User talk:Frettiebot
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Hello Frettiebot,
please stop adding {{Wikidata Infobox}} to categories and pages containing {{Taxonavigation}}.
All contributors I know are against it.
The simpliest for you is to avoid 'Category:Taxon categories'
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hello, where is example of this edit? Taxonavigation would be avoided. Thanks.--Frettie (talk) 06:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Here for example
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- But - there is not Taxonavigation template at this page ... --Frettie (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Frettie: You might want to update to the latest version of the python code, which also avoids {{Lepidoptera}} (amongst others). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. --Frettie (talk) 13:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- {{Coleoptera}} also does {{Taxonavigation}}. Cheers Liné1 (talk) 16:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. --Frettie (talk) 13:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Frettie: You might want to update to the latest version of the python code, which also avoids {{Lepidoptera}} (amongst others). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- But - there is not Taxonavigation template at this page ... --Frettie (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
wrong picture in Category:Rosenstein Castle (South Tyrol)
[edit]your bot chose a false picture. --ManfredK (talk) 21:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- This is not bot, it¨s my mistake. What is correct picture? --Frettie (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- thank you! --ManfredK (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate WD Infobox
[edit]Hi Frettie, please try to avoid duplicate boxes like this one added by your bot. --Arnd (talk) 06:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!
[edit]Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,
každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.
Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.
Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Kříž u Středního odborného učiliště elektrotechnického v Plzni (Q85339394) 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Juandev (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Kříž západně od Dolní Vlkýše (Q94440026) 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Juandev (talk) 13:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Pomník padlým dvou světových válek u Božkova (Q66055218) 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Juandev (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Socha Návrat z kosmu u Lidické ulice v Plzni (Q66051209) 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Juandev (talk) 07:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Socha Návrat z kosmu u Lidické ulice v Plzni (Q66051209) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Juandev (talk) 07:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Kříž východně od Malého Vrbna na rozcestí (Q72740381) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys
[edit]Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.
To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform). Both will run until approximately end October 2023.
- A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
- A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!
Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)