Calibrated neighborhood aware confidence measure for deep metric learning
Authors:
Maryna Karpusha,
Sunghee Yun,
Istvan Fehervari
Abstract:
Deep metric learning has gained promising improvement in recent years following the success of deep learning. It has been successfully applied to problems in few-shot learning, image retrieval, and open-set classifications. However, measuring the confidence of a deep metric learning model and identifying unreliable predictions is still an open challenge. This paper focuses on defining a calibrated…
▽ More
Deep metric learning has gained promising improvement in recent years following the success of deep learning. It has been successfully applied to problems in few-shot learning, image retrieval, and open-set classifications. However, measuring the confidence of a deep metric learning model and identifying unreliable predictions is still an open challenge. This paper focuses on defining a calibrated and interpretable confidence metric that closely reflects its classification accuracy. While performing similarity comparison directly in the latent space using the learned distance metric, our approach approximates the distribution of data points for each class using a Gaussian kernel smoothing function. The post-processing calibration algorithm with proposed confidence metric on the held-out validation dataset improves generalization and robustness of state-of-the-art deep metric learning models while provides an interpretable estimation of the confidence. Extensive tests on four popular benchmark datasets (Caltech-UCSD Birds, Stanford Online Product, Stanford Car-196, and In-shop Clothes Retrieval) show consistent improvements even at the presence of distribution shifts in test data related to additional noise or adversarial examples.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms
Authors:
Istvan Fehervari,
Avinash Ravichandran,
Srikar Appalaraju
Abstract:
Deep metric learning (DML) is a popular approach for images retrieval, solving verification (same or not) problems and addressing open set classification. Arguably, the most common DML approach is with triplet loss, despite significant advances in the area of DML. Triplet loss suffers from several issues such as collapse of the embeddings, high sensitivity to sampling schemes and more importantly…
▽ More
Deep metric learning (DML) is a popular approach for images retrieval, solving verification (same or not) problems and addressing open set classification. Arguably, the most common DML approach is with triplet loss, despite significant advances in the area of DML. Triplet loss suffers from several issues such as collapse of the embeddings, high sensitivity to sampling schemes and more importantly a lack of performance when compared to more modern methods. We attribute this adoption to a lack of fair comparisons between various methods and the difficulty in adopting them for novel problem statements. In this paper, we perform an unbiased comparison of the most popular DML baseline methods under same conditions and more importantly, not obfuscating any hyper parameter tuning or adjustment needed to favor a particular method. We find, that under equal conditions several older methods perform significantly better than previously believed. In fact, our unified implementation of 12 recently introduced DML algorithms achieve state-of-the art performance on CUB200, CAR196, and Stanford Online products datasets which establishes a new set of baselines for future DML research. The codebase and all tuned hyperparameters will be open-sourced for reproducibility and to serve as a source of benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
