Open-Source Conversational AI with SpeechBrain 1.0
Authors:
Mirco Ravanelli,
Titouan Parcollet,
Adel Moumen,
Sylvain de Langen,
Cem Subakan,
Peter Plantinga,
Yingzhi Wang,
Pooneh Mousavi,
Luca Della Libera,
Artem Ploujnikov,
Francesco Paissan,
Davide Borra,
Salah Zaiem,
Zeyu Zhao,
Shucong Zhang,
Georgios Karakasidis,
Sung-Lin Yeh,
Pierre Champion,
Aku Rouhe,
Rudolf Braun,
Florian Mai,
Juan Zuluaga-Gomez,
Seyed Mahed Mousavi,
Andreas Nautsch,
Xuechen Liu
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
SpeechBrain is an open-source Conversational AI toolkit based on PyTorch, focused particularly on speech processing tasks such as speech recognition, speech enhancement, speaker recognition, text-to-speech, and much more. It promotes transparency and replicability by releasing both the pre-trained models and the complete "recipes" of code and algorithms required for training them. This paper prese…
▽ More
SpeechBrain is an open-source Conversational AI toolkit based on PyTorch, focused particularly on speech processing tasks such as speech recognition, speech enhancement, speaker recognition, text-to-speech, and much more. It promotes transparency and replicability by releasing both the pre-trained models and the complete "recipes" of code and algorithms required for training them. This paper presents SpeechBrain 1.0, a significant milestone in the evolution of the toolkit, which now has over 200 recipes for speech, audio, and language processing tasks, and more than 100 models available on Hugging Face. SpeechBrain 1.0 introduces new technologies to support diverse learning modalities, Large Language Model (LLM) integration, and advanced decoding strategies, along with novel models, tasks, and modalities. It also includes a new benchmark repository, offering researchers a unified platform for evaluating models across diverse tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2024; v1 submitted 29 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Comparison and Analysis of New Curriculum Criteria for End-to-End ASR
Authors:
Georgios Karakasidis,
Tamás Grósz,
Mikko Kurimo
Abstract:
It is common knowledge that the quantity and quality of the training data play a significant role in the creation of a good machine learning model. In this paper, we take it one step further and demonstrate that the way the training examples are arranged is also of crucial importance. Curriculum Learning is built on the observation that organized and structured assimilation of knowledge has the ab…
▽ More
It is common knowledge that the quantity and quality of the training data play a significant role in the creation of a good machine learning model. In this paper, we take it one step further and demonstrate that the way the training examples are arranged is also of crucial importance. Curriculum Learning is built on the observation that organized and structured assimilation of knowledge has the ability to enable faster training and better comprehension. When humans learn to speak, they first try to utter basic phones and then gradually move towards more complex structures such as words and sentences. This methodology is known as Curriculum Learning, and we employ it in the context of Automatic Speech Recognition. We hypothesize that end-to-end models can achieve better performance when provided with an organized training set consisting of examples that exhibit an increasing level of difficulty (i.e. a curriculum). To impose structure on the training set and to define the notion of an easy example, we explored multiple scoring functions that either use feedback from an external neural network or incorporate feedback from the model itself. Empirical results show that with different curriculums we can balance the training times and the network's performance.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
Explainable Empirical Risk Minimization
Authors:
L. Zhang,
G. Karakasidis,
A. Odnoblyudova,
L. Dogruel,
A. Jung
Abstract:
The successful application of machine learning (ML) methods becomes increasingly dependent on their interpretability or explainability. Designing explainable ML systems is instrumental to ensuring transparency of automated decision-making that targets humans. The explainability of ML methods is also an essential ingredient for trustworthy artificial intelligence. A key challenge in ensuring explai…
▽ More
The successful application of machine learning (ML) methods becomes increasingly dependent on their interpretability or explainability. Designing explainable ML systems is instrumental to ensuring transparency of automated decision-making that targets humans. The explainability of ML methods is also an essential ingredient for trustworthy artificial intelligence. A key challenge in ensuring explainability is its dependence on the specific human user ("explainee"). The users of machine learning methods might have vastly different background knowledge about machine learning principles. One user might have a university degree in machine learning or related fields, while another user might have never received formal training in high-school mathematics. This paper applies information-theoretic concepts to develop a novel measure for the subjective explainability of the predictions delivered by a ML method. We construct this measure via the conditional entropy of predictions, given a user feedback. The user feedback might be obtained from user surveys or biophysical measurements. Our main contribution is the explainable empirical risk minimization (EERM) principle of learning a hypothesis that optimally balances between the subjective explainability and risk. The EERM principle is flexible and can be combined with arbitrary machine learning models. We present several practical implementations of EERM for linear models and decision trees. Numerical experiments demonstrate the application of EERM to detecting the use of inappropriate language on social media.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 3 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
