Software Citation Implementation Challenges
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Daina Bouquin,
Neil P. Chue Hong,
Jessica Hausman,
Catherine Jones,
Daniel Chivvis,
Tim Clark,
Mercè Crosas,
Stephan Druskat,
Martin Fenner,
Tom Gillespie,
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,
Morane Gruenpeter,
Ted Habermann,
Robert Haines,
Melissa Harrison,
Edwin Henneken,
Lorraine Hwang,
Matthew B. Jones,
Alastair A. Kelly,
David N. Kennedy,
Katrin Leinweber,
Fernando Rios,
Carly B. Robinson,
Ilian Todorov
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group) was a paper on software citation principles (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibilit…
▽ More
The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group) was a paper on software citation principles (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibility, and specificity) and discussed how they could be used to implement software citation in the scholarly community. In a series of talks and other activities, we have promoted software citation using these increasingly accepted principles. At the time the initial paper was published, we also provided guidance and examples on how to make software citable, though we now realize there are unresolved problems with that guidance. The purpose of this document is to provide an explanation of current issues impacting scholarly attribution of research software, organize updated implementation guidance, and identify where best practices and solutions are still needed.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
NeuroStorm: Accelerating Brain Science Discovery in the Cloud
Authors:
Gregory Kiar,
Robert J. Anderson,
Alex Baden,
Alexandra Badea,
Eric W. Bridgeford,
Andrew Champion,
Vikram Chandrashekhar,
Forrest Collman,
Brandon Duderstadt,
Alan C. Evans,
Florian Engert,
Benjamin Falk,
Tristan Glatard,
William R. Gray Roncal,
David N. Kennedy,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard,
Ryan A. Marren,
Onyeka Nnaemeka,
Eric Perlman,
Sharmishtaas Seshamani,
Eric T. Trautman,
Daniel J. Tward,
Pedro Antonio Valdés-Sosa,
Qing Wang,
Michael I. Miller
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuroscientists are now able to acquire data at staggering rates across spatiotemporal scales. However, our ability to capitalize on existing datasets, tools, and intellectual capacities is hampered by technical challenges. The key barriers to accelerating scientific discovery correspond to the FAIR data principles: findability, global access to data, software interoperability, and reproducibility…
▽ More
Neuroscientists are now able to acquire data at staggering rates across spatiotemporal scales. However, our ability to capitalize on existing datasets, tools, and intellectual capacities is hampered by technical challenges. The key barriers to accelerating scientific discovery correspond to the FAIR data principles: findability, global access to data, software interoperability, and reproducibility/re-usability. We conducted a hackathon dedicated to making strides in those steps. This manuscript is a technical report summarizing these achievements, and we hope serves as an example of the effectiveness of focused, deliberate hackathons towards the advancement of our quickly-evolving field.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018; v1 submitted 8 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
