-
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking
Authors:
Roland Stolz,
Hanna Krasowski,
Jakob Thumm,
Michael Eichelbeck,
Philipp Gassert,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Continuous action spaces in reinforcement learning (RL) are commonly defined as interval sets. While intervals usually reflect the action boundaries for tasks well, they can be challenging for learning because the typically large global action space leads to frequent exploration of irrelevant actions. Yet, little task knowledge can be sufficient to identify significantly smaller state-specific set…
▽ More
Continuous action spaces in reinforcement learning (RL) are commonly defined as interval sets. While intervals usually reflect the action boundaries for tasks well, they can be challenging for learning because the typically large global action space leads to frequent exploration of irrelevant actions. Yet, little task knowledge can be sufficient to identify significantly smaller state-specific sets of relevant actions. Focusing learning on these relevant actions can significantly improve training efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper, we propose to focus learning on the set of relevant actions and introduce three continuous action masking methods for exactly mapping the action space to the state-dependent set of relevant actions. Thus, our methods ensure that only relevant actions are executed, enhancing the predictability of the RL agent and enabling its use in safety-critical applications. We further derive the implications of the proposed methods on the policy gradient. Using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), we evaluate our methods on three control tasks, where the relevant action set is computed based on the system dynamics and a relevant state set. Our experiments show that the three action masking methods achieve higher final rewards and converge faster than the baseline without action masking.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Provable Traffic Rule Compliance in Safe Reinforcement Learning on the Open Sea
Authors:
Hanna Krasowski,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
For safe operation, autonomous vehicles have to obey traffic rules that are set forth in legal documents formulated in natural language. Temporal logic is a suitable concept to formalize such traffic rules. Still, temporal logic rules often result in constraints that are hard to solve using optimization-based motion planners. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising method to find motion plans f…
▽ More
For safe operation, autonomous vehicles have to obey traffic rules that are set forth in legal documents formulated in natural language. Temporal logic is a suitable concept to formalize such traffic rules. Still, temporal logic rules often result in constraints that are hard to solve using optimization-based motion planners. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising method to find motion plans for autonomous vehicles. However, vanilla RL algorithms are based on random exploration and do not automatically comply with traffic rules. Our approach accomplishes guaranteed rule-compliance by integrating temporal logic specifications into RL. Specifically, we consider the application of vessels on the open sea, which must adhere to the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS). To efficiently synthesize rule-compliant actions, we combine predicates based on set-based prediction with a statechart representing our formalized rules and their priorities. Action masking then restricts the RL agent to this set of verified rule-compliant actions. In numerical evaluations on critical maritime traffic situations, our agent always complies with the formalized legal rules and never collides while achieving a high goal-reaching rate during training and deployment. In contrast, vanilla and traffic rule-informed RL agents frequently violate traffic rules and collide even after training.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2024; v1 submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Stranding Risk for Underactuated Vessels in Complex Ocean Currents: Analysis and Controllers
Authors:
Andreas Doering,
Marius Wiggert,
Hanna Krasowski,
Manan Doshi,
Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux,
Claire J. Tomlin
Abstract:
Low-propulsion vessels can take advantage of powerful ocean currents to navigate towards a destination. Recent results demonstrated that vessels can reach their destination with high probability despite forecast errors. However, these results do not consider the critical aspect of safety of such vessels: because of their low propulsion which is much smaller than the magnitude of currents, they mig…
▽ More
Low-propulsion vessels can take advantage of powerful ocean currents to navigate towards a destination. Recent results demonstrated that vessels can reach their destination with high probability despite forecast errors. However, these results do not consider the critical aspect of safety of such vessels: because of their low propulsion which is much smaller than the magnitude of currents, they might end up in currents that inevitably push them into unsafe areas such as shallow areas, garbage patches, and shipping lanes. In this work, we first investigate the risk of stranding for free-floating vessels in the Northeast Pacific. We find that at least 5.04% would strand within 90 days. Next, we encode the unsafe sets as hard constraints into Hamilton-Jacobi Multi-Time Reachability (HJ-MTR) to synthesize a feedback policy that is equivalent to re-planning at each time step at low computational cost. While applying this policy closed-loop guarantees safe operation when the currents are known, in realistic situations only imperfect forecasts are available. We demonstrate the safety of our approach in such realistic situations empirically with large-scale simulations of a vessel navigating in high-risk regions in the Northeast Pacific. We find that applying our policy closed-loop with daily re-planning on new forecasts can ensure safety with high probability even under forecast errors that exceed the maximal propulsion. Our method significantly improves safety over the baselines and still achieves a timely arrival of the vessel at the destination.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Maximizing Seaweed Growth on Autonomous Farms: A Dynamic Programming Approach for Underactuated Systems Navigating on Uncertain Ocean Currents
Authors:
Matthias Killer,
Marius Wiggert,
Hanna Krasowski,
Manan Doshi,
Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux,
Claire J. Tomlin
Abstract:
Seaweed biomass offers significant potential for climate mitigation, but large-scale, autonomous open-ocean farms are required to fully exploit it. Such farms typically have low propulsion and are heavily influenced by ocean currents. We want to design a controller that maximizes seaweed growth over months by taking advantage of the non-linear time-varying ocean currents for reaching high-growth r…
▽ More
Seaweed biomass offers significant potential for climate mitigation, but large-scale, autonomous open-ocean farms are required to fully exploit it. Such farms typically have low propulsion and are heavily influenced by ocean currents. We want to design a controller that maximizes seaweed growth over months by taking advantage of the non-linear time-varying ocean currents for reaching high-growth regions. The complex dynamics and underactuation make this challenging even when the currents are known. This is even harder when only short-term imperfect forecasts with increasing uncertainty are available. We propose a dynamic programming-based method to efficiently solve for the optimal growth value function when true currents are known. We additionally present three extensions when as in reality only forecasts are known: (1) our methods resulting value function can be used as feedback policy to obtain the growth-optimal control for all states and times, allowing closed-loop control equivalent to re-planning at every time step hence mitigating forecast errors, (2) a feedback policy for long-term optimal growth beyond forecast horizons using seasonal average current data as terminal reward, and (3) a discounted finite-time Dynamic Programming (DP) formulation to account for increasing ocean current estimate uncertainty. We evaluate our approach through 30-day simulations of floating seaweed farms in realistic Pacific Ocean current scenarios. Our method demonstrates an achievement of 95.8% of the best possible growth using only 5-day forecasts. This confirms the feasibility of using low-power propulsion and optimal control for enhanced seaweed growth on floating farms under real-world conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2023; v1 submitted 4 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Safe Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Guarantees Satisfying Temporal Logic Specifications in Continuous Action Spaces
Authors:
Hanna Krasowski,
Prithvi Akella,
Aaron D. Ames,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Vanilla Reinforcement Learning (RL) can efficiently solve complex tasks but does not provide any guarantees on system behavior. To bridge this gap, we propose a three-step safe RL procedure for continuous action spaces that provides probabilistic guarantees with respect to temporal logic specifications. First, our approach probabilistically verifies a candidate controller with respect to a tempora…
▽ More
Vanilla Reinforcement Learning (RL) can efficiently solve complex tasks but does not provide any guarantees on system behavior. To bridge this gap, we propose a three-step safe RL procedure for continuous action spaces that provides probabilistic guarantees with respect to temporal logic specifications. First, our approach probabilistically verifies a candidate controller with respect to a temporal logic specification while randomizing the control inputs to the system within a bounded set. Second, we improve the performance of this probabilistically verified controller by adding an RL agent that optimizes the verified controller for performance in the same bounded set around the control input. Third, we verify probabilistic safety guarantees with respect to temporal logic specifications for the learned agent. Our approach is efficiently implementable for continuous action and state spaces. The separation of safety verification and performance improvement into two distinct steps realizes both explicit probabilistic safety guarantees and a straightforward RL setup that focuses on performance. We evaluate our approach on an evasion task where a robot has to reach a goal while evading a dynamic obstacle with a specific maneuver. Our results show that our safe RL approach leads to efficient learning while maintaining its probabilistic safety specification.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2023; v1 submitted 12 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning via Action Projection using Reachability Analysis and Polynomial Zonotopes
Authors:
Niklas Kochdumper,
Hanna Krasowski,
Xiao Wang,
Stanley Bak,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
While reinforcement learning produces very promising results for many applications, its main disadvantage is the lack of safety guarantees, which prevents its use in safety-critical systems. In this work, we address this issue by a safety shield for nonlinear continuous systems that solve reach-avoid tasks. Our safety shield prevents applying potentially unsafe actions from a reinforcement learnin…
▽ More
While reinforcement learning produces very promising results for many applications, its main disadvantage is the lack of safety guarantees, which prevents its use in safety-critical systems. In this work, we address this issue by a safety shield for nonlinear continuous systems that solve reach-avoid tasks. Our safety shield prevents applying potentially unsafe actions from a reinforcement learning agent by projecting the proposed action to the closest safe action. This approach is called action projection and is implemented via mixed-integer optimization. The safety constraints for action projection are obtained by applying parameterized reachability analysis using polynomial zonotopes, which enables to accurately capture the nonlinear effects of the actions on the system. In contrast to other state-of-the-art approaches for action projection, our safety shield can efficiently handle input constraints and dynamic obstacles, eases incorporation of the spatial robot dimensions into the safety constraints, guarantees robust safety despite process noise and measurement errors, and is well suited for high-dimensional systems, as we demonstrate on several challenging benchmark systems.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2023; v1 submitted 19 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarking
Authors:
Hanna Krasowski,
Jakob Thumm,
Marlon Müller,
Lukas Schäfer,
Xiao Wang,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Ensuring the safety of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms is crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to provide hard safety guarantees for RL, which is essential for applications where unsafe actions could have disastrous consequences. Nevertheless,…
▽ More
Ensuring the safety of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms is crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to provide hard safety guarantees for RL, which is essential for applications where unsafe actions could have disastrous consequences. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive comparison of these provably safe RL methods. Therefore, we introduce a categorization of existing provably safe RL methods, present the conceptual foundations for both continuous and discrete action spaces, and empirically benchmark existing methods. We categorize the methods based on how they adapt the action: action replacement, action projection, and action masking. Our experiments on an inverted pendulum and a quadrotor stabilization task indicate that action replacement is the best-performing approach for these applications despite its comparatively simple realization. Furthermore, adding a reward penalty, every time the safety verification is engaged, improved training performance in our experiments. Finally, we provide practical guidance on selecting provably safe RL approaches depending on the safety specification, RL algorithm, and type of action space.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
