riley,
Lorenzo Pellis,
Koen B. Pouwels,
Sebastian Bacon,
Arturas Eidukas,
Kaveh Jahanshahi,
Rosalind M. Eggo,
A. Sarah Walker
Abstract:
The response of many governments to the COVID-19 pandemic has involved measures to control within- and between-household transmission, providing motivation to improve understanding of the absolute and relative risks in these contexts. Here, we perform exploratory, residual-based, and transmission-dynamic household analysis of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS)…
▽ More
The response of many governments to the COVID-19 pandemic has involved measures to control within- and between-household transmission, providing motivation to improve understanding of the absolute and relative risks in these contexts. Here, we perform exploratory, residual-based, and transmission-dynamic household analysis of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) data from 26 April 2020 to 15 July 2021 in England. This provides evidence for: (i) temporally varying rates of introduction of infection into households broadly following the trajectory of the overall epidemic and vaccination programme; (ii) Susceptible-Infectious Transmission Probabilities (SITPs) of within-household transmission in the 15-35% range; (iii) the emergence of the Alpha and Delta variants, with the former being around 50% more infectious than wildtype and 35% less infectious than Delta within households; (iv) significantly (in the range 25-300%) more risk of bringing infection into the household for workers in patient-facing roles pre-vaccine; (v) increased risk for secondary school-age children of bringing the infection into the household when schools are open; (vi) increased risk for primary school-age children of bringing the infection into the household when schools were open since the emergence of new variants.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2021; v1 submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Key Questions for Modelling COVID-19 Exit Strategies
Authors:
Robin N Thompson,
T Deirdre Hollingsworth,
Valerie Isham,
Daniel Arribas-Bel,
Ben Ashby,
Tom Britton,
Peter Challoner,
Lauren H K Chappell,
Hannah Clapham,
Nik J Cunniffe,
A Philip Dawid,
Christl A Donnelly,
Rosalind Eggo,
Sebastian Funk,
Nigel Gilbert,
Julia R Gog,
Paul Glendinning,
William S Hart,
Hans Heesterbeek,
Thomas House,
Matt Keeling,
Istvan Z Kiss,
Mirjam Kretzschmar,
Alun L Lloyd,
Emma S McBryde
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Combinations of intense non-pharmaceutical interventions ('lockdowns') were introduced in countries worldwide to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Many governments have begun to implement lockdown exit strategies that allow restrictions to be relaxed while attempting to control the risk of a surge in cases. Mathematical modelling has played a central role in guiding interventions, but the challenge…
▽ More
Combinations of intense non-pharmaceutical interventions ('lockdowns') were introduced in countries worldwide to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Many governments have begun to implement lockdown exit strategies that allow restrictions to be relaxed while attempting to control the risk of a surge in cases. Mathematical modelling has played a central role in guiding interventions, but the challenge of designing optimal exit strategies in the face of ongoing transmission is unprecedented. Here, we report discussions from the Isaac Newton Institute 'Models for an exit strategy' workshop (11-15 May 2020). A diverse community of modellers who are providing evidence to governments worldwide were asked to identify the main questions that, if answered, will allow for more accurate predictions of the effects of different exit strategies. Based on these questions, we propose a roadmap to facilitate the development of reliable models to guide exit strategies. The roadmap requires a global collaborative effort from the scientific community and policy-makers, and is made up of three parts: i) improve estimation of key epidemiological parameters; ii) understand sources of heterogeneity in populations; iii) focus on requirements for data collection, particularly in Low-to-Middle-Income countries. This will provide important information for planning exit strategies that balance socio-economic benefits with public health.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2020; v1 submitted 21 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Socioeconomic bias in influenza surveillance
Authors:
Samuel V. Scarpino,
James G. Scott,
Rosalind M. Eggo,
Bruce Clements,
Nedialko B. Dimitrov,
Lauren Ancel Meyers
Abstract:
Individuals in low socioeconomic brackets are considered at-risk for developing influenza-related complications and often exhibit higher than average influenza-related hospitalization rates. This disparity has been attributed to various factors, including restricted access to preventative and therapeutic health care, limited sick leave, and household structure. Adequate influenza surveillance in t…
▽ More
Individuals in low socioeconomic brackets are considered at-risk for developing influenza-related complications and often exhibit higher than average influenza-related hospitalization rates. This disparity has been attributed to various factors, including restricted access to preventative and therapeutic health care, limited sick leave, and household structure. Adequate influenza surveillance in these at-risk populations is a critical precursor to accurate risk assessments and effective intervention. However, the United States of America's primary national influenza surveillance system (ILINet) monitors outpatient healthcare providers, which may be largely inaccessible to lower socioeconomic populations. Recent initiatives to incorporate internet-source and hospital electronic medical records data into surveillance systems seek to improve the timeliness, coverage, and accuracy of outbreak detection and situational awareness. Here, we use a flexible statistical framework for integrating multiple surveillance data sources to evaluate the adequacy of traditional (ILINet) and next generation (BioSense 2.0 and Google Flu Trends) data for situational awareness of influenza across poverty levels. We find that zip codes in the highest poverty quartile are a critical blind-spot for ILINet that the integration of next generation data fails to ameliorate.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
