-
Dynamics of Hot QCD Matter -- Current Status and Developments
Authors:
Santosh K. Das,
Prabhakar Palni,
Jhuma Sannigrahi,
Jan-e Alam,
Cho Win Aung,
Yoshini Bailung,
Debjani Banerjee,
Gergely Gábor Barnaföldi,
Subash Chandra Behera,
Partha Pratim Bhaduri,
Samapan Bhadury,
Rajesh Biswas,
Pritam Chakraborty,
Vinod Chandra,
Prottoy Das,
Sadhana Dash,
Saumen Datta,
Sudipan De,
Vaishnavi Desai,
Suman Deb,
Debarshi Dey,
Jayanta Dey,
Sabyasachi Ghosh,
Najmul Haque,
Mujeeb Hasan
, et al. (42 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The discovery and characterization of hot and dense QCD matter, known as Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), remains the most international collaborative effort and synergy between theorists and experimentalists in modern nuclear physics to date. The experimentalists around the world not only collect an unprecedented amount of data in heavy-ion collisions, at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), at Brook…
▽ More
The discovery and characterization of hot and dense QCD matter, known as Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), remains the most international collaborative effort and synergy between theorists and experimentalists in modern nuclear physics to date. The experimentalists around the world not only collect an unprecedented amount of data in heavy-ion collisions, at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) in New York, USA, and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland but also analyze these data to unravel the mystery of this new phase of matter that filled a few microseconds old universe, just after the Big Bang. In the meantime, advancements in theoretical works and computing capability extend our wisdom about the hot-dense QCD matter and its dynamics through mathematical equations. The exchange of ideas between experimentalists and theoreticians is crucial for the progress of our knowledge. The motivation of this first conference named "HOT QCD Matter 2022" is to bring the community together to have a discourse on this topic. In this article, there are 36 sections discussing various topics in the field of relativistic heavy-ion collisions and related phenomena that cover a snapshot of the current experimental observations and theoretical progress. This article begins with the theoretical overview of relativistic spin-hydrodynamics in the presence of the external magnetic field, followed by the Lattice QCD results on heavy quarks in QGP, and finally, it ends with an overview of experiment results.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Dynamics of QCD Matter -- current status
Authors:
Amaresh Jaiswal,
Najmul Haque,
Aman Abhishek,
Raktim Abir,
Aritra Bandyopadhyay,
Khatiza Banu,
Samapan Bhadury,
Sumana Bhattacharyya,
Trambak Bhattacharyya,
Deeptak Biswas,
H. C. Chandola,
Vinod Chandra,
Bhaswar Chatterjee,
Chandrodoy Chattopadhyay,
Nilanjan Chaudhuri,
Aritra Das,
Arpan Das,
Santosh K. Das,
Ashutosh Dash,
Kishan Deka,
Jayanta Dey,
Ricardo L. S. Farias,
Utsab Gangopadhyaya,
Ritesh Ghosh,
Sabyasachi Ghosh
, et al. (36 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this article, there are 18 sections discussing various current topics in the field of relativistic heavy-ion collisions and related phenomena, which will serve as a snapshot of the current state of the art.
Section 1 reviews experimental results of some recent light-flavored particle production data from ALICE collaboration. Other sections are mostly theoretical in nature.
Very strong but t…
▽ More
In this article, there are 18 sections discussing various current topics in the field of relativistic heavy-ion collisions and related phenomena, which will serve as a snapshot of the current state of the art.
Section 1 reviews experimental results of some recent light-flavored particle production data from ALICE collaboration. Other sections are mostly theoretical in nature.
Very strong but transient magnetic field created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions could have important observational consequences. This has generated a lot of theoretical activity in the last decade. Sections 2, 7, 9, 10 and 11 deal with the effects of the magnetic field on the properties of the QCD matter. There are several unanswered questions about the QCD phase diagram. Sections 3, 11 and 18 discuss various aspects of the QCD phase diagram and phase transitions.
Recent years have witnessed interesting developments in foundational aspects of hydrodynamics and their application to heavy-ion collisions. Sections 12, 15, 16 and 17 of this article probe some aspects of this exciting field.
Transport coefficients together with their temperature- and density-dependence, are essential inputs in hydrodynamical calculations. Sections 5, 8 and 14 deal with calculation/estimation of various transport coefficients (shear and bulk viscosity, thermal conductivity, relaxation times, etc.) of quark matter and hadronic matter.
Sections 4, 6 and 13 deals with interesting new developments in the field. Section 4 discusses color dipole gluon distribution function at small transverse momentum in the form of a series of Bells polynomials. Section 6 discusses the properties of Higgs boson in the quark gluon plasma using Higgs-quark interaction. Section 13 discusses modification of coalescence model to incorporate viscous corrections and application of this model.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2021; v1 submitted 29 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Stability study and time resolution measurement of Straw Tube detectors
Authors:
S. Roy,
S. Jaiswal,
S. Chatterjee,
A. Sen,
S. Das,
S. K. Ghosh,
S. Raha,
V. M. Lysan,
G. D. Kekelidze,
V. V. Myalkovsky,
S. Biswas
Abstract:
Straw tube detectors are single wire proportional counters that are widely used as a tracking device. We have carried out R$\&$D with a straw tube detector prototype. The motivation of this work is to study the stability of the performance in terms of gain and energy resolution of the straw tube detectors under high rate radiation. Two different methods are incorporated to perform this study. The…
▽ More
Straw tube detectors are single wire proportional counters that are widely used as a tracking device. We have carried out R$\&$D with a straw tube detector prototype. The motivation of this work is to study the stability of the performance in terms of gain and energy resolution of the straw tube detectors under high rate radiation. Two different methods are incorporated to perform this study. The gain and energy resolution of the detector are studied along with its variation with ambient temperature and pressure. X-ray from a radioactive source is used to irradiate the detector and the same source is also used to monitor the energy spectra simultaneously for calculation of gain. Variation of the gain and energy resolution of the straw tube detector under X-ray irradiation in Ar/CO$_2$ gas mixture is discussed in this article. We have also estimated the time resolution of the straw tube detectors that can be best achieved with cosmic rays as trigger for the same gas mixture. The details of the measurement process and the experimental results are presented in this article.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Updates on SM predictions of $|V_{cb}|$ and $R(D^{*})$ in $B\to D^{*}\ellν_\ell$ decays
Authors:
Sneha Jaiswal,
Soumitra Nandi,
Sunando Kumar Patra
Abstract:
We update the standard model (SM) predictions of $R(D^*)$ using the latest results on the decay distributions in $B \to D^* \ell ν_{\ell}$ ($\ell = μ, e$) by Belle collaboration, while extracting $|V_{cb}|$ at the same time. Depending on the inputs used in the analysis, we define various fit scenarios. Although the central values of the predicted $R(D^*)$ in all the scenarios have reduced from its…
▽ More
We update the standard model (SM) predictions of $R(D^*)$ using the latest results on the decay distributions in $B \to D^* \ell ν_{\ell}$ ($\ell = μ, e$) by Belle collaboration, while extracting $|V_{cb}|$ at the same time. Depending on the inputs used in the analysis, we define various fit scenarios. Although the central values of the predicted $R(D^*)$ in all the scenarios have reduced from its earlier predictions in 2017, the results are consistent with each other within the uncertainties. In this analysis, our prediction of $R(D^*)$ is consistent with the respective world average at $\sim 3σ$. We have also predicted several angular observables associated with $B \to D^* τν_τ$ decays. We note that the predicted $F_L(D^*)$ is consistent with the corresponding measurement at 2$σ$. Utilizing these new results, we fit the Wilson coefficients appearing beyond the standard model of particle physics (BSM). To see the trend of SM predictions, we have utilized the recently published preliminary results on the form-factors at non-zero recoil by the lattice groups like Fermilab-MILC and JLQCD and predicted the observables in $B \to D^* \ell ν_{\ell}$, and $B \to D^* τν_τ$ decays.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Extraction of $|V_{cb}|$ from $B\to D^{(*)}\ellν_\ell$ and the Standard Model predictions of $R(D^{(*)})$
Authors:
Sneha Jaiswal,
Soumitra Nandi,
Sunando Kumar Patra
Abstract:
We extract $|V_{cb}|$ from the available data in the decay $B \to D^{(*)}\ellν_{\ell}$. Our analysis uses the $q^2(w)$ binned differential decay rates in different subsamples of $B\to D\ellν_\ell$ ($\ell = e, μ$), while for the decay $B\to D^*\ellν_\ell$, the unfolded binned differential decay rates of four kinematic variables including the $q^2$ bins have been used. In the CLN and BGL parameteriz…
▽ More
We extract $|V_{cb}|$ from the available data in the decay $B \to D^{(*)}\ellν_{\ell}$. Our analysis uses the $q^2(w)$ binned differential decay rates in different subsamples of $B\to D\ellν_\ell$ ($\ell = e, μ$), while for the decay $B\to D^*\ellν_\ell$, the unfolded binned differential decay rates of four kinematic variables including the $q^2$ bins have been used. In the CLN and BGL parameterizations of the form factors, the combined fit to all the available data along with their correlations yields $|V_{cb}| = (39.77 \pm 0.89)\times 10^{-3}$ and $(40.90 \pm 0.94)\times 10^{-3}$ respectively. In these fits, we have used the inputs from lattice and light cone sum rule (LCSR) along with the data. Using our fit results and the HQET relations (with the known corrections included) amongst the form factors, and parameterizing the unknown higher order corrections (in the ratios of HQET form factors) with a conservative estimate of the normalizing parameters, we obtain $R(D^{*}) = 0.259 \pm 0.006$ (CLN) and $R(D^*) = 0.257 \pm 0.005$ (BGL).
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2017; v1 submitted 31 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
