-
Physics-Informed Machine Learning of Argon Gas-Driven Melt Pool Dynamics
Authors:
R. Sharma,
W. Grace Guo,
M. Raissi,
Y. B. Guo
Abstract:
Melt pool dynamics in metal additive manufacturing (AM) is critical to process stability, microstructure formation, and final properties of the printed materials. Physics-based simulation including computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the dominant approach to predict melt pool dynamics. However, the physics-based simulation approaches suffer from the inherent issue of very high computational cost…
▽ More
Melt pool dynamics in metal additive manufacturing (AM) is critical to process stability, microstructure formation, and final properties of the printed materials. Physics-based simulation including computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the dominant approach to predict melt pool dynamics. However, the physics-based simulation approaches suffer from the inherent issue of very high computational cost. This paper provides a physics-informed machine learning (PIML) method by integrating neural networks with the governing physical laws to predict the melt pool dynamics such as temperature, velocity, and pressure without using any training data on velocity. This approach avoids solving the highly non-linear Navier-Stokes equation numerically, which significantly reduces the computational cost. The difficult-to-determine model constants of the governing equations of the melt pool can also be inferred through data-driven discovery. In addition, the physics-informed neural network (PINN) architecture has been optimized for efficient model training. The data-efficient PINN model is attributed to the soft penalty by incorporating governing partial differential equations (PDEs), initial conditions, and boundary conditions in the PINN model.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Deep learning for detection and segmentation of artefact and disease instances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Authors:
Sharib Ali,
Mariia Dmitrieva,
Noha Ghatwary,
Sophia Bano,
Gorkem Polat,
Alptekin Temizel,
Adrian Krenzer,
Amar Hekalo,
Yun Bo Guo,
Bogdan Matuszewski,
Mourad Gridach,
Irina Voiculescu,
Vishnusai Yoganand,
Arnav Chavan,
Aryan Raj,
Nhan T. Nguyen,
Dat Q. Tran,
Le Duy Huynh,
Nicolas Boutry,
Shahadate Rezvy,
Haijian Chen,
Yoon Ho Choi,
Anand Subramanian,
Velmurugan Balasubramanian,
Xiaohong W. Gao
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Endoscopy Computer Vision Challenge (EndoCV) is a crowd-sourcing initiative to address eminent problems in developing reliable computer aided detection and diagnosis endoscopy systems and suggest a pathway for clinical translation of technologies. Whilst endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and treatment tool for hollow-organs, there are several core challenges often faced by endoscopists, ma…
▽ More
The Endoscopy Computer Vision Challenge (EndoCV) is a crowd-sourcing initiative to address eminent problems in developing reliable computer aided detection and diagnosis endoscopy systems and suggest a pathway for clinical translation of technologies. Whilst endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and treatment tool for hollow-organs, there are several core challenges often faced by endoscopists, mainly: 1) presence of multi-class artefacts that hinder their visual interpretation, and 2) difficulty in identifying subtle precancerous precursors and cancer abnormalities. Artefacts often affect the robustness of deep learning methods applied to the gastrointestinal tract organs as they can be confused with tissue of interest. EndoCV2020 challenges are designed to address research questions in these remits. In this paper, we present a summary of methods developed by the top 17 teams and provide an objective comparison of state-of-the-art methods and methods designed by the participants for two sub-challenges: i) artefact detection and segmentation (EAD2020), and ii) disease detection and segmentation (EDD2020). Multi-center, multi-organ, multi-class, and multi-modal clinical endoscopy datasets were compiled for both EAD2020 and EDD2020 sub-challenges. The out-of-sample generalization ability of detection algorithms was also evaluated. Whilst most teams focused on accuracy improvements, only a few methods hold credibility for clinical usability. The best performing teams provided solutions to tackle class imbalance, and variabilities in size, origin, modality and occurrences by exploring data augmentation, data fusion, and optimal class thresholding techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2021; v1 submitted 12 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images: The GlaS Challenge Contest
Authors:
Korsuk Sirinukunwattana,
Josien P. W. Pluim,
Hao Chen,
Xiaojuan Qi,
Pheng-Ann Heng,
Yun Bo Guo,
Li Yang Wang,
Bogdan J. Matuszewski,
Elia Bruni,
Urko Sanchez,
Anton Böhm,
Olaf Ronneberger,
Bassem Ben Cheikh,
Daniel Racoceanu,
Philipp Kainz,
Michael Pfeiffer,
Martin Urschler,
David R. J. Snead,
Nasir M. Rajpoot
Abstract:
Colorectal adenocarcinoma originating in intestinal glandular structures is the most common form of colon cancer. In clinical practice, the morphology of intestinal glands, including architectural appearance and glandular formation, is used by pathologists to inform prognosis and plan the treatment of individual patients. However, achieving good inter-observer as well as intra-observer reproducibi…
▽ More
Colorectal adenocarcinoma originating in intestinal glandular structures is the most common form of colon cancer. In clinical practice, the morphology of intestinal glands, including architectural appearance and glandular formation, is used by pathologists to inform prognosis and plan the treatment of individual patients. However, achieving good inter-observer as well as intra-observer reproducibility of cancer grading is still a major challenge in modern pathology. An automated approach which quantifies the morphology of glands is a solution to the problem. This paper provides an overview to the Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images Challenge Contest (GlaS) held at MICCAI'2015. Details of the challenge, including organization, dataset and evaluation criteria, are presented, along with the method descriptions and evaluation results from the top performing methods.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2016; v1 submitted 1 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
