User talk:Cesco77

Babel user information
it-N Quest'utente può contribuire con un livello madrelingua in italiano. en-1 This user has basic knowledge of English.
Users by language

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italian surfer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Im impressed.--Korall 18:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant Rock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --sfu 12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in wind farm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Chromatic aberration, e.g. see upper margin of head. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 19:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC) --  Done Thanks for your comment, I've tried to fix it, better now? --Cesco77 08:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Passer hispaniolensis

Ciao Francesco, I've adjusted your nomination here and there ;-). Could you now just add usage please. Gracie. Lycaon (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the update and the promo's. BTW, did you ever see this? Lycaon (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well behind Basilica of Santissima Trinità.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer hispaniolensis (Spanish Sparrow), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. Lycaon (talk) 08:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 11:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four white goose.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Cairina Moschata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good - Darius Baužys 15:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italian surfer 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 15:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

So would you surf Mavericks?

Hi Cesco77, I'd like to share with you few images of the waves I took. They are not even close in quality to the nominated image. I took them from shore. The waves were far, far, far away and against the sun, but still this slide show could give you an idea about the waves. There is at least one surfer in every image, but the last one. Best wishes, --Mbz1 (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Emys Orbicularis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. --Cayambe 16:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cairina Moschata Portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudemys nelsoni swim.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:58, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Permission

Hello.

I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your picture that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo in my book. Below are the animal that will represents your photo. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements. I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.

Photographer: Francesco Canu. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Four_white_goose.JPG Goose.

Thank you very much. Louise - zandtree@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slalom race 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 11:21, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slalom Race Sardinia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp eating grape.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I was going to ask you to remove the sound (since it's just white noise), but then there were a few bird cheeps, so maybe it's ok to leave it. The visuals are clear and well lit. --99of9 09:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Young Erinaceus europaeus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Why crop so tight? --Gidip 14:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Nice. Good quality. Usefull--Lmbuga 18:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)  Comment To me the crop is a bit tight, but the image is QI IMO--Lmbuga 18:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Civico Baccaredda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 08:17, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sardinian Sheep portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat illness 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I don't like this sight. But the quality is OK for me. --Hockei 19:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat illness 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though it's an awful picture of the cat's desease: good quality. --Dn@lor_01 11:022, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jason Rowe.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jason Rowe.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 10:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)