Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Nazeri, A

Detection of Auditory Brainstem Response Peaks Using Image Processing Techniques in Infants with Normal Hearing Sensitivity

Authors: Amir Majidpour, Samer Kais Jameel, Jafar Majidpour, Houra Bagheri, Tarik A. Rashid, Ahmadreza Nazeri, Mahshid Moheb Aleaba

Abstract: Introduction: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is measured to find the brainstem-level peripheral auditory nerve system integrity in children having normal hearing. The Auditory Evoked Potential (AEP) is generated using acoustic stimuli. Interpreting these waves requires competence to avoid misdiagnosing hearing problems. Automating ABR test labeling with computer vision may reduce human erro… ▽ More Introduction: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is measured to find the brainstem-level peripheral auditory nerve system integrity in children having normal hearing. The Auditory Evoked Potential (AEP) is generated using acoustic stimuli. Interpreting these waves requires competence to avoid misdiagnosing hearing problems. Automating ABR test labeling with computer vision may reduce human error. Method: The ABR test results of 26 children aged 1 to 20 months with normal hearing in both ears were used. A new approach is suggested for automatically calculating the peaks of waves of different intensities (in decibels). The procedure entails acquiring wave images from an Audera device using the Color Thresholder method, segmenting each wave as a single wave image using the Image Region Analyzer application, converting all wave images into waves using Image Processing (IP) techniques, and finally calculating the latency of the peaks for each wave to be used by an audiologist for diagnosing the disease. Findings: Image processing techniques were able to detect 1, 3, and 5 waves in the diagnosis field with accuracy (0.82), (0.98), and (0.98), respectively, and its precision for waves 1, 3, and 5, were respectively (0.32), (0.97) and (0.87). This evaluation also worked well in the thresholding part and 82.7 % correctly detected the ABR waves. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the audiology test battery suite can be made more accurate, quick, and error-free by using technology to automatically detect and label ABR waves. △ Less

Submitted 21 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Brain MR Image Synthesis for Tumor Segmentation (BraSyn)

Authors: Hongwei Bran Li, Gian Marco Conte, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Florian Kofler, Ivan Ezhov, Koen van Leemput, Marie Piraud, Maria Diaz, Byrone Cole, Evan Calabrese, Jeff Rudie, Felix Meissen, Maruf Adewole, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Dominic LaBella, Ahmed W. Moawad, Keyvan Farahani, James Eddy, Timothy Bergquist, Verena Chung, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Farouk Dako, Walter Wiggins, Zachary Reitman , et al. (43 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Automated brain tumor segmentation methods have become well-established and reached performance levels offering clear clinical utility. These methods typically rely on four input magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities: T1-weighted images with and without contrast enhancement, T2-weighted images, and FLAIR images. However, some sequences are often missing in clinical practice due to time const… ▽ More Automated brain tumor segmentation methods have become well-established and reached performance levels offering clear clinical utility. These methods typically rely on four input magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities: T1-weighted images with and without contrast enhancement, T2-weighted images, and FLAIR images. However, some sequences are often missing in clinical practice due to time constraints or image artifacts, such as patient motion. Consequently, the ability to substitute missing modalities and gain segmentation performance is highly desirable and necessary for the broader adoption of these algorithms in the clinical routine. In this work, we present the establishment of the Brain MR Image Synthesis Benchmark (BraSyn) in conjunction with the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2023. The primary objective of this challenge is to evaluate image synthesis methods that can realistically generate missing MRI modalities when multiple available images are provided. The ultimate aim is to facilitate automated brain tumor segmentation pipelines. The image dataset used in the benchmark is diverse and multi-modal, created through collaboration with various hospitals and research institutions. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2023; v1 submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Technical report of BraSyn

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Local Synthesis of Healthy Brain Tissue via Inpainting

Authors: Florian Kofler, Felix Meissen, Felix Steinbauer, Robert Graf, Eva Oswald, Ezequiel de da Rosa, Hongwei Bran Li, Ujjwal Baid, Florian Hoelzl, Oezguen Turgut, Izabela Horvath, Diana Waldmannstetter, Christina Bukas, Maruf Adewole, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Dominic LaBella, Ahmed W Moawad, Keyvan Farahani, James Eddy, Timothy Bergquist, Verena Chung, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Farouk Dako , et al. (43 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: A myriad of algorithms for the automatic analysis of brain MR images is available to support clinicians in their decision-making. For brain tumor patients, the image acquisition time series typically starts with a scan that is already pathological. This poses problems, as many algorithms are designed to analyze healthy brains and provide no guarantees for images featuring lesions. Examples include… ▽ More A myriad of algorithms for the automatic analysis of brain MR images is available to support clinicians in their decision-making. For brain tumor patients, the image acquisition time series typically starts with a scan that is already pathological. This poses problems, as many algorithms are designed to analyze healthy brains and provide no guarantees for images featuring lesions. Examples include but are not limited to algorithms for brain anatomy parcellation, tissue segmentation, and brain extraction. To solve this dilemma, we introduce the BraTS 2023 inpainting challenge. Here, the participants' task is to explore inpainting techniques to synthesize healthy brain scans from lesioned ones. The following manuscript contains the task formulation, dataset, and submission procedure. Later it will be updated to summarize the findings of the challenge. The challenge is organized as part of the BraTS 2023 challenge hosted at the MICCAI 2023 conference in Vancouver, Canada. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2023; v1 submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

Authors: Raghav Mehta, Angelos Filos, Ujjwal Baid, Chiharu Sako, Richard McKinley, Michael Rebsamen, Katrin Datwyler, Raphael Meier, Piotr Radojewski, Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan, Sahil Nalawade, Chandan Ganesh, Ben Wagner, Fang F. Yu, Baowei Fei, Ananth J. Madhuranthakam, Joseph A. Maldjian, Laura Daza, Catalina Gomez, Pablo Arbelaez, Chengliang Dai, Shuo Wang, Hadrien Reynaud, Yuan-han Mo, Elsa Angelini , et al. (67 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying… ▽ More Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at: https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Accepted for publication at the Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging (MELBA): https://www.melba-journal.org/papers/2022:026.html

Journal ref: Machine.Learning.for.Biomedical.Imaging. 1 (2022)

The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challenge

Authors: Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Maximilian Zenk, Brandon Edwards, Micah Sheller, G. Anthony Reina, Patrick Foley, Alexey Gruzdev, Jason Martin, Shadi Albarqouni, Yong Chen, Russell Taki Shinohara, Annika Reinke, David Zimmerer, John B. Freymann, Justin S. Kirby, Christos Davatzikos, Rivka R. Colen, Aikaterini Kotrotsou, Daniel Marcus, Mikhail Milchenko, Arash Nazeri, Hassan Fathallah-Shaykh, Roland Wiest, Andras Jakab , et al. (7 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This manuscript describes the first challenge on Federated Learning, namely the Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) challenge 2021. International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. However, the actual performance of participating (even the winning) algorithms on "real-world" clinical data often remains unclear, as the data included in challenge… ▽ More This manuscript describes the first challenge on Federated Learning, namely the Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) challenge 2021. International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. However, the actual performance of participating (even the winning) algorithms on "real-world" clinical data often remains unclear, as the data included in challenges are usually acquired in very controlled settings at few institutions. The seemingly obvious solution of just collecting increasingly more data from more institutions in such challenges does not scale well due to privacy and ownership hurdles. Towards alleviating these concerns, we are proposing the FeTS challenge 2021 to cater towards both the development and the evaluation of models for the segmentation of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Specifically, the FeTS 2021 challenge uses clinically acquired, multi-institutional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from the BraTS 2020 challenge, as well as from various remote independent institutions included in the collaborative network of a real-world federation (https://www.fets.ai/). The goals of the FeTS challenge are directly represented by the two included tasks: 1) the identification of the optimal weight aggregation approach towards the training of a consensus model that has gained knowledge via federated learning from multiple geographically distinct institutions, while their data are always retained within each institution, and 2) the federated evaluation of the generalizability of brain tumor segmentation models "in the wild", i.e. on data from institutional distributions that were not part of the training datasets. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2021; v1 submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.