-
Turkronicles: Diachronic Resources for the Fast Evolving Turkish Language
Authors:
Togay Yazar,
Mucahid Kutlu,
İsa Kerem Bayırlı
Abstract:
Over the past century, the Turkish language has undergone substantial changes, primarily driven by governmental interventions. In this work, our goal is to investigate the evolution of the Turkish language since the establishment of Türkiye in 1923. Thus, we first introduce Turkronicles which is a diachronic corpus for Turkish derived from the Official Gazette of Türkiye. Turkronicles contains 45,…
▽ More
Over the past century, the Turkish language has undergone substantial changes, primarily driven by governmental interventions. In this work, our goal is to investigate the evolution of the Turkish language since the establishment of Türkiye in 1923. Thus, we first introduce Turkronicles which is a diachronic corpus for Turkish derived from the Official Gazette of Türkiye. Turkronicles contains 45,375 documents, detailing governmental actions, making it a pivotal resource for analyzing the linguistic evolution influenced by the state policies. In addition, we expand an existing diachronic Turkish corpus which consists of the records of the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye by covering additional years. Next, combining these two diachronic corpora, we seek answers for two main research questions: How have the Turkish vocabulary and the writing conventions changed since the 1920s? Our analysis reveals that the vocabularies of two different time periods diverge more as the time between them increases, and newly coined Turkish words take the place of their old counterparts. We also observe changes in writing conventions. In particular, the use of circumflex noticeably decreases and words ending with the letters "-b" and "-d" are successively replaced with "-p" and "-t" letters, respectively. Overall, this study quantitatively highlights the dramatic changes in Turkish from various aspects of the language in a diachronic perspective.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
I Know You Did Not Write That! A Sampling Based Watermarking Method for Identifying Machine Generated Text
Authors:
Kaan Efe Keleş,
Ömer Kaan Gürbüz,
Mucahid Kutlu
Abstract:
Potential harms of Large Language Models such as mass misinformation and plagiarism can be partially mitigated if there exists a reliable way to detect machine generated text. In this paper, we propose a new watermarking method to detect machine-generated texts. Our method embeds a unique pattern within the generated text, ensuring that while the content remains coherent and natural to human reade…
▽ More
Potential harms of Large Language Models such as mass misinformation and plagiarism can be partially mitigated if there exists a reliable way to detect machine generated text. In this paper, we propose a new watermarking method to detect machine-generated texts. Our method embeds a unique pattern within the generated text, ensuring that while the content remains coherent and natural to human readers, it carries distinct markers that can be identified algorithmically. Specifically, we intervene with the token sampling process in a way which enables us to trace back our token choices during the detection phase. We show how watermarking affects textual quality and compare our proposed method with a state-of-the-art watermarking method in terms of robustness and detectability. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our watermarking scheme in distinguishing between watermarked and non-watermarked text, achieving high detection rates while maintaining textual quality.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2023; v1 submitted 29 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
New Metrics to Encourage Innovation and Diversity in Information Retrieval Approaches
Authors:
Mehmet Deniz Türkmen,
Matthew Lease,
Mucahid Kutlu
Abstract:
In evaluation campaigns, participants often explore variations of popular, state-of-the-art baselines as a low-risk strategy to achieve competitive results. While effective, this can lead to local "hill climbing" rather than more radical and innovative departure from standard methods. Moreover, if many participants build on similar baselines, the overall diversity of approaches considered may be l…
▽ More
In evaluation campaigns, participants often explore variations of popular, state-of-the-art baselines as a low-risk strategy to achieve competitive results. While effective, this can lead to local "hill climbing" rather than more radical and innovative departure from standard methods. Moreover, if many participants build on similar baselines, the overall diversity of approaches considered may be limited. In this work, we propose a new class of IR evaluation metrics intended to promote greater diversity of approaches in evaluation campaigns. Whereas traditional IR metrics focus on user experience, our two "innovation" metrics instead reward exploration of more divergent, higher-risk strategies finding relevant documents missed by other systems. Experiments on four TREC collections show that our metrics do change system rankings by rewarding systems that find such rare, relevant documents. This result is further supported by a controlled, synthetic data experiment, and a qualitative analysis. In addition, we show that our metrics achieve higher evaluation stability and discriminative power than the standard metrics we modify. To support reproducibility, we share our source code.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2023; v1 submitted 19 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Catch Me If You Can: Deceiving Stance Detection and Geotagging Models to Protect Privacy of Individuals on Twitter
Authors:
Dilara Dogan,
Bahadir Altun,
Muhammed Said Zengin,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Tamer Elsayed
Abstract:
The recent advances in natural language processing have yielded many exciting developments in text analysis and language understanding models; however, these models can also be used to track people, bringing severe privacy concerns. In this work, we investigate what individuals can do to avoid being detected by those models while using social media platforms. We ground our investigation in two exp…
▽ More
The recent advances in natural language processing have yielded many exciting developments in text analysis and language understanding models; however, these models can also be used to track people, bringing severe privacy concerns. In this work, we investigate what individuals can do to avoid being detected by those models while using social media platforms. We ground our investigation in two exposure-risky tasks, stance detection and geotagging. We explore a variety of simple techniques for modifying text, such as inserting typos in salient words, paraphrasing, and adding dummy social media posts. Our experiments show that the performance of BERT-based models fined tuned for stance detection decreases significantly due to typos, but it is not affected by paraphrasing. Moreover, we find that typos have minimal impact on state-of-the-art geotagging models due to their increased reliance on social networks; however, we show that users can deceive those models by interacting with different users, reducing their performance by almost 50%.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Patent Search Using Triplet Networks Based Fine-Tuned SciBERT
Authors:
Utku Umur Acikalin,
Mucahid Kutlu
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a novel method for the prior-art search task. We fine-tune SciBERT transformer model using Triplet Network approach, allowing us to represent each patent with a fixed-size vector. This also enables us to conduct efficient vector similarity computations to rank patents in query time. In our experiments, we show that our proposed method outperforms baseline methods.
In this paper, we propose a novel method for the prior-art search task. We fine-tune SciBERT transformer model using Triplet Network approach, allowing us to represent each patent with a fixed-size vector. This also enables us to conduct efficient vector similarity computations to rank patents in query time. In our experiments, we show that our proposed method outperforms baseline methods.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Overview of the CLEF--2021 CheckThat! Lab on Detecting Check-Worthy Claims, Previously Fact-Checked Claims, and Fake News
Authors:
Preslav Nakov,
Giovanni Da San Martino,
Tamer Elsayed,
Alberto Barrón-Cedeño,
Rubén Míguez,
Shaden Shaar,
Firoj Alam,
Fatima Haouari,
Maram Hasanain,
Watheq Mansour,
Bayan Hamdan,
Zien Sheikh Ali,
Nikolay Babulkov,
Alex Nikolov,
Gautam Kishore Shahi,
Julia Maria Struß,
Thomas Mandl,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Yavuz Selim Kartal
Abstract:
We describe the fourth edition of the CheckThat! Lab, part of the 2021 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting tasks related to factuality, and covers Arabic, Bulgarian, English, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to predict which posts in a Twitter stream are worth fact-checking, focusing on COVID-19 and politics (in all five languages). Task 2 a…
▽ More
We describe the fourth edition of the CheckThat! Lab, part of the 2021 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting tasks related to factuality, and covers Arabic, Bulgarian, English, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to predict which posts in a Twitter stream are worth fact-checking, focusing on COVID-19 and politics (in all five languages). Task 2 asks to determine whether a claim in a tweet can be verified using a set of previously fact-checked claims (in Arabic and English). Task 3 asks to predict the veracity of a news article and its topical domain (in English). The evaluation is based on mean average precision or precision at rank k for the ranking tasks, and macro-F1 for the classification tasks. This was the most popular CLEF-2021 lab in terms of team registrations: 132 teams. Nearly one-third of them participated: 15, 5, and 25 teams submitted official runs for tasks 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
An Information Retrieval Approach to Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detection
Authors:
Md Mustafizur Rahman,
Dinesh Balakrishnan,
Dhiraj Murthy,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
Building a benchmark dataset for hate speech detection presents various challenges. Firstly, because hate speech is relatively rare, random sampling of tweets to annotate is very inefficient in finding hate speech. To address this, prior datasets often include only tweets matching known "hate words". However, restricting data to a pre-defined vocabulary may exclude portions of the real-world pheno…
▽ More
Building a benchmark dataset for hate speech detection presents various challenges. Firstly, because hate speech is relatively rare, random sampling of tweets to annotate is very inefficient in finding hate speech. To address this, prior datasets often include only tweets matching known "hate words". However, restricting data to a pre-defined vocabulary may exclude portions of the real-world phenomenon we seek to model. A second challenge is that definitions of hate speech tend to be highly varying and subjective. Annotators having diverse prior notions of hate speech may not only disagree with one another but also struggle to conform to specified labeling guidelines. Our key insight is that the rarity and subjectivity of hate speech are akin to that of relevance in information retrieval (IR). This connection suggests that well-established methodologies for creating IR test collections can be usefully applied to create better benchmark datasets for hate speech. To intelligently and efficiently select which tweets to annotate, we apply standard IR techniques of {\em pooling} and {\em active learning}. To improve both consistency and value of annotations, we apply {\em task decomposition} and {\em annotator rationale} techniques. We share a new benchmark dataset for hate speech detection on Twitter that provides broader coverage of hate than prior datasets. We also show a dramatic drop in accuracy of existing detection models when tested on these broader forms of hate. Annotator rationales we collect not only justify labeling decisions but also enable future work opportunities for dual-supervision and/or explanation generation in modeling. Further details of our approach can be found in the supplementary materials.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2021; v1 submitted 17 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Understanding and Predicting Characteristics of Test Collections in Information Retrieval
Authors:
Md Mustafizur Rahman,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
Research community evaluations in information retrieval, such as NIST's Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), build reusable test collections by pooling document rankings submitted by many teams. Naturally, the quality of the resulting test collection thus greatly depends on the number of participating teams and the quality of their submitted runs. In this work, we investigate: i) how the number of pa…
▽ More
Research community evaluations in information retrieval, such as NIST's Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), build reusable test collections by pooling document rankings submitted by many teams. Naturally, the quality of the resulting test collection thus greatly depends on the number of participating teams and the quality of their submitted runs. In this work, we investigate: i) how the number of participants, coupled with other factors, affects the quality of a test collection; and ii) whether the quality of a test collection can be inferred prior to collecting relevance judgments from human assessors. Experiments conducted on six TREC collections illustrate how the number of teams interacts with various other factors to influence the resulting quality of test collections. We also show that the reusability of a test collection can be predicted with high accuracy when the same document collection is used for successive years in an evaluation campaign, as is common in TREC.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2022; v1 submitted 24 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkey
Authors:
Ammar Rashed,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Kareem Darwish,
Tamer Elsayed,
Cansın Bayrak
Abstract:
On June 24, 2018, Turkey conducted a highly consequential election in which the Turkish people elected their president and parliament in the first election under a new presidential system. During the election period, the Turkish people extensively shared their political opinions on Twitter. One aspect of polarization among the electorate was support for or opposition to the reelection of Recep Tay…
▽ More
On June 24, 2018, Turkey conducted a highly consequential election in which the Turkish people elected their president and parliament in the first election under a new presidential system. During the election period, the Turkish people extensively shared their political opinions on Twitter. One aspect of polarization among the electorate was support for or opposition to the reelection of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In this paper, we present an unsupervised method for target-specific stance detection in a polarized setting, specifically Turkish politics, achieving 90% precision in identifying user stances, while maintaining more than 80% recall. The method involves representing users in an embedding space using Google's Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based multilingual universal sentence encoder. The representations are then projected onto a lower dimensional space in a manner that reflects similarities and are consequently clustered. We show the effectiveness of our method in properly clustering users of divergent groups across multiple targets that include political figures, different groups, and parties. We perform our analysis on a large dataset of 108M Turkish election-related tweets along with the timeline tweets of 168k Turkish users, who authored 213M tweets. Given the resultant user stances, we are able to observe correlations between topics and compute topic polarization.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Too Many Claims to Fact-Check: Prioritizing Political Claims Based on Check-Worthiness
Authors:
Yavuz Selim Kartal,
Busra Guvenen,
Mucahid Kutlu
Abstract:
The massive amount of misinformation spreading on the Internet on a daily basis has enormous negative impacts on societies. Therefore, we need automated systems helping fact-checkers in the combat against misinformation. In this paper, we propose a model prioritizing the claims based on their check-worthiness. We use BERT model with additional features including domain-specific controversial topic…
▽ More
The massive amount of misinformation spreading on the Internet on a daily basis has enormous negative impacts on societies. Therefore, we need automated systems helping fact-checkers in the combat against misinformation. In this paper, we propose a model prioritizing the claims based on their check-worthiness. We use BERT model with additional features including domain-specific controversial topics, word embeddings, and others. In our experiments, we show that our proposed model outperforms all state-of-the-art models in both test collections of CLEF Check That! Lab in 2018 and 2019. We also conduct a qualitative analysis to shed light-detecting check-worthy claims. We suggest requesting rationales behind judgments are needed to understand subjective nature of the task and problematic labels.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2021; v1 submitted 17 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Embedding-based Qualitative Analysis of Polarization in Turkey
Authors:
Mucahid Kutlu,
Kareem Darwish,
Cansin Bayrak,
Ammar Rashed,
Tamer Elsayed
Abstract:
On June 24, 2018, Turkey conducted a highly-consequential election in which the Turkish people elected their president and parliament in the first election under a new presidential system. During the election period, the Turkish people extensively shared their political opinions on Twitter. One access of polarization among the electorate was support for or opposition to the reelection of Recep Tay…
▽ More
On June 24, 2018, Turkey conducted a highly-consequential election in which the Turkish people elected their president and parliament in the first election under a new presidential system. During the election period, the Turkish people extensively shared their political opinions on Twitter. One access of polarization among the electorate was support for or opposition to the reelection of Recep Tayyip Erdogan. In this paper, we explore the polarization between the two groups on their political opinions and lifestyle, and examine whether polarization had increased in the lead up to the election. We conduct our analysis on two collected datasets covering the time periods before and during the election period that we split into pro- and anti-Erdogan groups. For the pro and anti splits of both datasets, we generate separate word embedding models, and then use the four generated models to contrast the neighborhood (in the embedding space) of the political leaders, political issues, and lifestyle choices (e.g., beverages, food, and vacation). Our analysis shows that the two groups agree on some topics, such as terrorism and organizations threatening the country, but disagree on others, such as refugees and lifestyle choices. Polarization towards party leaders is more pronounced, and polarization further increased during the election time.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Devam vs. Tamam: 2018 Turkish Elections
Authors:
Mucahid Kutlu,
Kareem Darwish,
Tamer Elsayed
Abstract:
On June 24, 2018, Turkey held a historical election, transforming its parliamentary system to a presidential one. One of the main questions for Turkish voters was whether to start this new political era with reelecting its long-time political leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan or not. In this paper, we analyzed 108M tweets posted in the two months leading to the election to understand the groups that sup…
▽ More
On June 24, 2018, Turkey held a historical election, transforming its parliamentary system to a presidential one. One of the main questions for Turkish voters was whether to start this new political era with reelecting its long-time political leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan or not. In this paper, we analyzed 108M tweets posted in the two months leading to the election to understand the groups that supported or opposed Erdogan's reelection. We examined the most distinguishing hashtags and retweeted accounts for both groups. Our findings indicate strong polarization between both groups as they differ in terms of ideology, news sources they follow, and preferred TV entertainment.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Mix and Match: Collaborative Expert-Crowd Judging for Building Test Collections Accurately and Affordably
Authors:
Mucahid Kutlu,
Tyler McDonnell,
Aashish Sheshadri,
Tamer Elsayed,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
Crowdsourcing offers an affordable and scalable means to collect relevance judgments for IR test collections. However, crowd assessors may show higher variance in judgment quality than trusted assessors. In this paper, we investigate how to effectively utilize both groups of assessors in partnership. We specifically investigate how agreement in judging is correlated with three factors: relevance c…
▽ More
Crowdsourcing offers an affordable and scalable means to collect relevance judgments for IR test collections. However, crowd assessors may show higher variance in judgment quality than trusted assessors. In this paper, we investigate how to effectively utilize both groups of assessors in partnership. We specifically investigate how agreement in judging is correlated with three factors: relevance category, document rankings, and topical variance. Based on this, we then propose two collaborative judging methods in which a portion of the document-topic pairs are assessed by in-house judges while the rest are assessed by crowd-workers. Experiments conducted on two TREC collections show encouraging results when we distribute work intelligently between our two groups of assessors.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2018; v1 submitted 3 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Correlation and Prediction of Evaluation Metrics in Information Retrieval
Authors:
Mucahid Kutlu,
Vivek Khetan,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
Because researchers typically do not have the time or space to present more than a few evaluation metrics in any published study, it can be difficult to assess relative effectiveness of prior methods for unreported metrics when baselining a new method or conducting a systematic meta-review. While sharing of study data would help alleviate this, recent attempts to encourage consistent sharing have…
▽ More
Because researchers typically do not have the time or space to present more than a few evaluation metrics in any published study, it can be difficult to assess relative effectiveness of prior methods for unreported metrics when baselining a new method or conducting a systematic meta-review. While sharing of study data would help alleviate this, recent attempts to encourage consistent sharing have been largely unsuccessful. Instead, we propose to enable relative comparisons with prior work across arbitrary metrics by predicting unreported metrics given one or more reported metrics. In addition, we further investigate prediction of high-cost evaluation measures using low-cost measures as a potential strategy for reducing evaluation cost. We begin by assessing the correlation between 23 IR metrics using 8 TREC test collections. Measuring prediction error wrt. R-square and Kendall's tau, we show that accurate prediction of MAP, P@10, and RBP can be achieved using only 2-3 other metrics. With regard to lowering evaluation cost, we show that RBP(p=0.95) can be predicted with high accuracy using measures with only evaluation depth of 30. Taken together, our findings provide a valuable proof-of-concept which we expect to spur follow-on work by others in proposing more sophisticated models for metric prediction.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Efficient Test Collection Construction via Active Learning
Authors:
Md Mustafizur Rahman,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Tamer Elsayed,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test coll…
▽ More
To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs.\ full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online: https://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIR_AL_TestCollection_2020/.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2020; v1 submitted 17 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
EveTAR: Building a Large-Scale Multi-Task Test Collection over Arabic Tweets
Authors:
Maram Hasanain,
Reem Suwaileh,
Tamer Elsayed,
Mucahid Kutlu,
Hind Almerekhi
Abstract:
This article introduces a new language-independent approach for creating a large-scale high-quality test collection of tweets that supports multiple information retrieval (IR) tasks without running a shared-task campaign. The adopted approach (demonstrated over Arabic tweets) designs the collection around significant (i.e., popular) events, which enables the development of topics that represent fr…
▽ More
This article introduces a new language-independent approach for creating a large-scale high-quality test collection of tweets that supports multiple information retrieval (IR) tasks without running a shared-task campaign. The adopted approach (demonstrated over Arabic tweets) designs the collection around significant (i.e., popular) events, which enables the development of topics that represent frequent information needs of Twitter users for which rich content exists. That inherently facilitates the support of multiple tasks that generally revolve around events, namely event detection, ad-hoc search, timeline generation, and real-time summarization. The key highlights of the approach include diversifying the judgment pool via interactive search and multiple manually-crafted queries per topic, collecting high-quality annotations via crowd-workers for relevancy and in-house annotators for novelty, filtering out low-agreement topics and inaccessible tweets, and providing multiple subsets of the collection for better availability. Applying our methodology on Arabic tweets resulted in EveTAR , the first freely-available tweet test collection for multiple IR tasks. EveTAR includes a crawl of 355M Arabic tweets and covers 50 significant events for which about 62K tweets were judged with substantial average inter-annotator agreement (Kappa value of 0.71). We demonstrate the usability of EveTAR by evaluating existing algorithms in the respective tasks. Results indicate that the new collection can support reliable ranking of IR systems that is comparable to similar TREC collections, while providing strong baseline results for future studies over Arabic tweets.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2017; v1 submitted 18 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Intelligent Topic Selection for Low-Cost Information Retrieval Evaluation: A New Perspective on Deep vs. Shallow Judging
Authors:
Mucahid Kutlu,
Tamer Elsayed,
Matthew Lease
Abstract:
While test collections provide the cornerstone for Cranfield-based evaluation of information retrieval (IR) systems, it has become practically infeasible to rely on traditional pooling techniques to construct test collections at the scale of today's massive document collections. In this paper, we propose a new intelligent topic selection method which reduces the number of search topics needed for…
▽ More
While test collections provide the cornerstone for Cranfield-based evaluation of information retrieval (IR) systems, it has become practically infeasible to rely on traditional pooling techniques to construct test collections at the scale of today's massive document collections. In this paper, we propose a new intelligent topic selection method which reduces the number of search topics needed for reliable IR evaluation. To rigorously assess our method, we integrate previously disparate lines of research on intelligent topic selection and deep vs. shallow judging. While prior work on intelligent topic selection has never been evaluated against shallow judging baselines, prior work on deep vs. shallow judging has largely argued for shallowed judging, but assuming random topic selection. We argue that for evaluating any topic selection method, ultimately one must ask whether it is actually useful to select topics, or should one simply perform shallow judging over many topics? In seeking a rigorous answer to this over-arching question, we conduct a comprehensive investigation over a set of relevant factors never previously studied together 1) topic selection method 2) the effect of topic familiarity on human judging speed and 3) how different topic generation processes impact (i) budget utilization and (ii) the resultant quality of judgments. Experiments on NIST TREC Robust 2003 and Robust 2004 test collections show that not only can we reliably evaluate IR systems with fewer topics, but also that 1) when topics are intelligently selected, deep judging is often more cost-effective than shallow judging in evaluation reliability and 2) topic familiarity and topic generation costs greatly impact the evaluation cost vs. reliability trade-off. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom in showing that deep judging is often preferable to shallow judging when topics are selected intelligently.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2017; v1 submitted 26 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
