-
A Fresh Look at FAIR for Research Software
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Morane Gruenpeter,
Tom Honeyman,
Lorraine Hwang,
Mark D. Wilkinson,
Vanessa Sochat,
Hartwig Anzt,
Carole Goble,
for FAIR4RS Subgroup 1
Abstract:
This document captures the discussion and deliberation of the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) subgroup that took a fresh look at the applicability of the FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship for research software. We discuss the vision of research software as ideally reproducible, open, usable, recognized, sustained and robust, and then review both the charac…
▽ More
This document captures the discussion and deliberation of the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) subgroup that took a fresh look at the applicability of the FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship for research software. We discuss the vision of research software as ideally reproducible, open, usable, recognized, sustained and robust, and then review both the characteristic and practiced differences of research software and data. This vision and understanding of initial conditions serves as a backdrop for an attempt at translating and interpreting the guiding principles to more fully align with research software. We have found that many of the principles remained relatively intact as written, as long as considerable interpretation was provided. This was particularly the case for the "Findable" and "Accessible" foundational principles. We found that "Interoperability" and "Reusability" are particularly prone to a broad and sometimes opposing set of interpretations as written. We propose two new principles modeled on existing ones, and provide modified guiding text for these principles to help clarify our final interpretation. A series of gaps in translation were captured during this process, and these remain to be addressed. We finish with a consideration of where these translated principles fall short of the vision laid out in the opening.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2021; v1 submitted 26 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Referencing Source Code Artifacts: a Separate Concern in Software Citation
Authors:
Roberto Di Cosmo,
Morane Gruenpeter,
Stefano Zacchiroli
Abstract:
Among the entities involved in software citation, software source code requires special attention, due to the role it plays in ensuring scientific reproducibility. To reference source code we need identifiers that are not only unique and persistent, but also support \emph{integrity} checking intrinsically. Suitable identifiers must guarantee that denotedobjects will always stay the same, without r…
▽ More
Among the entities involved in software citation, software source code requires special attention, due to the role it plays in ensuring scientific reproducibility. To reference source code we need identifiers that are not only unique and persistent, but also support \emph{integrity} checking intrinsically. Suitable identifiers must guarantee that denotedobjects will always stay the same, without relying on external third parties and administrative processes. We analyze the role of identifiers for digital objects (IDOs), whose properties are different from, and complementary to, those of the various digital identifiers of objects (DIOs) that are today popular building blocks of software and data citation toolchains.We argue that both kinds of identifiers are needed and detail the syntax, semantics, and practical implementation of the persistent identifiers (PIDs) adopted by the Software Heritage project to reference billions of softwaresource code artifacts such as source code files, directories, and commits.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Software Citation Implementation Challenges
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Daina Bouquin,
Neil P. Chue Hong,
Jessica Hausman,
Catherine Jones,
Daniel Chivvis,
Tim Clark,
Mercè Crosas,
Stephan Druskat,
Martin Fenner,
Tom Gillespie,
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,
Morane Gruenpeter,
Ted Habermann,
Robert Haines,
Melissa Harrison,
Edwin Henneken,
Lorraine Hwang,
Matthew B. Jones,
Alastair A. Kelly,
David N. Kennedy,
Katrin Leinweber,
Fernando Rios,
Carly B. Robinson,
Ilian Todorov
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group) was a paper on software citation principles (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibilit…
▽ More
The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group) was a paper on software citation principles (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibility, and specificity) and discussed how they could be used to implement software citation in the scholarly community. In a series of talks and other activities, we have promoted software citation using these increasingly accepted principles. At the time the initial paper was published, we also provided guidance and examples on how to make software citable, though we now realize there are unresolved problems with that guidance. The purpose of this document is to provide an explanation of current issues impacting scholarly attribution of research software, organize updated implementation guidance, and identify where best practices and solutions are still needed.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
