-
Generating Media Background Checks for Automated Source Critical Reasoning
Authors:
Michael Schlichtkrull
Abstract:
Not everything on the internet is true. This unfortunate fact requires both humans and models to perform complex reasoning about credibility when working with retrieved information. In NLP, this problem has seen little attention. Indeed, retrieval-augmented models are not typically expected to distrust retrieved documents. Human experts overcome the challenge by gathering signals about the context…
▽ More
Not everything on the internet is true. This unfortunate fact requires both humans and models to perform complex reasoning about credibility when working with retrieved information. In NLP, this problem has seen little attention. Indeed, retrieval-augmented models are not typically expected to distrust retrieved documents. Human experts overcome the challenge by gathering signals about the context, reliability, and tendency of source documents - that is, they perform source criticism. We propose a novel NLP task focused on finding and summarising such signals. We introduce a new dataset of 6,709 "media background checks" derived from Media Bias / Fact Check, a volunteer-run website documenting media bias. We test open-source and closed-source LLM baselines with and without retrieval on this dataset, finding that retrieval greatly improves performance. We furthermore carry out human evaluation, demonstrating that 1) media background checks are helpful for humans, and 2) media background checks are helpful for retrieval-augmented models.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Document-level Claim Extraction and Decontextualisation for Fact-Checking
Authors:
Zhenyun Deng,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Andreas Vlachos
Abstract:
Selecting which claims to check is a time-consuming task for human fact-checkers, especially from documents consisting of multiple sentences and containing multiple claims. However, existing claim extraction approaches focus more on identifying and extracting claims from individual sentences, e.g., identifying whether a sentence contains a claim or the exact boundaries of the claim within a senten…
▽ More
Selecting which claims to check is a time-consuming task for human fact-checkers, especially from documents consisting of multiple sentences and containing multiple claims. However, existing claim extraction approaches focus more on identifying and extracting claims from individual sentences, e.g., identifying whether a sentence contains a claim or the exact boundaries of the claim within a sentence. In this paper, we propose a method for document-level claim extraction for fact-checking, which aims to extract check-worthy claims from documents and decontextualise them so that they can be understood out of context. Specifically, we first recast claim extraction as extractive summarization in order to identify central sentences from documents, then rewrite them to include necessary context from the originating document through sentence decontextualisation. Evaluation with both automatic metrics and a fact-checking professional shows that our method is able to extract check-worthy claims from documents more accurately than previous work, while also improving evidence retrieval.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey
Authors:
Mubashara Akhtar,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Zhijiang Guo,
Oana Cocarascu,
Elena Simperl,
Andreas Vlachos
Abstract:
Misinformation is often conveyed in multiple modalities, e.g. a miscaptioned image. Multimodal misinformation is perceived as more credible by humans, and spreads faster than its text-only counterparts. While an increasing body of research investigates automated fact-checking (AFC), previous surveys mostly focus on text. In this survey, we conceptualise a framework for AFC including subtasks uniqu…
▽ More
Misinformation is often conveyed in multiple modalities, e.g. a miscaptioned image. Multimodal misinformation is perceived as more credible by humans, and spreads faster than its text-only counterparts. While an increasing body of research investigates automated fact-checking (AFC), previous surveys mostly focus on text. In this survey, we conceptualise a framework for AFC including subtasks unique to multimodal misinformation. Furthermore, we discuss related terms used in different communities and map them to our framework. We focus on four modalities prevalent in real-world fact-checking: text, image, audio, and video. We survey benchmarks and models, and discuss limitations and promising directions for future research
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2023; v1 submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
AVeriTeC: A Dataset for Real-world Claim Verification with Evidence from the Web
Authors:
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Zhijiang Guo,
Andreas Vlachos
Abstract:
Existing datasets for automated fact-checking have substantial limitations, such as relying on artificial claims, lacking annotations for evidence and intermediate reasoning, or including evidence published after the claim. In this paper we introduce AVeriTeC, a new dataset of 4,568 real-world claims covering fact-checks by 50 different organizations. Each claim is annotated with question-answer p…
▽ More
Existing datasets for automated fact-checking have substantial limitations, such as relying on artificial claims, lacking annotations for evidence and intermediate reasoning, or including evidence published after the claim. In this paper we introduce AVeriTeC, a new dataset of 4,568 real-world claims covering fact-checks by 50 different organizations. Each claim is annotated with question-answer pairs supported by evidence available online, as well as textual justifications explaining how the evidence combines to produce a verdict. Through a multi-round annotation process, we avoid common pitfalls including context dependence, evidence insufficiency, and temporal leakage, and reach a substantial inter-annotator agreement of $κ=0.619$ on verdicts. We develop a baseline as well as an evaluation scheme for verifying claims through several question-answering steps against the open web.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2023; v1 submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who
Authors:
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Nedjma Ousidhoum,
Andreas Vlachos
Abstract:
Automated fact-checking is often presented as an epistemic tool that fact-checkers, social media consumers, and other stakeholders can use to fight misinformation. Nevertheless, few papers thoroughly discuss how. We document this by analysing 100 highly-cited papers, and annotating epistemic elements related to intended use, i.e., means, ends, and stakeholders. We find that narratives leaving out…
▽ More
Automated fact-checking is often presented as an epistemic tool that fact-checkers, social media consumers, and other stakeholders can use to fight misinformation. Nevertheless, few papers thoroughly discuss how. We document this by analysing 100 highly-cited papers, and annotating epistemic elements related to intended use, i.e., means, ends, and stakeholders. We find that narratives leaving out some of these aspects are common, that many papers propose inconsistent means and ends, and that the feasibility of suggested strategies rarely has empirical backing. We argue that this vagueness actively hinders the technology from reaching its goals, as it encourages overclaiming, limits criticism, and prevents stakeholder feedback. Accordingly, we provide several recommendations for thinking and writing about the use of fact-checking artefacts.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2023; v1 submitted 27 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking
Authors:
Zhijiang Guo,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Andreas Vlachos
Abstract:
Fact-checking has become increasingly important due to the speed with which both information and misinformation can spread in the modern media ecosystem. Therefore, researchers have been exploring how fact-checking can be automated, using techniques based on natural language processing, machine learning, knowledge representation, and databases to automatically predict the veracity of claims. In th…
▽ More
Fact-checking has become increasingly important due to the speed with which both information and misinformation can spread in the modern media ecosystem. Therefore, researchers have been exploring how fact-checking can be automated, using techniques based on natural language processing, machine learning, knowledge representation, and databases to automatically predict the veracity of claims. In this paper, we survey automated fact-checking stemming from natural language processing, and discuss its connections to related tasks and disciplines. In this process, we present an overview of existing datasets and models, aiming to unify the various definitions given and identify common concepts. Finally, we highlight challenges for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2022; v1 submitted 26 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
FEVEROUS: Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured information
Authors:
Rami Aly,
Zhijiang Guo,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
James Thorne,
Andreas Vlachos,
Christos Christodoulopoulos,
Oana Cocarascu,
Arpit Mittal
Abstract:
Fact verification has attracted a lot of attention in the machine learning and natural language processing communities, as it is one of the key methods for detecting misinformation. Existing large-scale benchmarks for this task have focused mostly on textual sources, i.e. unstructured information, and thus ignored the wealth of information available in structured formats, such as tables. In this p…
▽ More
Fact verification has attracted a lot of attention in the machine learning and natural language processing communities, as it is one of the key methods for detecting misinformation. Existing large-scale benchmarks for this task have focused mostly on textual sources, i.e. unstructured information, and thus ignored the wealth of information available in structured formats, such as tables. In this paper we introduce a novel dataset and benchmark, Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured information (FEVEROUS), which consists of 87,026 verified claims. Each claim is annotated with evidence in the form of sentences and/or cells from tables in Wikipedia, as well as a label indicating whether this evidence supports, refutes, or does not provide enough information to reach a verdict. Furthermore, we detail our efforts to track and minimize the biases present in the dataset and could be exploited by models, e.g. being able to predict the label without using evidence. Finally, we develop a baseline for verifying claims against text and tables which predicts both the correct evidence and verdict for 18% of the claims.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2021; v1 submitted 10 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
NeurIPS 2020 EfficientQA Competition: Systems, Analyses and Lessons Learned
Authors:
Sewon Min,
Jordan Boyd-Graber,
Chris Alberti,
Danqi Chen,
Eunsol Choi,
Michael Collins,
Kelvin Guu,
Hannaneh Hajishirzi,
Kenton Lee,
Jennimaria Palomaki,
Colin Raffel,
Adam Roberts,
Tom Kwiatkowski,
Patrick Lewis,
Yuxiang Wu,
Heinrich Küttler,
Linqing Liu,
Pasquale Minervini,
Pontus Stenetorp,
Sebastian Riedel,
Sohee Yang,
Minjoon Seo,
Gautier Izacard,
Fabio Petroni,
Lucas Hosseini
, et al. (28 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We review the EfficientQA competition from NeurIPS 2020. The competition focused on open-domain question answering (QA), where systems take natural language questions as input and return natural language answers. The aim of the competition was to build systems that can predict correct answers while also satisfying strict on-disk memory budgets. These memory budgets were designed to encourage conte…
▽ More
We review the EfficientQA competition from NeurIPS 2020. The competition focused on open-domain question answering (QA), where systems take natural language questions as input and return natural language answers. The aim of the competition was to build systems that can predict correct answers while also satisfying strict on-disk memory budgets. These memory budgets were designed to encourage contestants to explore the trade-off between storing retrieval corpora or the parameters of learned models. In this report, we describe the motivation and organization of the competition, review the best submissions, and analyze system predictions to inform a discussion of evaluation for open-domain QA.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2021; v1 submitted 31 December, 2020;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Joint Verification and Reranking for Open Fact Checking Over Tables
Authors:
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Vladimir Karpukhin,
Barlas Oğuz,
Mike Lewis,
Wen-tau Yih,
Sebastian Riedel
Abstract:
Structured information is an important knowledge source for automatic verification of factual claims. Nevertheless, the majority of existing research into this task has focused on textual data, and the few recent inquiries into structured data have been for the closed-domain setting where appropriate evidence for each claim is assumed to have already been retrieved. In this paper, we investigate v…
▽ More
Structured information is an important knowledge source for automatic verification of factual claims. Nevertheless, the majority of existing research into this task has focused on textual data, and the few recent inquiries into structured data have been for the closed-domain setting where appropriate evidence for each claim is assumed to have already been retrieved. In this paper, we investigate verification over structured data in the open-domain setting, introducing a joint reranking-and-verification model which fuses evidence documents in the verification component. Our open-domain model achieves performance comparable to the closed-domain state-of-the-art on the TabFact dataset, and demonstrates performance gains from the inclusion of multiple tables as well as a significant improvement over a heuristic retrieval baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2021; v1 submitted 30 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
UniK-QA: Unified Representations of Structured and Unstructured Knowledge for Open-Domain Question Answering
Authors:
Barlas Oguz,
Xilun Chen,
Vladimir Karpukhin,
Stan Peshterliev,
Dmytro Okhonko,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Sonal Gupta,
Yashar Mehdad,
Scott Yih
Abstract:
We study open-domain question answering with structured, unstructured and semi-structured knowledge sources, including text, tables, lists and knowledge bases. Departing from prior work, we propose a unifying approach that homogenizes all sources by reducing them to text and applies the retriever-reader model which has so far been limited to text sources only. Our approach greatly improves the res…
▽ More
We study open-domain question answering with structured, unstructured and semi-structured knowledge sources, including text, tables, lists and knowledge bases. Departing from prior work, we propose a unifying approach that homogenizes all sources by reducing them to text and applies the retriever-reader model which has so far been limited to text sources only. Our approach greatly improves the results on knowledge-base QA tasks by 11 points, compared to latest graph-based methods. More importantly, we demonstrate that our unified knowledge (UniK-QA) model is a simple and yet effective way to combine heterogeneous sources of knowledge, advancing the state-of-the-art results on two popular question answering benchmarks, NaturalQuestions and WebQuestions, by 3.5 and 2.6 points, respectively.
The code of UniK-QA is available at: https://github.com/facebookresearch/UniK-QA.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2022; v1 submitted 29 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Masking
Authors:
Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull,
Nicola De Cao,
Ivan Titov
Abstract:
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a popular approach to integrating structural inductive biases into NLP models. However, there has been little work on interpreting them, and specifically on understanding which parts of the graphs (e.g. syntactic trees or co-reference structures) contribute to a prediction. In this work, we introduce a post-hoc method for interpreting the predictions of GNN…
▽ More
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a popular approach to integrating structural inductive biases into NLP models. However, there has been little work on interpreting them, and specifically on understanding which parts of the graphs (e.g. syntactic trees or co-reference structures) contribute to a prediction. In this work, we introduce a post-hoc method for interpreting the predictions of GNNs which identifies unnecessary edges. Given a trained GNN model, we learn a simple classifier that, for every edge in every layer, predicts if that edge can be dropped. We demonstrate that such a classifier can be trained in a fully differentiable fashion, employing stochastic gates and encouraging sparsity through the expected $L_0$ norm. We use our technique as an attribution method to analyze GNN models for two tasks -- question answering and semantic role labeling -- providing insights into the information flow in these models. We show that we can drop a large proportion of edges without deteriorating the performance of the model, while we can analyse the remaining edges for interpreting model predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2022; v1 submitted 1 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Evaluating for Diversity in Question Generation over Text
Authors:
Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull,
Weiwei Cheng
Abstract:
Generating diverse and relevant questions over text is a task with widespread applications. We argue that commonly-used evaluation metrics such as BLEU and METEOR are not suitable for this task due to the inherent diversity of reference questions, and propose a scheme for extending conventional metrics to reflect diversity. We furthermore propose a variational encoder-decoder model for this task.…
▽ More
Generating diverse and relevant questions over text is a task with widespread applications. We argue that commonly-used evaluation metrics such as BLEU and METEOR are not suitable for this task due to the inherent diversity of reference questions, and propose a scheme for extending conventional metrics to reflect diversity. We furthermore propose a variational encoder-decoder model for this task. We show through automatic and human evaluation that our variational model improves diversity without loss of quality, and demonstrate how our evaluation scheme reflects this improvement.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
How do Decisions Emerge across Layers in Neural Models? Interpretation with Differentiable Masking
Authors:
Nicola De Cao,
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Wilker Aziz,
Ivan Titov
Abstract:
Attribution methods assess the contribution of inputs to the model prediction. One way to do so is erasure: a subset of inputs is considered irrelevant if it can be removed without affecting the prediction. Though conceptually simple, erasure's objective is intractable and approximate search remains expensive with modern deep NLP models. Erasure is also susceptible to the hindsight bias: the fact…
▽ More
Attribution methods assess the contribution of inputs to the model prediction. One way to do so is erasure: a subset of inputs is considered irrelevant if it can be removed without affecting the prediction. Though conceptually simple, erasure's objective is intractable and approximate search remains expensive with modern deep NLP models. Erasure is also susceptible to the hindsight bias: the fact that an input can be dropped does not mean that the model `knows' it can be dropped. The resulting pruning is over-aggressive and does not reflect how the model arrives at the prediction. To deal with these challenges, we introduce Differentiable Masking. DiffMask learns to mask-out subsets of the input while maintaining differentiability. The decision to include or disregard an input token is made with a simple model based on intermediate hidden layers of the analyzed model. First, this makes the approach efficient because we predict rather than search. Second, as with probing classifiers, this reveals what the network `knows' at the corresponding layers. This lets us not only plot attribution heatmaps but also analyze how decisions are formed across network layers. We use DiffMask to study BERT models on sentiment classification and question answering.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2021; v1 submitted 30 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networks
Authors:
Michael Schlichtkrull,
Thomas N. Kipf,
Peter Bloem,
Rianne van den Berg,
Ivan Titov,
Max Welling
Abstract:
Knowledge graphs enable a wide variety of applications, including question answering and information retrieval. Despite the great effort invested in their creation and maintenance, even the largest (e.g., Yago, DBPedia or Wikidata) remain incomplete. We introduce Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (R-GCNs) and apply them to two standard knowledge base completion tasks: Link prediction (recove…
▽ More
Knowledge graphs enable a wide variety of applications, including question answering and information retrieval. Despite the great effort invested in their creation and maintenance, even the largest (e.g., Yago, DBPedia or Wikidata) remain incomplete. We introduce Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (R-GCNs) and apply them to two standard knowledge base completion tasks: Link prediction (recovery of missing facts, i.e. subject-predicate-object triples) and entity classification (recovery of missing entity attributes). R-GCNs are related to a recent class of neural networks operating on graphs, and are developed specifically to deal with the highly multi-relational data characteristic of realistic knowledge bases. We demonstrate the effectiveness of R-GCNs as a stand-alone model for entity classification. We further show that factorization models for link prediction such as DistMult can be significantly improved by enriching them with an encoder model to accumulate evidence over multiple inference steps in the relational graph, demonstrating a large improvement of 29.8% on FB15k-237 over a decoder-only baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2017; v1 submitted 17 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Cross-Lingual Dependency Parsing with Late Decoding for Truly Low-Resource Languages
Authors:
Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull,
Anders Søgaard
Abstract:
In cross-lingual dependency annotation projection, information is often lost during transfer because of early decoding. We present an end-to-end graph-based neural network dependency parser that can be trained to reproduce matrices of edge scores, which can be directly projected across word alignments. We show that our approach to cross-lingual dependency parsing is not only simpler, but also achi…
▽ More
In cross-lingual dependency annotation projection, information is often lost during transfer because of early decoding. We present an end-to-end graph-based neural network dependency parser that can be trained to reproduce matrices of edge scores, which can be directly projected across word alignments. We show that our approach to cross-lingual dependency parsing is not only simpler, but also achieves an absolute improvement of 2.25% averaged across 10 languages compared to the previous state of the art.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.