Showing 1–31 of 31 results for author: Feuilloley, L

Local certification of forbidden subgraphs

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Linda Cook, Laurent Feuilloley, Théo Pierron, Sébastien Zeitoun

Abstract: Detecting specific structures in a network has been a very active theme of research in distributed computing for at least a decade. In this paper, we start the study of subgraph detection from the perspective of local certification. Remember that a local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small p… ▽ More Detecting specific structures in a network has been a very active theme of research in distributed computing for at least a decade. In this paper, we start the study of subgraph detection from the perspective of local certification. Remember that a local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Our main question is: For a given graph $H$, what is the minimum certificate size that allows checking that the network does not contain $H$ as a (possibly induced) subgraph? We show a variety of lower and upper bounds, uncovering an interesting interplay between the optimal certificate size, the size of the forbidden subgraph, and the locality of the verification. Along the way we introduce several new technical tools, in particular what we call the \emph{layered map}, which is not specific to forbidden subgraphs and that we expect to be useful for certifying many other properties. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Global certification via perfect hashing

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Sébastien Zeitoun

Abstract: In this work, we provide an upper bound for global certification of graph homomorphism, a generalization of graph coloring. In certification, the nodes of a network should decide if the network satisfies a given property, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Here, there is only one global certificate which is shared by all the nodes, and the property we want to certify is the… ▽ More In this work, we provide an upper bound for global certification of graph homomorphism, a generalization of graph coloring. In certification, the nodes of a network should decide if the network satisfies a given property, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Here, there is only one global certificate which is shared by all the nodes, and the property we want to certify is the existence of a graph homomorphism to a given graph. For bipartiteness, a special case of graph homomorphism, Feuilloley and Hirvonen proved in~\cite{FeuilloleyH18} some upper and lower bounds on the size of the optimal certificate, and made the conjecture that their lower bound could be improved to match their upper bound. We prove that this conjecture is false: their lower bound was in fact optimal, and we prove it by providing the matching upper bound using a known result of perfect hashing. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Local certification of local properties: tight bounds, trade-offs and new parameters

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Sébastien Zeitoun

Abstract: Local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. For many classic global properties, like checking the acyclicity of the network, the optimal size of the certificates depends on the size of the network, $n$. In this paper, we focus on properties for which… ▽ More Local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. For many classic global properties, like checking the acyclicity of the network, the optimal size of the certificates depends on the size of the network, $n$. In this paper, we focus on properties for which the size of the certificates does not depend on $n$ but on other parameters. We focus on three such important properties and prove tight bounds for all of them. Namely, we prove that the optimal certification size is: $Θしーた(\log k)$ for $k$-colorability (and even exactly $\lceil \log k \rceil$ bits in the anonymous model while previous works had only proved a $2$-bit lower bound); $(1/2)\log t+o(\log t)$ for dominating sets at distance $t$ (an unexpected and tighter-than-usual bound) ; and $Θしーた(\log Δでるた)$ for perfect matching in graphs of maximum degree $Δでるた$ (the first non-trivial bound parameterized by $Δでるた$). We also prove some surprising upper bounds, for example, certifying the existence of a perfect matching in a planar graph can be done with only two bits. In addition, we explore various specific cases for these properties, in particular improving our understanding of the trade-off between locality of the verification and certificate size. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2023; v1 submitted 21 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Accepted at STACS 2024

When Should You Wait Before Updating? Toward a Robustness Refinement

Authors: Swan Dubois, Laurent Feuilloley, Franck Petit, Mikaël Rabie

Abstract: Consider a dynamic network and a given distributed problem. At any point in time, there might exist several solutions that are equally good with respect to the problem specification, but that are different from an algorithmic perspective, because some could be easier to update than others when the network changes. In other words, one would prefer to have a solution that is more robust to topologic… ▽ More Consider a dynamic network and a given distributed problem. At any point in time, there might exist several solutions that are equally good with respect to the problem specification, but that are different from an algorithmic perspective, because some could be easier to update than others when the network changes. In other words, one would prefer to have a solution that is more robust to topological changes in the network; and in this direction the best scenario would be that the solution remains correct despite the dynamic of the network. In~\cite{CasteigtsDPR20}, the authors introduced a very strong robustness criterion: they required that for any removal of edges that maintain the network connected, the solution remains valid. They focus on the maximal independent set problem, and their approach consists in characterizing the graphs in which there exists a robust solution (the existential problem), or even stronger, where any solution is robust (the universal problem). As the robustness criteria is very demanding, few graphs have a robust solution, and even fewer are such that all of their solutions are robust. In this paper, we ask the following question: \textit{Can we have robustness for a larger class of networks, if we bound the number $k$ of edge removals allowed}? (See the full paper for the full abstract.) △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: To appear in SAND 2023

Pattern detection in ordered graphs

Authors: Guillaume Ducoffe, Laurent Feuilloley, Michel Habib, François Pitois

Abstract: A popular way to define or characterize graph classes is via forbidden subgraphs or forbidden minors. These characterizations play a key role in graph theory, but they rarely lead to efficient algorithms to recognize these classes. In contrast, many essential graph classes can be recognized efficiently thanks to characterizations of the following form: there must exist an ordering of the vertices… ▽ More A popular way to define or characterize graph classes is via forbidden subgraphs or forbidden minors. These characterizations play a key role in graph theory, but they rarely lead to efficient algorithms to recognize these classes. In contrast, many essential graph classes can be recognized efficiently thanks to characterizations of the following form: there must exist an ordering of the vertices such that some ordered pattern does not appear, where a pattern is basically an ordered subgraph. These pattern characterizations have been studied for decades, but there have been recent efforts to better understand them systematically. In this paper, we focus on a simple problem at the core of this topic: given an ordered graph of size $n$, how fast can we detect whether a fixed pattern of size $k$ is present? Following the literature on graph classes recognition, we first look for patterns that can be detected in linear time. We prove, among other results, that almost all patterns on three vertices (which capture many interesting classes, such as interval, chordal, split, bipartite, and comparability graphs) fall in this category. Then, in a finer-grained complexity perspective, we prove conditional lower bounds for this problem. In particular we show that for a large family of patterns on four vertices it is unlikely that subquadratic algorithm exist. Finally, we define a parameter for patterns, the merge-width, and prove that for patterns of merge-width $t$, one can solve the problem in $O(n^{ct})$ for some constant~$c$. As a corollary, we get that detecting outerplanar patterns and other classes of patterns can be done in time independent of the size of the pattern. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Lower bound for constant-size local certification

Authors: Virgina Ardévol Martínez, Marco Caoduro, Laurent Feuilloley, Jonathan Narboni, Pegah Pournajafi, Jean-Florent Raymond

Abstract: Given a network property or a data structure, a local certification is a labeling that allows to efficiently check that the property is satisfied, or that the structure is correct. The quality of a certification is measured by the size of its labels: the smaller, the better.This notion plays a central role in self-stabilization, because the size of the certification is a lower bound (and often an… ▽ More Given a network property or a data structure, a local certification is a labeling that allows to efficiently check that the property is satisfied, or that the structure is correct. The quality of a certification is measured by the size of its labels: the smaller, the better.This notion plays a central role in self-stabilization, because the size of the certification is a lower bound (and often an upper bound) on the memory needed for silent self-stabilizing construction of distributed data structures. From the point of view of distributed computing in general, it is also a measure of the locality of a property (e.g. properties of the network itself, such as planarity). When it comes to the size of the certification labels, one can identify three important regimes: the properties for which the optimal size is polynomial in the number of vertices of the graph, the ones that require only polylogarithmic size, and the ones that can be certified with a constant number of bits. The first two regimes are well studied, with several upper and lower bounds, specific techniques, and active research questions. On the other hand, the constant regime has never been really explored, at least on the lower bound side. The main contribution of this paper is the first non-trivial lower bound for this low regime. More precisely, we show that by using certification on just one bit (a binary certification), one cannot certify $k$-colorability for $k\geq 3$. To do so, we develop a new technique, based on the notion of score, and both local symmetry arguments and a global parity argument. We hope that this technique will be useful for establishing stronger results. We complement this result by a discussion of the implication of lower bounds for this constant-size regime, and with an upper bound for a related problem, illustrating that in some cases one can do better than the natural upper bound. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Short and local transformations between ($Δでるた+1$)-colorings

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Marc Heinrich, Mikaël Rabie

Abstract: Recoloring a graph is about finding a sequence of proper colorings of this graph from an initial coloring $σしぐま$ to a target coloring $ηいーた$. Adding the constraint that each pair of consecutive colorings must differ on exactly one vertex, one asks: Is there a sequence of colorings from $σしぐま$ to $ηいーた$? If yes, how short can it be? In this paper, we focus on $(Δでるた+1)$-colorings of graphs of maximum degree… ▽ More Recoloring a graph is about finding a sequence of proper colorings of this graph from an initial coloring $σしぐま$ to a target coloring $ηいーた$. Adding the constraint that each pair of consecutive colorings must differ on exactly one vertex, one asks: Is there a sequence of colorings from $σしぐま$ to $ηいーた$? If yes, how short can it be? In this paper, we focus on $(Δでるた+1)$-colorings of graphs of maximum degree $Δでるた$. Feghali, Johnson and Paulusma proved that, if both colorings are non-frozen (i.e. we can change the color of a least one vertex), then a quadratic recoloring sequence always exists. We improve their result by proving that there actually exists a linear transformation (assuming that $Δでるた$ is a constant). In addition, we prove that the core of our algorithm can be performed locally. Informally, this means that after some preprocessing, the color changes that a given node has to perform only depend on the colors of the vertices in a constant size neighborhood. We make this precise by designing of an efficient recoloring algorithm in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; v1 submitted 16 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Second version. Section 1 has been rewritten

What can be certified compactly?

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Théo Pierron

Abstract: Local certification consists in assigning labels (called \emph{certificates}) to the nodes of a network to certify a property of the network or the correctness of a data structure distributed on the network. The verification of this certification must be local: a node typically sees only its neighbors in the network. The main measure of performance of a certification is the size of its certificate… ▽ More Local certification consists in assigning labels (called \emph{certificates}) to the nodes of a network to certify a property of the network or the correctness of a data structure distributed on the network. The verification of this certification must be local: a node typically sees only its neighbors in the network. The main measure of performance of a certification is the size of its certificates. In 2011, Göös and Suomela identified $Θしーた(\log n)$ as a special certificate size: below this threshold little is possible, and several key properties do have certifications of this type. A certification with such small certificates is now called a \emph{compact local certification}, and it has become the gold standard of the area, similarly to polynomial time for centralized computing. A major question is then to understand which properties have $O(\log n)$ certificates, or in other words: what is the power of compact local certification? Recently, a series of papers have proved that several well-known network properties have compact local certifications: planarity, bounded-genus, etc. But one would like to have more general results, \emph{i.e.} meta-theorems. In the analogue setting of polynomial-time centralized algorithms, a very fruitful approach has been to prove that restricted types of problems can be solved in polynomial time in graphs with restricted structures. These problems are typically those that can be expressed in some logic, and the graph structures are whose with bounded width or depth parameters. We take a similar approach and prove the first meta-theorems for local certification. (See the abstract of the pdf for more details.) △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: A preliminary version of this paper appeared on the arxiv under the name "Local certification of MSO properties for bounded treedepth graphs". See arxiv:2110.01936. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2110.01936

Classifying grounded intersection graphs via ordered forbidden patterns

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Michel Habib

Abstract: It was noted already in the 90s that many classic graph classes, such as interval, chordal, and bipartite graphs, can be characterized by the existence of an ordering of the vertices avoiding some ordered subgraphs, called patterns. Very recently, all the classes corresponding to patterns on three vertices (including the ones mentioned above) have been listed, and proved to be efficiently recogniz… ▽ More It was noted already in the 90s that many classic graph classes, such as interval, chordal, and bipartite graphs, can be characterized by the existence of an ordering of the vertices avoiding some ordered subgraphs, called patterns. Very recently, all the classes corresponding to patterns on three vertices (including the ones mentioned above) have been listed, and proved to be efficiently recognizable. In contrast, very little is known about patterns on four vertices. One of the few graph classes characterized by a pattern on four vertices is the class of intersection graphs of rectangles that are said to be grounded on a line. This class appears naturally in the study of intersection graphs, and similar grounded classes have recently attracted a lot of attention. This paper contains three parts. First, we make a survey of grounded intersection graph classes, summarizing all the known inclusions between these various classes. Second, we show that the correspondence between a pattern on four vertices and grounded rectangle graphs is not an isolated phenomenon. We establish several other pattern characterizations for geometric classes, and show that the hierarchy of grounded intersection graph classes is tightly interleaved with the classes defined patterns on four vertices. We claim that forbidden patterns are a useful tool to classify grounded intersection graphs. Finally, we give an overview of the complexity of the recognition of classes defined by forbidden patterns on four vertices and list several interesting open problems. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2021; v1 submitted 1 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Second version with some citations added, thanks to Istvan Tomon

Local certification of MSO properties for bounded treedepth graphs

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Théo Pierron

Abstract: The graph model checking problem consists in testing whether an input graph satisfies a given logical formula. In this paper, we study this problem in a distributed setting, namely local certification. The goal is to assign labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. We first investigate which properties… ▽ More The graph model checking problem consists in testing whether an input graph satisfies a given logical formula. In this paper, we study this problem in a distributed setting, namely local certification. The goal is to assign labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. We first investigate which properties can be locally certified with small certificates. Not surprisingly, this is almost never the case, except for not very expressive logic fragments. Following the steps of Courcelle-Grohe, we then look for meta-theorems explaining what happens when we parameterize the problem by some standard measures of how simple the graph classes are. In that direction, our main result states that any MSO formula can be locally certified on graphs with bounded treedepth with a logarithmic number of bits per node, which is the golden standard in certification. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Distributed recoloring of interval and chordal graphs

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Marc Heinrich, Mikaël Rabie

Abstract: One of the fundamental and most-studied algorithmic problems in distributed computing on networks is graph coloring, both in bounded-degree and in general graphs. Recently, the study of this problem has been extended in two directions. First, the problem of recoloring, that is computing an efficient transformation between two given colorings (instead of computing a new coloring), has been consider… ▽ More One of the fundamental and most-studied algorithmic problems in distributed computing on networks is graph coloring, both in bounded-degree and in general graphs. Recently, the study of this problem has been extended in two directions. First, the problem of recoloring, that is computing an efficient transformation between two given colorings (instead of computing a new coloring), has been considered, both to model radio network updates, and as a useful subroutine for coloring. Second, as it appears that general graphs and bounded-degree graphs do not model real networks very well (with, respectively, pathological worst-case topologies and too strong assumptions), coloring has been studied in more specific graph classes. In this paper, we study the intersection of these two directions: distributed recoloring in two relevant graph classes, interval and chordal graphs. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Local certification of graph decompositions and applications to minor-free classes

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Théo Pierron

Abstract: Local certification consists in assigning labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. In the last few years, certification of graph classes received a considerable attention. The goal is to certify that a graph $G$ belongs to a given graph class~$\mathcal{G}$. Such certifications with labels of size… ▽ More Local certification consists in assigning labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. In the last few years, certification of graph classes received a considerable attention. The goal is to certify that a graph $G$ belongs to a given graph class~$\mathcal{G}$. Such certifications with labels of size $O(\log n)$ (where $n$ is the size of the network) exist for trees, planar graphs and graphs embedded on surfaces. Feuilloley et al. ask if this can be extended to any class of graphs defined by a finite set of forbidden minors. In this work, we develop new decomposition tools for graph certification, and apply them to show that for every small enough minor $H$, $H$-minor-free graphs can indeed be certified with labels of size $O(\log n)$. We also show matching lower bounds with a simple new proof technique. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2021; v1 submitted 30 July, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: New version with expanded introduction and various fixes

The Secretary Problem with Independent Sampling

Authors: José Correa, Andrés Cristi, Laurent Feuilloley, Tim Oosterwijk, Alexandros Tsigonias-Dimitriadis

Abstract: In the secretary problem we are faced with an online sequence of elements with values. Upon seeing an element we have to make an irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decision. The goal is to maximize the probability of picking the element of maximum value. The most classic version of the problem is that in which the elements arrive in random order and their values are arbitrary. However, by varying the… ▽ More In the secretary problem we are faced with an online sequence of elements with values. Upon seeing an element we have to make an irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decision. The goal is to maximize the probability of picking the element of maximum value. The most classic version of the problem is that in which the elements arrive in random order and their values are arbitrary. However, by varying the available information, new interesting problems arise. Also the case in which the arrival order is adversarial instead of random leads to interesting variants that have been considered in the literature. In this paper we study both the random order and adversarial order secretary problems with an additional twist. The values are arbitrary, but before starting the online sequence we independently sample each element with a fixed probability $p$. The sampled elements become our information or history set and the game is played over the remaining elements. We call these problems the random order secretary problem with $p$-sampling (ROS$p$ for short) and the adversarial order secretary problem with $p$-sampling (AOS$p$ for short). Our main result is to obtain best possible algorithms for both problems and all values of $p$. As $p$ grows to 1 the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. In the adversarial order setting, the best possible algorithm turns out to be a simple fixed threshold algorithm in which the optimal threshold is a function of $p$ only. In the random order setting we prove that the best possible algorithm is characterized by a fixed sequence of time thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should start accepting a value that is both a maximum of the online sequence and has a given ranking within the sampled elements. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 41 pages, 2 figures, shorter version published in proceedings of SODA21

MSC Class: 60G40 (Primary); 91A60 (Secondary)

Local Certification of Graphs with Bounded Genus

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud, Pedro Montealegre, Ivan Rapaport, Éric Rémila, Ioan Todinca

Abstract: Naor, Parter, and Yogev [SODA 2020] recently designed a compiler for automatically translating standard centralized interactive protocols to distributed interactive protocols, as introduced by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018]. In particular, by using this compiler, every linear-time algorithm for deciding the membership to some fixed graph class can be translated into a… ▽ More Naor, Parter, and Yogev [SODA 2020] recently designed a compiler for automatically translating standard centralized interactive protocols to distributed interactive protocols, as introduced by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018]. In particular, by using this compiler, every linear-time algorithm for deciding the membership to some fixed graph class can be translated into a $\mathsf{dMAM}(O(\log n))$ protocol for this class, that is, a distributed interactive protocol with $O(\log n)$-bit proof size in $n$-node graphs, and three interactions between the (centralizer) computationally-unbounded but non-trustable prover Merlin, and the (decentralized) randomized computationally-limited verifier Arthur. As a corollary, there is a $\mathsf{dMAM}(O(\log n))$ protocol for the class of planar graphs, as well as for the class of graphs with bounded genus. We show that there exists a distributed interactive protocol for the class of graphs with bounded genus performing just a single interaction, from the prover to the verifier, yet preserving proof size of $O(\log n)$ bits. This result also holds for the class of graphs with bounded demi-genus, that is, graphs that can be embedded on a non-orientable surface of bounded genus. The interactive protocols described in this paper are actually proof-labeling schemes, i.e., a subclass of interactive protocols, previously introduced by Korman, Kutten, and Peleg [PODC 2005]. In particular, these schemes do not require any randomization from the verifier, and the proofs may often be computed a priori, at low cost, by the nodes themselves. Our results thus extend the recent proof-labeling scheme for planar graphs by Feuilloley et al. [PODC 2020], to graphs of bounded genus, and to graphs of bounded demigenus. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Compact Distributed Certification of Planar Graphs

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud, Ivan Rapaport, Éric Rémila, Pedro Montealegre, Ioan Todinca

Abstract: Naor, Parter, and Yogev (SODA 2020) have recently demonstrated the existence of a \emph{distributed interactive proof} for planarity (i.e., for certifying that a network is planar), using a sophisticated generic technique for constructing distributed IP protocols based on sequential IP protocols. The interactive proof for planarity is based on a distributed certification of the correct execution o… ▽ More Naor, Parter, and Yogev (SODA 2020) have recently demonstrated the existence of a \emph{distributed interactive proof} for planarity (i.e., for certifying that a network is planar), using a sophisticated generic technique for constructing distributed IP protocols based on sequential IP protocols. The interactive proof for planarity is based on a distributed certification of the correct execution of any given sequential linear-time algorithm for planarity testing. It involves three interactions between the prover and the randomized distributed verifier (i.e., it is a \dMAM\/ protocol), and uses small certificates, on $O(\log n)$ bits in $n$-node networks. We show that a single interaction from the prover suffices, and randomization is unecessary, by providing an explicit description of a \emph{proof-labeling scheme} for planarity, still using certificates on just $O(\log n)$ bits. We also show that there are no proof-labeling schemes -- in fact, even no \emph{locally checkable proofs} -- for planarity using certificates on $o(\log n)$ bits. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: To appear at PODC 2020

Bibliography of distributed approximation beyond bounded degree

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: This document is an informal bibliography of the papers dealing with distributed approximation algorithms. A classic setting for such algorithms is bounded degree graphs, but there is a whole set of techniques that have been developed for other classes. These later classes are the focus of the current work. These classes have a geometric nature (planar, bounded genus and unit-disk graphs) and/or h… ▽ More This document is an informal bibliography of the papers dealing with distributed approximation algorithms. A classic setting for such algorithms is bounded degree graphs, but there is a whole set of techniques that have been developed for other classes. These later classes are the focus of the current work. These classes have a geometric nature (planar, bounded genus and unit-disk graphs) and/or have bounded parameters (arboricity, expansion, growth, independence) or forbidden structures (forbidden minors). △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2023; v1 submitted 22 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: An annotated bibliography. Fourth version (October 2023). Approx 5 new papers since 2021

Introduction to local certification

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: A distributed graph algorithm is basically an algorithm where every node of a graph can look at its neighborhood at some distance in the graph and chose its output. As distributed environment are subject to faults, an important issue is to be able to check that the output is correct, or in general that the network is in proper configuration with respect to some predicate. One would like this check… ▽ More A distributed graph algorithm is basically an algorithm where every node of a graph can look at its neighborhood at some distance in the graph and chose its output. As distributed environment are subject to faults, an important issue is to be able to check that the output is correct, or in general that the network is in proper configuration with respect to some predicate. One would like this checking to be very local, to avoid using too much resources. Unfortunately most predicates cannot be checked this way, and that is where certification comes into play. Local certification (also known as proof-labeling schemes, locally checkable proofs or distributed verification) consists in assigning labels to the nodes, that certify that the configuration is correct. There are several point of view on this topic: it can be seen as a part of self-stabilizing algorithms, as labeling problem, or as a non-deterministic distributed decision. This paper is an introduction to the domain of local certification, giving an overview of the history, the techniques and the current research directions. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; v1 submitted 28 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Comments: Final version for DMTCS

Journal ref: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 23, no. 3, Distributed Computing and Networking (September 15, 2021) dmtcs:6280

Note on distributed certification of minimum spanning trees

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: A distributed proof (also known as local certification, or proof-labeling scheme) is a mechanism to certify that the solution to a graph problem is correct. It takes the form of an assignment of labels to the nodes, that can be checked locally. There exists such a proof for the minimum spanning tree problem, using $O(\log n \log W)$ bit labels (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the graph, and… ▽ More A distributed proof (also known as local certification, or proof-labeling scheme) is a mechanism to certify that the solution to a graph problem is correct. It takes the form of an assignment of labels to the nodes, that can be checked locally. There exists such a proof for the minimum spanning tree problem, using $O(\log n \log W)$ bit labels (where $n$ is the number of nodes in the graph, and $W$ is the largest weight of an edge). This is due to Korman and Kutten who describe it in concise and formal manner in [Korman and Kutten 07]. In this note, we propose a more intuitive description of the result, as well as a gentle introduction to the problem. △ Less

Submitted 2 January, 2020; v1 submitted 16 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: A note explaining a known result. (New version, with minor changes.)

Silent MST approximation for tiny memory

Authors: Lélia Blin, Swan Dubois, Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: In this paper we show that approximation can help reduce the space used for self-stabilization. In the classic \emph{state model}, where the nodes of a network communicate by reading the states of their neighbors, an important measure of efficiency is the space: the number of bits used at each node to encode the state. In this model, a classic requirement is that the algorithm has to be \emph{sile… ▽ More In this paper we show that approximation can help reduce the space used for self-stabilization. In the classic \emph{state model}, where the nodes of a network communicate by reading the states of their neighbors, an important measure of efficiency is the space: the number of bits used at each node to encode the state. In this model, a classic requirement is that the algorithm has to be \emph{silent}, that is, after stabilization the states should not change anymore. We design a silent self-stabilizing algorithm for the problem of minimum spanning tree, that has a trade-off between the quality of the solution and the space needed to compute it. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2020; v1 submitted 21 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: To appear at SSS 2020

Optimal Space Lower Bound for Deterministic Self-Stabilizing Leader Election Algorithms

Authors: Lélia Blin, Laurent Feuilloley, Gabriel Le Bouder

Abstract: Given a boolean predicate $Πぱい$ on labeled networks (e.g., proper coloring, leader election, etc.), a self-stabilizing algorithm for $Πぱい$ is a distributed algorithm that can start from any initial configuration of the network (i.e., every node has an arbitrary value assigned to each of its variables), and eventually converge to a configuration satisfying $Πぱい$. It is known that leader election does not… ▽ More Given a boolean predicate $Πぱい$ on labeled networks (e.g., proper coloring, leader election, etc.), a self-stabilizing algorithm for $Πぱい$ is a distributed algorithm that can start from any initial configuration of the network (i.e., every node has an arbitrary value assigned to each of its variables), and eventually converge to a configuration satisfying $Πぱい$. It is known that leader election does not have a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using a constant-size register at each node, i.e., for some networks, some of their nodes must have registers whose sizes grow with the size $n$ of the networks. On the other hand, it is also known that leader election can be solved by a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using registers of $O(\log \log n)$ bits per node in any $n$-node bounded-degree network. We show that this latter space complexity is optimal. Specifically, we prove that every deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm solving leader election must use $Ωおめが(\log \log n)$-bit per node registers in some $n$-node networks. In addition, we show that our lower bounds go beyond leader election, and apply to all problems that cannot be solved by anonymous algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2023; v1 submitted 21 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Final journal version for DMTCS (Conference version at OPODIS 2021)

Journal ref: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 25:1, Distributed Computing and Networking (March 1, 2023) dmtcs:9335

Lower bounds for text indexing with mismatches and differences

Authors: Vincent Cohen-Addad, Laurent Feuilloley, Tatiana Starikovskaya

Abstract: In this paper we study lower bounds for the fundamental problem of text indexing with mismatches and differences. In this problem we are given a long string of length $n$, the "text", and the task is to preprocess it into a data structure such that given a query string $Q$, one can quickly identify substrings that are within Hamming or edit distance at most $k$ from $Q$. This problem is at the cor… ▽ More In this paper we study lower bounds for the fundamental problem of text indexing with mismatches and differences. In this problem we are given a long string of length $n$, the "text", and the task is to preprocess it into a data structure such that given a query string $Q$, one can quickly identify substrings that are within Hamming or edit distance at most $k$ from $Q$. This problem is at the core of various problems arising in biology and text processing. While exact text indexing allows linear-size data structures with linear query time, text indexing with $k$ mismatches (or $k$ differences) seems to be much harder: All known data structures have exponential dependency on $k$ either in the space, or in the time bound. We provide conditional and pointer-machine lower bounds that make a step toward explaining this phenomenon. We start by demonstrating lower bounds for $k = Θしーた(\log n)$. We show that assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, any data structure for text indexing that can be constructed in polynomial time cannot have $\mathcal{O}(n^{1-δでるた})$ query time, for any $δでるた>0$. This bound also extends to the setting where we only ask for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solutions for text indexing. However, in many applications the value of $k$ is rather small, and one might hope that for small~$k$ we can develop more efficient solutions. We show that this would require a radically new approach as using the current methods one cannot avoid exponential dependency on $k$ either in the space, or in the time bound for all even $\frac{8}{\sqrt{3}} \sqrt{\log n} \le k = o(\log n)$. Our lower bounds also apply to the dictionary look-up problem, where instead of a text one is given a set of strings. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Journal ref: SODA 2019, Jan 2019, San Diego, United States

Graph classes and forbidden patterns on three vertices

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Michel Habib

Abstract: This paper deals with graph classes characterization and recognition. A popular way to characterize a graph class is to list a minimal set of forbidden induced subgraphs. Unfortunately this strategy usually does not lead to an efficient recognition algorithm. On the other hand, many graph classes can be efficiently recognized by techniques based on some interesting orderings of the nodes, such as… ▽ More This paper deals with graph classes characterization and recognition. A popular way to characterize a graph class is to list a minimal set of forbidden induced subgraphs. Unfortunately this strategy usually does not lead to an efficient recognition algorithm. On the other hand, many graph classes can be efficiently recognized by techniques based on some interesting orderings of the nodes, such as the ones given by traversals. We study specifically graph classes that have an ordering avoiding some ordered structures. More precisely, we consider what we call patterns on three nodes, and the recognition complexity of the associated classes. In this domain, there are two key previous works. Damashke started the study of the classes defined by forbidden patterns, a set that contains interval, chordal and bipartite graphs among others. On the algorithmic side, Hell, Mohar and Rafiey proved that any class defined by a set of forbidden patterns can be recognized in polynomial time. We improve on these two works, by characterizing systematically all the classes defined sets of forbidden patterns (on three nodes), and proving that among the 23 different classes (up to complementation) that we find, 21 can actually be recognized in linear time. Beyond this result, we consider that this type of characterization is very useful, leads to a rich structure of classes, and generates a lot of open questions worth investigating. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2020; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: Third version version. 38 pages

Local verification of global proofs

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Juho Hirvonen

Abstract: In this work we study the cost of local and global proofs on distributed verification. In this setting the nodes of a distributed system are provided with a nondeterministic proof for the correctness of the state of the system, and the nodes need to verify this proof by looking at only their local neighborhood in the system. Previous works have studied the model where each node is given its own,… ▽ More In this work we study the cost of local and global proofs on distributed verification. In this setting the nodes of a distributed system are provided with a nondeterministic proof for the correctness of the state of the system, and the nodes need to verify this proof by looking at only their local neighborhood in the system. Previous works have studied the model where each node is given its own, possibly unique, part of the proof as input. The cost of a proof is the maximum size of an individual label. We compare this model to a model where each node has access to the same global proof, and the cost is the size of this global proof. It is easy to see that a global proof can always include all of the local proofs, and every local proof can be a copy of the global proof. We show that there exists properties that exhibit these relative proof sizes, and also properties that are somewhere in between. In addition, we introduce a new lower bound technique and use it to prove a tight lower bound on the complexity of reversing distributed decision and establish a link between communication complexity and distributed proof complexity. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Redundancy in Distributed Proofs

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud, Juho Hirvonen, Ami Paz, Mor Perry

Abstract: Distributed proofs are mechanisms enabling the nodes of a network to collectivity and efficiently check the correctness of Boolean predicates on the structure of the network, or on data-structures distributed over the nodes (e.g., spanning trees or routing tables). We consider mechanisms consisting of two components: a \emph{prover} assigning a \emph{certificate} to each node, and a distributed al… ▽ More Distributed proofs are mechanisms enabling the nodes of a network to collectivity and efficiently check the correctness of Boolean predicates on the structure of the network, or on data-structures distributed over the nodes (e.g., spanning trees or routing tables). We consider mechanisms consisting of two components: a \emph{prover} assigning a \emph{certificate} to each node, and a distributed algorithm called \emph{verifier} that is in charge of verifying the distributed proof formed by the collection of all certificates. In this paper, we show that many network predicates have distributed proofs offering a high level of redundancy, explicitly or implicitly. We use this remarkable property of distributed proofs for establishing perfect tradeoffs between the \emph{size of the certificate} stored at every node, and the \emph{number of rounds} of the verification protocol. If we allow every node to communicate to distance at most $t$, one might expect that the certificate sizes can be reduced by a multiplicative factor of at least~$t$. In trees, cycles and grids, we show that such tradeoffs can be established for \emph{all} network predicates, i.e., it is always possible to linearly decrease the certificate size. In arbitrary graphs, we show that any part of the certificates common to all nodes can be evenly redistributed among these nodes, achieving even a better tradeoff: this common part of the certificate can be reduced by the size of a smallest ball of radius $t$ in the network. In addition to these general results, we establish several upper and lower bounds on the certificate sizes used for distributed proofs for spanning trees, minimum-weight spanning trees, diameter, additive and multiplicative spanners, and more, improving and generalizing previous results from the literature. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2020; v1 submitted 8 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Error-Sensitive Proof-Labeling Schemes

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud

Abstract: Proof-labeling schemes are known mechanisms providing nodes of networks with certificates that can be verified locally by distributed algorithms. Given a boolean predicate on network states, such schemes enable to check whether the predicate is satisfied by the actual state of the network, by having nodes interacting with their neighbors only. Proof-labeling schemes are typically designed for enfo… ▽ More Proof-labeling schemes are known mechanisms providing nodes of networks with certificates that can be verified locally by distributed algorithms. Given a boolean predicate on network states, such schemes enable to check whether the predicate is satisfied by the actual state of the network, by having nodes interacting with their neighbors only. Proof-labeling schemes are typically designed for enforcing fault-tolerance, by making sure that if the current state of the network is illegal with respect to some given predicate, then at least one node will detect it. Such a node can raise an alarm, or launch a recovery procedure enabling the system to return to a legal state. In this paper, we introduce error-sensitive proof-labeling schemes. These are proof-labeling schemes which guarantee that the number of nodes detecting illegal states is linearly proportional to the edit-distance between the current state and the set of legal states. By using error-sensitive proof-labeling schemes, states which are far from satisfying the predicate will be detected by many nodes, enabling fast return to legality. We provide a structural characterization of the set of boolean predicates on network states for which there exist error-sensitive proof-labeling schemes. This characterization allows us to show that classical predicates such as, e.g., acyclicity, and leader admit error-sensitive proof-labeling schemes, while others like regular subgraphs don't. We also focus on compact error-sensitive proof-labeling schemes. In particular, we show that the known proof-labeling schemes for spanning tree and minimum spanning tree, using certificates on $O(\log n)$ bits, and on $O\left(\log^2n\right)$ bits, respectively, are error-sensitive, as long as the trees are locally represented by adjacency lists, and not just by parent pointers. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

How Long It Takes for an Ordinary Node with an Ordinary ID to Output?

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: In the context of distributed synchronous computing, processors perform in rounds, and the time-complexity of a distributed algorithm is classically defined as the number of rounds before all computing nodes have output. Hence, this complexity measure captures the running time of the slowest node(s). In this paper, we are interested in the running time of the ordinary nodes, to be compared with th… ▽ More In the context of distributed synchronous computing, processors perform in rounds, and the time-complexity of a distributed algorithm is classically defined as the number of rounds before all computing nodes have output. Hence, this complexity measure captures the running time of the slowest node(s). In this paper, we are interested in the running time of the ordinary nodes, to be compared with the running time of the slowest nodes. The node-averaged time-complexity of a distributed algorithm on a given instance is defined as the average, taken over every node of the instance, of the number of rounds before that node output. We compare the node-averaged time-complexity with the classical one in the standard LOCAL model for distributed network computing. We show that there can be an exponential gap between the node-averaged time-complexity and the classical time-complexity, as witnessed by, e.g., leader election. Our first main result is a positive one, stating that, in fact, the two time-complexities behave the same for a large class of problems on very sparse graphs. In particular, we show that, for LCL problems on cycles, the node-averaged time complexity is of the same order of magnitude as the slowest node time-complexity. In addition, in the LOCAL model, the time-complexity is computed as a worst case over all possible identity assignments to the nodes of the network. In this paper, we also investigate the ID-averaged time-complexity, when the number of rounds is averaged over all possible identity assignments. Our second main result is that the ID-averaged time-complexity is essentially the same as the expected time-complexity of randomized algorithms (where the expectation is taken over all possible random bits used by the nodes, and the number of rounds is measured for the worst-case identity assignment). Finally, we study the node-averaged ID-averaged time-complexity. △ Less

Submitted 21 November, 2017; v1 submitted 19 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: (Submitted) Journal version

Survey of Distributed Decision

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud

Abstract: We survey the recent distributed computing literature on checking whether a given distributed system configuration satisfies a given boolean predicate, i.e., whether the configuration is legal or illegal w.r.t. that predicate. We consider classical distributed computing environments, including mostly synchronous fault-free network computing (LOCAL and CONGEST models), but also asynchronous crash-p… ▽ More We survey the recent distributed computing literature on checking whether a given distributed system configuration satisfies a given boolean predicate, i.e., whether the configuration is legal or illegal w.r.t. that predicate. We consider classical distributed computing environments, including mostly synchronous fault-free network computing (LOCAL and CONGEST models), but also asynchronous crash-prone shared-memory computing (WAIT-FREE model), and mobile computing (FSYNC model). △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2017; v1 submitted 14 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

A hierarchy of local decision

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Pierre Fraigniaud, Juho Hirvonen

Abstract: We extend the notion of distributed decision in the framework of distributed network computing, inspired by recent results on so-called distributed graph automata. We show that, by using distributed decision mechanisms based on the interaction between a prover and a disprover, the size of the certificates distributed to the nodes for certifying a given network property can be drastically reduced.… ▽ More We extend the notion of distributed decision in the framework of distributed network computing, inspired by recent results on so-called distributed graph automata. We show that, by using distributed decision mechanisms based on the interaction between a prover and a disprover, the size of the certificates distributed to the nodes for certifying a given network property can be drastically reduced. For instance, we prove that minimum spanning tree can be certified with $O(\log n)$-bit certificates in $n$-node graphs, with just one interaction between the prover and the disprover, while it is known that certifying MST requires $Ωおめが(\log^2 n)$-bit certificates if only the prover can act. The improvement can even be exponential for some simple graph properties. For instance, it is known that certifying the existence of a nontrivial automorphism requires $Ωおめが(n^2)$ bits if only the prover can act. We show that there is a protocol with two interactions between the prover and the disprover enabling to certify nontrivial automorphism with $O(\log n)$-bit certificates. These results are achieved by defining and analysing a local hierarchy of decision which generalizes the classical notions of proof-labelling schemes and locally checkable proofs. △ Less

Submitted 29 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure

Brief Announcement : Average Complexity for the LOCAL Model

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley

Abstract: A standard model in network synchronised distributed computing is the LOCAL model. In this model, the processors work in rounds and, in the classic setting, they know the number of vertices of the network, $n$. Using $n$, they can compute the number of rounds after which they must all stop and output. It has been shown recently that for many problems, one can basically remove the assumption about… ▽ More A standard model in network synchronised distributed computing is the LOCAL model. In this model, the processors work in rounds and, in the classic setting, they know the number of vertices of the network, $n$. Using $n$, they can compute the number of rounds after which they must all stop and output. It has been shown recently that for many problems, one can basically remove the assumption about the knowledge of $n$, without increasing the asymptotic running time. In this case, it is assumed that different vertices can choose their final output at different rounds, but continue to transmit messages. In both models, the measure of the running time is the number of rounds before the last node outputs. In this brief announcement, the vertices do not have the knowledge of $n$, and we consider an alternative measure: the average, over the nodes, of the number of rounds before they output. We prove that the complexity of a problem can be exponentially smaller with the new measure, but that Linial's lower bound for colouring still holds. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Locally Optimal Load Balancing

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Juho Hirvonen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: This work studies distributed algorithms for locally optimal load-balancing: We are given a graph of maximum degree $Δでるた$, and each node has up to $L$ units of load. The task is to distribute the load more evenly so that the loads of adjacent nodes differ by at most $1$. If the graph is a path ($Δでるた= 2$), it is easy to solve the fractional version of the problem in $O(L)$ communication rounds, indep… ▽ More This work studies distributed algorithms for locally optimal load-balancing: We are given a graph of maximum degree $Δでるた$, and each node has up to $L$ units of load. The task is to distribute the load more evenly so that the loads of adjacent nodes differ by at most $1$. If the graph is a path ($Δでるた= 2$), it is easy to solve the fractional version of the problem in $O(L)$ communication rounds, independently of the number of nodes. We show that this is tight, and we show that it is possible to solve also the discrete version of the problem in $O(L)$ rounds in paths. For the general case ($Δでるた> 2$), we show that fractional load balancing can be solved in $\operatorname{poly}(L,Δでるた)$ rounds and discrete load balancing in $f(L,Δでるた)$ rounds for some function $f$, independently of the number of nodes. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 19 pages, 11 figures

Independent and Hitting Sets of Rectangles Intersecting a Diagonal Line : Algorithms and Complexity

Authors: José R. Correa, Laurent Feuilloley, Pablo Pérez-Lantero, José A. Soto

Abstract: Finding a maximum independent set (MIS) of a given fam- ily of axis-parallel rectangles is a basic problem in computational geom- etry and combinatorics. This problem has attracted significant atten- tion since the sixties, when Wegner conjectured that the corresponding duality gap, i.e., the maximum possible ratio between the maximum independent set and the minimum hitting set (MHS), is bounded b… ▽ More Finding a maximum independent set (MIS) of a given fam- ily of axis-parallel rectangles is a basic problem in computational geom- etry and combinatorics. This problem has attracted significant atten- tion since the sixties, when Wegner conjectured that the corresponding duality gap, i.e., the maximum possible ratio between the maximum independent set and the minimum hitting set (MHS), is bounded by a universal constant. An interesting special case, that may prove use- ful to tackling the general problem, is the diagonal-intersecting case, in which the given family of rectangles is intersected by a diagonal. Indeed, Chepoi and Felsner recently gave a factor 6 approximation algorithm for MHS in this setting, and showed that the duality gap is between 3/2 and 6. In this paper we improve upon these results. First we show that MIS in diagonal-intersecting families is NP-complete, providing one smallest subclass for which MIS is provably hard. Then, we derive an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for the maximum weight independent set when, in addition the rectangles intersect below the diagonal. This improves and extends a classic result of Lubiw, and amounts to obtain a 2-approximation algo- rithm for the maximum weight independent set of rectangles intersecting a diagonal. Finally, we prove that for diagonal-intersecting families the duality gap is between 2 and 4. The upper bound, which implies an approximation algorithm of the same factor, follows from a simple com- binatorial argument, while the lower bound represents the best known lower bound on the duality gap, even in the general case. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2014; v1 submitted 25 September, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

Comments: 26 pages