Grain boundary migration in polycrystalline $α$-Fe
Authors:
Zipeng Xu,
Yu-Feng Shen,
S. Kiana Naghibzadeh,
Xiaoyao Peng,
Vivekanand Muralikrishnan,
Siddharth Maddali,
David Menasche,
Amanda R. Krause,
Kaushik Dayal,
Robert M. Suter,
Gregory S. Rohrer
Abstract:
High energy x-ray diffraction microscopy was used to image the microstructure of $α$-Fe before and after a 600 $^\circ$C anneal. These data were used to determine the areas, curvatures, energies, and velocities of approximately 40,000 grain boundaries. The measured grain boundary properties depend on the five macroscopic grain boundary parameters. The velocities are not correlated with the product…
▽ More
High energy x-ray diffraction microscopy was used to image the microstructure of $α$-Fe before and after a 600 $^\circ$C anneal. These data were used to determine the areas, curvatures, energies, and velocities of approximately 40,000 grain boundaries. The measured grain boundary properties depend on the five macroscopic grain boundary parameters. The velocities are not correlated with the product of the mean boundary curvature and grain boundary energy, usually assumed to be the driving force. Boundary migration is made up of area changes (lateral motion) and translation (normal motion) and both contribute to the total migration. Through the lateral motion component of the migration, low energy boundaries tend to expand in area while high energy boundaries shrink, reducing the average energy through grain boundary replacement. The driving force for this process is not related to curvature and might disrupt the expected curvature-velocity relationship.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Comparison of simulated and measured grain volume changes during grain growth
Authors:
Xiaoyao Peng,
Aditi Bhattacharya,
S. Kiana Naghibzadeh,
David Kinderlehrer,
Robert Suter,
Kaushik Dayal,
Gregory S. Rohrer
Abstract:
The three-dimensional microstructure of Ni, observed after five annealing intervals, was compared to simulations of grain growth using the threshold dynamics method with the assumption of capillarity as the only driving force. A grain-by-grain comparison made it possible to identify the sources of differences between the simulation and experiment. The most significant difference was for grains of…
▽ More
The three-dimensional microstructure of Ni, observed after five annealing intervals, was compared to simulations of grain growth using the threshold dynamics method with the assumption of capillarity as the only driving force. A grain-by-grain comparison made it possible to identify the sources of differences between the simulation and experiment. The most significant difference was for grains of the smallest sizes, which the simulation predicted would lose volume and disappear at a greater rate than observed in the experiment. The loss of grains created errors in the numbers of neighbors of the remaining grains, and it was found that errors in the simulated grain volume were correlated to errors in the number of near neighbors. While anisotropic grain boundary properties likely play a role in the differences, the size dependence of the errors suggest that it might be necessary to include a size dependence in the model for grain boundary migration kinetics.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
