Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Many Radiator

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Radio station logo files uploaded by Many Radiator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Radio station logos; unlikely to be "own work" as claimed or licensed under the given Creative Commons licenses. At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality, but not all of them.

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I do not think there is a need to delete these logos; what really needs to be done is to change their licensing from “own work” (because the uploader did not create them) to something that would state that the logos are copyrighted by their respective owners while also providing a valid “fair use” rationale for using the logos in the pertaining articles. If for some reason the logos still need to be deleted, then allow me to save them so I can later re-upload them with proper “fair use” licensing like all other properly-licensed logos. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 22:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Wcquidditch: A huge list of files like this is unwieldy and I've seem nominations similar to this declined on procedural reasons simply because of number of files being nominated at once takes too much time to assess properly. So, it would be quite helpful if you could break the list in your original OP up into sections indicting which ones you feel clearly are too complex to be PD and which ones you feel might be close enough to be {{PD-textlogo}}. If a file that has been claimed as "own work" has simply been mislicensed, its licensing can be easily fixed. For example, File:LA965.png, File:La96.5FM.png, File:SuperK106FM.png are just a few of the above which seem acceptable as "PD-textlogo" and these can probably be kept if there's no other reason for deleting them. On the other hand, certain files like File:Caribbean Country 93.5.png and File:WBQN Borinquen 1160.png seem to be obviously too complex to be "PD-textlogo" and probably would've been better off tagged for speedy deletion instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I will try to fix the sourcing on those three PD-textlogo examples. I already saved most of the other logos for later reupload to enWP. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 04:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixed them now. For File:SuperK106FM.png, I could not locate exact source but did find a slightly updated version on the station’s official home page, so I uploaded the refreshed version and put the link to the home page as the source. I invite you to examine it and see if the shading effects still allow it to pass as PD-textlogo. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 04:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose "At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality..." Which ones? That's too vague. The nominator doesn't say, and doesn't also say why he thinks some of the files may not be. I don't believe we can comment with certainty if the submission itself doesn't know the facts. But, most importantly, the number of files submitted (seems over 100 and perhaps even closer to 200) is way too large for any reasonable editor to be expected to comment on them as a group and not risk judging some (potentially many) of the files in the list unfairly. Seems to me a reasonable number of files to nominate would had been perhaps in the 10s, not in the 100s. I oppose the nomination because it should be denied in favor that it be resubmitted in a lesser quantity of files and with less vague, more concrete, details. Mercy11 (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Marking this DS as deleted, and moved those still not deleted to a new section below, to facillite easier admin handling. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not deleted from DR above, moved to a new section

[edit]

Copied from above, in order to make a new arbitrary break. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most as unsourced, kept one with corrected source and license. --JuTa 03:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Television station logo files uploaded by Many Radiator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Television station logos; unlikely to be "own work" as claimed or licensed under the given Creative Commons licenses. Like with the radio station logos, some are probably under the threshold of originality, but not all of them.

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above for radio logos, I do not think there is a need to delete these logos; what really needs to be done is to change their licensing from “own work” (because the uploader did not create them) to something that would state that the logos are copyrighted by their respective owners while also providing a valid “fair use” rationale for using the logos in the pertaining articles. If for some reason the logos still need to be deleted, then allow me to save them so I can later re-upload them with proper “fair use” licensing like all other properly-licensed logos. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 22:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the issues pertaining File:NBC PR.png, so please remove this file from this delete nomination as per this talk page. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 01:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also did the same for File:Make TV PR.png. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 01:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that some of the images nominated here for deletion are lower-resolution duplicates of other images also nominated here. The uploader should have just uploaded one version over another, thus avoiding duplicity and redundancy in the process. ​‑‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 01:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose (Again) Ditto from my comment regarding the radio stations nomination above: "At least some of these are probably under the threshold of originality..." Which ones? That's too vague. The nominator doesn't say, and doesn't also say why he thinks some of the files may not be. I don't believe we can comment with certainty if the submission itself doesn't know the facts. But, most importantly, the number of TV station files submitted (seems perhaps some 50 or so) is way too large for any reasonable editor to be expected to comment on all of them as a group and not risk judging some (potentially many) of the TV station files in the list unfairly. Seems to me a reasonable number of files to nominate would had been perhaps in the 10s, not in the 50s. I oppose the nomination because it should be denied in favor that it be resubmitted in a lesser quantity of files and with less vague, more concrete, details. Mercy11 (talk) 01:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most as unsourced, kept two with corrected source and license. --JuTa 03:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Many_Radiator&oldid=353537444"