-
Analysis of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 in situ CME observations
Authors:
Skralan Hosteaux,
Luciano Rodiguez,
Stefaan Poedts
Abstract:
This paper studies ICMEs detected by both Voyager spacecraft during propagation from 1 to 10 AU, with observations from 1977 to 1980. ICMEs are detected by using several signatures in the in-situ data, the primary one being the low measured to expected proton temperature ratio. We found 21 events common to both spacecraft and study their internal structure in terms of plasma and magnetic field pro…
▽ More
This paper studies ICMEs detected by both Voyager spacecraft during propagation from 1 to 10 AU, with observations from 1977 to 1980. ICMEs are detected by using several signatures in the in-situ data, the primary one being the low measured to expected proton temperature ratio. We found 21 events common to both spacecraft and study their internal structure in terms of plasma and magnetic field properties. We find that ICMEs are expanding as they propagate outwards, with decreasing density and magnetic field intensities, in agreement with previous studies. We first carry out a statistical study and then a detailed analysis of each case. Furthermore, we analyse one case in which a shock can be clearly detected by both spacecraft. The methods described here can be interesting for other studies combining data sets from heliospheric missions. Furthermore, they highlight the importance of exploiting useful data from past missions.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Numerical simulations of shear-induced consecutive coronal mass ejections
Authors:
D. -C. Talpeanu,
E. Chané,
S. Poedts,
E. D'Huys,
M. Mierla,
I. Roussev,
S. Hosteaux
Abstract:
Methods: Stealth CMEs represent a particular class of solar eruptions that are clearly distinguished in coronagraph observations, but they don't have a clear source signature. A particular type of stealth CMEs occurs in the trailing current sheet of a previous ejection, therefore, we used the 2.5D MHD package of the code MPI-AMRVAC to numerically simulate consecutive CMEs by imposing shearing moti…
▽ More
Methods: Stealth CMEs represent a particular class of solar eruptions that are clearly distinguished in coronagraph observations, but they don't have a clear source signature. A particular type of stealth CMEs occurs in the trailing current sheet of a previous ejection, therefore, we used the 2.5D MHD package of the code MPI-AMRVAC to numerically simulate consecutive CMEs by imposing shearing motions onto the inner boundary. The initial magnetic configuration consists of a triple arcade structure embedded into a bimodal solar wind, and the sheared polarity inversion line is found in the southern loop system. The mesh was continuously adapted through a refinement method that applies to current carrying structures. We then compared the obtained eruptions with the observed directions of propagation of an initial multiple coronal mass ejection (MCME) event that occurred in September 2009. We further analysed the simulated ejections by tracking the centre of their flux ropes in latitude and their total speed. Radial Poynting flux computation was employed as well to follow the evolution of electromagnetic energy introduced into the system.
Results: Changes within 1\% in the shearing speed result in three different scenarios for the second CME, although the preceding eruption seems insusceptible to such small variations. Depending on the applied shearing speed, we thus obtain a failed eruption, a stealth, or a CME driven by the imposed shear, as the second ejection. The dynamics of all eruptions are compared with the observed directions of propagation of an MCME event and a good correlation is achieved. The Poynting flux analysis reveals the temporal variation of the important steps of eruptions. For the first time, a stealth CME is simulated in the aftermath of a first eruption, through changes in the applied shearing speed.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Effect of the solar wind density on the evolution of normal and inverse coronal mass ejections
Authors:
S. Hosteaux,
E. Chané,
S. Poedts
Abstract:
We investigate the evolution of both normal and inverse CMEs ejected at different initial velocities, and observe the effect of the background wind density and their magnetic polarity on their evolution up to 1 AU. We performed 2.5D simulations by solving the magnetohydrodynamic equations on a radially stretched grid, employing a block-based adaptive mesh refinement scheme based on a density thres…
▽ More
We investigate the evolution of both normal and inverse CMEs ejected at different initial velocities, and observe the effect of the background wind density and their magnetic polarity on their evolution up to 1 AU. We performed 2.5D simulations by solving the magnetohydrodynamic equations on a radially stretched grid, employing a block-based adaptive mesh refinement scheme based on a density threshold to achieve high resolution following the evolution of the magnetic clouds and the leading bow shocks. All the simulations discussed in the present paper were performed using the same initial grid and numerical methods. The polarity of the internal magnetic field of the CME has a substantial effect on its propagation velocity and on its deformation and erosion during its evolution towards Earth. We quantified the effects of the polarity of the internal magnetic field of the CMEs and of the density of the background solar wind on the arrival times of the shock front and the magnetic cloud. We determined the positions and propagation velocities of the magnetic clouds and thus also the stand-off distance of the leading shock fronts (i.e. the thickness of the magnetic sheath region) and the deformation and erosion of the magnetic clouds during their evolution from the Sun to the Earth. Inverse CMEs were found to be faster than normal CMEs ejected in the same initial conditions, but with smaller stand-off distances. They also have a higher magnetic cloud length, opening angle, and mass. Synthetic satellite time series showed that the shock magnitude is not affected by the polarity of the CME. However, the density peak of the magnetic cloud is dependent on the polarity and, in case of inverse CMEs, also on the background wind density. The magnitude of the z-component of the magnetic field was not influenced by either the polarity or the wind density.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
