(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Search | arXiv e-print repository
Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Hoopes, A

Searching in archive eess. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2301.11329  [pdf

    eess.IV cs.AI cs.CV cs.LG

    Anatomy-aware and acquisition-agnostic joint registration with SynthMorph

    Authors: Malte Hoffmann, Andrew Hoopes, Douglas N. Greve, Bruce Fischl, Adrian V. Dalca

    Abstract: Affine image registration is a cornerstone of medical image analysis. While classical algorithms can achieve excellent accuracy, they solve a time-consuming optimization for every image pair. Deep-learning (DL) methods learn a function that maps an image pair to an output transform. Evaluating the function is fast, but capturing large transforms can be challenging, and networks tend to struggle if… ▽ More

    Submitted 11 July, 2024; v1 submitted 26 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

    Comments: 33 pages, 19 figures, 4 tables, affine registration, deformable registration, deep learning, hypernetwork, domain shift, neuroimaging, final published version

    Journal ref: Imaging Neuroscience, 2, 2024, 1-33

  2. arXiv:2203.16680  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG eess.IV

    Learning the Effect of Registration Hyperparameters with HyperMorph

    Authors: Andrew Hoopes, Malte Hoffmann, Douglas N. Greve, Bruce Fischl, John Guttag, Adrian V. Dalca

    Abstract: We introduce HyperMorph, a framework that facilitates efficient hyperparameter tuning in learning-based deformable image registration. Classical registration algorithms perform an iterative pair-wise optimization to compute a deformation field that aligns two images. Recent learning-based approaches leverage large image datasets to learn a function that rapidly estimates a deformation for a given… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: Accepted for publication at the Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging (MELBA) at https://www.melba-journal.org

  3. arXiv:2203.09974  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-ph q-bio.NC

    SynthStrip: Skull-Stripping for Any Brain Image

    Authors: Andrew Hoopes, Jocelyn S. Mora, Adrian V. Dalca, Bruce Fischl, Malte Hoffmann

    Abstract: The removal of non-brain signal from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, known as skull-stripping, is an integral component of many neuroimage analysis streams. Despite their abundance, popular classical skull-stripping methods are usually tailored to images with specific acquisition properties, namely near-isotropic resolution and T1-weighted (T1w) MRI contrast, which are prevalent in research… ▽ More

    Submitted 26 July, 2022; v1 submitted 18 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: 19 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables, skull stripping, brain extraction, image synthesis, MRI-contrast agnosticism, deep learning, final published version

    Journal ref: Neuroimage 260, 2022

  4. arXiv:2112.06979  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

    Authors: Bhakti Baheti, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Hamed Akbari, Michel Bilello, Benedikt Wiestler, Julian Schwarting, Evan Calabrese, Jeffrey Rudie, Syed Abidi, Mina Mousa, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Brandon K. K. Fields, Florian Kofler, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Tony C. W. Mok, Albert C. S. Chung, Marek Wodzinski, Artur Jurgas, Niccolo Marini, Manfredo Atzori, Henning Muller, Christoph Grobroehmer, Hanna Siebert, Lasse Hansen , et al. (48 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Registration of longitudinal brain MRI scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registr… ▽ More

    Submitted 17 April, 2024; v1 submitted 13 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

  5. arXiv:2112.06693  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV cs.LG

    Hypernet-Ensemble Learning of Segmentation Probability for Medical Image Segmentation with Ambiguous Labels

    Authors: Sungmin Hong, Anna K. Bonkhoff, Andrew Hoopes, Martin Bretzner, Markus D. Schirmer, Anne-Katrin Giese, Adrian V. Dalca, Polina Golland, Natalia S. Rost

    Abstract: Despite the superior performance of Deep Learning (DL) on numerous segmentation tasks, the DL-based approaches are notoriously overconfident about their prediction with highly polarized label probability. This is often not desirable for many applications with the inherent label ambiguity even in human annotations. This challenge has been addressed by leveraging multiple annotations per image and t… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

    MSC Class: 68T07 (Primary) 92C55; 94A08 (Secondary) ACM Class: I.4; I.4.6; I.2; I.2.1; I.5.1; I.5.4; J.3

  6. arXiv:2112.04489  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Learn2Reg: comprehensive multi-task medical image registration challenge, dataset and evaluation in the era of deep learning

    Authors: Alessa Hering, Lasse Hansen, Tony C. W. Mok, Albert C. S. Chung, Hanna Siebert, Stephanie Häger, Annkristin Lange, Sven Kuckertz, Stefan Heldmann, Wei Shao, Sulaiman Vesal, Mirabela Rusu, Geoffrey Sonn, Théo Estienne, Maria Vakalopoulou, Luyi Han, Yunzhi Huang, Pew-Thian Yap, Mikael Brudfors, Yaël Balbastre, Samuel Joutard, Marc Modat, Gal Lifshitz, Dan Raviv, Jinxin Lv , et al. (28 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Image registration is a fundamental medical image analysis task, and a wide variety of approaches have been proposed. However, only a few studies have comprehensively compared medical image registration approaches on a wide range of clinically relevant tasks. This limits the development of registration methods, the adoption of research advances into practice, and a fair benchmark across competing… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 October, 2022; v1 submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

  7. arXiv:2101.01035  [pdf, other

    cs.CV eess.IV

    HyperMorph: Amortized Hyperparameter Learning for Image Registration

    Authors: Andrew Hoopes, Malte Hoffmann, Bruce Fischl, John Guttag, Adrian V. Dalca

    Abstract: We present HyperMorph, a learning-based strategy for deformable image registration that removes the need to tune important registration hyperparameters during training. Classical registration methods solve an optimization problem to find a set of spatial correspondences between two images, while learning-based methods leverage a training dataset to learn a function that generates these corresponde… ▽ More

    Submitted 4 May, 2021; v1 submitted 4 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

    Comments: IPMI 2021: Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Keywords: Deformable Image Registration, Hyperparameter Search, Deep Learning, Hypernetworks, and Amortized Learning

  8. A Longitudinal Method for Simultaneous Whole-Brain and Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis

    Authors: Stefano Cerri, Andrew Hoopes, Douglas N. Greve, Mark Mühlau, Koen Van Leemput

    Abstract: In this paper we propose a novel method for the segmentation of longitudinal brain MRI scans of patients suffering from Multiple Sclerosis. The method builds upon an existing cross-sectional method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation, introducing subject-specific latent variables to encourage temporal consistency between longitudinal scans. It is very generally applicable, as it d… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 September, 2020; v1 submitted 12 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.