-
The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy
Authors:
Marc Kamionkowski,
Adam G. Riess
Abstract:
Over the past decade, the disparity between the value of the cosmic expansion rate directly determined from measurements of distance and redshift or instead from the standard $Λ$CDM cosmological model calibrated by measurements from the early Universe, has grown to a level of significance requiring a solution. Proposed systematic errors are not supported by the breadth of available data (and "unkn…
▽ More
Over the past decade, the disparity between the value of the cosmic expansion rate directly determined from measurements of distance and redshift or instead from the standard $Λ$CDM cosmological model calibrated by measurements from the early Universe, has grown to a level of significance requiring a solution. Proposed systematic errors are not supported by the breadth of available data (and "unknown errors" untestable by lack of definition). Simple theoretical explanations for this "Hubble tension" that are consistent with the majority of the data have been surprisingly hard to come by, but in recent years, attention has focused increasingly on models that alter the early or pre-recombination physics of $Λ$CDM as the most feasible. Here, we describe the nature of this tension, emphasizing recent developments on the observational side. We then explain why early-Universe solutions are currently favored and the constraints that any such model must satisfy. We discuss one workable example, early dark energy, and describe how it can be tested with future measurements. Given an assortment of more extended recent reviews on specific aspects of the problem, the discussion is intended to be fairly general and understandable to a broad audience.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Report of the Topical Group on Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics for for Snowmass 2021
Authors:
Rana X. Adhikari,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ke Fang,
B. S. Sathyaprakash,
Kirsten Tollefson,
Tiffany R. Lewis,
Kristi Engel,
Amin Aboubrahim,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yashar Akrami,
Roberto Aloisio,
Rafael Alves Batista,
Mario Ballardini,
Stefan W. Ballmer,
Ellen Bechtol,
David Benisty,
Emanuele Berti,
Simon Birrer,
Alexander Bonilla,
Richard Brito,
Mauricio Bustamante,
Robert Caldwell,
Vitor Cardoso,
Sukanya Chakrabarti,
Thomas Y. Chen
, et al. (96 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics take two primary forms: Very high energy particles (cosmic rays, neutrinos, and gamma rays) and gravitational waves. Already today, these probes give access to fundamental physics not available by any other means, helping elucidate the underlying theory that completes the Standard Model. The last decade has witnessed a revolution of exciting discoveries such as…
▽ More
Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics take two primary forms: Very high energy particles (cosmic rays, neutrinos, and gamma rays) and gravitational waves. Already today, these probes give access to fundamental physics not available by any other means, helping elucidate the underlying theory that completes the Standard Model. The last decade has witnessed a revolution of exciting discoveries such as the detection of high-energy neutrinos and gravitational waves. The scope for major developments in the next decades is dramatic, as we detail in this report.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
Authors:
Elcio Abdalla,
Guillermo Franco Abellán,
Amin Aboubrahim,
Adriano Agnello,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yashar Akrami,
George Alestas,
Daniel Aloni,
Luca Amendola,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Richard I. Anderson,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Vernon Barger,
Spyros Basilakos,
Ronaldo C. Batista,
Elia S. Battistelli,
Richard Battye,
Micol Benetti,
David Benisty,
Asher Berlin,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Emanuele Berti,
Bohdan Bidenko
, et al. (178 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of system…
▽ More
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,σ$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Olga Mena,
Supriya Pan,
Luca Visinelli,
Weiqiang Yang,
Alessandro Melchiorri,
David F. Mota,
Adam G. Riess,
Joseph Silk
Abstract:
The $Λ$CDM model provides a good fit to a large span of cosmological data but harbors areas of phenomenology. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, discrepancies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. The most statistically significant tension is the $4-6σ$ disagreement between predictions of the Hubble constant $H_0$ by early time probes with…
▽ More
The $Λ$CDM model provides a good fit to a large span of cosmological data but harbors areas of phenomenology. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, discrepancies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. The most statistically significant tension is the $4-6σ$ disagreement between predictions of the Hubble constant $H_0$ by early time probes with $Λ$CDM model, and a number of late time, model-independent determinations of $H_0$ from local measurements of distances and redshifts. The high precision and consistency of the data at both ends present strong challenges to the possible solution space and demand a hypothesis with enough rigor to explain multiple observations--whether these invoke new physics, unexpected large-scale structures or multiple, unrelated errors. We present a thorough review of the problem, including a discussion of recent Hubble constant estimates and a summary of the proposed theoretical solutions. Some of the models presented are formally successful, improving the fit to the data in light of their additional degrees of freedom, restoring agreement within $1-2σ$ between {\it Planck} 2018, using CMB power spectra data, BAO, Pantheon SN data, and R20, the latest SH0ES Team measurement of the Hubble constant ($H_0 = 73.2 \pm 1.3{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$ at 68\% confidence level). Reduced tension might not simply come from a change in $H_0$ but also from an increase in its uncertainty due to degeneracy with additional physics, pointing to the need for additional probes. While no specific proposal makes a strong case for being highly likely or far better than all others, solutions involving early or dynamical dark energy, neutrino interactions, interacting cosmologies, primordial magnetic fields, and modified gravity provide the best options until a better alternative comes along.[Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2021; v1 submitted 1 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Cosmology Intertwined IV: The Age of the Universe and its Curvature
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (66 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A precise measurement of the curvature of the Universe is of primeval importance for cosmology since it could not only confirm the paradigm of primordial inflation but also help in discriminating between different early Universe scenarios. The recent observations, while broadly consistent with a spatially flat standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model, are showing tensions that still allow (and…
▽ More
A precise measurement of the curvature of the Universe is of primeval importance for cosmology since it could not only confirm the paradigm of primordial inflation but also help in discriminating between different early Universe scenarios. The recent observations, while broadly consistent with a spatially flat standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model, are showing tensions that still allow (and, in some cases, even suggest) a few percent deviations from a flat universe. In particular, the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background power spectra, assuming the nominal likelihood, prefer a closed universe at more than 99\% confidence level. While new physics could be in action, this anomaly may be the result of an unresolved systematic error or just a statistical fluctuation. However, since a positive curvature allows a larger age of the Universe, an accurate determination of the age of the oldest objects provides a smoking gun in confirming or falsifying the current flat $Λ$CDM model.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined III: $f σ_8$ and $S_8$
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides a wonderful fit to current cosmological data, but a few tensions and anomalies became statistically significant with the latest data analyses. While these anomalies could be due to the presence of systematic errors in the experiments, they could also indicate the need for new physics beyond the standard model. In this Letter of Interest…
▽ More
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides a wonderful fit to current cosmological data, but a few tensions and anomalies became statistically significant with the latest data analyses. While these anomalies could be due to the presence of systematic errors in the experiments, they could also indicate the need for new physics beyond the standard model. In this Letter of Interest we focus on the tension of the Planck data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models for solving this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit with a single model a full array of data and not just one parameter at a time.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, that has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in portion the result of sys…
▽ More
The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, that has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in portion the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the $4.4σ$ tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting new physics models that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade experiments will be crucial.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined I: Perspectives for the Next Decade
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides an amazing description of a wide range of astrophysical and astronomical data. However, there are a few big open questions, that make the standard model look like a first-order approximation to a more realistic scenario that still needs to be fully understood. In this Letter of Interest we will list a few important goals that need to be…
▽ More
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides an amazing description of a wide range of astrophysical and astronomical data. However, there are a few big open questions, that make the standard model look like a first-order approximation to a more realistic scenario that still needs to be fully understood. In this Letter of Interest we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances present between the different cosmological probes, as the Hubble constant $H_0$ value, the $σ_8 - S_8$ tension, and the anomalies present in the Planck results. Finally, we will give an overview of upgraded experiments and next-generation space-missions and facilities on Earth, that will be of crucial importance to address all these questions.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe
Authors:
L. Verde,
T. Treu,
A. G. Riess
Abstract:
The standard cosmological model successfully describes many observations from widely different epochs of the Universe, from primordial nucleosynthesis to the accelerating expansion of the present day. However, as the basic cosmological parameters of the model are being determined with increasing and unprecedented precision, it is not guaranteed that the same model will fit more precise observation…
▽ More
The standard cosmological model successfully describes many observations from widely different epochs of the Universe, from primordial nucleosynthesis to the accelerating expansion of the present day. However, as the basic cosmological parameters of the model are being determined with increasing and unprecedented precision, it is not guaranteed that the same model will fit more precise observations from widely different cosmic epochs. Discrepancies developing between observations at early and late cosmological time may require an expansion of the standard model, and may lead to the discovery of new physics. The workshop "Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe" was held at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics on July 15-17 2019 (More details of the workshop (including on-line presentations) are given at the website: https://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/enervac-c19) to evaluate increasing evidence for these discrepancies, primarily in the value of the Hubble constant as well as ideas recently proposed to explain this tension. Multiple new observational results for the Hubble constant were presented in the time frame of the workshop using different probes: Cepheids, strong lensing time delays, tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), megamasers, Oxygen-rich Miras and surface brightness fluctuations (SBF) resulting in a set of six new ones in the last several months. Here we present the summary plot of the meeting that shows combining any three independent approaches to measure H$_0$ in the late universe yields tension with the early Universe values between 4.0$σ$ and 5.8$σ$. This shows that the discrepancy does not appear to be dependent on the use of any one method, team, or source. Theoretical ideas to explain the discrepancy focused on new physics in the decade of expansion preceding recombination as the most plausible. This is a brief summary of the workshop.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Did LIGO detect dark matter?
Authors:
Simeon Bird,
Ilias Cholis,
Julian B. Muñoz,
Yacine Ali-Haïmoud,
Marc Kamionkowski,
Ely D. Kovetz,
Alvise Raccanelli,
Adam G. Riess
Abstract:
We consider the possibility that the black-hole (BH) binary detected by LIGO may be a signature of dark matter. Interestingly enough, there remains a window for masses $20\,M_\odot \lesssim M_{\rm bh} \lesssim 100\, M_\odot$ where primordial black holes (PBHs) may constitute the dark matter. If two BHs in a galactic halo pass sufficiently close, they radiate enough energy in gravitational waves to…
▽ More
We consider the possibility that the black-hole (BH) binary detected by LIGO may be a signature of dark matter. Interestingly enough, there remains a window for masses $20\,M_\odot \lesssim M_{\rm bh} \lesssim 100\, M_\odot$ where primordial black holes (PBHs) may constitute the dark matter. If two BHs in a galactic halo pass sufficiently close, they radiate enough energy in gravitational waves to become gravitationally bound. The bound BHs will rapidly spiral inward due to emission of gravitational radiation and ultimately merge. Uncertainties in the rate for such events arise from our imprecise knowledge of the phase-space structure of galactic halos on the smallest scales. Still, reasonable estimates span a range that overlaps the $2-53$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ rate estimated from GW150914, thus raising the possibility that LIGO has detected PBH dark matter. PBH mergers are likely to be distributed spatially more like dark matter than luminous matter and have no optical nor neutrino counterparts. They may be distinguished from mergers of BHs from more traditional astrophysical sources through the observed mass spectrum, their high ellipticities, or their stochastic gravitational wave background. Next generation experiments will be invaluable in performing these tests.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2016; v1 submitted 1 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Supernova Limits on the Cosmic Equation of State
Authors:
P. M. Garnavich,
S. Jha,
P. Challis,
A. Clocchiatti,
A. Diercks,
A. V. Filippenko,
R. L. Gilliland,
C. J. Hogan,
R. P. Kirshner,
B. Leibundgut,
M. M. Phillips,
D. Reiss,
A. G. Riess,
B. P. Schmidt,
R. A. Schommer,
R. C. Smith,
J. Spyromilio,
C. Stubbs,
N. B. Suntzeff,
J. Tonry,
S. M. Carroll
Abstract:
We use Type Ia supernovae studied by the High-Z Supernova Search Team to constrain the properties of an energy component which may have contributed to accelerating the cosmic expansion. We find that for a flat geometry the equation of state parameter for the unknown component, alpha_x=P_x/rho_x, must be less than -0.55 (95% confidence) for any value of Omega_m and is further limited to alpha_x<-…
▽ More
We use Type Ia supernovae studied by the High-Z Supernova Search Team to constrain the properties of an energy component which may have contributed to accelerating the cosmic expansion. We find that for a flat geometry the equation of state parameter for the unknown component, alpha_x=P_x/rho_x, must be less than -0.55 (95% confidence) for any value of Omega_m and is further limited to alpha_x<-0.60 (95%) if Omega_m is assumed to be greater than 0.1 . These values are inconsistent with the unknown component being topological defects such as domain walls, strings, or textures. The supernova data are consistent with a cosmological constant (alpha_x=-1) or a scalar field which has had, on average, an equation of state parameter similar to the cosmological constant value of -1 over the redshift range of z=1 to the present. Supernova and cosmic microwave background observations give complementary constraints on the densities of matter and the unknown component. If only matter and vacuum energy are considered, then the current combined data sets provide direct evidence for a spatially flat Universe with Omega_tot=Omega_m+Omega_Lambda = 0.94 +/- 0.26 (1-sigma).
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 1998;
originally announced June 1998.
