User talk:GeorgHH/Archiv 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Re:User:Ferramenta Digital

[edit]

Done. See User talk:Ferramenta Digital#problemas com as suas imagens. Greetings--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removal of categories

[edit]

PLease stop removing images from categories it is considered vandalism Gnangarra 03:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before you tell me off you should know that a uncategorised category like Category:Chamelaucium is not usefull. The right place for the only one image is Chamelaucium uncinatum. --GeorgHH 09:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danke!

[edit]

Danke für das entfernen der arbeit der vandalen auf meiner seite. Ich bin sehr dankbar! Redvers 22:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

[edit]

Could I speak to you on IRC or something for a second? You're the only administrator I could find. +Hexagon1 (t) 08:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Euphorbia villosa

[edit]

Hallo Georg, diese Seite ist derzeit leider verwaist. Ein Redirect zur Euphorbia austriaca ist jedoch nicht sinnvoll, da diese nicht synonym zu Euphorbia villosa ist. E. villosa ist eine anerkannte Art zu der E. austriaca möglicherweise, aber noch ungeklärt, eine Unterart darstellt. (Nach einiger Diskussion wurde E. austriaca deshalb wieder aktiviert) Grüße, Ies 07:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, dann lösche ich die Seite jetzt, du hattest sie ja bereits zum löschen markiert. Danke für die Info. --GeorgHH 08:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plaque Anchors.jpg

[edit]

Hallo, ist das o. g. Bild aus Hamburg? Wäre für mich wichtig zu wissen, da es das letzt Bild ist, was noch nicht in einer der Unterkategorien von Category:Plaques in Germany ist ;-) --Bo-rhein-sieg 11:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, ja es ist aus Hamburg, ich hab's jetzt in die Unterkategorie eingeordnet. --GeorgHH 18:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Feriaenpyaracuy.jpg

[edit]

See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Feriaenpyaracuy.jpg&diff=next&oldid=3072325

Are you really sure that this image is "own work"?, do you know the uploader?. In other case, I'm discord with your performance.

In Commons:Licensing#License Information say: The Source of the material, preferably a web link or a citation. This obviously does not apply if the material is first published on the commons and the uploader is the author of the material. This should be stated explicitly. Greetings--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 00:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'am not sure. You can delete the image, it's unused. --GeorgHH 10:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gloeden's pic

[edit]

What do you mean by "page currently doesn't specify who created the content"? As clearly stated in the page, in English and Italian, and in the title as well, it is Wilhem von Gloeden (1856-1931). Who died more than 70 years go, hence the {{PD-Old}} licence. --G.dallorto 12:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image description is missing a licence. If it is PD-Old please tag the image with {{PD-Old}}. Thank you. --GeorgHH 13:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are we talking about the same page? THERE US a POD-Old licence. This is the whole code of it:

{{no license/en|month=November|day=20|year=2006}} <span id="63288912058" ></span> == Summary == * {{Italiano}} [[Wilhelm von Gloeden]] (1856-1931), Ragazzo travestito in abiti femminili in atteggiamento di preghiera (dettaglio). Il modello può essere identificato, con l'assistente di Gloeden e poi suo erede, Pancrazio Buciunì. * {{English}} [[Wilhelm von Gloeden]] (1856-1931), Praying boy posing in female dress (detail). The model can be identified as Pancrazio Buciunì, Gloeden's assistant and (later) heir. <gallery> Image:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - n. 1337 - Pancrazio Buciunì e un altro modello.jpg|Pancrazio Buciunì (identificato come tale sul retro della foto) e un altro modello. Image:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - Ragazzo come Madonna - ebay 1.jpg|Orante. Image:Gloeden, Wilhem von (1856-1931) - Ragazzo come Madonna - ebay 2.jpg|Dettaglio del precedente. Image:Buciunì, Pancrazio (1879-1963) - Foto dalla sua tomba a Taormina - foto G. Dall'Orto.jpg|La foto sulla tomba di Buciunì.

== Licensing == {{PD-Old}}

[[Category:Wilhelm von Gloeden| ]] [[Category:Prayer]] [[Category:People and places related to Wilhelm von Gloeden|Buciuni]] I higlighted the Pd-Old part. Are you visualising a different text I do? (not a confrontation: visualisation on Mozilla since a couple weeks ago gives me problems, now). --G.dallorto 13:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have found the error: the PD-Old tag was not displayed because the gallery was missing the end tag. --GeorgHH 13:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good to know, and to remind. Thank you for the assistance. --G.dallorto 13:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings by Fritz Höger

[edit]

Moin Georg,

ich halte obige Kategorie für nicht sinnvoll, da alles auch unter Category:Fritz Höger stehen könnte (in der Kategorie steht nämlich ausschließlich die Unterkategorie). Meines Erachtens sollten wir mit weitere Unterkategoriesierung warten, bis die Hauptkategorie unübersichtlich wird (zu einzelnen Gebäuden gibt es ja nur deshalb Kategorien, weil deren Oberkategorie Category:Hamburg-Mitte inzwischen über 400 Bilder umfasst).

Gruß vom --Mogelzahn 19:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, hab die Category gefüllt weil sie vorhanden war, und ich halte sie auch für sinnvoll weil Fritz Höger für die Person steht und Buildings by Fritz Höger für seine Werke (so wie bei Büchern oder Malern auch.) Aber du hast recht das die Hauptkategorie natürlich etwas verloren wirkt, es wäre schön wenn mal ein, zwei Bilder von Friz Höger auftauchen würden... --GeorgHH 19:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:Radisson_SAS_Tallinn_2006-08-14.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for notifying. I added necessary licencing. Should I remove below red tags? -Mardus 23:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the notify tag can be removed if the licence is given. Thanks for your reply. --GeorgHH 12:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, I've read your message in my talk page. The copyright has been quite a confusing matter to me and I always messed things up, although I really meant no harm and was only too eager to share with others the valuable things I found. Tut mir leid...

Other images, according to the wikipedia copyright policy, shall be deleted since I can't provided their licences. :( However, those images I mentioned above are really free, while the only problem is how I can prove that. Could we talk more about that? Vielleicht kannst du mir dabei helfen. --GnuDoyng 14:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image:Chek-ling-baik-ing.gif is a book cover (book covers are generally not allowed on commonsand except old historical books), copyrighted by www.hanxue.net.
  • Image:Fish ball.jpg - i am unable to ckeck the copyright status (source is not english or german)

Bundespräsidialamt / Bildstelle

[edit]

hallo georg, ich hab in der tat eine genehmigung vom präsidialamt aus berlin. ich schicke sie dir auf deine diskussion. ansonsten mail mich bitte direkt an: hendrike at baudissin.com

schönen sonntag mit bitte u. aw.

hendrike Hendrike 10:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CD Cover (Image:Portash-rocks.jpg) geloescht?

[edit]

Hallo Georg, ich habe gerade gesehen, dass Du soeben das CD-Cover Image:Portash-rocks.jpg geloescht hast, was ich gerade eingestellt habe. Gibt es ein generelles Verbot, CD-Covers einzustellen oder ist das eine lizenzrechtliche Frage? Bei Letzterem kann ich sagen, dass mir die Genehmigung vorliegt. Sollte Ersteres zutreffen, so hast Du natuerlich recht. Viele Gruesse Robin--Robse 11:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Robse, CD-Cover und ähnliches sind auf commons grundsätzlich nicht erlaubt, siehe Commons:Lizenzen 3. Absatz. Einen schönen Sonntag noch. --GeorgHH 11:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, dann weiss ich nun Bescheid und passe den zugehoerigen Artikel auch wieder mit an und entferne den Bildlink. Auch Dir nen schoenen 2ten Advent. --Robse 12:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frage:

[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH,

Also das hier:

kann ich nicht verstehen, was macht das die englische Wikipedia, dort ist auch von jedem Album das Cover abgebildet! zb: | bitte klicken

mfg: --Jeysan 13:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Die englische Wikipedia erlaubt fair use (die Nutzung von geschützen Inhalten), andere wikis, wie auch die deutsche, erlauben dies nicht. Da commons ein Project ist das Material für alle Wikimedia-Projekte zur Verfügung stellt, ist fair use hier verboten, nur Material das überall erlaubt ist darf hier hochgeladen werden. --GeorgHH 13:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Flickr

[edit]

Will do. I wasn't aware of the flickr template before. Sincerely, --BostonMA 18:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gibnews

[edit]

I must have forgotten to specify that Image:Ape al.jpg was PD all images uploaded by me are my own work and are donated to the public domain (apart from the GBC television logo, and I maintain their website) I haven't found a way to change this if its missed on the upload. --Gibnews 23:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


License Problem

[edit]

Hi GeorgHH
I write you about the lincense of this picture : Iles_Flottantes_Titicaca. I am the author of this photography and I uploaded it to wikipedia myself. In order to be compliant with wikimedia policies, I released it with the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License.
You went to my website and saw that the original picture was posted there under the non-wikimedia compliant by-nc-nd. Thus the image is now subject to speedy deletion.
I am not an expert concerning copyright and licenses, so correct me if i am wrong, but I uploaded a slighly different pic on wikipedia with the Attribution ShareAlike attributes. So I think it is compliant with the Commons licensing policy. If you want to contact me, you can do it here : xtof [AT] pixinn.net
Yours,
Christophe Meneboeuf

Thank you for explanation, i removed the deletion tag from the image. --GeorgHH 10:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Transvestitenschwein

[edit]

I went ahead and changed the block from 1 week to an infinite block. If the user ever wants to actually contribute they will need a less hostile username. --Gmaxwell 22:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Before blocking i was thinking so, too, but not sure about such drastic operation. --GeorgHH 11:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special pages

[edit]

Sorry, I'm not involved with the actual developers, and I think you need one of those. - Andre Engels 14:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks- but I don't understand

[edit]

Thanyou for the heads-up on the discussion about Template:PD-Old-70 (Edit Discussion links Page history). I've commented as you requested. I don't however understand your comment.
   ' (I removed the delete-tag from the template because the images which using it are listed for deletion, too) --GeorgHH (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)' , did you mean to say ... 'because the images using it are NOT listed ...'?

I hope so, as I Didn't see deletion tags on several of them at least, nor should PD images be discarded however they may need to be recatted. Best regards // FrankB 13:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my english is not the best...
What i mean is: when the tamplate PD-Old-70 is marked with {{delete}}, then all images which use the template PD-Old-70 are displaying the deletion warning text, too. And this is leading to misunderstandings. Therefore i removed the deletion-tag from the template PD-Old-70. The deletion request itself is topical.
I hope this is a better statement now. --GeorgHH 20:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added back the delete tag, but put it within <noinclude> tags. That way, it's shown on the template page, since that's being discussed, but not on pages using the template. Cnyborg 00:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blocked for contribuite

[edit]

I have tried every possible way to do it right. Don't say i should not 'make it' right but instead put the copyright status and permissions that each image actually has because you would be a hypocrite. I followed how to make a right contribution by checking the pictures that are actually online and available and working. But for me it doesn't. Have you noticed that while the english version of wikipedia has lots of pictures the spanish version has none? they might me a 5% of articules with pictures, you know why? becouse you delete them. i know commons is for every version but it just looks like the english pals have far more options, dont ya think? maybe you don't want this version to grow. because you do all your efforts to discourage everyone of uploading any material. so they don't keep trying. but i did. and you punish me. thanx.

—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Spike dude (talk • contribs) 02:13, 14. Dez. 2006

Gallerien und Kategorien

[edit]

Hallo!

Ich wollte noch weitere Bilder im Bereich Maschinenbau bzw. Umformtechnik hochladen. Allerdings weiß ich nicht ganz genau, wie im Detail Gallerien bzw. Kategorien erstellt werden bzw. welche Konvetionen gültig sind. Ist ja nicht unbedingt notwendig, dass jemand hinter mir her räumen muss. Wäre nett, wenn du mir da ein wenig auf die Sprünge helfen könntest. Aus der englischsprachigen Hilfe bin ich nicht unbedingt schlau geworden. F. Broer 11:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Falcon, jedes Bild sollte mindestens einer Kategorie zugeordnet sein, natürlich können es auch mehrere sein - bis hier ist es wie in der deutschen wikipedia. Wenn du eine neue Kategorie anlegen willst, beachte das die englische Bezeichnung verwendet wird und die neue Kategorie wiederum einer übergeordneten Kategorie zugeordnet ist.
Für mehrer Bilder die gleichartiges zeigen kann auch eine Galerie angelegt werden. Galerien sind auf Commons etwa das was in wikipedia ein Artikel ist, allerdings ohne ausführliche Textinhalte - nur ein kurzer Einleitungssatz der beschreibt um was es sich handelt sollte angegeben werden (Beispiel: Steam machinery).
Du könntest also Bilder des Brettfallhammers z.B. in Category:Machines oder eine passende Unterkategorie einordnen, oder du legst eine Galerie an die dem deutschen wiki artikel de:Gesenkschmiedehammer entspricht. Dort könntest du Abschnitte für die einzelnen Hammerarten anlegen, wie im Beispiel Steam machinery.
  • Um ein Bild einer Kategorie zuzuordnen trage beispielsweise [[Category:Machines]] auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite ein.
  • Um eine Galerie anzulegen erstellt du eine neue Seite (wie einen Artikel in de.wiki) und trägst die Bilder wie folgt ein:
<gallery>
Image:Brettfallhammer Werkzeugraum.jpg|Brettfallhammer Werkzeugraum
Image:Brettfallhammer Gesenke.jpg|Brettfallhammer Gesenke
</gallery>
Die deutschsprachige Hilfeseite zu den Kategorien findest du hier.
--GeorgHH 14:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

need help deleting pictures

[edit]

hey can you please delete the following pictures? I want to upload a better versions of them. So please delete the following pictures: Image:Cricket World Cup trophy.jpg
Image:Australia vs. New Zealand, Eden Park.jpg
Image:Australia v India.jpg
Image:MCG Stadium.jpg
Image:South Africa vs England.jpg
Image:England v Sri Lanka, Twenty20 International.jpg

thanks -- Ricky212 16:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, images will be deleted only if they are copyright violations.
  • If you want to upload a new (better) version of the images (e.g. with reduced brightness or a better resolution) then please overwrite the excisting file. Use the link Upload a new version of this file at the file history of the excisting image. Load it up with the same name, confirm the warning on the upload formular that the file can be replaced.
  • If you want to upload a similar (different) image, please upload it with another name. --GeorgHH 16:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hey it says my account is too new so can you just delete it it would make things easier. so please help me out here Ricky212 19:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hey im just going to upload them with a new name but I'll tag the old ones with the duplicate tag so please delete the old ones and not the new ones I'm about to upload. Thank you and sorry for the hassle. Ricky212 22:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Universidad Adolfo Ibañez

[edit]

If it showed any sign of being a gallery I would agree with you. This page appeared to me to be a misplaced Wikipedia article. —JeremyA 20:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Oscar Ursinus

[edit]

Hallo, leider habe ich noch Probleme mit der englischsprachigen COMMONS. Das Bild von OSCAR URSINUS hatte ich mit einem TOOL von der englischen WIKIPEDIA nach Commons verschoben. Die Verletzung von Urheberrechten sind nicht meine Absicht. Ich wollte den deutschen Artikel Carl Oscar Ursinus aufwerten. Das Bild wird momentan bei mir noch angezeigt, obwohl anscheinend gelöscht. Wie läßt sich das Problem lösen? Ich hoffe auf deine Hilfe. --DSC 22:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo DSC, das Problem ist die fehlende Quellenangabe des Originals. Ohne die läßt sich nicht sagen wer der Autor des Fotos ist, wann es gemacht wurde und somit auch nicht ob es Public Domain ist. --GeorgHH 21:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the Image:126_2607.JPG

[edit]

Hello GeorgHH: excuses me about upload this image. It is one bad image and it must be deleted. Please deleted it. Thenk you. Regars --Txo (discusión) Mi discusión en castellano 19:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rona Ambrose1.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you deleted both of my images. I understand the image policies on Commons. Why did you delete Image:Rona Ambrose1.jpg? Images from Flickr are fair use. Please explain to me what I have done wrong. Thanks, FellowWikipedian 16:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the image source says All rights reserved. Fair use is not allowed on commons, see Commons:Licensing#Material under the fair use clause is not allowed on the Commons, so you can upload only flickr images which are licensed under a free licence like cc-by-sa or similar. --GeorgHH 17:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cloaca Maxima

[edit]

Dear Sir, I got a very strange message regarding an image I have uploaded some time ago.

If you have the kindness to look at the history of the image, you may notice that before uploading the picture I have contacted the author, who graciously accepted the use of his picture. This correspondence has been provided at the moment of uploading the picture and can be found on the first history page.

It seems that this authorization was subsequently moved to another place. Maybe I did not put it in the right place but a merciful administrator has corrected this and sent it to the right place.

If the author has granted his approval and this approval has been archived, I really dont understand what I am doing wrong and why this image which illustrates one of my articles should be schedules for deletion.

I am willing to do whatever I have to, but I have to understand what is wrong in order to do so.

Regards. Afil 18:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have did it right, and the permission is placed on the image description. But the permission to use the image is incomplete, it is missing a concrete licence like {{PD}} or {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Please ask the author under which licence the image can be used. For help about licensing see Commons:Licensing. --GeorgHH 18:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the image Image:Chinese numbers.PNG

[edit]

Anyways, I just realized that it's triplicated (by me, again sorry)

Copyright information and other stuff (at the moment only in English - I have to translate) is in Image:Huāmǎ numerals.png information page. Image:Chinese numbers.PNG and Image:Chinese numbers.png have also the same origin, copyright and authors (except they are not corrected by 百ひゃく家いえ姓せい之の四よん)

Please, can you delete both images called Chinese numbers?

And I was so late in answering because I took a rest on Commons.

—Nethac DIU, always would speak here—
22:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hello i've deleted the duplicates, also i redirected Huāmǎ numerals to Chinese numerals.
Thanks for your help. --GeorgHH 10:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CireneMonumento.jpg

[edit]

Done (TY) MM 01:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. --GeorgHH 10:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bild von Joseph Beuys

[edit]

hallo georg, jetzt wird's etwas kompliziert: es geht um das neue sw-bild, das beuys vor einem seiner werke zeigt [1]. was ist deine meinung dazu? ist es copyright-politisch korrekt oder nicht? ich würde es gerne für den deutschen artikel über beuys verwenden [2]. das problem ist: es scheint die fotografie eines kunstwerkes zu sein, das eine fotografie von beuys VOR einem seiner kunstwerke zeigt, was an sich nach VG Bild-Kunst ein © problem darstellt...ich hoffe ich habe mich nicht zu kompliziert ausgedrückt *lach*...würdest du das checken und im problemfall auf "delete" setzen? sonst frage ich in der deutschen UR diskussion nach. mit bitte um antwort auf meiner deutschen WP usersite [3]. danke im voraus und ein frohes neues jahr! hendrike 08:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

[edit]

I was the one with the IP that blanked my talk page (I wasn't logged in).  :) Rarelibra 15:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

About images of Motosierra.

[edit]

Hello,

Both images: "Motosierra primera formacion (banda).jpg" and "Marcos Motosierra (banda).jpg, has been provided personally by the same band, which has not specified a licence of any kind. In addition, the reason why I have given an E-mail address of the author is because I have no other way to prove its permission. In the case of the second image ("Marcos Motosierra (banda).jpg"), which as I have mentioned before it was provided with the personal allowance of its author, however, in order to provide some verifiable licence I have use the same that one of the authors applies for all its pictures. My mistake.

On the other hand, I have realized one way or another I must send an E-mail with written permissions. But I have to ask: Must the author also send an e-mail with the permission, or just I have to do it?

--Motobanger 00:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you have received a written permission from the author you have to send a copy to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, not the author. The permission must have information about a concrete licence like {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, commercial use and derivatives must be allowed. You find help for the contents of a permission and OTRS here and here.
If you haven't a permission you can upload the images on es.wiki, assumed fair use is allowed there. --GeorgHH 11:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About images of Motosierra.

[edit]

Hello,

Both images: "Motosierra primera formacion (banda).jpg" and "Marcos Motosierra (banda).jpg, has been provided personally by the same band, which has not specified a licence of any kind. In addition, the reason why I have given an E-mail address of the author is because I have no other way to prove its permission. In the case of the second image ("Marcos Motosierra (banda).jpg"), which as I have mentioned before it was provided with the personal allowance of its author, however, in order to provide some verifiable licence I have use the same that one of the authors applies for all its pictures. My mistake.

On the other hand, I have realized one way or another I must send an E-mail with written permissions. But I have to ask: Must the author also send an e-mail with the permission, or just I have to do it?

--Motobanger 00:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you have received a written permission from the author you have to send a copy to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, not the author. The permission must have information about a concrete licence like {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, commercial use and derivatives must be allowed. You find help for the contents of a permission and OTRS here and here.
If you haven't a permission you can upload the images on es.wiki, assumed fair use is allowed there. --GeorgHH 11:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wiki letter w.png

[edit]

Please note that this is not a speedily deletion candidate. Quoth Erik Möller (now a member of Wikimedia's Board of Trustees) regarding Commons policy: "'Obsolete' images should indeed no longer be deleted except where they're orphaned and there's clearly no opposition." There doesn't appear to have been a deletion discussion, and some users generally oppose the deletion of "superseded" images. David Levy 22:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Dateien von C. A. Seydel Söhne

[edit]

Hallo, die Genehmigung wurde vom Geschäftsführer per email an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org gesendet. Hier nochmal die Mail: --Matthias.Gruber 16:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

hiermit erkläre ich, dass jegliche Bilder und Dateien stammend von der Homepage http://www.seydel1847.de urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Die Gesellschaft gestattet jedermann (auch außerhalb und völlig unabhängig von der Wikipedia) jegliche Nutzung, so weitreichend, wie dies gesetzlich möglich ist (u.a. Verwendung für jeden Zweck, Aufführung, Weiterverbreitung, kommerzielle Nutzung, Bearbeitung) weltweit und zeitlich unbeschränkt unter der Bedingung der angemessenen Nennung seiner Urheberschaft (z.B. in der Bildunterschrift).

Das betrifft eine Reihe von Bildern siehe hier --> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matthias.Gruber

Diese Einverständniserklärung erfolgte aufgrund folgender Nachrichten an Herrn Gruber, Matthias. siehe: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Seydel_zeppelin.jpg

Für Rückfragen stehe ich Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Lars Seifert Geschäftsführer


www.seydel1847.de

C.A.Seydel Söhne GmbH Mundharmonikafabrik Robert-Koch-Str. 1 D-08248 Klingenthal

Tel.: 037467/22548 Fax : 037467/22453

Email: lars.seifert@seydel1847.com


To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Rubén Fernández Iriart

[edit]

Hello GeorgeHH. I was going to mark the page Rubén Fernández Iriart to be "speedydeleted" (it is written in spanish, but it began to be a joke of a user againts his teacher, look at the contributions of Jjsmith2, the photos he has uploaded, and the historial of the page). But I don't know very well the way Commons works in this cases (I'm not very active here), so I prefer telling you and asking what to do in this cases. Thanks. Er Komandante (messages) 20:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if the page is clearly not encyclopedic and not usefull for any wikipedia, tag it with [[:Template:Speedy|{{against Commons:Project scope}}]]. If it is not clear please use {{reason}} and follow the instructions on Commons:Deletion requests. --GeorgHH 20:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder von hamburger-s-bahn.de

[edit]

Hallo Georg,
ich hab jetzt erst mitbekommen, dass die Bilder nun doch gelöscht wurden, allerdings ohne irgendwelche Nachrichten davon zu bekommen. Ich habe bei mir im Posteingang noch eine Mail von dem Webmaster der Seite, in der er mir die Benutzung der Bilder (auch bearbeitet) in der Wiki erlaubt. Ich wollte dich deshalb fragen, ob ich die Bilder nochmal hochladen könnte und du mir vllt. sagst, welche Lizenz und wo nun genau die Erlaubnis dahin muss. Danke schonmal, Platte. -- Platte C 15:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Platte, ich habe gerade auf deiner Diskussionsseite gesehen, das die Genehmigung die du an OTRS gesendet hast nicht für die Commons geeignet ist. In der Genehmigung muß eine freie Lizenz definiert sein, also z.B. {{GFDL}} oder {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Ebenso darf die Nutzung nicht auf wikipedia beschränkt sein. Die Commons Lizenzrichtlinien findest du hier.
Wenn du eine solche Genehmigung hast oder noch bekommst, dann sag mir bescheid, die Bilder können noch eine zeitlang wiederhergestellt werden. --GeorgHH 20:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User galleries

[edit]

I notice you are making new categories for user galleries. I am not sure I understand the purpose of this. If you take a look at Template:Welcome there is already a function for the user to browse own uploaded files. This gallery will be updated by the MediaWiki software for each upload. Where the galleries you are currently creating demands not only that the user in question is noticed about the existance of this category - but also that he/she manually adds any uploads to this category.

So I just don't really see any purpose of creating user gallery categories. --|EPO| 19:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i dont create new categories - i put uncategorized but used categories which are listed in Special:Wantedcategories in the Category:User galleries. The user categories are created if a commons user upload images from a wiki with the CommonsHelper or PushForCommons tool. --GeorgHH 19:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CireneMonumento.jpg

[edit]

I'm not sure I did understand: I see in the page the tag {{PD-self}}: is there something wrong with that? MM 22:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, its ok. You've tagged it PD-Self after i leaved a message on your talk page. Thank you. --GeorgHH 20:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no license tagging

[edit]

Thank you for pointing me to this. The problem was some substing in my hacked version of Quick-delete. It has now been fixed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

If you can shed any light

[edit]

See this message: User talk:Duesentrieb#Suspicious and seemingly nonsensical edits, where I mention your name in vain. (sort of. <g> Please check on anom edits, and see if they make sense when you stumble over them. Best regards // FrankB 05:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beuys hoch Zehn

[edit]

hi georg, ich schreib in englisch falls das ausdiskutiert werden sollte und danke dir wieder mal SEHR bei mithilfe...es geht wie immer um copyrights...

I've some lil' problems with these images:

  • Bild:BeuysAchberg85.jpg
  • Image:BeuysAchberg78.jpg
  • Bild:BeuysAchberg73.jpg

is there still a valid copyright licence @ wikimedia existing or not? i need an answer for further usage in the WP. thank U, greetings + regards

hendrike ♒ 10:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Georg, as i wrote. The author sent these images to me and i`ve already forwarded the needed licence to the author. He is going to send it today or tommorrow! I will give him a call. I don`t want to upload the whole set again! Thanks and regards, --Zita 11:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The licence has been sent! Please take a look! --Zita 14:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
well done, very nice,thanx zita... i appreciate it and i'll use the images in other Wikimedia WPs...hendrike ♒ 11:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dvor_porf_det1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for noticing that I forgot to put licence.It`s fixed now. CrniBombarder!!! 03:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeorgHH/Archiv_2&oldid=203272963"