-
Fundamental Physics in Small Experiments
Authors:
T. Blum,
P. Winter,
T. Bhattacharya,
T. Y. Chen,
V. Cirigliano,
D. DeMille,
A. Gerarci,
N. R. Hutzler,
T. M. Ito,
O. Kim,
R. Lehnert,
W. M. Morse,
Y. K. Semertzidis
Abstract:
High energy physics aims to understand the fundamental laws of particles and their interactions at both the largest and smallest scales of the universe. This typically means probing very high energies or large distances or using high-intensity beams, which often requires large-scale experiments. A complementary approach is offered through high-precision measurements in small- and mid-scale size ex…
▽ More
High energy physics aims to understand the fundamental laws of particles and their interactions at both the largest and smallest scales of the universe. This typically means probing very high energies or large distances or using high-intensity beams, which often requires large-scale experiments. A complementary approach is offered through high-precision measurements in small- and mid-scale size experiments, often at lower energies. The field of such high-precision experiments has seen tremendous progress and importance for particle physics for at least two reasons. First, they exploit synergies to adjacent areas of particle physics and benefit by many recent advances in experimental techniques. Together with intensified phenomenological explorations, these advances led to the realization that challenges associated with weak couplings or the expected suppression factors from the mass scale of new physics can be overcome with such methods. Second, many of these measurements add a new set of particle physics phenomena and observables that can be reached compared to the more conventional methodologies using high energies. Combining high-precision, smaller-scale measurements with the large-scale efforts therefore casts a wider and tighter net for possible effects originating from physics beyond the Standard Model.
This report presents a broad set of small-scale research projects that could provide key new precision measurements in the areas of electric dipole moments, magnetic dipole moments, fermion flavor violation, tests of spacetime symmetries, and tests with gravity. The growing impact of these high-precision studies in high energy physics and the complementary input they provide compared to large-scale efforts warrants strong support over the next decades. In particular, EDM searches are expected to improve sensitivities by four or more orders of magnitude in the next decade or two.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2022; v1 submitted 16 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Lattice QCD and Particle Physics
Authors:
Andreas S. Kronfeld,
Tanmoy Bhattacharya,
Thomas Blum,
Norman H. Christ,
Carleton DeTar,
William Detmold,
Robert Edwards,
Anna Hasenfratz,
Huey-Wen Lin,
Swagato Mukherjee,
Konstantinos Orginos,
Richard Brower,
Vincenzo Cirigliano,
Zohreh Davoudi,
Bálint Jóo,
Chulwoo Jung,
Christoph Lehner,
Stefan Meinel,
Ethan T. Neil,
Peter Petreczky,
David G. Richards,
Alexei Bazavov,
Simon Catterall,
Jozef J. Dudek,
Aida X. El-Khadra
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Contribution from the USQCD Collaboration to the Proceedings of the US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021).
Contribution from the USQCD Collaboration to the Proceedings of the US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021).
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Prospects for precise predictions of $a_μ$ in the Standard Model
Authors:
G. Colangelo,
M. Davier,
A. X. El-Khadra,
M. Hoferichter,
C. Lehner,
L. Lellouch,
T. Mibe,
B. L. Roberts,
T. Teubner,
H. Wittig,
B. Ananthanarayan,
A. Bashir,
J. Bijnens,
T. Blum,
P. Boyle,
N. Bray-Ali,
I. Caprini,
C. M. Carloni Calame,
O. Catà,
M. Cè,
J. Charles,
N. H. Christ,
F. Curciarello,
I. Danilkin,
D. Das
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We discuss the prospects for improving the precision on the hadronic corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, and the plans of the Muon $g-2$ Theory Initiative to update the Standard Model prediction.
We discuss the prospects for improving the precision on the hadronic corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, and the plans of the Muon $g-2$ Theory Initiative to update the Standard Model prediction.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics
Authors:
Ricardo Alarcon,
Jim Alexander,
Vassilis Anastassopoulos,
Takatoshi Aoki,
Rick Baartman,
Stefan Baeßler,
Larry Bartoszek,
Douglas H. Beck,
Franco Bedeschi,
Robert Berger,
Martin Berz,
Hendrick L. Bethlem,
Tanmoy Bhattacharya,
Michael Blaskiewicz,
Thomas Blum,
Themis Bowcock,
Anastasia Borschevsky,
Kevin Brown,
Dmitry Budker,
Sergey Burdin,
Brendan C. Casey,
Gianluigi Casse,
Giovanni Cantatore,
Lan Cheng,
Timothy Chupp
, et al. (118 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Static electric dipole moments of nondegenerate systems probe mass scales for physics beyond the Standard Model well beyond those reached directly at high energy colliders. Discrimination between different physics models, however, requires complementary searches in atomic-molecular-and-optical, nuclear and particle physics. In this report, we discuss the current status and prospects in the near fu…
▽ More
Static electric dipole moments of nondegenerate systems probe mass scales for physics beyond the Standard Model well beyond those reached directly at high energy colliders. Discrimination between different physics models, however, requires complementary searches in atomic-molecular-and-optical, nuclear and particle physics. In this report, we discuss the current status and prospects in the near future for a compelling suite of such experiments, along with developments needed in the encompassing theoretical framework.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model
Authors:
T. Aoyama,
N. Asmussen,
M. Benayoun,
J. Bijnens,
T. Blum,
M. Bruno,
I. Caprini,
C. M. Carloni Calame,
M. Cè,
G. Colangelo,
F. Curciarello,
H. Czyż,
I. Danilkin,
M. Davier,
C. T. H. Davies,
M. Della Morte,
S. I. Eidelman,
A. X. El-Khadra,
A. Gérardin,
D. Giusti,
M. Golterman,
Steven Gottlieb,
V. Gülpers,
F. Hagelstein,
M. Hayakawa
, et al. (107 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We review the present status of the Standard Model calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. This is performed in a perturbative expansion in the fine-structure constant $α$ and is broken down into pure QED, electroweak, and hadronic contributions. The pure QED contribution is by far the largest and has been evaluated up to and including $\mathcal{O}(α^5)$ with negligible numerical…
▽ More
We review the present status of the Standard Model calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. This is performed in a perturbative expansion in the fine-structure constant $α$ and is broken down into pure QED, electroweak, and hadronic contributions. The pure QED contribution is by far the largest and has been evaluated up to and including $\mathcal{O}(α^5)$ with negligible numerical uncertainty. The electroweak contribution is suppressed by $(m_μ/M_W)^2$ and only shows up at the level of the seventh significant digit. It has been evaluated up to two loops and is known to better than one percent. Hadronic contributions are the most difficult to calculate and are responsible for almost all of the theoretical uncertainty. The leading hadronic contribution appears at $\mathcal{O}(α^2)$ and is due to hadronic vacuum polarization, whereas at $\mathcal{O}(α^3)$ the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution appears. Given the low characteristic scale of this observable, these contributions have to be calculated with nonperturbative methods, in particular, dispersion relations and the lattice approach to QCD. The largest part of this review is dedicated to a detailed account of recent efforts to improve the calculation of these two contributions with either a data-driven, dispersive approach, or a first-principle, lattice-QCD approach. The final result reads $a_μ^\text{SM}=116\,591\,810(43)\times 10^{-11}$ and is smaller than the Brookhaven measurement by 3.7$σ$. The experimental uncertainty will soon be reduced by up to a factor four by the new experiment currently running at Fermilab, and also by the future J-PARC experiment. This and the prospects to further reduce the theoretical uncertainty in the near future-which are also discussed here-make this quantity one of the most promising places to look for evidence of new physics.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2020; v1 submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Direct CP violation and the $ΔI=1/2$ rule in $K\toππ$ decay from the Standard Model
Authors:
Ryan Abbott,
Thomas Blum,
Peter A. Boyle,
Mattia Bruno,
Norman H. Christ,
Daniel Hoying,
Chulwoo Jung,
Christopher Kelly,
Christoph Lehner,
Robert D. Mawhinney,
David J. Murphy,
Christopher T. Sachrajda,
Amarjit Soni,
Masaaki Tomii,
Tianle Wang
Abstract:
We present a lattice QCD calculation of the $ΔI=1/2$, $K\toππ$ decay amplitude $A_0$ and $\varepsilon'$, the measure of direct CP-violation in $K\toππ$ decay, improving our 2015 calculation of these quantities. Both calculations were performed with physical kinematics on a $32^3\times 64$ lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of $a^{-1}=1.3784(68)$ GeV. However, the current calculation includes…
▽ More
We present a lattice QCD calculation of the $ΔI=1/2$, $K\toππ$ decay amplitude $A_0$ and $\varepsilon'$, the measure of direct CP-violation in $K\toππ$ decay, improving our 2015 calculation of these quantities. Both calculations were performed with physical kinematics on a $32^3\times 64$ lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of $a^{-1}=1.3784(68)$ GeV. However, the current calculation includes nearly four times the statistics and numerous technical improvements allowing us to more reliably isolate the $ππ$ ground-state and more accurately relate the lattice operators to those defined in the Standard Model. We find ${\rm Re}(A_0)=2.99(0.32)(0.59)\times 10^{-7}$ GeV and ${\rm Im}(A_0)=-6.98(0.62)(1.44)\times 10^{-11}$ GeV, where the errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. The former agrees well with the experimental result ${\rm Re}(A_0)=3.3201(18)\times 10^{-7}$ GeV. These results for $A_0$ can be combined with our earlier lattice calculation of $A_2$ to obtain ${\rm Re}(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)=21.7(2.6)(6.2)(5.0) \times 10^{-4}$, where the third error represents omitted isospin breaking effects, and Re$(A_0)$/Re$(A_2) = 19.9(2.3)(4.4)$. The first agrees well with the experimental result of ${\rm Re}(\varepsilon'/\varepsilon)=16.6(2.3)\times 10^{-4}$. A comparison of the second with the observed ratio Re$(A_0)/$Re$(A_2) = 22.45(6)$, demonstrates the Standard Model origin of this "$ΔI = 1/2$ rule" enhancement.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2020; v1 submitted 20 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Opportunities for lattice QCD in quark and lepton flavor physics
Authors:
Christoph Lehner,
Stefan Meinel,
Tom Blum,
Norman H. Christ,
Aida X. El-Khadra,
Maxwell T. Hansen,
Andreas S. Kronfeld,
Jack Laiho,
Ethan T. Neil,
Stephen R. Sharpe,
Ruth S. Van de Water
Abstract:
This document is one of a series of whitepapers from the USQCD collaboration. Here, we discuss opportunities for lattice QCD in quark and lepton flavor physics. New data generated at Belle II, LHCb, BES III, NA62, KOTO, and Fermilab E989, combined with precise calculations of the relevant hadronic physics, may reveal what lies beyond the Standard Model. We outline a path toward improvements of the…
▽ More
This document is one of a series of whitepapers from the USQCD collaboration. Here, we discuss opportunities for lattice QCD in quark and lepton flavor physics. New data generated at Belle II, LHCb, BES III, NA62, KOTO, and Fermilab E989, combined with precise calculations of the relevant hadronic physics, may reveal what lies beyond the Standard Model. We outline a path toward improvements of the precision of existing lattice-QCD calculations and discuss groundbreaking new methods that allow lattice QCD to access new observables.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2019; v1 submitted 20 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Hadronic contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment Workshop. $(g-2)_μ$: Quo vadis? Workshop. Mini proceedings
Authors:
Maurice Benayoun,
Johan Bijnens,
Tom Blum,
Irinel Caprini,
Gilberto Colangelo,
Henryk Czyż,
Achim Denig,
Cesareo A. Dominguez,
Simon Eidelman,
Christian S. Fischer,
Paolo Gauzzi,
Yuping Guo,
Andreas Hafner,
Masashi Hayakawa,
Gregorio Herdoiza,
Martin Hoferichter,
Guangshun Huang,
Karl Jansen,
Fred Jegerlehner,
Benedikt Kloss,
Bastian Kubis,
Zhiqing Liu,
William Marciano,
Pere Masjuan,
Harvey B. Meyer
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the mini-proceedings of the workshops Hadronic contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment: strategies for improvements of the accuracy of the theoretical prediction and $(g-2)_μ$: Quo vadis?, both held in Mainz from April 1$^{\rm rst}$ to 5$^{\rm th}$ and from April 7$^{\rm th}$ to 10$^{\rm th}$, 2014, respectively.
We present the mini-proceedings of the workshops Hadronic contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment: strategies for improvements of the accuracy of the theoretical prediction and $(g-2)_μ$: Quo vadis?, both held in Mainz from April 1$^{\rm rst}$ to 5$^{\rm th}$ and from April 7$^{\rm th}$ to 10$^{\rm th}$, 2014, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2014; v1 submitted 14 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Planning the Future of U.S. Particle Physics (Snowmass 2013): Chapter 9: Computing
Authors:
L. A. T. Bauerdick,
S. Gottlieb,
G. Bell,
K. Bloom,
T. Blum,
D. Brown,
M. Butler,
A. Connolly,
E. Cormier,
P. Elmer,
M. Ernst,
I. Fisk,
G. Fuller,
R. Gerber,
S. Habib,
M. Hildreth,
S. Hoeche,
D. Holmgren,
C. Joshi,
A. Mezzacappa,
R. Mount,
R. Pordes,
B. Rebel,
L. Reina,
M. C. Sanchez
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 9, on Computing, discusses the computing challenges for future experiments in the Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic Frontiers, for accelerator science, and for particle theory, as well as structural issues in su…
▽ More
These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 9, on Computing, discusses the computing challenges for future experiments in the Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic Frontiers, for accelerator science, and for particle theory, as well as structural issues in supporting the intense uses of computing required in all areas of particle physics.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Charged Leptons
Authors:
J. Albrecht,
M. Artuso,
K. Babu,
R. H. Bernstein,
T. Blum,
D. N. Brown,
B. C. K. Casey,
C. -h. Cheng,
V. Cirigliano,
A. Cohen,
A. Deshpande,
E. C. Dukes,
B. Echenard,
A. Gaponenko,
D. Glenzinski,
M. Gonzalez-Alonso,
F. Grancagnolo,
Y. Grossman,
R. C. Group,
R. Harnik,
D. G. Hitlin,
B. Kiburg,
K. Knoepfe,
K. Kumar,
G. Lim
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This is the report of the Intensity Frontier Charged Lepton Working Group of the 2013 Community Summer Study "Snowmass on the Mississippi", summarizing the current status and future experimental opportunities in muon and tau lepton studies and their sensitivity to new physics. These include searches for charged lepton flavor violation, measurements of magnetic and electric dipole moments, and prec…
▽ More
This is the report of the Intensity Frontier Charged Lepton Working Group of the 2013 Community Summer Study "Snowmass on the Mississippi", summarizing the current status and future experimental opportunities in muon and tau lepton studies and their sensitivity to new physics. These include searches for charged lepton flavor violation, measurements of magnetic and electric dipole moments, and precision measurements of the decay spectrum and parity-violating asymmetries.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2013; v1 submitted 20 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
The Muon (g-2) Theory Value: Present and Future
Authors:
Thomas Blum,
Achim Denig,
Ivan Logashenko,
Eduardo de Rafael,
B. Lee Roberts,
Thomas Teubner,
Graziano Venanzoni
Abstract:
This White Paper briefly reviews the present status of the muon (g-2) Standard-Model prediction. This value results in a 3 - 4 standard-deviation difference with the experimental result from Brookhaven E821. The present experimental uncertainty is $\pm 63 \times 10^{-11}$ (0.54~ppm), and the Standard-Model uncertainty is $\simeq \pm 49 \times 10^{-11}$. Fermilab experiment E989 has the goal to red…
▽ More
This White Paper briefly reviews the present status of the muon (g-2) Standard-Model prediction. This value results in a 3 - 4 standard-deviation difference with the experimental result from Brookhaven E821. The present experimental uncertainty is $\pm 63 \times 10^{-11}$ (0.54~ppm), and the Standard-Model uncertainty is $\simeq \pm 49 \times 10^{-11}$. Fermilab experiment E989 has the goal to reduce the experimental error to $\pm 16 \times 10^{-11}$. Improvements in the Standard-Model value, which should be achieved between now and when the first results from Fermilab E989 could be available, should lead to a Standard-Model uncertainty of $\sim \,\pm 35 \times 10^{-11}$. These improvements would halve the uncertainty on the difference between experiment and theory, and should clarify whether the current difference points toward New Physics, or to a statistical fluctuation. At present, the (g-2) result is arguably the most compelling indicator of physics beyond the Standard Model and, at the very least, it represents a major constraint for speculative new theories such as supersymmetry, dark gauge bosons or extra dimensions.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
Project X: Physics Opportunities
Authors:
Andreas S. Kronfeld,
Robert S. Tschirhart,
Usama Al-Binni,
Wolfgang Altmannshofer,
Charles Ankenbrandt,
Kaladi Babu,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Matthew Bass,
Brian Batell,
David V. Baxter,
Zurab Berezhiani,
Marc Bergevin,
Robert Bernstein,
Sudeb Bhattacharya,
Mary Bishai,
Thomas Blum,
S. Alex Bogacz,
Stephen J. Brice,
Joachim Brod,
Alan Bross,
Michael Buchoff,
Thomas W. Burgess,
Marcela Carena,
Luis A. Castellanos,
Subhasis Chattopadhyay
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Part 2 of "Project X: Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, Broader Impacts". In this Part, we outline the particle-physics program that can be achieved with Project X, a staged superconducting linac for intensity-frontier particle physics. Topics include neutrino physics, kaon physics, muon physics, electric dipole moments, neutron-antineutron oscillations, new light particles, had…
▽ More
Part 2 of "Project X: Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, Broader Impacts". In this Part, we outline the particle-physics program that can be achieved with Project X, a staged superconducting linac for intensity-frontier particle physics. Topics include neutrino physics, kaon physics, muon physics, electric dipole moments, neutron-antineutron oscillations, new light particles, hadron structure, hadron spectroscopy, and lattice-QCD calculations. Part 1 is available as arXiv:1306.5022 [physics.acc-ph] and Part 3 is available as arXiv:1306.5024 [physics.acc-ph].
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2016; v1 submitted 20 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier
Authors:
J. L. Hewett,
H. Weerts,
R. Brock,
J. N. Butler,
B. C. K. Casey,
J. Collar,
A. de Gouvea,
R. Essig,
Y. Grossman,
W. Haxton,
J. A. Jaros,
C. K. Jung,
Z. T. Lu,
K. Pitts,
Z. Ligeti,
J. R. Patterson,
M. Ramsey-Musolf,
J. L. Ritchie,
A. Roodman,
K. Scholberg,
C. E. M. Wagner,
G. P. Zeller,
S. Aefsky,
A. Afanasev,
K. Agashe
, et al. (443 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier. Science opportunities at the intensity frontier are identified and described in the areas of heavy quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, proton decay, new light weakly-coupled particles, and nucleons, nuclei, and atoms.
The Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier. Science opportunities at the intensity frontier are identified and described in the areas of heavy quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, proton decay, new light weakly-coupled particles, and nucleons, nuclei, and atoms.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Full QED+QCD Low-Energy Constants through Reweighting
Authors:
Tomomi Ishikawa,
Thomas Blum,
Masashi Hayakawa,
Taku Izubuchi,
Chulwoo Jung,
Ran Zhou
Abstract:
The effect of sea quark electromagnetic charge on meson masses is investigated, and first results for full QED+QCD low-energy constants are presented. The electromagnetic charge for sea quarks is incorporated in quenched QED+full QCD lattice simulations by a reweighting method. The reweighting factor, which connects quenched and unquenched QED, is estimated using a stochastic method on 2+1 flavor…
▽ More
The effect of sea quark electromagnetic charge on meson masses is investigated, and first results for full QED+QCD low-energy constants are presented. The electromagnetic charge for sea quarks is incorporated in quenched QED+full QCD lattice simulations by a reweighting method. The reweighting factor, which connects quenched and unquenched QED, is estimated using a stochastic method on 2+1 flavor dynamical domain-wall quark ensembles.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2012; v1 submitted 27 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
