-
Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age
Authors:
Ralph Neuhäuser,
Guillermo Torres,
Markus Mugrauer,
Dagmar L. Neuhäuser,
Jesse Chapman,
Daniela Luge,
Matteo Cosci
Abstract:
After core hydrogen burning, massive stars evolve from blue-white dwarfs to red supergiants by expanding, brightening, and cooling within few millennia. We discuss a previously neglected constraint on mass, age, and evolutionary state of Betelgeuse and Antares, namely their observed colour evolution over historical times: We place all 236 stars bright enough for their colour to be discerned by the…
▽ More
After core hydrogen burning, massive stars evolve from blue-white dwarfs to red supergiants by expanding, brightening, and cooling within few millennia. We discuss a previously neglected constraint on mass, age, and evolutionary state of Betelgeuse and Antares, namely their observed colour evolution over historical times: We place all 236 stars bright enough for their colour to be discerned by the unaided eye (V$\le$3.3 mag) on the colour-magnitude-diagram (CMD), and focus on those in the Hertzsprung gap. We study pre-telescopic records on star colour with historically-critical methods to find stars that have evolved noticeably in colour within the last millennia. Our main result is that Betelgeuse was recorded with a colour significantly different (non-red) than today (red, B$-$V=$1.78 \pm 0.05$ mag). Hyginus (Rome) and Sima Qian (China) independently report it two millennia ago as appearing like Saturn (B$-$V=$1.09 \pm 0.16$ mag) in colour and `yellow' (quantifiable as B$-$V=$0.95 \pm 0.35$ mag), respectively (together, 5.1$σ$ different from today). The colour change of Betelgeuse is a new, tight constraint for single-star theoretical evolutionary models (or merger models). It is most likely located less than one millennium past the bottom of the red giant branch, before which rapid colour evolution is expected. Evolutionary tracks from MIST consistent with both its colour evolution and its location on the CMD suggest a mass of $\sim$14M$_{\odot}$ at $\sim$14 Myr. The (roughly) constant colour of Antares for the last three millennia also constrains its mass and age. Wezen was reported white historically, but is now yellow.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2022; v1 submitted 11 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Orbit determination just from historical observations? Test case: The comet of AD 760 is identified as 1P/Halley
Authors:
D. L. Neuhäuser,
R. Neuhäuser,
M. Mugrauer,
A. Harrak,
J. Chapman
Abstract:
Recent advances in techniques of critical close reading of historical texts can now be applied to records of pre-telescopic celestial observations - allowing significant progress for analyzing and solving orbits of past comets: we exemplify our method by solving the orbit of the comet in AD 760 only with historical observations and then identify it with 1P/Halley. A detailed eyewitness record with…
▽ More
Recent advances in techniques of critical close reading of historical texts can now be applied to records of pre-telescopic celestial observations - allowing significant progress for analyzing and solving orbits of past comets: we exemplify our method by solving the orbit of the comet in AD 760 only with historical observations and then identify it with 1P/Halley. A detailed eyewitness record with drawing of a comet in AD 760 in the Syriac Chronicle of Zuqnin (finished AD 775/6) was not yet included in the study of its orbit - the Chinese reports alone do not yield a sufficient number of dated positions. We analyze the Syriac and Chinese sources with critical methods for quantitative astronomical usage, we also consider a few further records from the Mediterranean and West Asian area. With our conservatively derived dated positions we can determine the best fitting Keplerian orbital solution by least squares fitting yielding the orbital elements; the parameter ranges for non-periodic solutions and highly eccentric periodic solutions are consistent with each other. The allowed parameter ranges for perihelion distance and inclination are sufficiently small to identify the comet with 1P/Halley. Although 1P/Halley is the only comet, where the telescopic orbit is credibly linked to pre-telescopic returns, e.g. to AD 760, our identification confirms claims from extrapolating telescopic observations backward in time - here independently based on historical data. In particular, we obtained a precise perihelion time (760 May 19.1 \pm 1.7). The inferior conjunction between comet and Sun as on the previously published orbit (760 May 31.9) is shifted by about one day compared to our new orbit (June 1.8), only the new one is consistent with the last observation (June 1.0) before conjunction as reported in the Chronicle of Zuqnin. We also study the comet's brightness evolution ...
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Critical comments on publications by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae/supernovae and their candidates
Authors:
R. Neuhäuser,
D. L. Neuhäuser
Abstract:
We critically discuss recent articles by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae and supernovae (SNe) as well as their list of `24 most promising events' `with rather high probability to be a nova' (Hoffmann et al. 2020). Their alleged positional accuracy of previously suggested historical nova/SN records is based on inhomogeneous datasets (Vogt et al. 2019), but then used for the nova search…
▽ More
We critically discuss recent articles by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae and supernovae (SNe) as well as their list of `24 most promising events' `with rather high probability to be a nova' (Hoffmann et al. 2020). Their alleged positional accuracy of previously suggested historical nova/SN records is based on inhomogeneous datasets (Vogt et al. 2019), but then used for the nova search in Hoffmann et al. (2020). Their claim that previously only `point coordinates' for nova/SN candidates were published, is fabricated. Their estimate of expected nova detection rates is off by a factor of 10 due to miscalculation. They accept counterparts down to 4 to 7 mag at peak, which is against the consensus for the typical limit of naked-eye discovery. When they discuss previously suggested identifications of historical novae, which they all doubt, they do not present new facts (Hoffmann 2019). Their catalog of `24 most promising events' for novae (Hoffmann et al. 2020) neglects important recent literature (e.g. Pankenier et al. 2008 and Stephenson and Green 2009), the claimed methods are not followed, etc. At least half of their short-list candidates were and are to be considered comets. For many of the others, duration of more than one night and/or a precise position is missing and/or the sources were treated mistakenly. Two highlights, a fabricated SN AD 667/668 and a presumable recurrent nova in AD 891, are already rejected in detail in Neuhaeuser et al. (2021); in both cases, all evidence speaks in favor of comets. There remains only one reliable case, where close to one (possible) historically reported position, a nova shell was already found (AD 1437, Shara et al. 2017). Follow-up observations cannot be recommended.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Novae, supernovae, or something else? -- (Super-)nova highlights from Hoffmann & Vogt are quite certainly comets (AD 668 and 891)
Authors:
Ralph Neuhaeuser,
Dagmar L. Neuhaeuser,
Jesse Chapman
Abstract:
Galactic novae and supernovae can be studied by utilizing historical observations, yielding explosion time, location on sky~etc. Recent publications by Hoffmann & Vogt present CVs, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae etc. as potential counterparts based on their list of historically reported transients from the Classical Chinese text corpus. Since their candidate selection neglects the state-of-…
▽ More
Galactic novae and supernovae can be studied by utilizing historical observations, yielding explosion time, location on sky~etc. Recent publications by Hoffmann & Vogt present CVs, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae etc. as potential counterparts based on their list of historically reported transients from the Classical Chinese text corpus. Since their candidate selection neglects the state-of-the-art (e.g. Stephenson \& Green), and since it includes `broom stars' and `fuzzy stars', i.e. probable comets, we investigate their catalogue in more detail. We discuss here their two highlights, the suggestion of two `broom star' records dated AD 667 and 668 as one historical supernova and of the `guest star' of AD 891 as recurrent nova U Sco. The proposed positional search areas are not justified due to translation and dating problems, source omission, as well as misunderstandings of historical Chinese astronomy and unfounded textual interpretations. All sources together provide strong evidence for comet sightings in both AD 668 and 891 -- e.g., there are no arguments for stationarity. The AD 667 record is a misdated doublet of 668. Our critique pertains more generally to their whole catalogue of `24 most promising events': their speculations on counterparts lack a solid foundation and should not be used in follow-ups.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
New sunspots and aurorae in the historical Chinese text corpus? Comments on uncritical digital search applications
Authors:
D. L. Neuhaeuser,
R. Neuhaeuser,
J. Chapman
Abstract:
We review some applications of the method of electronic searching for historical observations of sunspots and aurorae in the Chinese text corpus by Hayakawa et al. etc. However, we show strong shortcomings in the digital search technique as applied by them: almost all likely true sunspot and aurora records were presented before (e.g. Xu et al. 2000), which is not mentioned in those papers; the rem…
▽ More
We review some applications of the method of electronic searching for historical observations of sunspots and aurorae in the Chinese text corpus by Hayakawa et al. etc. However, we show strong shortcomings in the digital search technique as applied by them: almost all likely true sunspot and aurora records were presented before (e.g. Xu et al. 2000), which is not mentioned in those papers; the remaining records are dubious and often refer to other phenomena, neither spots nor aurorae (this also applies to Hayakawa et al. 2017c). Most of the above publications include very few Chinese texts and translations, and their tables with abbreviated keywords do not allow the reader to consider alternative interpretations (the tables also do not specify which records mention night-time). We have compared some of their event tables with previously published catalogs and found various discrepancies. There are also intrinsic inconsistencies, misleading information (lunar phase for day-time events), and dating errors. We present Chinese texts and translations for some of their presumable new aurorae: only one can be considered a likely true aurora (AD 604 Jan); some others were selected on the sole basis of the use of the word "light" or "rainbow". Several alleged new aurorae present observations beside the Sun during day-time. There are well-known comets among their presumable aurorae. We also discuss, (i) whether "heiqi ri pang" can stand for black spot(s) "on one side of" or "beside" the sun, (ii) aurora color confusion in Hayakawa et al. (2015, 2016), and (iii) whether "white" and "unusual rainbows" can be aurorae.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2017; v1 submitted 14 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Sunspot numbers based on historic records in the 1610s - early telescopic observations by Simon Marius and others
Authors:
Ralph Neuhaeuser,
Dagmar L. Neuhaeuser
Abstract:
Hoyt & Schatten (1998) claim that Simon Marius would have observed the sun from 1617 Jun 7 to 1618 Dec 31 (Gregorian calendar) all days, except three short gaps in 1618, but would never have detected a sunspot -- based on a quotation from Marius in Wolf (1857), but misinterpreted by Hoyt & Schatten. Marius himself specified in early 1619 that "for one and a half year ... rather few or more often n…
▽ More
Hoyt & Schatten (1998) claim that Simon Marius would have observed the sun from 1617 Jun 7 to 1618 Dec 31 (Gregorian calendar) all days, except three short gaps in 1618, but would never have detected a sunspot -- based on a quotation from Marius in Wolf (1857), but misinterpreted by Hoyt & Schatten. Marius himself specified in early 1619 that "for one and a half year ... rather few or more often no spots could be detected ... which was never observed before" (Marius 1619). The generic statement by Marius can be interpreted such that the active day fraction was below 0.5 (but not zero) from fall 1617 to spring 1619 and that it was 1 before fall 1617 (since August 1611). Hoyt & Schatten cite Zinner (1952), who referred to Zinner (1942), where observing dates by Marius since 1611 are given, but which were not used by Hoyt & Schatten. We present all relevant texts from Marius where he clearly stated that he observed many spots in different form on and since 1611 Aug 3 (Julian) = Aug 13 (Greg.) (on the first day together with Ahasverus Schmidnerus), 14 spots on 1612 May 30 (Julian) = Jun 9 (Greg.), which is consistent with drawings by Galilei and Jungius for that day, the latter is shown here for the first time, at least one spot on 1611 Oct 3 and/or 11 (Julian), i.e. Oct 13 and/or 21 (Greg.), when he changed his sunspot observing technique, he also mentioned that he has drawn sunspots for 1611 Nov 17 (Julian) = Nov 27 (Greg.), in addition to those clearly datable detections, there is evidence in the texts for regular observations. ... Sunspots records by Malapert from 1618 to 1621 show that the last low-latitude spot was seen in Dec 1620, while the first high-latitude spots were noticed in June and Oct 1620, so that the Schwabe cycle turnover (minimum) took place around that time, ...
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2016; v1 submitted 13 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Solar activity around AD 775 from aurorae and radiocarbon
Authors:
Ralph Neuhaeuser,
Dagmar L. Neuhaeuser
Abstract:
A large variation in 14 C around AD 775 has been considered to be caused by one or more solar super-flares within one year. We critically review all known aurora reports from Europe as well as the Near, Middle, and Far East from AD 731 to 825 and find 39 likely true aurorae plus four more potential aurorae and 24 other reports about halos, meteors, thunderstorms etc., which were previously misinte…
▽ More
A large variation in 14 C around AD 775 has been considered to be caused by one or more solar super-flares within one year. We critically review all known aurora reports from Europe as well as the Near, Middle, and Far East from AD 731 to 825 and find 39 likely true aurorae plus four more potential aurorae and 24 other reports about halos, meteors, thunderstorms etc., which were previously misinterpreted as aurorae or misdated; we assign probabilities for all events according to five aurora criteria. We find very likely true aurorae in AD 743, 745, 762, 765, 772, 773, 793, 796, 807, and 817. There were two aurorae in the early 770s observed near Amida (now Diyarbakir in Turkey near the Turkish-Syrian border), which were not only red, but also green-yellow - being at a relatively low geo-magnetic latidude, they indicate a relatively strong solar storm. However, it cannot be argued that those aurorae (geo-magnetical latitude 43 to 50 deg, considering five different reconstructions of the geo-magnetic pole) could be connected to one or more solar super-flares causing the 14 C increase around AD 775: There are several reports about low- to mid-latitude aurorae at 32 to 44 deg geo-magnetical latitude in China and Iraq; some of them were likely observed (quasi-)simultaneously in two of three areas (Europe, Byzantium/Arabia, East Asia), one lasted several nights, and some indicate a particulary strong geo-magnetic storm (red colour and dynamics), namely in AD 745, 762, 793, 807, and 817 - always without 14 C peaks. We use 39 likely true aurorae as well as historic reports about sunspots together with the radiocarbon content from tree rings to reconstruct solar activity: From about AD 733 to 823, we see at least nine Schwabe cycles ...
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2015; v1 submitted 5 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
