How is Time Frequency Space Modulation Related to Short Time Fourier Signaling?
Authors:
Akbar M Sayeed
Abstract:
We investigate the relationship between Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) modulation and Orthogonal Short Time Fourier (OSTF) signaling. OTFS was recently proposed as a new scheme for high Doppler scenarios and builds on OSTF. We first show that the two schemes are unitarily equivalent in the digital domain. However, OSTF defines the analog-digital interface with the waveform domain. We then…
▽ More
We investigate the relationship between Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) modulation and Orthogonal Short Time Fourier (OSTF) signaling. OTFS was recently proposed as a new scheme for high Doppler scenarios and builds on OSTF. We first show that the two schemes are unitarily equivalent in the digital domain. However, OSTF defines the analog-digital interface with the waveform domain. We then develop a critically sampled matrix-vector model for the two systems and consider linear minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) filtering at the receiver to suppress inter-symbol interference. Initial comparison of capacity and (uncoded) probability of error reveals a surprising observation: OTFS under-performs OSTF in capacity but over-performs in probability of error. This result can be attributed to characteristics of the channel matrices induced by the two systems. In particular, the diagonal entries of OTFS matrix exhibit nearly identical magnitude, whereas those of the OSTF matrix exhibit wild fluctuations induced by multipath randomness. It is observed that by simply replacing the unitary matrix, relating OTFS to OSTF, by an arbitrary unitary matrix results in performance nearly identical to OTFS. We then extend our analysis to orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and also consider a more extreme scenario of relatively large delay and Doppler spreads. Our results demonstrate the significance of using OSTF basis waveforms rather than sinusoidal ones in OFDM in highly dynamic environments, and also highlight the impact of the level of channel state information used at the receiver.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Design and Implementation of Butterworth, Chebyshev-I and Elliptic Filter for Speech Signal Analysis
Authors:
Prajoy Podder,
Md. Mehedi Hasan,
Md. Rafiqul Islam,
Mursalin Sayeed
Abstract:
In the field of digital signal processing, the function of a filter is to remove unwanted parts of the signal such as random noise that is also undesirable. To remove noise from the speech signal transmission or to extract useful parts of the signal such as the components lying within a certain frequency range, filters are necessary. Filters are broadly used in signal processing and communication…
▽ More
In the field of digital signal processing, the function of a filter is to remove unwanted parts of the signal such as random noise that is also undesirable. To remove noise from the speech signal transmission or to extract useful parts of the signal such as the components lying within a certain frequency range, filters are necessary. Filters are broadly used in signal processing and communication systems in applications such as channel equalization, noise reduction, radar, audio processing, speech signal processing, video processing, biomedical signal processing that is noisy ECG, EEG, EMG signal filtering, electrical circuit analysis and analysis of economic and financial data. In this paper, three types of infinite impulse response filter i.e. Butterworth, Chebyshev type I and Elliptical filter have been discussed theoretically and experimentally. Butterworth, Chebyshev type I and elliptic low pass, high pass, band pass and band stop filter have been designed in this paper using MATLAB Software. The impulse responses, magnitude responses, phase responses of Butterworth, Chebyshev type I and Elliptical filter for filtering the speech signal have been observed in this paper. Analyzing the Speech signal, its sampling rate and spectrum response have also been found.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2020; v1 submitted 8 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
cSeiz: An Edge-Device for Accurate Seizure Detection and Control for Smart Healthcare
Authors:
Md Abu Sayeed,
Saraju P. Mohanty,
Elias Kougianos
Abstract:
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders affecting up to 1% of the world's population and approximately 2.5 million people in the United States. Seizures in more than 30% of epilepsy patients are refractory to anti-epileptic drugs. An important biomedical research effort is focused on the development of an energy efficient implantable device for the real-time control of seizures.…
▽ More
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders affecting up to 1% of the world's population and approximately 2.5 million people in the United States. Seizures in more than 30% of epilepsy patients are refractory to anti-epileptic drugs. An important biomedical research effort is focused on the development of an energy efficient implantable device for the real-time control of seizures. In this paper we propose an Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) based automated seizure detection and drug delivery system (DDS) for the control of seizures. The proposed system will detect seizures and inject a fast acting anti-convulsant drug at the onset to suppress seizure progression. The drug injection is performed in two stages. Initially, the seizure detector detects the seizure from the electroencephalography (EEG) signal using a hyper-synchronous signal detection circuit and a signal rejection algorithm (SRA). In the second stage, the drug is released in the seizure onset area upon seizure detection. The design was validated using a system-level simulation and consumer electronics proof of concept. The proposed seizure detector reports a sensitivity of 96.9% and specificity of 97.5%. The use of minimal circuitry leads to a considerable reduction of power consumption compared to previous approaches. The proposed approach can be generalized to other sensor modalities and the use of both wearable and implantable solutions, or a combination of the two.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
