-
Study of the decay and production properties of $D_{s1}(2536)$ and $D_{s2}^*(2573)$
Authors:
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
P. Adlarson,
O. Afedulidis,
X. C. Ai,
R. Aliberti,
A. Amoroso,
Q. An,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
I. Balossino,
Y. Ban,
H. -R. Bao,
V. Batozskaya,
K. Begzsuren,
N. Berger,
M. Berlowski,
M. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
F. Bianchi,
E. Bianco,
A. Bortone,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
A. Brueggemann
, et al. (645 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D_{s1}(2536)^-$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D^*_{s2}(2573)^-$ processes are studied using data samples collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies from 4.530 to 4.946~GeV. The absolute branching fractions of $D_{s1}(2536)^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^{*0}K^-$ and $D_{s2}^*(2573)^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^0K^-$ are measured for the first time to be…
▽ More
The $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D_{s1}(2536)^-$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D^*_{s2}(2573)^-$ processes are studied using data samples collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies from 4.530 to 4.946~GeV. The absolute branching fractions of $D_{s1}(2536)^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^{*0}K^-$ and $D_{s2}^*(2573)^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^0K^-$ are measured for the first time to be $(35.9\pm 4.8\pm 3.5)\%$ and $(37.4\pm 3.1\pm 4.6)\%$, respectively. The measurements are in tension with predictions based on the assumption that the $D_{s1}(2536)$ and $D_{s2}^*(2573)$ are dominated by a bare $c\bar{s}$ component. The $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D_{s1}(2536)^-$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D^*_{s2}(2573)^-$ cross sections are measured, and a resonant structure at around 4.6~GeV with a width of 50~MeV is observed for the first time with a statistical significance of $15σ$ in the $e^+e^-\rightarrow D_s^+D^*_{s2}(2573)^-$ process. It could be the $Y(4626)$ found by the Belle collaboration in the $D_s^+D_{s1}(2536)^{-}$ final state, since they have similar masses and widths. There is also evidence for a structure at around 4.75~GeV in both processes.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
STCF Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 -- Physics & Detector
Authors:
M. Achasov,
X. C. Ai,
R. Aliberti,
L. P. An,
Q. An,
X. Z. Bai,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
A. Barnyakov,
V. Blinov,
V. Bobrovnikov,
D. Bodrov,
A. Bogomyagkov,
A. Bondar,
I. Boyko,
Z. H. Bu,
F. M. Cai,
H. Cai,
J. J. Cao,
Q. H. Cao,
Z. Cao,
Q. Chang,
K. T. Chao,
D. Y. Chen,
H. Chen
, et al. (413 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Super $τ$-Charm facility (STCF) is an electron-positron collider proposed by the Chinese particle physics community. It is designed to operate in a center-of-mass energy range from 2 to 7 GeV with a peak luminosity of $0.5\times 10^{35}{\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ or higher. The STCF will produce a data sample about a factor of 100 larger than that by the present $τ$-Charm factory -- the BEPCII,…
▽ More
The Super $τ$-Charm facility (STCF) is an electron-positron collider proposed by the Chinese particle physics community. It is designed to operate in a center-of-mass energy range from 2 to 7 GeV with a peak luminosity of $0.5\times 10^{35}{\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ or higher. The STCF will produce a data sample about a factor of 100 larger than that by the present $τ$-Charm factory -- the BEPCII, providing a unique platform for exploring the asymmetry of matter-antimatter (charge-parity violation), in-depth studies of the internal structure of hadrons and the nature of non-perturbative strong interactions, as well as searching for exotic hadrons and physics beyond the Standard Model. The STCF project in China is under development with an extensive R\&D program. This document presents the physics opportunities at the STCF, describes conceptual designs of the STCF detector system, and discusses future plans for detector R\&D and physics case studies.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Detector Technologies for CLIC
Authors:
A. C. Abusleme Hoffman,
G. Parès,
T. Fritzsch,
M. Rothermund,
H. Jansen,
K. Krüger,
F. Sefkow,
A. Velyka,
J. Schwandt,
I. Perić,
L. Emberger,
C. Graf,
A. Macchiolo,
F. Simon,
M. Szalay,
N. van der Kolk,
H. Abramowicz,
Y. Benhammou,
O. Borysov,
M. Borysova,
A. Joffe,
S. Kananov,
A. Levy,
I. Levy,
G. Eigen
, et al. (107 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a high-energy high-luminosity linear electron-positron collider under development. It is foreseen to be built and operated in three stages, at centre-of-mass energies of 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV and 3 TeV, respectively. It offers a rich physics program including direct searches as well as the probing of new physics through a broad set of precision measurements of Stan…
▽ More
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a high-energy high-luminosity linear electron-positron collider under development. It is foreseen to be built and operated in three stages, at centre-of-mass energies of 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV and 3 TeV, respectively. It offers a rich physics program including direct searches as well as the probing of new physics through a broad set of precision measurements of Standard Model processes, particularly in the Higgs-boson and top-quark sectors. The precision required for such measurements and the specific conditions imposed by the beam dimensions and time structure put strict requirements on the detector design and technology. This includes low-mass vertexing and tracking systems with small cells, highly granular imaging calorimeters, as well as a precise hit-time resolution and power-pulsed operation for all subsystems. A conceptual design for the CLIC detector system was published in 2012. Since then, ambitious R&D programmes for silicon vertex and tracking detectors, as well as for calorimeters have been pursued within the CLICdp, CALICE and FCAL collaborations, addressing the challenging detector requirements with innovative technologies. This report introduces the experimental environment and detector requirements at CLIC and reviews the current status and future plans for detector technology R&D.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report
Authors:
The CLIC,
CLICdp collaborations,
:,
T. K. Charles,
P. J. Giansiracusa,
T. G. Lucas,
R. P. Rassool,
M. Volpi,
C. Balazs,
K. Afanaciev,
V. Makarenko,
A. Patapenka,
I. Zhuk,
C. Collette,
M. J. Boland,
A. C. Abusleme Hoffman,
M. A. Diaz,
F. Garay,
Y. Chi,
X. He,
G. Pei,
S. Pei,
G. Shu,
X. Wang,
J. Zhang
, et al. (671 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a TeV-scale high-luminosity linear $e^+e^-$ collider under development at CERN. Following the CLIC conceptual design published in 2012, this report provides an overview of the CLIC project, its current status, and future developments. It presents the CLIC physics potential and reports on design, technology, and implementation aspects of the accelerator and the…
▽ More
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a TeV-scale high-luminosity linear $e^+e^-$ collider under development at CERN. Following the CLIC conceptual design published in 2012, this report provides an overview of the CLIC project, its current status, and future developments. It presents the CLIC physics potential and reports on design, technology, and implementation aspects of the accelerator and the detector. CLIC is foreseen to be built and operated in stages, at centre-of-mass energies of 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV and 3 TeV, respectively. CLIC uses a two-beam acceleration scheme, in which 12 GHz accelerating structures are powered via a high-current drive beam. For the first stage, an alternative with X-band klystron powering is also considered. CLIC accelerator optimisation, technical developments and system tests have resulted in an increased energy efficiency (power around 170 MW) for the 380 GeV stage, together with a reduced cost estimate at the level of 6 billion CHF. The detector concept has been refined using improved software tools. Significant progress has been made on detector technology developments for the tracking and calorimetry systems. A wide range of CLIC physics studies has been conducted, both through full detector simulations and parametric studies, together providing a broad overview of the CLIC physics potential. Each of the three energy stages adds cornerstones of the full CLIC physics programme, such as Higgs width and couplings, top-quark properties, Higgs self-coupling, direct searches, and many precision electroweak measurements. The interpretation of the combined results gives crucial and accurate insight into new physics, largely complementary to LHC and HL-LHC. The construction of the first CLIC energy stage could start by 2026. First beams would be available by 2035, marking the beginning of a broad CLIC physics programme spanning 25-30 years.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2019; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Luminosity measurements for the R scan experiment at BESIII
Authors:
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
S. Ahmed,
X. C. Ai,
O. Albayrak,
M. Albrecht,
D. J. Ambrose,
A. Amoroso,
F. F. An,
Q. An,
J. Z. Bai,
O. Bakina,
R. Baldini Ferroli,
Y. Ban,
D. W. Bennett,
J. V. Bennett,
N. Berger,
M. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
J. M. Bian,
F. Bianchi,
E. Boger,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
H. Cai
, et al. (405 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
By analyzing the large-angle Bhabha scattering events $e^{+}e^{-}$ $\to$ ($γ$)$e^{+}e^{-}$ and diphoton events $e^{+}e^{-}$ $\to$ $γγ$ for the data sets collected at center-of-mass (c.m.) energies between 2.2324 and 4.5900 GeV (131 energy points in total) with the upgraded Beijing Spectrometer (BESIII) at the Beijing Electron-Positron Collider (BEPCII), the integrated luminosities have been measur…
▽ More
By analyzing the large-angle Bhabha scattering events $e^{+}e^{-}$ $\to$ ($γ$)$e^{+}e^{-}$ and diphoton events $e^{+}e^{-}$ $\to$ $γγ$ for the data sets collected at center-of-mass (c.m.) energies between 2.2324 and 4.5900 GeV (131 energy points in total) with the upgraded Beijing Spectrometer (BESIII) at the Beijing Electron-Positron Collider (BEPCII), the integrated luminosities have been measured at the different c.m. energies, individually. The results are the important inputs for R value and $J/ψ$ resonance parameter measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Detector resolution correction for width of intermediate states in three particle decays
Authors:
Igor Denisenko,
Igor Boyko
Abstract:
We propose a method that allows to take into account detector resolution in the partial wave analysis event-by-event fit as a special case. Implementation of the method is discussed and the applicability of the method is studied for the $J/ψ\to K^{*\pm}K^{\mp} \to K^+K^-π^0$ and $J/ψ\to K_2(1430)^\pm K^{\mp} \to K^+K^-π^0$ decays.
We propose a method that allows to take into account detector resolution in the partial wave analysis event-by-event fit as a special case. Implementation of the method is discussed and the applicability of the method is studied for the $J/ψ\to K^{*\pm}K^{\mp} \to K^+K^-π^0$ and $J/ψ\to K_2(1430)^\pm K^{\mp} \to K^+K^-π^0$ decays.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Measurements of Baryon Pair Decays of $χ_{cJ}$ Mesons
Authors:
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
O. Albayrak,
D. J. Ambrose,
F. F. An,
Q. An,
J. Z. Bai,
Y. Ban,
J. Becker,
J. V. Bennett,
M. Bertani,
J. M. Bian,
E. Boger,
O. Bondarenko,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
V. Bytev,
X. Cai,
O. Cakir,
A. Calcaterra,
G. F. Cao,
S. A. Cetin,
J. F. Chang,
G. Chelkov,
G. Chen
, et al. (326 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using 106 $\times 10^{6}$ $ψ^{\prime}$ decays collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII, three decays of $χ_{cJ}$ ($J=0,1,2$) with baryon pairs ($\llb$, $\ssb$, $\SSB$) in the final state have been studied. The branching fractions are measured to be $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c0,1,2}\rightarrowΛ\barΛ) =(33.3 \pm 2.0 \pm 2.6)\times 10^{-5}$, $(12.2 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.1)\times 10^{-5}$,…
▽ More
Using 106 $\times 10^{6}$ $ψ^{\prime}$ decays collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII, three decays of $χ_{cJ}$ ($J=0,1,2$) with baryon pairs ($\llb$, $\ssb$, $\SSB$) in the final state have been studied. The branching fractions are measured to be $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c0,1,2}\rightarrowΛ\barΛ) =(33.3 \pm 2.0 \pm 2.6)\times 10^{-5}$, $(12.2 \pm 1.1 \pm 1.1)\times 10^{-5}$, $(20.8 \pm 1.6 \pm 2.3)\times 10^{-5}$; $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c0,1,2}\rightarrowΣ^{0}\barΣ^{0})$ = $(47.8 \pm 3.4 \pm 3.9)\times 10^{-5}$, $(3.8 \pm 1.0 \pm 0.5)\times 10^{-5}$, $(4.0 \pm 1.1 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{-5}$; and $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c0,1,2}\rightarrowΣ^{+}\barΣ^{-})$ = $(45.4 \pm 4.2 \pm 3.0)\times 10^{-5}$, $(5.4 \pm 1.5 \pm 0.5)\times 10^{-5}$, $(4.9 \pm 1.9 \pm 0.7)\times 10^{-5}$, where the first error is statistical and the second is systematic. Upper limits on the branching fractions for the decays of $χ_{c1,2}\rightarrowΣ^{0}\barΣ^{0}$, $Σ^{+}\barΣ^{-}$, are estimated to be $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c1}\rightarrowΣ^{0}\barΣ^{0}) < 6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c2}\rightarrowΣ^{0}\barΣ^{0}) < 6.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c1}\rightarrowΣ^{+}\barΣ^{-}) < 8.7\times 10^{-5}$ and $\cal{B}$$(χ_{c2}\rightarrowΣ^{+}\barΣ^{-}) < 8.8\times 10^{-5}$ at the 90% confidence level.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2013; v1 submitted 9 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
Why the paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) is scientifically unacceptable
Authors:
The HARP-CDP group,
:,
A. Bolshakova,
I. Boyko,
G. Chelkov,
D. Dedovitch,
A. Elagin,
M. Gostkin,
A. Guskov,
Z. Kroumchtein,
Yu. Nefedov,
K. Nikolaev,
A. Zhemchugov,
F. Dydak,
J. Wotschack,
A. De Min,
V. Ammosov,
V. Gapienko,
V. Koreshev,
A. Semak,
Yu. Sviridov,
E. Usenko,
V. Zaets
Abstract:
The paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) by A. Bagulya et al. violates standards of quality of work and scientific ethics on several counts. The paper contains assertions that contradict established detector physics. The paper falls short of proving the correctness of the authors' concepts and results. The paper ignores or quotes misleadingly pertinent published work. The paper ignores th…
▽ More
The paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) by A. Bagulya et al. violates standards of quality of work and scientific ethics on several counts. The paper contains assertions that contradict established detector physics. The paper falls short of proving the correctness of the authors' concepts and results. The paper ignores or quotes misleadingly pertinent published work. The paper ignores the fact that the authors' concepts and results have already been shown wrong in the published literature. The authors seem unaware that cross-section results from the 'HARP Collaboration' that are based on the paper's concepts and algorithms are in gross disagreement with the results of a second analysis of the same data, and with the results of other experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2009;
originally announced September 2009.